Hey.. We got left out!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #1  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Hey.. We got left out!

I just received my January 2005 issue of Car and Driver today with the 10 Best Cars report.

The TL is NOT in there! Not only is it not in the 10 best, it didn't even make the "also rans"!! What's going on?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #2  
dashotgun's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: ralegih triangle area nc
I guess they did not like it that's life. I am sure there is a bimmer or two or three in there how boring
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #3  
cM3go's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
the RL and TSX are on there
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #4  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,103
Likes: 4,763
From: Maryland
I noticed that also, but on the plus side Car and Driver picked the TSX and RL in their top-ten classes. I guess the conveted BMW 3 series is hard to beat for the auto magazines best of issues.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #5  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,067
Likes: 4,698
From: Cleveland area, OH
Once again, RWD is king in the sporty entry-level luxury sedan class. Oh, well. maybe next year. Life goes on, and I go on driving.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
While my preference is RWD for a number of reasons, I will easily admit that FWD has come a heck of a long way and the TL is among the best of the lot. If the TL were RWD, it would need more cubic inches primarily for more torque. But what a nice setup that would be, eh?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #7  
Eduardo's Avatar
USC YQUE
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angeles, California.
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
I just received my January 2005 issue of Car and Driver today with the 10 Best Cars report.

The TL is NOT in there! Not only is it not in the 10 best, it didn't even make the "also rans"!! What's going on?
Just enjoy your TL. Remember that this is just their own subjective list (other automobile rags will undoubtedly come down to their own conclusion).

You bought your TL because you love the way it drove and looked to you. Other magazines have their point-of-view; the one that counts is yours.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #8  
missmyprelude's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
The TL is NOT in there! Not only is it not in the 10 best, it didn't even make the "also rans"!! What's going on?
Car and Driver typically only includes new cars and previous winners in their "nominees" list for the 10Best. It looks like their format is a bit different this year (separated into categories), but I'm guessing that's still how they pick the cars to include.

A few things surprised me:
1) The RL - not that it's not good, but is it really that good?
2) The Dodge Magnum. Ok, I just don't get it.
3) No G35. The G35 has everything that Car and Driver wants. The car was practically built for them. Sure, I don't like it as much as the TL, but most of the rags love it.
4) No S2000. One of the most thrilling cars to drive. Period. Not sure what they missed here.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 01:05 AM
  #9  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Who could list Top 10 for us???
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #10  
tlram's Avatar
I shift therefore I am
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: West LA, CA
I think C & D top 10 list does not consider a car again if that is not redesigned. Their argument was that if it did not make the cut the first time, there is no reason to think it would, again.

Since the TL is not redesigned for 2005, I was not surprised that it didn't make the list now. (It should've, in 2004!).

But it sure is good to see RL and TSX both in there. Speaks well of Acura bloodline in general.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:53 AM
  #11  
Salut's Avatar
i souport publik edekason
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
From: Granada Hills, CA
Originally Posted by tlram
I think C & D top 10 list does not consider a car again if that is not redesigned. Their argument was that if it did not make the cut the first time, there is no reason to think it would, again.

Since the TL is not redesigned for 2005, I was not surprised that it didn't make the list now. (It should've, in 2004!).

But it sure is good to see RL and TSX both in there. Speaks well of Acura bloodline in general.
Well said... and I agree whole heartedly...

They do not consider redesigns...

Whatever...

Salut
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #12  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
To Eduardo;

I couldn't agree with your sentiments more. Thanks.. you nailed it.

To the rest of you.. good points, indeed. I like Car and Driver (heck, I've been reading it for over 40 years.. and other car magazines, too, along the way). But they are in love with BMW. How many times have you read one of their road tests, just to find somewhere in the text, a comparison to a 3-series.. or a 5-series? It's almost as though BMW is their benchmark and everything else, the struggling also-ran. Perhaps the G35 and the TL and other similar entries DO model themselves after the BMW, but I believe there are those that don't necessary follow that drum beat.

And, of course, there are the advertisers. Can't pick on a car too hard because we don't want to lose advertising money.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 07:01 AM
  #13  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
I should ad something about my TL along the lines of Eduardo's statements.

