3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

13.998@106.04mph - 05 TL 6MT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2010, 10:01 AM
  #121  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
This guy's responses are so frustrating to read.

This has to be one of the dumbest discussion ever. You are insisting that the 2010 MS3 is a highway monster from 4th gear and up due to "boost cut" in the first three gears which btw I was unable to find ANY type of information on. Please post up a link of your findings? Not Dyno's in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, because if that's the case EVERYONE's cars are highway monsters. The fact that you are arguing that your car is faster from 100mph+ to what ever is beyond my comprehension. That has to be by far the stupidest thing I've heard you say since the MS3 being a "demon" "supercar" which also makes me believe you have never driven ANYTHING but your car, noob to the enthusiast world, and extremely biased towards your car (understandable).

From an overall performance stand point for those of us "normal non-biased enthusiast" the 2010 MS3 is generally a low-mid 14 second car although capable of 13's stock. It traps 98-101 just like the TL. Comparing anything past 100 should be irrelevant since generally most street racers don't pass 100mph due to the chance of being caught by the police.

Your arguement that the MS3 is much faster on a roll could be true although from the cars specs and from what i read, you are over exaggerating how much faster.

BTW, MS3 GOD/KING or what ever...a member on here has a quote of your where you compared your MS3 to the likes of a "Demon" on the highway I'm sure he'll post up soon.
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:02 AM
  #122  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by I hate cars
Why would any underpowered car cut power in 3rd gear?
Torque steer. Bingo.

2 most critical factors that cause torque-steer on MS3:

- Gears are too short = too much power = more chance getting torque steer. If the gears were taller, it would help minimize torque steer. Ask Mazda why they decided to make low gears so tight on manual gear box, I don't know.

- HP and TQ is a bit too much for a FWD car. Also keep in mind that the power comes early too, at 3k rpm instead of 6k like on N/A cars.


I remember from a long time ago that you were basing this on the fact that the hp numbers went up in 4th gear on the dyno. EVERY car does the same thing and none of them have power cut in the first 3 gears.
But MS3 has power cut, on 1st three gears. It is true. Honda and Acura on the other hand, does not have power cut if you disable the VSC. Disabling the VSC does not help on the MS3, the power is still cut significantly.


If it were true, I would be embarassed to admit it. Talk about a completely useless car. Do you go around doing 120+mph roll ons....
It could be useless car for some people. It's targeted for certain demographic, those who like track racing (not stupid drag strips) and "roll-on" on the street, like me. You don't have to start from 120 mph roll. 40 mph rolling start is fine, all the way up to top speed of 155 mph. The 6th gear on the MS3 is a "performance gear", not for fuel economy. It is extremely tight and you can get from 125 to 155 very quickly.


As for my dragstrip runs, if all I had run was the GN I would not be so sure. I've run many cars and practically lived at the track. They're all the same. Get a 3 second 60' and it still traps the same, sometimes higher.
No they are not. A car with boost cut on multiple gears will not get you the same trap speed as the car with no boost cut. It's not about launching from start, I'm talking power being reduced while the car is moving, and that is what you are not getting it.


You fail to answer, why does this slow car have an imaginary power cut in 3rd gear? Are you saying it will smoke the tires in 3rd without the cut?
Absolutely.


If this is the case with only 260hp, you probably should not drag race.
Now you finally get it. This car is NOT for drag racing. I thought I told you that a long time ago... I didn't buy this car to drag race, I bought it to ROLL RACE, and superb handling.


Last, who's full of excuses? I would have to say the one with the 100mph car that claims it hangs with the faster cars only in 4th gear based on this imaginary power cut.
It is not imaginary. They are real, real power cut. How much simpler can this get? Beating or keeping up with some of 104~ 105 mph trap cars is common for the MS3.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:10 AM
  #123  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
OMG. This guy just said if they removed the boost cut in 3rd gear the 2010 MS3 would smoke the tires............................................. ....SPEECHLESS. Please close this thread due to ignorance and arrogance from this guy. The only thing he's good for is stirring up other members due to his biased belief's of his car even though all the data is there.
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:13 AM
  #124  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by IHC
You fail to answer, why does this slow car have an imaginary power cut in 3rd gear? Are you saying it will smoke the tires in 3rd without the cut?
Originally Posted by MS3GOD/KING
Absolutely.
You my friend need to get in other cars. It's clear the MS3 is the fastest car you've driven/rode in. You have no idea what you're talking about if you honestly think a 260hp car without this so called boost cut can smoke tires in 3rd gear. If that doesn't show ignorance/arrogance i don't know what does.
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:22 AM
  #125  
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
 
TylerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Age: 35
Posts: 6,803
Received 3,017 Likes on 1,515 Posts
at somebody who buys a car specifically for roll racing.
TylerT is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:23 AM
  #126  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God

And the TL cannot pull on a stock MS3, unless the TL is equipped with supercharger + other mods. The trap speed you got at the drag strip is fraud I believe. TL with bolt-on's can't get to that speed unless you have very strong tail wind with all weather is in your favor. Expect to see 99~ 101 mph on your TL. Besides, the G37 you pulled may have been an '08 model with automatic. They are pretty slow in rolling start races. If you can't beat them then your car has some issues.
.
The trap speed he posted is fraud? Thats hilarious! I wouldn't call it fraud at all. It might seem a little high but you act like its a crime that he posted his timeslips. The way Alex pulled on that GS350 he might be trapping that high. He would probobly give you a great run from a high roll in your MS3 since you can hang with cars that run 104-105 trap speeds.

