3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2008 TL Type -S with 3.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2013, 09:23 AM
  #1  
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Intelxual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 TL Type -S with 3.2?

Hello, I am currently looking at buying my first Acura.
What I have been searching for is 07-08 TL Type - S and have found one that baffles me. It is a Type - S according to the VIN and had dealer call Acura corporate, becuase after I test drive I noticed the car had a 3.2L not the 3.5L it should.

Long story short, the car was special ordered from factory with the 3.2 motor.......Why would anyone do this?

Is the car worth more or less? ( I am thinking less)
Old 05-01-2013, 09:24 AM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,267 Likes on 11,974 Posts
that cannot be.

some where some one is getting suckered.
you should probably post the link or pictures of this car.

most likely it was a base TL converted to look like a type s
Old 05-01-2013, 09:26 AM
  #3  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
ArthurL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,004
Received 125 Likes on 114 Posts
That's really odd... regardless I wouldn't pull the trigger on this one. Something is fishy.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:43 AM
  #4  
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Intelxual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the link to the car.

http://www.davisautosales.com/window...UA76598A027778
Old 05-01-2013, 09:45 AM
  #5  
Needs a 930
 
BeezleTL85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Texas
Age: 38
Posts: 5,146
Received 759 Likes on 547 Posts
Run away from it
Old 05-01-2013, 09:47 AM
  #6  
2021 RDX A SPEC
 
Acura604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,572
Received 308 Likes on 189 Posts
exterior is 100% legit and could be just a 'typo' in the ad.

did you actually pop the hood to confirm engine?

most of these 2-bit auto dealers dont know jack about the car and may have just did a google search and stuck it in there. go back if you can and pop the hood.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (05-01-2013)
Old 05-01-2013, 09:48 AM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,267 Likes on 11,974 Posts
no shots of engine.

can only assume that it is a true type-s with a misprint in the ad.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:50 AM
  #8  
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Intelxual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I have test driven already...popped the hood and noticed it.....I had to point it out to the dealer originally. Not sure how it compares to a 3.5L engine as this is the only one I have driven.....they seem to be very hard to find in my area at a reasonable price.

I am trying to talk this guy down to $13-14k
Old 05-01-2013, 09:52 AM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,267 Likes on 11,974 Posts
Originally Posted by Intelxual
Yes, I have test driven already...popped the hood and noticed it.....I had to point it out to the dealer originally. Not sure how it compares to a 3.5L engine as this is the only one I have driven.....they seem to be very hard to find in my area at a reasonable price.

I am trying to talk this guy down to $13-14k
are you sure it wasnt an engine cover?

the ECU's are different.
it wouldnt work.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:55 AM
  #10  
2021 RDX A SPEC
 
Acura604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,572
Received 308 Likes on 189 Posts
well..this is way too odd... there's no such thing as a 'special order' engine ... the ONLY other thing could be a complete rebuild using typeS parts.. i dont know... makes absolutely no sense.
Old 05-01-2013, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Type Sour
iTrader: (2)
 
THEReeM718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 699
Received 72 Likes on 61 Posts
Pass and on to the next TL...
Old 05-01-2013, 10:03 AM
  #12  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 39
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
is everyone taking crazy pills today?

it's clearly a type-s, VIN confirms that. it's just a typo on the page.

there is no other explanation for it.
The following 6 users liked this post by SharksBreath:
Acura_Dude (05-01-2013), Joneill44 (05-01-2013), justnspace (05-01-2013), paperboy42190 (05-02-2013), rossv1 (05-01-2013), Undying Dreams (05-01-2013) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 05-01-2013, 10:09 AM
  #13  
Where Did My Garage Go?!!
iTrader: (3)
 
lucnex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 35
Posts: 825
Received 75 Likes on 48 Posts
it was mine and i converted it to a 3.2L to get better gas mileage then traded it in
Old 05-01-2013, 10:14 AM
  #14  
Needs a 930
 
BeezleTL85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Texas
Age: 38
Posts: 5,146
Received 759 Likes on 547 Posts
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
is everyone taking crazy pills today?

it's clearly a type-s, VIN confirms that. it's just a typo on the page.

there is no other explanation for it.
He says he popped the hood and it says 3.2......