I get excited about driving my TL. Like in the evenings close to bedtime, I start getting charged about waking up and driving to work (I take a long way to enjoy the car and eliminate the chance of stone chips on my paint and windshield). This week, I drove my truck to work three times and now I am excited about leaving in a few minutes to do some errands. This afternoon, I have a 100+ mile trip to a family thing. Sometimes, when I haven't driven it for a day or two, I take it out for maybe 20 minutes after I get home from work for a "TL moment". This winter's gonna kill me because when the first snow hits, the car will stay in the garage for days.. or maybe longer because the thought of sand and salt getting on the car does not site well with me.. let along any chance of driving it in the snow.

Yep, I get all charged up with the thought of taking her out on the road.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 07:11 AM
  #14  
nauticalx1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
It didnt make it because the Tl's trannysucks and its torque steer is ridiculus. Im personally waiting for the next IS, which will blow the TL away. Have fun with your hondas.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #15  
BrandNewTL's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
From: canton, MI
I think the butt prints problem killed its chances. Oh, the shame.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 08:21 AM
  #16  
lakeman's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Lake Hartwell, SC
C and D and similar mags have a performance bent (and therefore a RWD bias) . They test and drive cars close to the limit. Most of us who own cars -particularly in this category - don't drive that way. IMHO less than 10% drive near the limit and then only a few % of the time.

IMHO the TL is unbeatable up to about 8/10th in every performance category, it just exhibits some undesired traits very near the limit. In the final analysis, for most drivers, most of the time, the TL is worthy of the 10 best award, however, C and D tests them at the limit and the TL comes up short when compared to the RWD competition.

Side note: Interestingly the TL has performance numbers that beat most of the RWD competition. Look at the R and T test with the TL and new 530 in it. The TL beat the BMW in nearly every measured performance category - for $10K less!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #17  
SMF-TLS's Avatar
Yada, Yada, Yada
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: CT
We shoud just ignore this post
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
It didnt make it because the Tl's trannysucks and its torque steer is ridiculus. Im personally waiting for the next IS, which will blow the TL away. Have fun with your hondas.
We will have fun with our TL's, go ahead and wait.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 09:06 AM
  #18  
Yoda117's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
It didnt make it because the Tl's trannysucks and its torque steer is ridiculus. Im personally waiting for the next IS, which will blow the TL away. Have fun with your hondas.

Uhm... would this explain why the TL I was in last night slammed the IS it was playing rabbit with last night?

I didn't think so either

All cars are subjective folks... find what fits your need best.

As for me, I swore that I would NEVER again buy another Honda after 13 years with my civic...

I pick up my TL at 2:00 PM today
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #19  
kosh2258's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 5
From: Southern MN
Why any magazine picks certain vehicles...

It boils down to who's plopping down the most bucks for advertising to the publisher.

The magazines will deny it, citing some vague thing called "editorial integrity" but that's just doublespeak. I've stopped paying much attention to these awards because they've become meaningless. Here today, gone tomorrow.

These candidates are evaluted over a very short time frame, mostly on a first impression basis. There have been "winners" in the past that have turned out to be really big losers long term. The Saab 9000 comes to mind.

Anything RWD is going to win right now simply because that's the tech du jur at the moment. It's all come down to media hype, statistical numbers (which can be played with any myriad of ways), and perception. Objective and critical evaluation are long gone from the mix.

If a vehicle can generate prodigous amounts of tire smoke from the rear wheels, it's the best thing since sliced bread. Not withstanding that it get's 15 mpg and has a really unremarkable, mediocre actually, HP/Torque to displacement ratio, and isn't really put together all that well.
It has good flash factor and that's all that counts.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #20  
Acuraluvr's Avatar
Spinnin them beats
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 47
From: Delaware
omg, i hav made a subscription like in nov and they havnt given me 1 issue yet, and i wanted this one....... but list year the tl won many awares from motorweek etc....

___________
tip the scales
04' anthricite tl navi/5at
96 toyota landcrusier
03' suburban z71
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #21  
nauticalx1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Expected 2006 IS




2006 GS






ACURA

CASE CLOSED
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #22  
pettydw's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Car and Driver is the most objective magazine I read, and I have read them all. I have driven many cars over the years and agree with their road test impressions. C&D is not afraid to say they do not like a car (Pontiac G6 in Jan'05 issue). You will not find negative descriptions in any other car magazine (Consumer Reports is an exception, but aiming at a different audience).
Since I don't get to autocrosses like I used to (where vehicle dynamics are obvious to observers), C&D magazine is the best way to cut to the chase when buying a new car. They put the Audi S4 and BMW 3 series ahead of the TL in their March 2004 comparison test, but I prefer front drive winter traction and I know what a pain German cars are maintenance wise (having owned VW's, Audi, Porsche). The TL was also a much better bargain than the Germans.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #23  
direk_04TL's Avatar
loves his TL!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
Expected 2006 IS