Plus even a strong tail wind isn't going to give you a 4MPH increase in trapspeed. You might be lucky to achieve a 1mph increase at best. When you race you want the weather to be in your favor. The colder it is and the drier it is the faster you will run. That isn't a crime!
SatinSilverAV6 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:33 AM
  #127  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Mazda: Trap speed is not for children. It's not the end-all be-all, but it is a good comparison, and is probably the most accurate on what would happen from a dig. From a roll, yes it's a different story but it still holds weight.

I was comparing what MOST people look at in terms of a car's performance. Every magazine, every drag racer, and every enthusiast for that matter, compares cars on their 1/4 mile time. Just because you are a tROLL racer (oops) and don't understand that 1/4 mile matters doesn't mean that the rest of the world doesn't. I understand it pulls high end, that's great. I would still guarantee I would be right next to it @125mph. After that I shift into 5th and no my car doesn't pull much at all in 5th. And I don't care because who needs 5th gear to pull in their DD?

You're so worried about the power cut in the 1st 3 gears yet say keep insisting that a 40 roll is great. Explain that?

And wtf? You said that tho I add more power gearing stays constant. WHAT!? So you're telling me because the gearing is the same, I won't gain anything from my mods? I hope not.

An MS3 without the power cut would smoke the tires in 3rd? Maybe a nice chirp on the 2-3 shift, and MAYBE a a small chirp into 4th like the RSX. But to say they would smoke the tires in 3rd? Z06's don't even do that and they are lighter and have double the power in both HP and TQ....

I can't wait to find an MS3 just so I can laugh at how ignorant you sound. I put down more power than an MS3 (with the exception of torque) and I have pretty aggressive gearing as well. For you to say I have no chance is just ridiculous.
Sonnick is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:35 AM
  #128  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God

That won't happen. A 7th gen Accord with an exhaust mod will not come anywhere close to the stock MS3 from roll. If you are rolling start from maybe 20 mph you might have a chance but from 40 or 50 roll you won't be able to keep up. You make it sound like Honda Accord is so fast when it isn't.
I doubt you will get 104+ with those mods. You have to keep in mind that when you add power, the gearing stays the constant.
.
I would love to see Sonnick race against your stock MS3. I think he would be slightly pulling on you from a 40 or 50 plus roll and eat you up from a low MPH roll or a dead stop. I have seen his vids and I have seen what a stock MS3 can do. Now A stock 7th gen AV6 6MT you would edge from a high roll, but those exhaust mods and intake mods that sonnick has brought him from 215WHP to 255WHP. So I have no doubt that his car is trapping 104MPH or higher since a stock AV6 6MT can hit 99MPH at the highest stock with only 215WHP. A 40WHP increase will easily net an increase like that especially weighing in at 3250lbs or so.
SatinSilverAV6 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:00 AM
  #129  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
MS3, you give me headache. You're worse than the guy that had a 6MT TL and traded it for an IS350 (manual transmission was his name I think?) Please stop posting incoherent babble.


(BTW, my sig is quoted from that other forum where you claim it isn't you, but anyone with an IQ > 90 can read between the lines.)
anx1300c is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:05 AM
  #130  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
I thought I remember 1 guy on this site hitting 13.9 @101MPH stock but you might be right that he had an intake. I am curious though to see alex go back to the track to see if he can duplicate his trap speeds. It would be interesting to see what other vehicles ran in the left lane like he did to see what their trap speeds were and that would help determine whether the testing equipment was off or not.



Driving skill is definately the main concern. Seems like most people don't know how to get the full potential out of the MS3 as far as what gear to start in when racing from a roll and where the most optimal shift points need to occur.
If you're talking about type-s09, he ran 13.9x @ 99.1x with an intake; it's on here somewhere. I don't see a base 6MT trapping over 100 without some decent mods.
anx1300c is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:13 AM
  #131  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nova_G
This guy's responses are so frustrating to read.
You are making yourself frustrating when it's not frustrating.

This has to be one of the dumbest discussion ever. You are insisting that the 2010 MS3 is a highway monster from 4th gear and up due to "boost cut" in the first three gears which btw I was unable to find ANY type of information on. Please post up a link of your findings?
The discussion is new and something you aren't aware of, or don't have any clue about. Don't just make an assumption by saying it's a dumb discussion just because you have lack in understanding in this discussion. Think before posting. Thanks.