If I didn't just read that then someone pass the pills please
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (05-01-2013)
Old 05-01-2013, 10:19 AM
  #15  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
ArthurL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,004
Received 125 Likes on 114 Posts
But where does the story of the car being a "special order" come in? Did the dealer tell you that? LOL

Who the heck "special orders" a Type-S with a 3.2!? It's like me going to an Audi dealership telling the salesman that I want an S4 but with a 2.0T engine. Something doesn't add up.

For all we know, it could actually just be an engine cover off of a base model. If that's the case.. and it's actually a legit Type-S then talk the salesman down on the price while he still thinks that it's a 3.2.

Last edited by ArthurL; 05-01-2013 at 10:21 AM.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:19 AM
  #16  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
AccordFlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baltimore
Age: 35
Posts: 634
Received 213 Likes on 135 Posts
check the engine block for the VIN and see if it matches up...
The following 2 users liked this post by AccordFlex:
BeezleTL85 (05-01-2013), kaza (05-01-2013)
Old 05-01-2013, 10:21 AM
  #17  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 39
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Originally Posted by BeezleTL85
He says he popped the hood and it says 3.2......





If I didn't just read that then someone pass the pills please
I don't really care what he said he saw. It's a type-s. nothing else to it.

my stash is running low, sorry.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:27 AM
  #18  
Advanced
 
BlackFlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 80
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
...and is it me or do dealers even wash the vehicle before taking picures? It seems like such an easy step...
Old 05-01-2013, 10:40 AM
  #19  
riding low and steady
iTrader: (3)
 
dontTL'em'nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 40
Posts: 596
Received 80 Likes on 76 Posts
thats definately odd. If thats whats on the vin plate then it is what it is. Thats a red flag for almost everyone with the base motor when you popped the hood. What kind of dealership is this?

edit - nevermind it looks a like a ma and pa dealership. Walk away quick and dont turn back. Hopefully its just a engine cover, but then again the average customer would even know to swap brackets to make it fit.

Last edited by dontTL'em'nothing; 05-01-2013 at 10:44 AM.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:42 AM
  #20  
Chapter Leader (Midwest Region)
 
McCollins23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kansas City
Age: 43
Posts: 2,427
Received 784 Likes on 558 Posts
+1 on probably just a different engine cover, they are nearly identical.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:45 AM
  #21  
Intermediate
 
JohnG3TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Livermore CA
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
If the origal owner smoked the 3.5 engine, could they replace it with a 3.2? It may of been cheaped and easyer to find a 3.2 at a junk yard. I don't know enogh about the ECU working with both engine types.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:46 AM
  #22  
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 44
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
Well first off, NEVER believe any story a dealership tells you because a lot of those scumbags will literally say anything to make a sale. Hence, telling someone it was a special order engine ROFLMAO!!!!
Like the guys said above the cars is for sure a Type S as the VIn proves it, as for the engine like said above again. Either the engine cover was swapped at some point during its ownership (probably the most likely), or the original motor developed issues or was blown and the motor was replaced with the 3.2 (basically someone trying to save money and took the cheap way). However someone above said the 3.2 wont even work paired into a Type S.

Your gonna have to verify some numbers on the engine to be sure, unless someone else knows of a visual way to tell the two apart by just lifting up the engine cover.

You can figure it out!
Old 05-01-2013, 10:47 AM
  #23  
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Intelxual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a used car dealer, says he has the car on consignment from a family "friend" from FL.

I am just passing on the car all together.

I found another 2007 type s w/125k miles that checks out for $14k but the dealer can't come up with any service records of timing belt service.

