My trip to the mountains with new 6MT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2003 | 10:03 PM
  #1  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
My trip to the mountains with new 6MT

How funny that lakeman would just post the same sort of review. For my trip, I had a Gs430 and a G35 auto along.

1. I replaced the tires with very HP Goodyear F1s and I no longer have much gripe with overboosted steering. It's as good as fwd gets and hardly lighter than my 330i.

2. Lower the suspension, I don't think so. I nailed the nose a half dozen times coming out of driveways.

3. After a few hundred enthusiastic miles, the clutch engagement lifts off the floor to just about the right height.

4. Don't trust the car to parking valets. I'm certain that one took my car on a "road test." All the valets drooled on it.

5. The brakes were great.

6. It's a great "luxury sport" car. It is way quieter and rides way better than the G35, besides having a far better driver's compartment and it's at least as quiet and comfortable as the $57K Lexus, with better seats, better handling and less jerky throttle tip in..

6. It's different, a revver, but ran right with the GS and G at any speed.

7. The throttle is not mapped nearly as aggressively as the G or GS. It is as fast. These were public roads in the LA hills so we couldn't go over 90 but the three cars were a dead heat with different strong power ranges.

8. The G was Jekyll and Hyde, really unstable in the wet but great up to 8/10ths dry. The GS430 understeered and body rolled too much. The TL was as good as the G up to 8/10ths.

9. Above 8/10ths, I would rather drive the TL as it just gets harder to push as it understeers. The G becomes unstable.

10. None of these three cars , in any way comes close to the 330i as a pure handler.

11. For virtually any trip, freeway or a run through the sierras, I would choose the TL. The only exception being an ocassional more aggressive jaunt in the 330i.
Old 12-28-2003 | 10:18 PM
  #2  
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
From: SE Wash. State
Tire question: Do your new Goodyear F1 (GSD3, I assume) have the flat-spotting problem like the stock Bridgestone EL42 tires? Researching their construction, I see they also contain some nylon. Nylon is frequently mentioned as the root of the flat spotting problem in tires. How are the Goodyears for noise and ride harshness compared to stock?

I think even the Bridgestones wouldn't exhibit the problem (much) if driven daily or more. The Goodyear's are on my list of possible replacements if I go with summer tires, along with Toyo Proxes T1-S (also contain nylon). If I go with all-seasons, the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S, and Pirelli P Zero Nero are possibilities. Neither of these mention nylon in their construction.
Old 12-28-2003 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
I have Pilot Sports on my 330i and I really like them. I thought long and hard about the Neros. I finally chose the F1s based upon the Tirerack reviews rating them best for traction, wet or dry, noise and ride. I've had S03s and didn't like the rramlining or noise. Even after getting the F1s, I agonized over the Neros.

Yes, they are noisier and harsher than stock. But after 700 miles with lots of slab freeway, I have felt no vibrations and the noise level and ride in the car are still excellent. On a rough road, you hear tires but not as bad as many and still better than my limit. And, boy do they improve the steering and cornering stability, None of the unstable hunting felt with the stockers.
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
Peters's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Re:Tires

Very interesting on the tires change, particularly the impact on steering feel. Did you change the size at all? Have you got 17" rims?
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:28 PM
  #5  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
Stock size and 17s. I'm not a fan of 18s, noise, cost, ride. The better tires made a 200% difference in steering fel and accuracy. The stockers were very vague and the HPT 030s are not good.
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
Peters's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I couldn't agree more on the stock tires. They are very limited at high speeds and its a very uneasy feeling - I also think they are contributing to the road/feel vibration issue. Well, your information is greatly appreciated. I have snow to contend with and I don't want to switch tires all the time; I will have to do my research.
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:37 PM
  #7  
RJC RSX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
what do you consider high speeds?
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:37 PM
  #8  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
Everybody I talk to about the PZero Neros is high on them, as is Tirerack. Even though I live in a land where it snows every 30 or so years I damn near got them.
Old 12-28-2003 | 11:45 PM
  #9  
Peters's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
High Speeds