2006 GS






ACURA

CASE CLOSED
geez, if OUR current TLs are beautiful now, then the 06 TL (with AWD i hope) would definitely blow the doors off of these LEXI (plural?).
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 11:42 AM
  #24  
avs007's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 26
From: Pacific NW
Originally Posted by pettydw
Car and Driver is the most objective magazine I read, and I have read them all. I have driven many cars over the years and agree with their road test impressions. C&D is not afraid to say they do not like a car (Pontiac G6 in Jan'05 issue). You will not find negative descriptions in any other car magazine (Consumer Reports is an exception, but aiming at a different audience).
Since I don't get to autocrosses like I used to (where vehicle dynamics are obvious to observers), C&D magazine is the best way to cut to the chase when buying a new car. They put the Audi S4 and BMW 3 series ahead of the TL in their March 2004 comparison test, but I prefer front drive winter traction and I know what a pain German cars are maintenance wise (having owned VW's, Audi, Porsche). The TL was also a much better bargain than the Germans.
While I agree, the wierd thing is the G35 I think. I say this, because I have an episode of Car & Driver TV, where they did a comparo of sport sedans. And Car and Driver rated the G35 as #1, the Bimmer, #2, and the TL #3. (and the CTS and others somewhere else) So C&D ranked the G35 ahead of the BMW, yet the BMW still gets on the 10 best? In this episode, the C&D team admitted that the japanese have finally beat the Germans. They said the only reason the TL placed #3, was because it was FWD.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 11:43 AM
  #25  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
In all fairness, C&D did give very high marks to both the TL and the TL A-Spec in their prior reviews. And that's why I was surprised it didn't make it into the 10 Best list.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #26  
Dvus555's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ --> NE GA
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
Expected 2006 IS

[



Tell Lexus they better put an extra seem on those seats.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #27  
vtecracer's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: California
You guys should see the G35 forums. I've never seen so much hate towards C&D after their car got pulled off the ten best. lol. Atleast there are still a few Hondas on the list.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:55 PM
  #28  
cM3go's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
Expected 2006 IS



looks like a Mazda 3
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #29  
zamo's Avatar
Houses Won't Depreciate?
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,238
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL
Originally Posted by direk_04TL
geez, if OUR current TLs are beautiful now, then the 06 TL (with AWD i hope) would definitely blow the doors off of these LEXI (plural?).
U need to wait till '08 at least. Acura/Honda does not overhaul a model less than 4 years.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #30  
NoRespect's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
I have been driving RWD vehicles all of my life, occasional 4wd, in a northern (snowy clime) I will take the fwd or awd any day. This is one of the best drives I have ever had. I enjoy every day going to work and wish the drive was longer. I don't give a Rats @SS who's best of list my car is on. It's fun to drive. There are plenty of good/great cars out there. More than I'll ever get to drive. Learn to love what you drive without trashing what you don't.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #31  
Gearhead
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 38
From: MPLS, MN
I just don't get C&D's love affair with the 3 series BMW. I owned a lot of Beemers in the past starting with a 2002tii which was an amazing car in its day. However I spent time in Europe several weeks driving a 3 series and I couldn't wait to get out of the POS! The previous time I had a C class MB and it was far better than the 3 I couldn't believe.

Brakes were better on the C, mileage better, more comfortable and driving dynamics felt every bit as good in the C as in the 3. C was quiter, quicker, more trunk space and I could list about 20 other things were the MB was better than the 3. Another thing I noticed is it seems that I saw a lot more MB's in Germany than before and before I used to see more BMW's than Audi or MB but that isn't the case any more. Audi and MB seem to have more cars on the road than BMW in their home market. I don't know exact sales statistics for the Germany market and it was just an observation. Even a friend of mine who was with and NOT a car nut noticed it as well as the difference between the 3 series and C series.

I can't find another can in this class that is a better value than the TL. I hate to damn it with faint praise but as SouthernBoy has attested it has excellent driving dynamics. It is comfy, fast, sweet motor, economical, great nav, etc. Normally I wouldn't have even considered buying a FWD car but the TL won me over.