Anyone here think $14k is a good deal with that much mileage? Or just keep looking.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:48 AM
  #24  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (4)
 
ArthurL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 1,004
Received 125 Likes on 114 Posts
I was told you can't pair the 3.2 with a Type-S transmission. It's a lot of work to do the swap.. dropping the sub-frame and all.. replacing the ECU.. replacing the transmission, etc.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:49 AM
  #25  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,267 Likes on 11,974 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnG3TLS
If the origal owner smoked the 3.5 engine, could they replace it with a 3.2? It may of been cheaped and easyer to find a 3.2 at a junk yard. I don't know enogh about the ECU working with both engine types.
-ECU
-maybe problems with tranny/mounts
-wire harness(would have to spend countless hours remapping wires)

if it were that easy; we would be swapping the 3.5 into the base TL's.
The following 2 users liked this post by justnspace:
Acura_Dude (05-01-2013), lucnex (05-01-2013)
Old 05-01-2013, 01:24 PM
  #26  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
-ECU
-maybe problems with tranny/mounts
-wire harness(would have to spend countless hours remapping wires)

if it were that easy; we would be swapping the 3.5 into the base TL's.
The bell housing it's what is different, or so I've read.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (05-01-2013)
Old 05-01-2013, 01:33 PM
  #27  
Advanced
 
Purple ashes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 78
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
where did you match the vin? make sure all vins around the car match up, it could be a switched vin or something, still i say no go because the previous owner probaly did something fishy to the car.
Old 05-01-2013, 01:45 PM
  #28  
Safety Car
iTrader: (8)
 
EvilVirus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,227
Received 1,120 Likes on 893 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
The bell housing it's what is different, or so I've read.
You are correct the bell housing are different and will not mount up to a base model without major modifications.
Old 05-01-2013, 03:31 PM
  #29  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
check the manifold....the Type S has a magnesium manifold....

I am with Aaron, on this one....looks like a Type S with a base engine cover and the dealer might have just BS you when you asked why is there a 3.2 in it....
Old 05-01-2013, 07:40 PM
  #30  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,267 Likes on 11,974 Posts
there is a guy on our forums who recently did a 3.5 into an accord.

but it took a lot of work and he's sort of a genius.
Old 05-01-2013, 07:42 PM
  #31  
TLicious Type S
 
dannyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: KC USA
Posts: 415
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts
Run!
Old 05-01-2013, 10:43 PM
  #32  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
nttstt444's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,335
Received 301 Likes on 258 Posts
Im jumping on the boat that is just a different engine cover. Someone prob tried to paint it or mod it in some way and messed it up and got a 3.2 cover for cheap or something.
Old 05-01-2013, 11:20 PM
  #33  
e92 335i
 
ladiesman217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Age: 33
Posts: 680
Received 54 Likes on 33 Posts
Honestly I think its 99% a Type-S from the pedals to the trim, to the exterior. Every little detail that makes the Type-S different from a base is there, unless he actually changed the engine to the 3.2 which is HIGHLY unlikely I dont think you should worry. It's prob just a different engine cover.
Old 05-01-2013, 11:24 PM
  #34  
Senior Moderator
 
mau108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 1,414
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
aren't the 3.2 covers cut out of the intake manifold with the etching of the 3.2 on the manifold it self?

The 3.5's are all covered up and if you remove the cover nothing is etched on the intake manifold.
Old 05-02-2013, 03:41 AM
  #35  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
I say type s with base engine cover as so many ppl have said before me. You can't modify the VIN, it clearly says UA7
Old 05-02-2013, 06:26 AM
  #36  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 60
Posts: 7,901
Received 832 Likes on 679 Posts
Just an FYI-
Doing some research, the AT in the '08 base TL is the same as the TLS.
Now, replacement of the 3.2 into the TLS may present another problem, but it appears that the intake manifold and heads are the same, so I'd say it's certainly a possibility.

If it was replaced with the 3.2, you'd certainly think that the 3.5 cover would have been used.

Guess more investigation would be needed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gatrhumpy
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
19
12-31-2015 04:22 PM
kmarqueling
Car Parts for Sale
1
10-03-2015 01:14 AM
STL TL-S
3G TL Problems & Fixes
9
09-23-2015 08:52 PM
justin.w13.walker
Car Parts for Sale
0
09-22-2015 02:21 PM



Quick Reply: 2008 TL Type -S with 3.2?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.