Well, anything over 120 km/h is high in my view. Under safe conditions, I've had the car up near its top speed. I have a 5AT. It is very, very skiddish at that speed. (with stock tires)
Old 12-29-2003 | 12:07 AM
  #10  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
I pushed the stockers into a weird hunting sensation at 60 in back to back sweepers. It was like I had to keep steering to stay on line and would rebound from any change.
Old 12-29-2003 | 12:13 AM
  #11  
Peters's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
The "hunting sensation" is a good description when they are pushed. At very high speeds, its like you're almost separated from the road...very dissapointing. From the posts, I've drawn some consolation that its not the car. But I'm not happy. This is my third TL and I've owned Honda's since '85. There will be some discussion with Acura tomorrow.
Old 12-29-2003 | 12:15 AM
  #12  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
The tires fixed it.
Old 12-29-2003 | 06:56 AM
  #13  
lakeman's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Lake Hartwell, SC
Re: My trip to the mountains with new 6MT

Originally posted by partagas

1. I replaced the tires with very HP Goodyear F1s and I no longer have much gripe with overboosted steering. It's as good as fwd gets and hardly lighter than my 330i.

2. Lower the suspension, I don't think so. I nailed the nose a half dozen times coming out of driveways.

5. The brakes were great.

6. It's a great "luxury sport" car.

9. Above 8/10ths, I would rather drive the TL as it just gets harder to push as it understeers. The G becomes unstable.

10. None of these three cars , in any way comes close to the 330i as a pure handler.

partagas, nice write up

I totally agree with your assessment, but I didn't have other cars readily available to compare - except from memory.

1) I feel the 030's give pretty good grip, but did not do much to reduce the over-boosted feel. Eventually, I would like to switch to the F1's in a 245 width to see if that helps.

2,5,6) very much agree

9) and 10) these are some key points for anyone considering the G, 330, and TL. Since I rarely drive over 8/10ths, and want a predictable car should I go over that, that makes the TL the best choice for me.

partagas, one more thought. How do you think the TL (if it has at least HPT or better rubber) will fare in a side-by-side comparison test. IMHO, I think it could surprise a lot of testers. Considering value, I think it could take most of the competition.
Old 12-29-2003 | 10:44 AM
  #14  
partagas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Central Cal
Its numbers will work. Acceleration, even slalom speeds but the C&D people will continue to slaughter the fwd and the heavy nose when tossing it from turn to turn. Probably the same a s last time. So, BMW #1, Audi #2, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the TL beat the G35 again because of the G's noise, rotten ride, rotten driver compartment and unpredictable tail. This is the same thing that happened with the last TL at both C&D and Edmunds.

R&T and Motor Trend chase fads too much to be credible.
Old 12-29-2003 | 10:57 AM
  #15  
RJC RSX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Re: High Speeds

Originally posted by Peters
Well, anything over 120 km/h is high in my view. Under safe conditions, I've had the car up near its top speed. I have a 5AT. It is very, very skiddish at that speed. (with stock tires)
hmm that's 75mph. On a 3-4 hour highway drive, my average speed was about 85, sometimes higher, and the car felt totally solid every step of the way. on a deserted, straight highway i took my hands off the wheel for a minute or so to test and the car tracked straight on, again very solid.
Old 12-29-2003 | 11:10 AM
  #16  
Tripp11's Avatar
Newbie for Life
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 11
Nice write-up Partagas...you've provided some insightful details on comparisons to the TL - especially your 330i which I also looked at when car shopping.

Thanks for all your insight as I greatly appreciate it on this board, along with everyone else's insight/opinion.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
08-15-2019 12:58 PM
Acura604
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
09-28-2015 12:24 PM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
09-27-2015 06:16 PM
jaimbot
4G TL (2009-2014)
9
09-17-2015 09:25 AM
vbgregg
4G TL (2009-2014)
2
09-11-2015 05:38 PM



Quick Reply: My trip to the mountains with new 6MT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.