07-08 TL-s Vs. 97-01 Prelude Sh handling
#1
07-08 TL-s Vs. 97-01 Prelude Sh handling
New member here. I have joined your great site because i have narrowed down my next choice for my next car to be a TL-S 6spd man.
I currently drive a 97 Prelude type Sh and i have become bored of it after owning it for 5 years. I need something faster, luxurious, 4 doors, and better looking.
the TL-S fills that spot and my question to you is how a TL-S's handling compares to a prelude. My favorite feature of my lude besides the looks is the handling.
Does a TL-S handle better, much better, or the same and what are the differences?
also does the gearbox feel nice and firm when shifting?
thank you,
I currently drive a 97 Prelude type Sh and i have become bored of it after owning it for 5 years. I need something faster, luxurious, 4 doors, and better looking.
the TL-S fills that spot and my question to you is how a TL-S's handling compares to a prelude. My favorite feature of my lude besides the looks is the handling.
Does a TL-S handle better, much better, or the same and what are the differences?
also does the gearbox feel nice and firm when shifting?
thank you,
#3
While the TL-S is a nice car, good looking, carry 5, probably faster acceleration, but you can't expect it to have better handling than your Prelude SH in terms of handling, i am not saying TL's not fast on the track, but it definitely understeer more than prelude on the limit.
After all, one is a 4 door sedan, or sport sedan whatever you call, the other one is a 2 door sport coupe. Other than handling i guess TL's pretty much better in everything, better sound insulation, newer interior, leather, navi, 6 speed.
I personally like the Tl's clutch and gear box feeling lot better, but that's just me.
Both are good cars in their time and their class.
After all, one is a 4 door sedan, or sport sedan whatever you call, the other one is a 2 door sport coupe. Other than handling i guess TL's pretty much better in everything, better sound insulation, newer interior, leather, navi, 6 speed.
I personally like the Tl's clutch and gear box feeling lot better, but that's just me.
Both are good cars in their time and their class.
#4
While the TL-S is a nice car, good looking, carry 5, probably faster acceleration, but you can't expect it to have better handling than your Prelude SH in terms of handling, i am not saying TL's not fast on the track, but it definitely understeer more than prelude on the limit.
After all, one is a 4 door sedan, or sport sedan whatever you call, the other one is a 2 door sport coupe. Other than handling i guess TL's pretty much better in everything, better sound insulation, newer interior, leather, navi, 6 speed.
I personally like the Tl's clutch and gear box feeling lot better, but that's just me.
Both are good cars in their time and their class.
After all, one is a 4 door sedan, or sport sedan whatever you call, the other one is a 2 door sport coupe. Other than handling i guess TL's pretty much better in everything, better sound insulation, newer interior, leather, navi, 6 speed.
I personally like the Tl's clutch and gear box feeling lot better, but that's just me.
Both are good cars in their time and their class.
i hope it is not too much understeer. My mom has a base 04 camry and that thing understeers like a mofo. I hope the Tl-S does not have understeering like that.
the lude gets very little understeer for a FWD, but my biggest gripe is torque, i need more power in the low revs and thats where the J35 comes in.
#7
very hard to find a 6mt tl-s thats close to me. All autos around my area.
I might just make another long trip to test drive a 6mt, or just wait until the day that i'm ready to pull the trigger.
the other day i made an 80 mile trip to test drive a 6mt, i showed up and was told the car was getting touch ups and not available for test drives. i was pissed
Trending Topics
#8
Haha, the camry, i know what you're talking about.
TL or TL-S definitely won't understeer like those Camry or Avalon. All MT TL has LSD after all, and suspension is not so toyota boat like.
Torque? oh yeah the 3.2 and 3.5 will give you way more low end torque than the H22. Have you ever considered a non-type S? I personally think the 3.2 is enough. Members here have claimed MT 3.2 is faster than Auto 3.5!
Off topic, i still like the H22, rev happy
TL or TL-S definitely won't understeer like those Camry or Avalon. All MT TL has LSD after all, and suspension is not so toyota boat like.
Torque? oh yeah the 3.2 and 3.5 will give you way more low end torque than the H22. Have you ever considered a non-type S? I personally think the 3.2 is enough. Members here have claimed MT 3.2 is faster than Auto 3.5!
Off topic, i still like the H22, rev happy
#9
Haha, the camry, i know what you're talking about.
TL or TL-S definitely won't understeer like those Camry or Avalon. All MT TL has LSD after all, and suspension is not so toyota boat like.
Torque? oh yeah the 3.2 and 3.5 will give you way more low end torque than the H22. Have you ever considered a non-type S? I personally think the 3.2 is enough. Members here have claimed MT 3.2 is faster than Auto 3.5!
Off topic, i still like the H22, rev happy
TL or TL-S definitely won't understeer like those Camry or Avalon. All MT TL has LSD after all, and suspension is not so toyota boat like.
Torque? oh yeah the 3.2 and 3.5 will give you way more low end torque than the H22. Have you ever considered a non-type S? I personally think the 3.2 is enough. Members here have claimed MT 3.2 is faster than Auto 3.5!
Off topic, i still like the H22, rev happy
I must have the type-s. The rims, navigation, back up camera, tails, j35, red gauges, and KBP!!!
the h22 is a good engine. It's nothing special under 4,500 rpm but its a raped ape after the 4,500. That engine just begs to be driven hard. very rev happy and takes tons of abuse.
probably gonna keep the lude for work transportation, and keep the tl-s for the weekends and for the females.
