A-Spec and Advance Std. features!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2018 | 03:22 PM
  #161  
ZipSpeed's Avatar
There are four lights!
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 509
Likes: 215
From: Calgary, Canada
Originally Posted by MTD
Me too. It does however have the vent seats and 16 speaker stereo which I wanted. I wear polarized glasses and Ive read you cant see the HUD with those types of glasses on.
Yeah, I never owned a vehicle with a HUD before, so I guess I will never know what I'm missing out! I do listen to lots of music and if I'd have to choose between the two, I'd take the nicer audio system.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 03:26 PM
  #162  
mcrompton's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 69
Originally Posted by cmac1212
That's the exact same fuel economy as the TLX. https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymo...cura_TLX.shtml. What document is that from?

You can find them here:

https://www.acuratrainingguide.com/training-guide
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 03:45 PM
  #163  
hondu's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 56
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by mcrompton
That link shows

FWD
22/28/24
22/27/24 (A-spec)

4WD
21/27/23
21/26/23 (A-spec)
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #164  
mcrompton's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 69
Originally Posted by hondu
That link shows

FWD
22/28/24
22/27/24 (A-spec)

4WD
21/27/23
21/26/23 (A-spec)
There’s two documents that conflict with each other on there. So maybe not final MPG yet?
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 04:06 PM
  #165  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
Originally Posted by hondu
That link shows

FWD
22/28/24
22/27/24 (A-spec)

4WD
21/27/23
21/26/23 (A-spec)
Yep - first column FWD, second SH-AWD.



Last edited by HotRodW; May 22, 2018 at 04:08 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 04:25 PM
  #166  
iutodd's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 339
Likes: 118
So...these numbers are somewhat disappointing but not wholly terrible I guess. Some competitive numbers:

BMW X3: 22/29/25
Q5: 23/27/25
RDX FWD: 22/28/24
XC60 T5: 22/28/24
GLC300 4MATIC: 21/28/24
F-PACE: 22/27/24
RDX SHAWD: 21/27/23
XC60 T6: 21/27/23
Lexus RX350AWD: 19/26/22
Cadillac XT5 AWD: 18/25/21
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 04:51 PM
  #167  
Madd Dog's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,026
From: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by MTD
Me too. It does however have the vent seats and 16 speaker stereo which I wanted. I wear polarized glasses and Ive read you cant see the HUD with those types of glasses on.
Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
Yeah, I never owned a vehicle with a HUD before, so I guess I will never know what I'm missing out! I do listen to lots of music and if I'd have to choose between the two, I'd take the nicer audio system.
Yes polarized lenses hide the HUD.

I was at a BMW drivers event, and was able to drive an X3 on the road on a pre-programmed nav route with waypoints. I was surprised that there was no HUD on a loaded demonstration car, then it hit me that I have polarized sunglasses on. So I took them off, and there was the HUD. It was way bigger than earlier HUDs I have seen, and it was both distracting and helpful. It still took my focus off the traffic in front of me, but it was less distracting than looking over at the screen. It gave good info, but I saw a learning curve ahead of me to make sure I didn’t stare at the thing. I dunno, maybe that’s why you need automatic emergency braking.


”I tell ya, it’s not easy bein’ me.”




Last edited by Madd Dog; May 22, 2018 at 04:57 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 05:37 PM
  #168  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
I'm a little surprised that the A-Spec has different ratings. As I understand the rule, the EPA wouldn't require different ratings since all trims are mechanically the same. I'm guessing Acura voluntarily lowered the rating to avoid disappointing A-Spec owners who are likely to feel the impact of the wider, grippier tires.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 05:53 PM
  #169  
jcardona1's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 88
Likes: 45
Originally Posted by HotRodW
I'm a little surprised that the A-Spec has different ratings. As I understand the rule, the EPA wouldn't require different ratings since all trims are mechanically the same. I'm guessing Acura voluntarily lowered the rating to avoid disappointing A-Spec owners who are likely to feel the impact of the wider, grippier tires.
I'm pretty sure it's because of the 20" wheels.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 06:12 PM
  #170  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
Originally Posted by jcardona1
I'm pretty sure it's because of the 20" wheels.
Yeah, but it's not required that they give it different ratings. The EPA isn't that strict.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 06:34 PM
  #171  
idgystinks's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 152
Likes: 16
From: America
EPA odd topic but true story..

