2008 TL Type -S with 3.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:23 AM
  #1  
Intelxual's Avatar
Thread Starter
5th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
2008 TL Type -S with 3.2?

Hello, I am currently looking at buying my first Acura.
What I have been searching for is 07-08 TL Type - S and have found one that baffles me. It is a Type - S according to the VIN and had dealer call Acura corporate, becuase after I test drive I noticed the car had a 3.2L not the 3.5L it should.

Long story short, the car was special ordered from factory with the 3.2 motor.......Why would anyone do this?

Is the car worth more or less? ( I am thinking less)
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
that cannot be.

some where some one is getting suckered.
you should probably post the link or pictures of this car.

most likely it was a base TL converted to look like a type s
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #3  
ArthurL's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 125
From: NYC
That's really odd... regardless I wouldn't pull the trigger on this one. Something is fishy.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:43 AM
  #4  
Intelxual's Avatar
Thread Starter
5th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Here is the link to the car.

http://www.davisautosales.com/window...UA76598A027778
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #5  
BeezleTL85's Avatar
Needs a 930
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 759
From: Texas
Run away from it
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
Acura604's Avatar
2024 RDX A SPEC
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 323
From: Vancouver, B.C.
exterior is 100% legit and could be just a 'typo' in the ad.

did you actually pop the hood to confirm engine?

most of these 2-bit auto dealers dont know jack about the car and may have just did a google search and stuck it in there. go back if you can and pop the hood.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
no shots of engine.

can only assume that it is a true type-s with a misprint in the ad.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:50 AM
  #8  
Intelxual's Avatar
Thread Starter
5th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Yes, I have test driven already...popped the hood and noticed it.....I had to point it out to the dealer originally. Not sure how it compares to a 3.5L engine as this is the only one I have driven.....they seem to be very hard to find in my area at a reasonable price.

I am trying to talk this guy down to $13-14k
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
Originally Posted by Intelxual
Yes, I have test driven already...popped the hood and noticed it.....I had to point it out to the dealer originally. Not sure how it compares to a 3.5L engine as this is the only one I have driven.....they seem to be very hard to find in my area at a reasonable price.

I am trying to talk this guy down to $13-14k
are you sure it wasnt an engine cover?

the ECU's are different.
it wouldnt work.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:55 AM
  #10  
Acura604's Avatar
2024 RDX A SPEC
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 323
From: Vancouver, B.C.
well..this is way too odd... there's no such thing as a 'special order' engine ... the ONLY other thing could be a complete rebuild using typeS parts.. i dont know... makes absolutely no sense.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:56 AM
  #11  
THEReeM718's Avatar
Type Sour
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 699
Likes: 72
From: NYC
Pass and on to the next TL...
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:03 AM
  #12  
SharksBreath's Avatar
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 2,886
From: baltimore
is everyone taking crazy pills today?

it's clearly a type-s, VIN confirms that. it's just a typo on the page.

there is no other explanation for it.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #13  
lucnex's Avatar
Where Did My Garage Go?!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 75
From: Chicago, IL
it was mine and i converted it to a 3.2L to get better gas mileage then traded it in
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #14  
BeezleTL85's Avatar
Needs a 930
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 759
From: Texas
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
is everyone taking crazy pills today?

it's clearly a type-s, VIN confirms that. it's just a typo on the page.

there is no other explanation for it.
He says he popped the hood and it says 3.2......





If I didn't just read that then someone pass the pills please
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:19 AM
  #15  
ArthurL's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 125
From: NYC
But where does the story of the car being a "special order" come in? Did the dealer tell you that? LOL

Who the heck "special orders" a Type-S with a 3.2!? It's like me going to an Audi dealership telling the salesman that I want an S4 but with a 2.0T engine. Something doesn't add up.

For all we know, it could actually just be an engine cover off of a base model. If that's the case.. and it's actually a legit Type-S then talk the salesman down on the price while he still thinks that it's a 3.2.

Last edited by ArthurL; May 1, 2013 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:19 AM
  #16  
AccordFlex's Avatar
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 634
Likes: 214
From: Baltimore
check the engine block for the VIN and see if it matches up...
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:21 AM
  #17  
SharksBreath's Avatar
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 2,886
From: baltimore
Originally Posted by BeezleTL85
He says he popped the hood and it says 3.2......





If I didn't just read that then someone pass the pills please
I don't really care what he said he saw. It's a type-s. nothing else to it.

my stash is running low, sorry.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #18  
BlackFlag's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 6
From: Flagstaff, AZ
...and is it me or do dealers even wash the vehicle before taking picures? It seems like such an easy step...
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:40 AM
  #19  
dontTL'em'nothing's Avatar
riding low and steady
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 596
Likes: 81
From: Nashville, TN
thats definately odd. If thats whats on the vin plate then it is what it is. Thats a red flag for almost everyone with the base motor when you popped the hood. What kind of dealership is this?

edit - nevermind it looks a like a ma and pa dealership. Walk away quick and dont turn back. Hopefully its just a engine cover, but then again the average customer would even know to swap brackets to make it fit.