As for the new Lexi, they better be packing a big dose of HP. I drove a GS300 and it was an underpowered dog! I drove it 5 minutes and took it back to the dealer it was that disappointing. If I wanted to spend over $50k again on a car I'll buy another MB rather than a GS4xx.

Something about the new GS Lexus that makes me think of a pregnant G35 and the fact is too much like a Camry! I also hate wood steering wheels. Too damn cold in the winter and tough to grip. The IS is a tiny little car inside. I can't get excited about it at all.

I really like the looks of the TL. It is handsome in an almost classical sense. It dumbfounds me why the TL didn't make the 10best especially after they said how good it was before.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #32  
SMF-TLS's Avatar
Yada, Yada, Yada
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by cTLgo
looks like a Mazda 3
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #33  
kosh2258's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 5
From: Southern MN
Objective is relative...

Car and Driver is the most objective magazine I read, and I have read them all.
I've read them all too, for a lot years, and I've watched the objectivity decline to the point where, yes, C&D will pan a particular vehicle, but only if the thing is such an obvious underachiever that to do otherwise would make the magazine look foolish.

The sad thing is, you're right, C&D is pretty much the most objective of the lot, but today that isn't saying much.

The Toyota GS looks more like it's gunning for the Nissan Maxima than anything else.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #34  
SouthernBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,342
Likes: 163
From: Suburb of Manassas, VA
NoRespect and wavshrdr make some excellent points.

NoRespect says to hell with what magazines or really, anyone else says. It's all about what YOU like and what satisfies YOUR wants and needs at the time. Man, I couldn't agree more. I will search for information and ask questions and beg comments and opinions, but when it all comes down to plunking down your money, it's what you find the most appealing. Everything else may be good to know and interesting to read and hear, but when you turn that key and put it in gear for the trip down the road, does it put a smile on your face and make you happy? That's really what matters.

And wavshrdr talks about the looks of the cars. So many just like like variations of a theme.. the jelly bean look. The TL looks different and has an understated elegance with a measure of hunkered down look that I find quite appealing. Actually, I think the TL is just flat drop dead gorgeous. And I love the way the thing drives. Yes, I have a few like-to-haves about the car, but they're few and certainly not cause for concern to me. This is one sweet machine.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #35  
ChRiS_nYc's Avatar
black on black on bla....
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 1
From: New York City
my question is who the fuk cares what car and driver thinks they've been swinging off BMW's nutsack for years. :whocares: on the other hand I agree the TL would be a shoe-in if it had RWD but that doesnt bother me--the handling of the TL is definetly above average.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #36  
matelot's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 0
From: Bushwhacked Land
Originally Posted by nauticalx1
It didnt make it because the Tl's trannysucks and its torque steer is ridiculus. Im personally waiting for the next IS, which will blow the TL away. Have fun with your hondas.
I 'm new round here...is this guy the resident troll or there is worse ?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #37  
Mindworm's Avatar
Bears Rule!(Well, kinda')
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Dunno...I just know that Lexus still hasn't found a way to make their cars look appealing like Acura and Infiniti have. Look at the G35 Coupe. Class and power all the way. Look at the FX. Daring and tough. Look at the TL. Best 4 door in it's class. Look at the MDX. Amazingly strong list of positives. And ALL OF THEM ARE SHARP LOOKING.

Look at ANY Lexus, and you enter yawns-ville....population YOU. Even with the redesigns I've seen (which will inevitably be changed before they hit market....)

You can wait and wait and wait, or you can enjoy. It's like the guy that sits on his butt at the dance and points fingers at everyone else, but dares not dance himself.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #38  
Bonedoc's Avatar
VTEC is happiness
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, MA
A couple of comments:

the TSX is not a redesign, so they obviously consider all currently available vehicles. No sweat, so they didn't rank the TL--although having all 3 in the top 10 would have been sweet.

to nauticalx1: you need to relax...why the inferiority complex?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #39  
nauticalx1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by matelot
I 'm new round here...is this guy the resident troll or there is worse ?
No troll, just gettin under the skin of these hallucinating fools who think that their TL's are all that and the center of the world. Get a life.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 05:31 PM
  #40  
SMF-TLS's Avatar
Yada, Yada, Yada
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: CT
Lexus is the Buick of Japanese cars.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.