Killed a V6 Firebird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2006 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
Killed a V6 Firebird



This guy on my way home tonight in a newer model V6 Firebird thought that he would be a dick and drive 35 in a 55 until a passing zone, then gun it so I couldn't pass him. It didn't work out that way. As I got over to pass, I saw a puff of black soot come from his single tailpipe so I pushed my foot to the floor (we were only doing 40 max at this point) By 65 I saw him looking like this: in my rearview. He must have thought his detroit "muscle" could outrun any Japanese sedan.

BTW my car is a totally stock 02 TL-P
Old 03-17-2006 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Car Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 843
Likes: 1
From: Chicago (Lincoln Square)
Sweet, you killed somewhere between a 16.4 and a 15.2 car.
Old 03-18-2006 | 03:49 AM
  #3  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
Don't get me wrong, I have respect for true American muscle - but punks in V6 F-bodies or V6 Mustangs crack me up.
Old 03-18-2006 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
sbuswell's Avatar
I need 2 more gears
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 7
From: Springvale, Maine
V6 Firebirds are slow as shit. I agree it is fun destroying them.
Old 03-18-2006 | 06:37 PM
  #5  
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 32
From: Seattle Area
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
Don't get me wrong, I have respect for true American muscle - but punks in V6 F-bodies or V6 Mustangs crack me up.
Yeah, it's gotta have the engine to back up the badge.

Good kill.
Old 03-18-2006 | 08:20 PM
  #6  
03Sheermax's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Yeah, V6 firebirds and Mustang are an absolute joke. It's a shame, they shouldn't even build those vehicle's with those motors, it gives muscle cars a bad name.
Old 03-19-2006 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
Actuary's Avatar
18,000mi. 29000km
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
except new V6 stang could come close.
Old 03-20-2006 | 08:17 AM
  #8  
TLsu's Avatar
Wallace, LA
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 03Sheermax
Yeah, V6 firebirds and Mustang are an absolute joke. It's a shame, they shouldn't even build those vehicle's with those motors, it gives muscle cars a bad name.
I agree...nice kill anyway, especially because he was being a jack ass.
Old 03-20-2006 | 12:38 PM
  #9  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by Actuary
except new V6 stang could come close.
240tq (right?) sounds like a big advantage over the TL, but the execution is horrible. See this streetfire video of several new Mustang V6 1/4 mile runs:

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...D56655FD06.htm

My TL would have no trouble destroying it.
Old 03-20-2006 | 12:47 PM
  #10  
Turbonator's Avatar
Blue Wild Angel Music
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
240tq (right?) sounds like a big advantage over the TL, but the execution is horrible. See this streetfire video of several new Mustang V6 1/4 mile runs:

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...D56655FD06.htm

My TL would have no trouble destroying it.

v6 is that slow or is that guy a very bad driver?
Old 03-20-2006 | 01:38 PM
  #11  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
It seems to be an automatic, so I'd say the V6 is just that slow. The manual should be quicker, but I'd still bet money on the TL. Kris's stock 00 TL-P with 175k miles ran a 15.01 at the track. That would be handing that new V6 Mustang its ass on a silver platter.
Old 03-20-2006 | 02:10 PM
  #12  
Turbonator's Avatar
Blue Wild Angel Music
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 1
From: Philly, PA
man...if the new one is that slow... than the last gen. v6 mustang must be a
Old 03-20-2006 | 03:41 PM
  #13  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by Turbonator
man...if the new one is that slow... than the last gen. v6 mustang must be a
Oh yeah it was.
Old 03-20-2006 | 05:03 PM
  #14  
hamilton1's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Ont Canada
stock 3.8 v6 mustangs are slow, but when modded they can be a 10-11 sec 1/4 car (+550rwhp\+600 tq ). check out the timeslips\dynopage on www.v6power.net there are many guys running twin turbos and superchargers. back in 1999 I had a 1996 v6 mustang, with ported heads cam, vortech v2 supercharger, intercooler, ported upper and lower intake manifold,and the car put out 370rwhp and ran in the 12s. v6 cameros\firebirds, are the same, slow stock but can beat alot of v8s when modded. The mustang was alot faster then my cl-s but the thing broke down every week end, plus everyone has one
Old 03-20-2006 | 05:09 PM
  #15  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
But we're talking completely stock cars here. The J32 is simply a superior engine. A J32A2 6spd CL-S can post better timeslips than what I saw from far more powerful (by dyno numbers) modded 3.8 Mustangs. I saw one with something like 242whp, 257wtq and a timeslip of 14.8@90.5mph. That's getting smoked by a well-driven completely stock CL-S6.
Old 03-20-2006 | 09:08 PM
  #16  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Car Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 843
Likes: 1
From: Chicago (Lincoln Square)
A 98-02 Firebird, last body style, was a 14.7-15.0 car. The slowest would be a 93-95 car, they had the 3.4 and were like a 16.5 car.