Stock MS3 does, physically pull harder starting from 4th gear on the road. I experience this all the time. I just do not feel as much hp and torque in first three gears. That's one way to tell MS3 has power reduction on those gears. Honda and Acura cars I have driven/test driven in the past were not like that. They had good power from low gears and stayed like that till you get to high speeds. The another way to find out is to plug in the AP computer and analyze the horsepower and torque figures on the runs, on physical road. It will tell you horsepower and torque on every gears, and everything else you need. That's how some of the MS3 owners know that there are physically the power reduction on this car in stock ECU map. Don't try to compare it against the "normal" cars like yours, G35, Accord, TL, whatever.. they don't have power cut once you disable the VSC but it doesn't work like that with the MS3. Look you are getting all educated now. I don't like the fact I'm sharing out such valuable information.


Not Dyno's in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, because if that's the case EVERYONE's cars are highway monsters. The fact that you are arguing that your car is faster from 100mph+ to what ever is beyond my comprehension. That has to be by far the stupidest thing I've heard you say..
Don't jump into conclusion without listening to what other poster has said, me, in this case. Therefore, you are the one acting stupid. Just returning a favor..


since the MS3 being a "demon" "supercar" which also makes me believe you have never driven ANYTHING but your car, noob to the enthusiast world, and extremely biased towards your car (understandable).
Now you are trolling. I have never said about it being "demon", although it is most certainly a "monster" on the highway. Trolling will get you nowhere.


low-mid 14 second car although capable of 13's stock.
It's the driver that makes all that difference. Some idiot can drive an MS3 that has no clue about proper shift points and can easily get mid 14 seconds or slower. But then once again, MS3 isn't made for drag racing. I have said this for the 3rd time now I think.


It traps 98-101 just like the TL. Comparing anything past 100 should be irrelevant since generally most street racers don't pass 100mph due to the chance of being caught by the police.
Comparing trap speed is inaccurate when comparing against different cars with different drivetrain. If you are comparing same car with different mods, then it is a good source to use. There are cars that trap 105 mph and runs much faster than the other car that traps the same 105 mph. C55 AMG for example, would smoke the IS350 and G37 in the roll races. They all have similar quarter mile trap speed.

Racing upto 100 mph is what I call "baby race". Nope, MS3 is still faster even long before you get to 100 in the roll race. 40-100 the MS3 will pull on you. Part of the reason is that it has the huge advantage in torque and weight. Try 50~ 125 or 140. Most highway runs are done in the speed ranging anywhere from 60-150. Many of them go past 100.


Your arguement that the MS3 is much faster on a roll could be true although from the cars specs and from what i read, you are over exaggerating how much faster.
It is not an exaggeration. It's the reality.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:13 AM
  #132  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by anx1300c
If you're talking about type-s09, he ran 13.9x @ 99.1x with an intake; it's on here somewhere. I don't see a base 6MT trapping over 100 without some decent mods.
Thank you.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:15 AM
  #133  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by anx1300c
If you're talking about type-s09, he ran 13.9x @ 99.1x with an intake; it's on here somewhere. I don't see a base 6MT trapping over 100 without some decent mods.
Yea I haven't seen 101 out of a stock TL. However, type-s09 had a UR pulley too when he ran that time
Sonnick is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:18 AM
  #134  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nova_G
OMG. This guy just said if they removed the boost cut in 3rd gear the 2010 MS3 would smoke the tires............................................. ....SPEECHLESS. Please close this thread due to ignorance and arrogance from this guy. The only thing he's good for is stirring up other members due to his biased belief's of his car even though all the data is there.
Actually in cool weather with summer tires it's easy to spin the tires even without the power cut on the MS3 on the street. This is no news. It appears you are the one being ignorant. You don't seem to know about the tires and how traction is affected in temperatures.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:27 AM
  #135  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
juruki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Age: 40
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Mazdaspeed3troll: do you join every car forum to praise your little MS3?
Highway demon! LOL
juruki is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:29 AM
  #136  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
The trap speed he posted is fraud?
Uh, that appears to be correct.

I wouldn't call it fraud at all. It might seem a little high but you act like its a crime that he posted his timeslips. The way Alex pulled on that GS350 he might be trapping that high.
You don't have to trap 106 mph to beat the GS350 from roll at high speeds. Trap speed has no relation to how different vehicles perform at rolling speeds. You can find a car that traps 100 mph and beat the GS350 from roll. And I do not believe the OP's trap speed. The trap box could have been inaccurate, or had a very strong tail wind, like I said earlier.


He would probobly give you a great run from a high roll in your MS3 since you can hang with cars that run 104-105 trap speeds.
If he can keep up with a 335i or C55 AMG he can give me a good run. Man that would require A LOT of mods for the TL to run that fast. I just don't see bolt-on mods such as intake and exhaust would boost that much. It's not realistic for N/A cars.