Last edited by dontTL'em'nothing; May 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:42 AM
  #20  
McCollins23's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Midwest Region)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 784
From: Kansas City
+1 on probably just a different engine cover, they are nearly identical.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #21  
JohnG3TLS's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
From: Livermore CA
If the origal owner smoked the 3.5 engine, could they replace it with a 3.2? It may of been cheaped and easyer to find a 3.2 at a junk yard. I don't know enogh about the ECU working with both engine types.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:46 AM
  #22  
JTS97Z28's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,242
Likes: 949
From: Plainfield, IL
Well first off, NEVER believe any story a dealership tells you because a lot of those scumbags will literally say anything to make a sale. Hence, telling someone it was a special order engine ROFLMAO!!!!
Like the guys said above the cars is for sure a Type S as the VIn proves it, as for the engine like said above again. Either the engine cover was swapped at some point during its ownership (probably the most likely), or the original motor developed issues or was blown and the motor was replaced with the 3.2 (basically someone trying to save money and took the cheap way). However someone above said the 3.2 wont even work paired into a Type S.

Your gonna have to verify some numbers on the engine to be sure, unless someone else knows of a visual way to tell the two apart by just lifting up the engine cover.

You can figure it out!
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:47 AM
  #23  
Intelxual's Avatar
Thread Starter
5th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
This is a used car dealer, says he has the car on consignment from a family "friend" from FL.

I am just passing on the car all together.

I found another 2007 type s w/125k miles that checks out for $14k but the dealer can't come up with any service records of timing belt service.

Anyone here think $14k is a good deal with that much mileage? Or just keep looking.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #24  
ArthurL's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 125
From: NYC
I was told you can't pair the 3.2 with a Type-S transmission. It's a lot of work to do the swap.. dropping the sub-frame and all.. replacing the ECU.. replacing the transmission, etc.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:49 AM
  #25  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
Originally Posted by JohnG3TLS
If the origal owner smoked the 3.5 engine, could they replace it with a 3.2? It may of been cheaped and easyer to find a 3.2 at a junk yard. I don't know enogh about the ECU working with both engine types.
-ECU
-maybe problems with tranny/mounts
-wire harness(would have to spend countless hours remapping wires)

if it were that easy; we would be swapping the 3.5 into the base TL's.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 01:24 PM
  #26  
NvrDwn's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 677
Likes: 132
From: Franklin County Virginia
Originally Posted by justnspace
-ECU
-maybe problems with tranny/mounts
-wire harness(would have to spend countless hours remapping wires)

if it were that easy; we would be swapping the 3.5 into the base TL's.
The bell housing it's what is different, or so I've read.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 01:33 PM
  #27  
Purple ashes's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 78
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
where did you match the vin? make sure all vins around the car match up, it could be a switched vin or something, still i say no go because the previous owner probaly did something fishy to the car.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 01:45 PM
  #28  
EvilVirus's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,227
Likes: 1,120
From: Houston
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
The bell housing it's what is different, or so I've read.
You are correct the bell housing are different and will not mount up to a base model without major modifications.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 03:31 PM
  #29  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,733
From: Kansas City, MO
check the manifold....the Type S has a magnesium manifold....

I am with Aaron, on this one....looks like a Type S with a base engine cover and the dealer might have just BS you when you asked why is there a 3.2 in it....
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #30  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
there is a guy on our forums who recently did a 3.5 into an accord.

but it took a lot of work and he's sort of a genius.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #31  
dannyz's Avatar
TLicious Type S
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 415
Likes: 120
From: KC USA
Run!
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:43 PM
  #32  
nttstt444's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 303
Im jumping on the boat that is just a different engine cover. Someone prob tried to paint it or mod it in some way and messed it up and got a 3.2 cover for cheap or something.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 11:20 PM
  #33  
ladiesman217's Avatar
e92 335i
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 54
From: Toronto
Honestly I think its 99% a Type-S from the pedals to the trim, to the exterior. Every little detail that makes the Type-S different from a base is there, unless he actually changed the engine to the 3.2 which is HIGHLY unlikely I dont think you should worry. It's prob just a different engine cover.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #34  
mau108's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 71
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
aren't the 3.2 covers cut out of the intake manifold with the etching of the 3.2 on the manifold it self?

The 3.5's are all covered up and if you remove the cover nothing is etched on the intake manifold.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 03:41 AM
  #35  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
I say type s with base engine cover as so many ppl have said before me. You can't modify the VIN, it clearly says UA7
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 06:26 AM
  #36  
Turbonut's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,900
Likes: 834
From: NJ
Just an FYI-
Doing some research, the AT in the '08 base TL is the same as the TLS.
Now, replacement of the 3.2 into the TLS may present another problem, but it appears that the intake manifold and heads are the same, so I'd say it's certainly a possibility.

If it was replaced with the 3.2, you'd certainly think that the 3.5 cover would have been used.

Guess more investigation would be needed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gatrhumpy
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
19
Dec 31, 2015 04:22 PM
kmarqueling
Car Parts for Sale
1
Oct 3, 2015 01:14 AM
STL TL-S
3G TL Problems & Fixes
9
Sep 23, 2015 08:52 PM
justin.w13.walker
Car Parts for Sale
0
Sep 22, 2015 02:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.