Originally Posted by HotRodW
Yeah, but it's not required that they give it different ratings. The EPA isn't that strict.
Way off subject but EPA comment reminds me of a terrible true story. I had a great chuckle as I was taking EPA comment completely out of context in my recollection. I imagine VW shareholders (-$31,000,000,000 and rising) and some executives headed for prison would disagree that the EPA is not strict.

On a side note, many regulating parts of the Clean Air Act were authored by an outright fraud, a now convicted felon in the most horrible government rip off stories ever told. John Beale was the highest paid person at EPA while pretending to be a CIA spy. Yes, true story. He plead guilty and was fined $1,000,000. (He wrote a check on the spot which tells you all you need to know).

https://www.washingtonian.com/2014/0...ooked-the-epa/
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 07:01 PM
  #172  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
Originally Posted by idgystinks
Way off subject but EPA comment reminds me of a terrible true story. I had a great chuckle as I was taking EPA comment completely out of context in my recollection. I imagine VW shareholders (-$31,000,000,000 and rising) and some executives headed for prison would disagree that the EPA is not strict.

On a side note, many regulating parts of the Clean Air Act were authored by an outright fraud, a now convicted felon in the most horrible government rip off stories ever told. John Beale was the highest paid person at EPA while pretending to be a CIA spy. Yes, true story. He plead guilty and was fined $1,000,000. (He wrote a check on the spot which tells you all you need to know).

https://www.washingtonian.com/2014/0...ooked-the-epa/
I'm no fan of the EPA, but VW deserved everything they got. I was one of the unfortunate owners caught up in that sh!t show.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 07:07 PM
  #173  
cruiserchuck's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 371
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by mcrompton
Too bad nobody at Honda proof reads these things. When you click on the pdf document, it shows that the new RDX will have 2 way power seats. I prefer the 12 way that is actually being offered.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 08:02 PM
  #174  
Tony Pac's Avatar
AZ Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 1,654
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
A bit random question but when it comes to reliability of German cars. which brand is more reliable? MB, Audi or BMW.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 08:04 PM
  #175  
TxLady's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 176
Likes: 61
From: Big State of Texas
J.D. Powers website has some pretty good charts on each of those...hopefully unbiased.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 08:31 PM
  #176  
cruiserchuck's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 371
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by Tony Pac
A bit random question but when it comes to reliability of German cars. which brand is more reliable? MB, Audi or BMW.
According to Consumer Reports, Audi is the best of the three. Acura was dead last among all brands this year.

Like many others, I hope the RDX is the start of Acura's climb back to the top for dependability and value for luxury cars.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 09:06 PM
  #177  
idgystinks's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 152
Likes: 16
From: America
I have not owned an Acura in a while and was shocked by the rise of Audi and the fall of Acura in these customer survey ratings.
Reply
Old May 22, 2018 | 10:15 PM
  #178  
stl0090's Avatar
9th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
just a correction

Originally Posted by cruiserchuck
According to Consumer Reports, Audi is the best of the three. Acura was dead last among all brands this year.
I have a copy of the 2018 Consumer Reports car guide in front of me, and the rankings for Luxury Compact SUV are
1 BMW X3
2 Porsche Macan S
3 Lexus NX 300
4 Audi Q5
5 Lexus NX 300h
6 Acura RDX

All of which show a predicted reliability of "above average" and receive the designation "recommended". Dead last is Land Rover, 2nd to last is Jaguar F-Pace and 3rd from last is the Alfa Stelvio.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 01:46 AM
  #179  
RDX10's Avatar
Suzuka Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,533
Likes: 959
Originally Posted by birdonamission
Question - I use Shell 95%+ of the time because I do their Fuel Rewards thing to earn gas discounts. I've usually been getting a nickel off a gallon for their V-Power 91 octane premium gas. Is that cleansing additive Shell puts in the gas a demonstrably good thing for the engine or just a gimmick?
I honestly can’t answer that. I don’t think it has any bad effects (I know people who will only fill up with shell and have no issues) but I also don’t know if it makes a huge difference. I think what makes a bigger difference is always filling at places that stock top-tier gasoline.