Plus even a strong tail wind isn't going to give you a 4MPH increase in trapspeed. You might be lucky to achieve a 1mph increase at best. When you race you want the weather to be in your favor. The colder it is and the drier it is the faster you will run. That isn't a crime!
I said tail wind with good weather. It's not just cold weather. Sounds like you have no understand of DA.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:42 AM
  #137  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
i thought you were toning it down. now your back to the same old troll.

the fact that you are arguing with IHC about track times is so ass backwards that i can even begin to explain it.

you say that u only roll race so it leads me to believe you have never even been down a 1/4 so how the fuck would you know how trap speeds affect races? i bet you dont even know where the nearest track is from your house.

i have a friend with a MS3 and he dynoed 230 whp to the wheels 264 wtq in 4th gear.
15psi in 3rd and 4th

10 psi in 1st and 2nd.

what you havent mentioned is that turning off DSC makes the car reach full boost in 1,2,3,4 gears; so all this bullshit is exactly that. bullshit.

so either GTFO or provide a point that is relevant to the thread.

im willing to bet that you dont even have an MS3. either that or you get ridiculed so hard on the MS3 boards that you have to come troll acurazine.

you talking shit to IHC about is auto TL is so funny considering your car is STOCK.
phee is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:50 AM
  #138  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sonnick
Mazda: Trap speed is not for children.
For inexperienced car enthusiasts / drivers, yes it is.


but it is a good comparison, and is probably the most accurate on what would happen from a dig. From a roll, yes it's a different story but it still holds weight.
It doesn't hold much I'm afraid.


I would still guarantee I would be right next to it @125mph.
Not with your car and setup. it's not enough to hang with a completely stock MS3 to 125 from roll either. The stock MS3 is faster than many people think. They have much better power to weight ratio, plus being turbo it just gets faster at high speeds. From dig you may likely beat me. From 20-80 probably very close. Rolling start at 20 mph you will get the advantage because I'm in the "POWER CUT ZONE". 50-100 I would be faster. Forget about trying to race to 125. I have beat the modified late model Mustang GT (stock one is 305 hp / 315 tq) at high speed roll. I walked him hard. The stock Mustang GT is a 104~ 105 mph trap car. Comparing trap speed is useless for roll racing different cars.


After that I shift into 5th and no my car doesn't pull much at all in 5th. And I don't care because who needs 5th gear to pull in their DD?
Long before you get to 5th gear I'm already faster. Your gears are too tall, even the 4th gear.


You're so worried about the power cut in the 1st 3 gears yet say keep insisting that a 40 roll is great. Explain that?
It's an idea start with 3rd gear as the power reduction isn't as bad as the first two. And the gears are so short I can get to 4th immediately. it doesn't take long time to get to the next gear like your car, or any other N/A Honda or Acura cars.


And wtf? You said that tho I add more power gearing stays constant. WHAT!? So you're telling me because the gearing is the same, I won't gain anything from my mods? I hope not.
Of course you gain power by modding the engine, but it won't get you to go as fast at higher speeds. You need a lot more power to overcome the tall gears that you have. Buick GN that I hate cars drive isn't as much issue as it has so much of hp and tq. But for your mods, it's not enough to make it go considerably faster. Stop thinking like your car is super fast. It's not fast at all.


Z06's don't even do that and they are lighter and have double the power in both HP and TQ....
Z06 is a RWD, and has wider set of tires. You too, don't seem to know about how temperatures affect tire traction.


I can't wait to find an MS3 just so I can laugh at how ignorant you sound.
Go to mazdaspeed forum and ask for a race. Someone nearby you may be glad to run with you.


I put down more power than an MS3 (with the exception of torque) and I have pretty aggressive gearing as well.
It's not just horsepower that determine final numbers. You have gear ratios as well as final drive ratios. I have the advantage in both! And on top of that, my car has better power to weight ratio. You can't keep up with a stock MS3. Forget about beating it.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:50 AM
  #139  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
i should also add that the ms3 has most of its available TQ so far high up in the powerband that the civic Si has a higher avg tq in its entire powerband..

anyone with half a lobe knows that peak power means nothing if your powerband looks like a capital N
phee is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:52 AM
  #140  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Uh, that appears to be correct.
Fraud? No
Equipment that isn't calibrated correctly? Possibly


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
You don't have to trap 106 mph to beat the GS350 from roll at high speeds. Trap speed has no relation to how different vehicles perform at rolling speeds. You can find a car that traps 100 mph and beat the GS350 from roll. And I do not believe the OP's trap speed. The trap box could have been inaccurate, or had a very strong tail wind, like I said earlier.
Trap speed is the closest indicator you have to how you will perform in a roll race. It isn't close to 100% accurate but it gives some insight. Again a very strong tail wind isn't going to give you a 4-5MPH increase in your trap speed. Non-calibrated equipment would.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
If he can keep up with a 335i or C55 AMG he can give me a good run. Man that would require A LOT of mods for the TL to run that fast. I just don't see bolt-on mods such as intake and exhaust would boost that much. It's not realistic for N/A cars..
Intake mods and exhaust mods gave sonnick a 40WHP increase from a normal stock Accord 6MT. He has his dyno to prove it. A TL would be in a similar category with sonnicks mods.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
I said tail wind with good weather. It's not just cold weather. Sounds like you have no understand of DA.
I definately understand DA. I live in tucson, az where the DA sucks! Good weather is cold weather and also dry weather! You don't want a hot and humid day. More likely its the non- calibrated equipment. Alex will have to run again for us to really know for sure.
SatinSilverAV6 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 11:58 AM
  #141  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
The stock MS3 is faster than many people think. They have much better power to weight ratio, plus being turbo it just gets faster at high speeds. From dig you may likely beat me. From 20-80 probably very close. Rolling start at 20 mph you will get the advantage because I'm in the "POWER CUT ZONE". 50-100 I would be faster. Forget about trying to race to 125. I have beat the modified late model Mustang GT (stock one is 305 hp / 315 tq) at high speed roll. I walked him hard. The stock Mustang GT is a 104~ 105 mph trap car. Comparing trap speed is useless for roll racing different cars.


.
I have never seen a 05+ GT Auto or Manual Stang stock hit more than 103MPH. Most are in the 101-103 range even on dragtimes.com. None have hit over 103MPH on that site. 1-3rd gear are for the 1/4 mile. The GT's 4th gear sucks. There is a race on youtube where they pit the 2011 Mustang V6 against the 2010 GT stang and the V6 starts pulling up top once the GT hits 3rd gear.

Last edited by SatinSilverAV6; 06-18-2010 at 12:00 PM.
SatinSilverAV6 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:06 PM
  #142  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by phee
i thought you were toning it down. now your back to the same old troll.
back to the old troll? what are you talking about?? This is my first time. Maybe you've got mixed up with someone else.


You say that u only roll race so it leads me to believe you have never even been down a 1/4 so how the fuck would you know how trap speeds affect races?
You guessed incorrectly. I bought the MS3 because it provides best performance bang for buck, and I'm not a rice fan boy. I roll race only on certain occasions and that is because that's what this car excels at. It is not built for drag racing. And I have no desire to race at the drag strip because of it. My strength is through experience and research, lots of reading. Also being intelligent helps. Most members here don't seem to know much about racing and has no understanding of gearing which is unfortunate...


i have a friend with a MS3 and he dynoed 230 whp to the wheels 264 wtq in 4th gear.
15psi in 3rd and 4th

10 psi in 1st and 2nd.

what you havent mentioned is that turning off DSC makes the car reach full boost in 1,2,3,4 gears; so all this bullshit is exactly that. bullshit.
I have already covered this in my previous posts. Read up again. No, turning off DSC has no effect on boost on MS3. The only thing it disable is the traction. With VSC On, it cuts even more power to keep from spinning. With Honda or Acura you disable VSC you get full power out of them. There is difference.


im willing to bet that you dont even have an MS3. either that or you get ridiculed so hard on the MS3 boards that you have to come troll acurazine.
It's more fun visiting other forums than my local mazda forum. It's about message deliverance. To teach them how MS3 works.


you talking shit to IHC about is auto TL is so funny considering your car is STOCK.
Automatic TL is a very slow car. It has one of the worst gearing in history, and it's a lame 5 speed transmission. The car is too heavy and torque-less. I was just stating the facts.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:08 PM
  #143  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by phee
i should also add that the ms3 has most of its available TQ so far high up in the powerband that the civic Si has a higher avg tq in its entire powerband..

anyone with half a lobe knows that peak power means nothing if your powerband looks like a capital N
MS3 doesn't have capital N power band. it's pretty descent actually. Torque comes before you get to 3k rpm and it stay up the higher you go. And having torque at high rpm isn't needed as the horsepower takes over the job at high end. You don't seem to know about engine power band.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:11 PM
  #144  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
phee is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:14 PM
  #145  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
MS3 doesn't have capital N power band. it's pretty descent actually. Torque comes before you get to 3k rpm and it stay up the higher you go. And having torque at high rpm isn't needed as the horsepower takes over the job at high end. You don't seem to know about engine power band.
who woulda thunk that horespower replaces torque at the high end!

im sure that calculation of horespower has nothing to do with tq at all.

FYI HP is calculated from torque and RPM, with a "constant" of 5,252.

HP = (torque X RPM) / 5252

therefore HP is a multiplicative of RPM and TQ, meaning that TQ is very much important in the high end.

fml. im done arguing with you, you just showed all of acurazine that you have no knowledge of engines. next time you claim that someone has no engine knowledge you should do your research.
phee is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:16 PM
  #146  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
You are making yourself frustrating when it's not frustrating.
Nice!


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
The discussion is new and something you aren't aware of, or don't have any clue about. Don't just make an assumption by saying it's a dumb discussion just because you have lack in understanding in this discussion. Think before posting. Thanks.
Oh? Not sure I quite understand what you're saying here...my argument was that this discussion about the MS3 being highly capable (according to you) in higher gears is dumb. Reason it's dumb is because it's dangerous (roll racing), not in the normal (especially if you need to be close to triple digit speeds), and only specific to your car (due to this boost cut which i'm still waiting for some links to back up your statement). Now as far as my lack of understanding according to you...what exactly don't I understand? That the MS3 is the Ferrari's/Lamborghini's long lost ugly cousin? Reading comprehension much? Or did the bias and fanboyism get to your heart/head?