#11
#12
You can't really compare a 2 door sports car with a 4 door. It probably drives like a boat to you on your first drive since you are used to a prelude. That was my first impression on the car. TL even a S is an entry level luxury sedan that's fast, good looking and handles decent. If that's what you are looking for you won't be disappointed. If you are seeking a great handling car you should probably look at BMW 3's.
#13
RPF1+RS3 FTW
iTrader: (6)
1997 Prelude Type SH
Skidpad: .89g
Slalom: 66.6mph
Source: http://motortrend.automotive.com/745...-sh/index.html
2008 Acura TL Type S
Skidpad: .91g
Slalom: 66.0mph
Source: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=4460
Seem like a pretty good numbers for a "car that drives like a boat". (Note: My car does not drive like a boat )
#14
Instructor
I currently own (AUTO) WDP 04 acura tl, but honesttly i missed my 94 V-TECH prelude 5 speeds.
Stick shift is more fun and my prelude handling better than my TL (SHOULD HAVE GOT THE 6 spd TL ).
TL-S IS THE WAY TO GO MAN
I DO LOVE THE TL MORE BECAUSE LUXURIOUS MORE COMFORTABLE.
https://acurazine.com/forums/picture...pictureid=9544
Stick shift is more fun and my prelude handling better than my TL (SHOULD HAVE GOT THE 6 spd TL ).
TL-S IS THE WAY TO GO MAN
I DO LOVE THE TL MORE BECAUSE LUXURIOUS MORE COMFORTABLE.
https://acurazine.com/forums/picture...pictureid=9544
#15
Maybe you can't but I can, lets look at some numbers:
1997 Prelude Type SH
Skidpad: .89g
Slalom: 66.6mph
Source: http://motortrend.automotive.com/745...-sh/index.html
2008 Acura TL Type S
Skidpad: .91g
Slalom: 66.0mph
Source: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=4460
Seem like a pretty good numbers for a "car that drives like a boat". (Note: My car does not drive like a boat )
1997 Prelude Type SH
Skidpad: .89g
Slalom: 66.6mph
Source: http://motortrend.automotive.com/745...-sh/index.html
2008 Acura TL Type S
Skidpad: .91g
Slalom: 66.0mph
Source: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=4460
Seem like a pretty good numbers for a "car that drives like a boat". (Note: My car does not drive like a boat )
good find.
#16
Maybe you can't but I can, lets look at some numbers:
1997 Prelude Type SH
Skidpad: .89g
Slalom: 66.6mph
Source: http://motortrend.automotive.com/745...-sh/index.html
2008 Acura TL Type S
Skidpad: .91g
Slalom: 66.0mph
Source: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=4460
Seem like a pretty good numbers for a "car that drives like a boat". (Note: My car does not drive like a boat )
1997 Prelude Type SH
Skidpad: .89g
Slalom: 66.6mph
Source: http://motortrend.automotive.com/745...-sh/index.html
2008 Acura TL Type S
Skidpad: .91g
Slalom: 66.0mph
Source: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=4460
Seem like a pretty good numbers for a "car that drives like a boat". (Note: My car does not drive like a boat )
#17
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
My sister used to have a 97 Prelude. Decent little car but drove like a go cart. I guess my point is you cant really compare the Prelude to a newer TL as they are completely different cars. I came from a Corvette Z06 so I know all about handling and acceleration and I am 100% happy with my 07 non type S TL. Im not sure how much of a difference 30 HP will feel like between the type S and non type S. That isnt much HP difference.
Also, just curious do you race the car or something? For everyday driving I dont see why handling would be of much concern. The TL will be more than sufficient for everyday spirited driving!! I love mine!
Also, just curious do you race the car or something? For everyday driving I dont see why handling would be of much concern. The TL will be more than sufficient for everyday spirited driving!! I love mine!
#18
I too owned a Prelude 98&01. Both were base, 98 was manual, 01 was auto. In terms of handling the TL is a little more ponderous, mine is an 06 auto. I have swapped out wheels for staggered 19's 255front and 275 rear, also have slotted rotors and carbon ceramic pads. The handling now is great, not like a Prelude by any means, but much better. The prelude was an awesome car and I still miss my 98 today! The TSX is a slower car, however, i think that it drives more like a 4door prelude...although slower. In the end the TL is a great car and I highly recommend it.... You'll miss the lude!!
#20
OP: if you ever need a replacement ATTS unit for the SH lude, I have a good low mileage part for sale.
The 3G is not "boat like" handling. They stiffened the susp a bit from the 2G. Lexus LS, now that's like a boat.
If your looking to do serious performance/engine mods, I would look into getting a mint, older 6MT TSX.
The 3G is not "boat like" handling. They stiffened the susp a bit from the 2G. Lexus LS, now that's like a boat.
If your looking to do serious performance/engine mods, I would look into getting a mint, older 6MT TSX.
#21
I am not even gonna say what a TSX felt like on my test drive. I'll give you a quote from the salesman though, "if you shift at a lower RPM it's not as bad".
Last edited by Cerezo; 04-14-2009 at 05:19 PM.
#22
I too owned a Prelude 98&01. Both were base, 98 was manual, 01 was auto. In terms of handling the TL is a little more ponderous, mine is an 06 auto. I have swapped out wheels for staggered 19's 255front and 275 rear, also have slotted rotors and carbon ceramic pads. The handling now is great, not like a Prelude by any means, but much better. The prelude was an awesome car and I still miss my 98 today! The TSX is a slower car, however, i think that it drives more like a 4door prelude...although slower. In the end the TL is a great car and I highly recommend it.... You'll miss the lude!!
or do u mean tsx?
read it again. i get it now
Last edited by IWANTMYTL-S; 04-15-2009 at 03:54 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM