Hondata vs. KTuner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2019, 05:02 PM
  #81  
User Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
leomio85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Age: 38
Posts: 1,011
Received 381 Likes on 235 Posts
I could be completely wrong, but I don't think anything OTA would effect the tune. More than likely OTA updates are simply an update to the infotainment and other possible software updates. Things like the ECU tune that controls AFR and timing are firmware, which requires you to be plugged into the OBDII to make the changes.

That being said, I'm sure you'd notice the power drop off if the tune did get wiped from an OTA update.
Old 10-30-2019, 07:11 PM
  #82  
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MPLS, MN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
An OTA update would be incredibly risky to do for the ECU. Brick the infotainment and the car still will drive. Brick the ECU and ...
Old 10-30-2019, 07:59 PM
  #83  
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MPLS, MN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Looks like the latest version of the Ktuner SW is 1.0.9.2. Here is the version history but it doesn't say the RDX is in it from what I can tell u

Version History

Version 1.0.8.5 is when RDX support was added.
Old 10-31-2019, 07:54 AM
  #84  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by wavshrdr
Looks like the latest version of the Ktuner SW is 1.0.9.2. Here is the version history but it doesn't say the RDX is in it from what I can tell u

Version History

Version 1.0.8.5 is when RDX support was added.
the Software Version Description, or SVD, is just going to tell you changes from the last version. RDX was added in 1.0.8.5 and there have been no changes for RDX since then. I did not see a date next to the version on the website, am I missing something? That is somewhat important.. just say'in

They update quite a few vehicles, with all sorts of enhancements, which may make into the RDX. hopefully..

Last edited by Funz51; 10-31-2019 at 07:59 AM.
Old 10-31-2019, 08:18 AM
  #85  
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MPLS, MN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
I didn't see the tune in the version control list for the 2020 RDX but I don't know the associated ECU numbers and they are different than the 2019's. They were added about a month ago. Likely they might have just ported most of the tune over from the 2019 code.

From the times I drove it, the tune seemed pretty solid. I just wish the very solid midrange pull extended into the top end. It seems stock and tuned this motor is less of a revver than I would expect. Maybe there are some significant breathing limitation for high RPM HP. I've been tracking my car stock and it almost never shifts much beyond 6k at WOT.
Old 10-31-2019, 08:39 AM
  #86  
Advanced
 
not2envy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: FL
Age: 38
Posts: 87
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by wavshrdr
I didn't see the tune in the version control list for the 2020 RDX but I don't know the associated ECU numbers and they are different than the 2019's. They were added about a month ago. Likely they might have just ported most of the tune over from the 2019 code.

From the times I drove it, the tune seemed pretty solid. I just wish the very solid midrange pull extended into the top end. It seems stock and tuned this motor is less of a revver than I would expect. Maybe there are some significant breathing limitation for high RPM HP. I've been tracking my car stock and it almost never shifts much beyond 6k at WOT.
Maybe a upgraded intercooler and intake when they become available would help it rev out more. plus upgraded down pipe
Old 11-11-2019, 06:07 PM
  #87  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by Funz51
I will report on the stage 2 burn soon, including MPG, butt-kick measurement, rpm hanging and general 'normal' driving experience (traffic and otherwise). So far, with only some tooling around and a few WOT's, I find it awesome. Not only the power increase, but the way it handles itself with normal launches from 0, 10, and 30 mph. Very well done so far.

...also, which was mentioned by someone before, the brakes appear to be harder, and the sport steering is a bit tighter. i assume it is because they used the latest factory ECU settings as a base. My original ECU was A88.
... and I used Parallels running Win10 on my Mac laptop to burn the V1.2/ECU.
Update on stage 2 tune. The throttle delay is not gone. It comes and goes just like factory, but is less noticable. Again, this points to the tranny reaction more than the ECU tune.
The mpg of stage 2 tune did not change from factory tune. If you don't keep mashing that pedal, the tune keeps the car in as high a gear as possible and feels conservative, but it reacts faster from a mash. And when you mash, and you are moving, the turbo feels already spun up, or spins up faster/earlier, along with the 60 more lbs of torque.
I did not do any 0-60 times at this time. The published hp and torque curves should explain alot.
Old 11-11-2019, 07:05 PM
  #88  
Racer
 
Burger Steak & Eggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 377
Received 59 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by Funz51
The throttle delay is not gone.
I am disappointed.
Old 11-11-2019, 07:47 PM
  #89  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by Burger Steak & Eggs
I am disappointed.
Yeah, so am I. It is a lot less though, just not gone. And again inconsistent.
Old 11-13-2019, 04:18 PM
  #90  
Burning Brakes
 
sonyfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,117
Received 378 Likes on 262 Posts
FYI, I found my old OBDII scanner can read calibration identification. To my surprise, the ID is 5YF-A860. Not sure what's going on as my ECU part number is A87...
Old 11-15-2019, 10:29 AM
  #91  
Racer
 
lil12002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 436
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Side question here. If you go with the stage II do you need to keep the k tuner control gauge connected while using the car?
Old 11-15-2019, 10:45 AM
  #92  
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MPLS, MN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Everything can be removed after you load the tune. The Ktuner does have data logging capability though that can help you see what is actually going on such as knock counter to see if you have any issues with your fuel quality. For the v1_2 you'll need a laptop to collect and view this data.
The following users liked this post:
Funz51 (11-15-2019)
Old 11-24-2019, 07:33 PM
  #93  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Ktuner 1.0.9.3 is now available. It says it includes the 2020 RDX tune.
The following users liked this post:
SpaceBot (11-24-2019)
Old 12-26-2019, 07:28 PM
  #94  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Ktuner version 1.0.9.4 is now available.
Old 12-29-2019, 01:01 AM
  #95  
Burning Brakes
 
sonyfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,117
Received 378 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by Funz51
Ktuner version 1.0.9.4 is now available.
Can you check the ECU SW version in this release? It can be found in calibration ID under ECU info, if Ktuner software is similar to FlashPro.
Old 12-29-2019, 10:53 AM
  #96  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by sonyfever
Can you check the ECU SW version in this release? It can be found in calibration ID under ECU info, if Ktuner software is similar to FlashPro.
What does Flashpro show?
Old 12-29-2019, 11:01 AM
  #97  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by sonyfever
Can you check the ECU SW version in this release? It can be found in calibration ID under ECU info, if Ktuner software is similar to FlashPro.
ECU Version for Ktuner 1.0.9.4

The following users liked this post:
sonyfever (12-30-2019)
Old 02-22-2020, 03:34 PM
  #98  
Expanse me
 
Funz51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 877
Received 299 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by Funz51
ECU Version for Ktuner 1.0.9.4
Update.... ktuner 1.0.9.6 ecu version is A88.
Old 02-22-2020, 04:19 PM
  #99  
Burning Brakes
 
sonyfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,117
Received 378 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by Funz51
Update.... ktuner 1.0.9.6 ecu version is A88.
Thanks for the info. For 2019 RDX, FlashPro has been using A88 since 3.4.8 from Nov last year. Just an observation, no good or bad as both systems eventually use the latest version from Acura.
Old 04-25-2021, 02:11 AM
  #100  
Burning Brakes
 
sonyfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,117
Received 378 Likes on 262 Posts
Found this post from Derek@IMW comparing the two tuning options:

https://www.imwtuned.com/blog/what-to-choose

Last edited by sonyfever; 04-25-2021 at 02:21 AM.
The following users liked this post:
SpaceBot (04-26-2021)
Old 04-27-2021, 01:41 PM
  #101  
Instructor
 
NBPDC505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 41
Posts: 189
Received 115 Likes on 66 Posts
Seeing this list before in a post from Derek is what steered me to Ktuner for mine. Used Hondata on all of my previous vehicles, but for the new DI turbo cars Ktuner looks to be the best path forward.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cu2Suspect
2G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
17
01-14-2014 03:08 PM
manman007
1G RDX DIY & FAQ
2
11-09-2012 09:01 AM
gungho_15
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
3
05-04-2011 08:42 AM
Habu
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
49
03-18-2011 04:57 PM
Twisteds2k
1G TSX (2004-2008)
4
08-17-2006 09:49 PM



Quick Reply: Hondata vs. KTuner?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.