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Stock MS3 does, physically pull harder starting from 4th gear on the road. I experience this all the time. I just do not feel as much hp and torque in first three gears. That's one way to tell MS3 has power reduction on those gears.
Links. We need verified proof not just your "feel"

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Honda and Acura cars I have driven/test driven in the past were not like that. They had good power from low gears and stayed like that till you get to high speeds. The another way to find out is to plug in the AP computer and analyze the horsepower and torque figures on the runs, on physical road. It will tell you horsepower and torque on every gears, and everything else you need. That's how some of the MS3 owners know that there are physically the power reduction on this car in stock ECU map. Don't try to compare it against the "normal" cars like yours, G35, Accord, TL, whatever.. they don't have power cut once you disable the VSC but it doesn't work like that with the MS3. Look you are getting all educated now. I don't like the fact I'm sharing out such valuable information.
That's because Honda's have very linear hp and a flat torque curve...while turbos usually have to spool. For some reason I have this feeling that if you were to drive an E9x M3 you would still feel like your MS3 could pull...Perhaps you don't understand the basic difference between an N/A engine and a FI'd engine? Hit the books. BTW, i think what you mean by plugging in to the AP computer and analyze the HP/TQ figures is "data logging" .

I'm glad my car looks normal because sometimes cars that are out of the norm like your's for example, makes people want to throw up or smile back in your case, could be both LOL

BTW, still waiting on links to provided your claims.

Originally Posted by mazdasped3God
Don't jump into conclusion without listening to what other poster has said, me, in this case. Therefore, you are the one acting stupid. Just returning a favor..
Worthless discussion stay on topic.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3
Now you are trolling. I have never said about it being "demon", although it is most certainly a "monster" on the highway. Trolling will get you nowhere.
Making yourself look worst by the minute. I'm the one who's trolling? How exactly did Alex's 1/4 run turn into your MS3 being a highway demon? Put two and two together (which may be hard for you) and you can clearly see who the troll is.


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3
It's the driver that makes all that difference. Some idiot can drive an MS3 that has no clue about proper shift points and can easily get mid 14 seconds or slower. But then once again, MS3 isn't made for drag racing. I have said this for the 3rd time now I think.
Re-read my post you're not getting it. I can tell comprehension is not your forte. I guess the "demon" has taken over your body

Originally Posted by mazdaspee3God
Comparing trap speed is inaccurate when comparing against different cars with different drivetrain. If you are comparing same car with different mods, then it is a good source to use. There are cars that trap 105 mph and runs much faster than the other car that traps the same 105 mph. C55 AMG for example, would smoke the IS350 and G37 in the roll races. They all have similar quarter mile trap speed.
Ignorance. Get back to the basics and hit the books you clearly don't understand anything.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3
Racing upto 100 mph is what I call "baby race". Nope, MS3 is still faster even long before you get to 100 in the roll race. 40-100 the MS3 will pull on you. Part of the reason is that it has the huge advantage in torque and weight. Try 50~ 125 or 140. Most highway runs are done in the speed ranging anywhere from 60-150. Many of them go past 100.
Just plain stupid. I'm sorry but i'm really not trying to "verbally attack" you but this post is just plain stupid. I'm almost sure 99% of forum members agree with me on this one.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
It is not an exaggeration. It's the reality.
Your reality. But for the rest of us normal car enthusiast, we all know how it really goes down.

BTW, please don't try to "educate" people when clearly you are so ignorant and arrogant that you don't see your own faults. Everyone here knows your as ignorant as they come so you are hardly "schooling" anyone. You are so into your belief that it has made you narrow minded.
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:19 PM
  #147  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Trap speed is the closest indicator you have to how you will perform in a roll race.
It doesn't. The best indicator would be study your vehicle's weight and gearing as well as power delivery. Trap speed is useless for comparing different cars from roll application.


It isn't close to 100% accurate but it gives some insight. Again a very strong tail wind isn't going to give you a 4-5MPH increase in your trap speed. Non-calibrated equipment would.
You seem to have trouble comprehending what I said earlier. I said in combination of tail wind and weather all in your favor. And tail wind alone can certainly affect more than 1 mph you are keep claiming. Also it changes depending on how strong the tail wind is. There are tail winds that travel 5 mph, or 40 mph.


Intake mods and exhaust mods gave sonnick a 40WHP increase from a normal stock Accord 6MT. He has his dyno to prove it. A TL would be in a similar category with sonnicks mods.
If his is really putting out 40 additional hp then it may run close to stock MS3. I still find hard to believe those mods add that much power on N/A cars like on Accord. Hope that claim isn't an exaggeration.


I definately understand DA. I live in tucson, az where the DA sucks! Good weather is cold weather and also dry weather! You don't want a hot and humid day. More likely its the non- calibrated equipment. Alex will have to run again for us to really know for sure.
DA is more to it than just that. You have barometric pressure as well as altitude that comes into play. it's not just simple dry Hot | Cold weather.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:20 PM
  #148  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by phee
who woulda thunk that horespower replaces torque at the high end!

im sure that calculation of horespower has nothing to do with tq at all.

FYI HP is calculated from torque and RPM, with a "constant" of 5,252.