My friend's 97 went 13.6 with heads, cam, gutted, and 12.3 with nitrous.
Old 03-20-2006 | 10:33 PM
  #17  
sbuswell's Avatar
I need 2 more gears
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 7
From: Springvale, Maine
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
A 98-02 Firebird, last body style, was a 14.7-15.0 car. The slowest would be a 93-95 car, they had the 3.4 and were like a 16.5 car.

My friend's 97 went 13.6 with heads, cam, gutted, and 12.3 with nitrous.
I have a friend who used to have an 01 V6 Firebird and it wasn't close to a 14sec car. It was in good shape, no known problems and wasn't fast at all. Maybe 0-60 in 7.5 on a good day 1/4 at 15.7-16.0 not 14.7-15.0.
Old 03-21-2006 | 06:45 AM
  #18  
SatinSilverTypS's Avatar
ChairmanMaoSaysRTFM
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Dutchess County, NY
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
But we're talking completely stock cars here. The J32 is simply a superior engine.


honda is one of the few companies that can really get the most out of a V6 without forced induction. for christ's sake, even the new 3.5L chevy V6 is only putting out 211hp.

SSTS
Old 03-21-2006 | 03:39 PM
  #19  
03CoupeV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: GA
The old 3800 Series-II naturally aspirated only made 200-205 and it was a 3.8L. Hell, even the force-fed one only made 240 in some applications.

Had more torque, though.
Old 03-24-2006 | 11:09 PM
  #20  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Car Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 843
Likes: 1
From: Chicago (Lincoln Square)
I have a ton of friends who had the last gen 3.8 V6 Firebirds, and the best was 14.7 with just a cone filter. But he was mostly a 15.doh car. One friend went 14.2 with a converter, gear, dr's, and some other stuff...
Old 03-27-2006 | 07:59 AM
  #21  
SatinSilverTypS's Avatar
ChairmanMaoSaysRTFM
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Dutchess County, NY
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
The old 3800 Series-II naturally aspirated only made 200-205 and it was a 3.8L. Hell, even the force-fed one only made 240 in some applications.

Had more torque, though.
well my brother has a 1998 grand prix with a series II that he uses as a beater. it does have a nice torque curve in my opinion, but it's not fast at all. plus i think the exhaust they used on those cars sound like ass. but gimme a grand national with a 3800 series I any day and i'll take it

SSTS
Old 03-30-2006 | 09:05 PM
  #22  
Actuary's Avatar
18,000mi. 29000km
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
I heard new V6 manuals do under 7 seconds, that's big improvment over last one.
Old 03-31-2006 | 02:42 PM
  #23  
wilp99's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,317
Likes: 0
From: TAMPA
i beat a v6 stang in my 99 3.0cl..(i/h/e) it was like 3 cars then he did a ricer fly by. what a homo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VA2000TL
2G TL (1999-2003)
39
10-02-2015 08:26 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
STL TL-S
3G TL Problems & Fixes
9
09-23-2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Killed a V6 Firebird



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.