https://www.toptiergas.com/licensedbrands/

Look at this page I stumbled upon, it’s posted by Acura Canada and talks about top tier gas and how they recommend it for Acura vehicles. Super ironic lol.

https://www.acura.ca/owners/top-tier-gas

Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
Well, count me as super disappointed that I can't get the A-Spec trim with all the bells and whistles. Really want the HUD and adaptive dampers. Guess I'll test drive both.
I am super super disappointed. I was soooo hoping we’d get an A-Spec Elite. What’s even more annoying is they really cut out some things I would have loved to have on the A-Spec like the adaptive shocks, 16-way seats, and HUD. I would probably wait a little bit, I have a feeling something good is coming after the first year (reshuffling of trims) and even more for the MMC.

Originally Posted by MTD
Me too. It does however have the vent seats and 16 speaker stereo which I wanted. I wear polarized glasses and Ive read you cant see the HUD with those types of glasses on.
This was something that really stuck out to me. It’s a very good balance. I would rather take the A-Spec over the elite model for sure. But not sure about A-Spec over Platinum.

Originally Posted by hondu
That link shows

FWD
22/28/24
22/27/24 (A-spec)

4WD
21/27/23
21/26/23 (A-spec)
So looks like the numbers I read about were accurate unfortunately. As much as I like the new RDX it’s starting to have a lot of things that bother me about it. On the plus side there are SO MANY crossovers to look at right now so I’m sure I’ll find something I really like.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 02:10 AM
  #180  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by chickdr
Exactly why they should have gone with the DI 3.5. Would have been a lot better setup. 2.0T's are going to be highly stressed when they are used in the manner folks are used to with the "archaic" 3.5l in the current gen RDX. Gas mileage will be abysmal. Mark my words, folks will be complaining like mad over the crappy MPG once the new RDX hits the streets.
Originally Posted by idgystinks
2.0T experiment. You may tire of my 2.0T observations but since I drive one everyday, I have some credibility I hope. Today since my Accord Sport is broken in so to speak, my 25 mile commute was made a little fun. Mix of highway (70 mph) and a few expressways (50 mph).

Last week when I drove like a more mature person it yielded 41 mpg on said commute. Today no surprisingly I yielded 31 mpg. EPA rates 32 highway which seems to be the trend for current testing methods. My trip computer has shown one of the better when I calculate at the pump (within 1 mpg)

The 2.0T has a lot of potential in AWD mode. I loose traction at 25 mph in 10 Speed Sport) due to impressive torque curve. AWD will harness this engine fully and SH-AWD had better made it fun-at a cost of course.

What would mpg be in RDX on same commute? 41 careful (Accord) , 31 spirited (Accord) could be around 31 Careful and 22 Spirited with RDX. If highway steady could be around 30 mpg in real life I would be happy with new RDX.
Yea I thin it's too early to assume the RDX will get horrible gas mileage in the real world. I have seen the Accord 2.0T doing really well in the real world, relative to its rating, 41mpg is just amazing when it's rated at 32mpg on the hwy.

Originally Posted by JM2010 SH-AWD
Regarding gas mileage of the new RDX, Honda/Acura products very often exceed their EPA numbers in real life, as shown above. My wife's 2.4 6MT Accord (9th Gen) is rated at 34 highway. But in non-winter weather, it's as easy as falling off a log to get that car into the 40s on the freeway. Not sure how that will work with the 2.0T, but early indications seem to suggest that 2.0 Accord owners are not having difficulty surpassing the EPA number for that car/engine.
Yea that seems to be the trend. I wouldn't worry too much about the EPA ratings.