HP = (torque X RPM) / 5252

therefore HP is a multiplicative of RPM and TQ, meaning that TQ is very much important in the high end.

fml. im done arguing with you, you just showed all of acurazine that you have no knowledge of engines. next time you claim that someone has no engine knowledge you should do your research.
He's probably taking notes on the forumla
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:21 PM
  #149  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Ms3
3.538:1
2.238:1
1.535:1
1.171:1
1.085:1
0.853:1
3.538:1

tl
3.933
2.478
1.700
1.250
0.975
0.770
4.008

Who has shorter gears?

Shorter
1st-TL
2nd-TL
3rd-MS3
4th-TL
5th-MS3
6th-MS3

looks like the tl would basically be ther faster car off the line all the way to the end of 4th which is about 127 mph and by then it will be too far ahead for an MS3 to play catch up.

even from a 3rd gear roll the tl will be in its powerband when the MS3 has to shift giving the tl about 1.5k more to gain on it and equal out the distance. (if the MS3 gains any distance due to its lower HP output and we all know that HP is the only factor at high rpm ranges)

Last edited by phee; 06-18-2010 at 12:30 PM.
phee is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:32 PM
  #150  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nova_G
Oh? Not sure I quite understand what you're saying here...my argument was that this discussion about the MS3 being highly capable (according to you) in higher gears is dumb.
It is not dumb. You are wanting to say it's dumb because you don't like hearing the fact that the MS3 excels at higher speeds due to its engineering on gearing and power.


Reason it's dumb is because it's dangerous (roll racing), not in the normal (especially if you need to be close to triple digit speeds)
Any type of racing is dangerous. What makes you think racing from dig is safe? The act of racing is bad to begin with. You need to try better than that, young one.


Now as far as my lack of understanding according to you...what exactly don't I understand? That the MS3 is the Ferrari's/Lamborghini's long lost ugly cousin? Reading comprehension much? Or did the bias and fanboyism get to your heart/head?
You don't seem to understand that how boost cut affects trap speed. And you don't seem to understand that turbo cars with close gearing requires power cut from the ECU to keep it from torque-steer. For N/A cars like yours, it's not an issue. You don't seem to understand short gearing vs tall gearing. Not all cars work the same way due to the complexity of gearing, power, and the drivetrain. ECU has to get mapped differently for different cars. And you jump into conclusions too easily.


Links. We need verified proof not just your "feel"
Did you not read the rest of the paragraph there? Try to read thoroughly and completely before hitting that "Reply" button. Sounds like you are shaking. Relax.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:36 PM
  #151  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
It doesn't. The best indicator would be study your vehicle's weight and gearing as well as power delivery. Trap speed is useless for comparing different cars from roll application..
It does. Trap speed has to do with Vehicles weight and gearing as well as power. How is trapspeed useless?


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
You seem to have trouble comprehending what I said earlier. I said in combination of tail wind and weather all in your favor. And tail wind alone can certainly affect more than 1 mph you are keep claiming. Also it changes depending on how strong the tail wind is. There are tail winds that travel 5 mph, or 40 mph. .
I don't have any trouble comprehending. For example if you are at Sea Level and have a hot and humid day with no tail wind vs a cold and dry day with a 40MPH tail wind there isn't going to be a 4 or 5MPH difference in trapspeed.



Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
If his is really putting out 40 additional hp then it may run close to stock MS3. I still find hard to believe those mods add that much power on N/A cars like on Accord. Hope that claim isn't an exaggeration..
Check out his dyno. He just posted it today on this website. 255whp Find it as hard to believe as you want.



Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
DA is more to it than just that. You have barometric pressure as well as altitude that comes into play. it's not just simple dry Hot | Cold weather.
Yes I know. Hence why I said I live in Tucson, AZ with a crappy DA. We are at 3075ft elevation. How do you think I got my 1/4 mile correction? I used the DA calculator and entered in my Elevation, Barametric pressure, current temp oh and don't forget reletive humidity.

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php

Here is the link in case you need a lesson
SatinSilverAV6 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:43 PM
  #152  
i am so smart S M R T
 
01clsstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Age: 42
Posts: 630
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thumbs down sigh

i wish i had that 5 minutes of my life back before i read this thread. On a side note mazdaspeed3god's english is pretty good. How long have you been in the country?
01clsstock is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 12:54 PM
  #153  
FTW
 
lusid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TC, MN
Age: 41
Posts: 1,631
Received 84 Likes on 45 Posts
I couldn't scroll fast enough to get to the bottom of the page.... stop feeding the troll lol. GOOD LORD! I hate mazda's now.
lusid is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:02 PM
  #154  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
It is not dumb. You are wanting to say it's dumb because you don't like hearing the fact that the MS3 excels at higher speeds due to its engineering on gearing and power.
READING COMPREHENSION re read my post

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3GoD
Any type of racing is dangerous. What makes you think racing from dig is safe? The act of racing is bad to begin with. You need to try better than that, young one.
At least road racing/drag racing is at a controlled environment and doesn't endanger by standers who choose not to be involved with any type of racing. I know I'm young but i feel pretty comfortable when I say my intelligence is far beyond you can comprehend in the car world. But thanks for pointing out my age (like its supposed to be a deciding factor on the argument)


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
You don't seem to understand that how boost cut affects trap speed. And you don't seem to understand that turbo cars with close gearing requires power cut from the ECU to keep it from torque-steer. For N/A cars like yours, it's not an issue. You don't seem to understand short gearing vs tall gearing. Not all cars work the same way due to the complexity of gearing, power, and the drivetrain. ECU has to get mapped differently for different cars. And you jump into conclusions too easily.
Forget it i'm sure the mods will agree with me on the fact that we are trying to enlighten YOU but it's mentally impossible for you to understand.

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Did you not read the rest of the paragraph there? Try to read thoroughly and completely before hitting that "Reply" button. Sounds like you are shaking. Relax.
Did you read? Still waiting on the LINKS my god. How old are you?
nova_G is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:22 PM
  #155  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Some gems I learned from this thread...

A TL trapping 105mph is not believable but.....

A ms3 will smoke the tires in 3rd without imaginary power cut.

A ms3 will beat cars from a 40mph roll that absolutely humiliate it in the 1/4 and trap higher.

A ms3 pulls harder in 4th than it does in 1st.

Trap speeds are irrelevent for comparing how cars will do against one another in a roll race.

260 ms3 hp are greater than 340+ Ford or Mercedes hp.

The ms3 is the only car to dyno more in 4th than 3rd gear.



Ms3 guy, how many times have you raced at the track? You have so much to learn.
I hate cars is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:32 PM
  #156  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
^^ Thank you for making me "Lol" @ work

Mazda I never claimed my Accord was super fast. All I said was that it would be right next to or creep on your stock MS3. So, by putting 2 and 2 together, it seems like YOU think the MS3 is 'super fast.'
Sonnick is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:38 PM
  #157  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
juruki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Age: 40
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
^^ its a highway monster
LOL
juruki is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:42 PM
  #158  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
It is not dumb. You are wanting to say it's dumb because you don't like hearing the fact that the MS3 excels at higher speeds due to its engineering on gearing and power.
Yes, the ms3 engineers are the only ones that know how to match powerband to gears.
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Any type of racing is dangerous. What makes you think racing from dig is safe? The act of racing is bad to begin with. You need to try better than that, young one.
You don't understand how racing from 0mph is safer than racing from 80-150mph? So sad.


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
You don't seem to understand that how boost cut affects trap speed. And you don't seem to understand that turbo cars with close gearing requires power cut from the ECU to keep it from torque-steer. For N/A cars like yours, it's not an issue. You don't seem to understand short gearing vs tall gearing. Not all cars work the same way due to the complexity of gearing, power, and the drivetrain. ECU has to get mapped differently for different cars. And you jump into conclusions too easily.
Point being, there is no boost cut whatsoever after second gear and I'm not so sure about that. Post up some literature stating there's some sort of power reduction in 3rd.

It doesn't matter if it's turbo hp or NA hp. It's still only 260hp.

Close gearing makes no difference in traction, only overall gearing and after you're past 1st gear it's irrelevent because you can't spin them anyway.


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Did you not read the rest of the paragraph there? Try to read thoroughly and completely before hitting that "Reply" button. Sounds like you are shaking. Relax.
Classic "manual transmission". Don't think you're fooling those of us that have been around for a while.
I hate cars is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:45 PM
  #159  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nova_G
Making yourself look worst by the minute. I'm the one who's trolling? How exactly did Alex's 1/4 run turn into your MS3 being a highway demon? Put two and two together (which may be hard for you) and you can clearly see who the troll is.
You haven't talked anything technically. The only thing I see in your posts is filled with insults and trolling. You have do much doubts why don't you visit mazdaspeedforum and ask them around? You don't believe me, there are others to get you to understand.. It doesn't really bother me as i know the fact and don't care if you believe it. You are not my threat, sorry. Nice try though.


Ignorance. Get back to the basics and hit the books you clearly don't understand anything.
I already have. I am highly educated and experienced. You on the other hand is not. You are also very young too, age of 22. Listen, I'm not into playing with the trolls. this is not my area. If you keep trolling like this I will have to just ignore ya.



Just plain stupid. I'm sorry but i'm really not trying to "verbally attack" you but this post is just plain stupid. I'm almost sure 99% of forum members agree with me on this one.
It's not stupid. This is very important discussion. Unfortunately many people don't know this.


Your reality. But for the rest of us normal car enthusiast, we all know how it really goes down.
It doesn't. You are just not wanting to hear the fact. You are not liking what I have to say.


BTW, please don't try to "educate" people when clearly you are so ignorant and arrogant that you don't see your own faults. Everyone here knows your as ignorant as they come so you are hardly "schooling" anyone. You are so into your belief that it has made you narrow minded.
Actually I'm the one with broad mind. Think bigger, more broad. The amount of experience is in question.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 01:50 PM
  #160  
Banned
 
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nova_G
Did you read? Still waiting on the LINKS my god. How old are you?
You have not read everything I have said. Do you have any idea what AP is? Sounds like you don't know it, hence you completely ignored that part of my answer. It's such losers that have so much doubts.. Sounds like you are the one needs reading.
mazdaspeed3God is offline  


Quick Reply: 13.998@106.04mph - 05 TL 6MT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.