Originally Posted by idgystinks
I have not owned an Acura in a while and was shocked by the rise of Audi and the fall of Acura in these customer survey ratings.
My understanding is that a lot of it has to do with the dual screen system used in recent Acura models. It's laggy and hard to learn. The way some of these surveys are setup mean infotainment "issues" are counted as reliability issues.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 02:23 AM
  #181  
liquidh2o's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 38
Interesting footnote for the gas mileage.

24. Based on 2019 EPA mileage ratings. Use for comparison purposes only. Your actual mileage will vary, depending on how you drive and maintain your vehicle, driving conditions, battery pack age/condition (hybrid only) and other factors.
Could be that it's simply a canned statement that they copy/paste across all models. That, or maybe Acura has a hybrid model ready to go, and will release it in the coming years
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 02:39 AM
  #182  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
hahaha may be another typo but they should definitely consider building a RDX sport hybrid!
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 06:56 AM
  #183  
Madd Dog's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,026
From: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
It is beginning to look like, comparably equipped, the RDX might be ~ 7-10K less than the X3.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 08:19 AM
  #184  
Tony Pac's Avatar
AZ Community Team
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 1,654
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by stl0090
I have a copy of the 2018 Consumer Reports car guide in front of me, and the rankings for Luxury Compact SUV are
1 BMW X3
2 Porsche Macan S
3 Lexus NX 300
4 Audi Q5
5 Lexus NX 300h
6 Acura RDX

All of which show a predicted reliability of "above average" and receive the designation "recommended". Dead last is Land Rover, 2nd to last is Jaguar F-Pace and 3rd from last is the Alfa Stelvio.
Thanks for sharing the info

This is useful. I wanted exactly this ranking. I hope with the new RDX, it moves up!
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 08:29 AM
  #185  
mcrompton's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 69
Unless Consumer Reports hates the new RDX infotainment system, it should bring the brand up. Personally I think it's silly to group infotainment into the reliability category. When I think reliability I think power train, brakes, et cetera. One's preference on infotainment is subjective and shouldn't bring a brand's overall ratings down.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 08:34 AM
  #186  
TxLady's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 176
Likes: 61
From: Big State of Texas
Allot depends on how much weight you give to the results too. Here is US news top 15 in the 2018 Luxury SUV lineup, and guess where Acura is? Tied for the #1 spot with Audi. I like to look at a number of sources for how a vehicle sizes up. Purchased a Camry when they first came out based on Consumer Reports recommendation and it was the worst car I’ve ever owned.

https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...y-compact-suvs
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 08:58 AM
  #187  
matt12345's Avatar
6th Gear
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by Madd Dog
It is beginning to look like, comparably equipped, the RDX might be ~ 7-10K less than the X3.
BMW x3 pricing is hard to work out though. I think it's possible to get it up to 80k CAD if you add every option under the sun.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 09:47 AM
  #188  
iutodd's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 339
Likes: 118
Originally Posted by HotRodW
Yeah, but it's not required that they give it different ratings. The EPA isn't that strict.
Actually the EPA changed the testing procedures starting for MY2017 and wider tires do seem to have a detrimental effect (and specifically on the highway number - they changed how they deal with the "coast down" section and mechanical resistance of the tires). For example look at the Accord 2.0T Sport vs. the 2.0T EX-L ratings - the tires are all the difference there.

I'm actually surprised the numbers aren't more different given the difference in the Accord's ratings - maybe the tire difference isn't as big.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 09:47 AM
  #189  
ultramart's Avatar
Hello World
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 80
Likes: 10
From: Quebec
Originally Posted by RDX10
False. Octane has nothing to do with gasoline cleanliness. It does however have to do with the gasolines resitance to ignition under compression, hence why many turboed cars and premium cars with performance engines require premium. Some companies (shell) do put extra cleaning additives into their premium gasoline, but that’s an additive and has nothing to do with the inherent octane rating.
VW and Audi are infamous for their carbon buildup in the 2.0T engine. If Octane was a precursor of cleanliness that wouldn’t be the case since that engine requires premium.
I watch a TV show every week (RPM, in Quebec) and the three automotive journalists always say that Premium fuel is more refined and will cause less carbon deposits in the combustion chamber. I just did a quick search on internet and a lot of sources says it's not cleaner. I'm quite surprised.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 09:48 AM
  #190  
iutodd's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 339
Likes: 118
Originally Posted by matt12345
BMW x3 pricing is hard to work out though. I think it's possible to get it up to 80k CAD if you add every option under the sun.
I recently went through the BMW build site to build an X3 and got very confused.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 10:35 AM
  #191  
MTD's Avatar
MTD
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 329
Likes: 111
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by ultramart
I watch a TV show every week (RPM, in Quebec) and the three automotive journalists always say that Premium fuel is more refined and will cause less carbon deposits in the combustion chamber. I just did a quick search on internet and a lot of sources says it's not cleaner. I'm quite surprised.
Many premium fuels here in Canada are ethanol free. Shell, Canadian Tire, for example. Ethanol can gum up fuel components over time. Cleaner might not be the best description, but the ethanol free fuels are more pure.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 10:46 AM
  #192  
stl0090's Avatar
9th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MTD
I wear polarized glasses and Ive read you cant see the HUD with those types of glasses on.
Regarding polarized lenses and HUDs, I have a car with a HUD that I was driving this morning, and with my polarized sunglasses there is an angle at which I can make the HUD nearly fade away, however it is just as easy to make it fully visible with a tiny head shift. It is really a non-issue for me, at least, if I cannot see the HUD clearly I just turn my head ever so slightly. I wouldn't let it concern you.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 11:20 AM
  #193  
ZipSpeed's Avatar
There are four lights!
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 509
Likes: 215
From: Calgary, Canada
Originally Posted by RDX10
I am super super disappointed. I was soooo hoping we’d get an A-Spec Elite. What’s even more annoying is they really cut out some things I would have loved to have on the A-Spec like the adaptive shocks, 16-way seats, and HUD. I would probably wait a little bit, I have a feeling something good is coming after the first year (reshuffling of trims) and even more for the MMC.
You know, you bring up a good point. I think we will be able to buy a sport variant with all the bells and whistles one day - the Type S. It sucks for those who can't afford it, or are unwilling to spend that much (myself included) but it is what it is.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 02:18 PM
  #194  
RDX10's Avatar
Suzuka Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,533
Likes: 959
Originally Posted by mcrompton
Unless Consumer Reports hates the new RDX infotainment system, it should bring the brand up. Personally I think it's silly to group infotainment into the reliability category. When I think reliability I think power train, brakes, et cetera. One's preference on infotainment is subjective and shouldn't bring a brand's overall ratings down.
I don’t have much faith in consumer reports for that reason. The way they look at reliability issues doesn’t make sense to me either. I see it the way you see it.

Originally Posted by ultramart
I watch a TV show every week (RPM, in Quebec) and the three automotive journalists always say that Premium fuel is more refined and will cause less carbon deposits in the combustion chamber. I just did a quick search on internet and a lot of sources says it's not cleaner. I'm quite surprised.
It’s not your fault at all man. I used to beleive the same thing until I spent some time on forums and learned differently. So many companies market premium gas as being cleaner and I bet if I asked 100 random people in public, 95%+ would tell me premium is cleaner. Don’t sweat it!

Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
You know, you bring up a good point. I think we will be able to buy a sport variant with all the bells and whistles one day - the Type S. It sucks for those who can't afford it, or are unwilling to spend that much (myself included) but it is what it is.
This is the only thing that makes sense to me. Why else would they seperate the A-Spec from the Elite and then take some of the features that should be on A-Spec and put them on the Elite only. I bet we’re going to see a Type-S even though I was so against it happening before.

Sidenote: That base model really is a good buy, it comes so well featured that I think it will be a volume seller.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 02:40 PM
  #195  
idgystinks's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 152
Likes: 16
From: America
The base is base in name only and I agree a potential higher market share than now. Sad to only get BSD and RCTA on Tech and above but you do get the Honda sensing (Acura Watch).

If Honda/Acura sensible they are trying to figure out how to transform a little Accord production into RDX production. Acura has a very small dealer footprint which limits their market penetration. Two dealers in all of Oklahoma (refrain from any OK comments).........

We have yet to see what the pleather seats look like in base RDX. With Apple car play, I really have a hard time with Tech package. With me it is base or Advance. Ventilated seats are very enticing (Oklahoma). I would expect the Advance to be $8K more than Base and $4k more than Tech all things being equal.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 05:43 PM
  #196  
RDX10's Avatar
Suzuka Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,533
Likes: 959
Originally Posted by idgystinks
The base is base in name only and I agree a potential higher market share than now. Sad to only get BSD and RCTA on Tech and above but you do get the Honda sensing (Acura Watch).

If Honda/Acura sensible they are trying to figure out how to transform a little Accord production into RDX production. Acura has a very small dealer footprint which limits their market penetration. Two dealers in all of Oklahoma (refrain from any OK comments).........

We have yet to see what the pleather seats look like in base RDX. With Apple car play, I really have a hard time with Tech package. With me it is base or Advance. Ventilated seats are very enticing (Oklahoma). I would expect the Advance to be $8K more than Base and $4k more than Tech all things being equal.
I don’t really like the packaging either. I think they need to reshuffle some of those features/options. I also agree that there is almost no point of the tech package anymore. The difference between the base and tech is minimal but massive when it comes to the Elite model. I also don’t care for the Elite Platinum model. It should have been the Elite-A-Spec model and combined the A-Spec package with those features on the Elite platinum package. But what do I know
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 06:04 PM
  #197  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
Originally Posted by iutodd
Actually the EPA changed the testing procedures starting for MY2017 and wider tires do seem to have a detrimental effect (and specifically on the highway number - they changed how they deal with the "coast down" section and mechanical resistance of the tires). For example look at the Accord 2.0T Sport vs. the 2.0T EX-L ratings - the tires are all the difference there.

I'm actually surprised the numbers aren't more different given the difference in the Accord's ratings - maybe the tire difference isn't as big.
They changed the guidelines, yes, but manufacturers still aren't required to submit separate ratings for each wheel/tire combo. The "your mileage may vary" section specifically indicates tires as one of the factors affecting real-world results.
Reply
Old May 23, 2018 | 09:54 PM
  #198  
cruiserchuck's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 371
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by stl0090
I have a copy of the 2018 Consumer Reports car guide in front of me, and the rankings for Luxury Compact SUV are
1 BMW X3
2 Porsche Macan S
3 Lexus NX 300
4 Audi Q5
5 Lexus NX 300h
6 Acura RDX

All of which show a predicted reliability of "above average" and receive the designation "recommended". Dead last is Land Rover, 2nd to last is Jaguar F-Pace and 3rd from last is the Alfa Stelvio.
I was referring to the brand as a whole, not model by model. I looked through my old issues of Consumer Reports, and realized that I mixed up the owners satisfaction rating and the reliability rating. In the February 2018 list of owners satisfaction, Acura is dead last at No. 30. Audi is No. 5, BMW is No. 15, and Mercedes is No. 22. In the December 2017 list of reliability, Audi is No. 4, BMW is No. 5, Mercedes is No. 14, and Acura is No. 19.

I drove the two Acuras that I owned for over 450,000 miles with no major problems, and almost no minor problems. I hope Acura gets back to that level of dependability. My Audi lease expires in December 2019, and I can see myself buying an RDX at that time if it is as good as I hope it is.
Reply
Old May 24, 2018 | 09:48 AM
  #199  
birdonamission's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 698
Likes: 219
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by birdonamission
I don't know if I'm remembering correctly, but did I hear or read in one of the dozens of videos and articles out there on the '19 that it will have in-car Wi-Fi? I thought I did, but not certain...
Not to quote myself, but...lol.

Anyway, I noticed at 2:49 of this video that apparently the car has a 4G LTE Wi-Fi hot spot.

Reply
Old May 24, 2018 | 09:51 AM
  #200  
mcrompton's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 69
Correct, the Advanced has 4G LTE hotspot as a feature through AT&T
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.