Keyless Entry Vulnerabilities
Keyless Entry Vulnerabilities
I have read internet articles about electronic devices stealing signals between the keyless entry device and the vehicle to mimic the device and gain entry into the vehicle and perhaps figure out a way to drive it away. I don't know if these articles are theoretical hype or actually pointing out a vulnerability that has been hacked frequently. The Subaru was mentioned as being particularly vulnerable as its codes are easily broken supposedly. For the 2019 RDX has Acura provided any statements on this topic that anyone has seen? One solution and I took the bait and bought is something called a Faraday pouch that blocks the RF signals when the keyless device is put into the shielded pocket. It has a second pocket that is unshielded and the pouch fits easily into a pants pocket. I don't know if I wasted about $15 for it, but it does work. When I leave the vehicle, I have it in the unshielded pocket, tap the door, locking it, and then moving the device to the shielded pocket and try to open the door and it fails because the signal is blocked. When I return, I move it to the unshielded side to open the door and keep it there until my drive is complete. In the house I keep it in the shielded pocket, because some of this eavesdropping equipment supposedly according to the articles can intercept signals from the device that is quite a distance away. It is probably a chicken little attitude, but on the cost/risk spectrum it is a very low cost solution to probably a low risk vulnerability.
Doesn't hurt to take precautions. I personally haven't worried about auto theft since I owned my '93 Accord, which is one of those vehicles that has a high theft rate for parts. Since then, I figured that if someone is going to steal a car that it's not likely to be an Acura. Between the immobilizer tech and relatively low value compared to other luxury vehicles, I don't see them as a hot theft item. Plus, if you have comprehensive insurance, you're covered for theft.
Now if we're talking about break in's to steal stuff in the car it might be a different matter. However, I think it's bad practice to leave anything valuable in a car, especially in plain sight. There's really no reason for it anyway. No one carries CD's with them anymore. Cash in plain sight is just stupid. Expensive sunglasses can easily be concealed in the sunglass holder, glove box or center console. And new generation stereo's rarely get stolen anymore.
Regardless, not a bad idea to take precautions. But like you said, it's definitely a low risk vulnerability.
Now if we're talking about break in's to steal stuff in the car it might be a different matter. However, I think it's bad practice to leave anything valuable in a car, especially in plain sight. There's really no reason for it anyway. No one carries CD's with them anymore. Cash in plain sight is just stupid. Expensive sunglasses can easily be concealed in the sunglass holder, glove box or center console. And new generation stereo's rarely get stolen anymore.
Regardless, not a bad idea to take precautions. But like you said, it's definitely a low risk vulnerability.
An upscale car requires an upscale solution. :-)
I have seen the tin foil articles and actually used that for awhile, but it was a pain wrapping and unwrapping it depending on when you wanted the signal blocked or passed.
I have seen the tin foil articles and actually used that for awhile, but it was a pain wrapping and unwrapping it depending on when you wanted the signal blocked or passed.
You can wrap your fob in tin foil! LINK
Actually in all seriousness I use an rfid blocking wallet, but more because I like the size and minimalistic approach. I look at it this way with cars.....it’s insured, it can be imobilized and tracked. If you want it that bad, I’ll welcome the upgrade if you Total it.
RFID wallet, yes, when I travel to Europe. (Three WEEKS). But at home? I ain’t putting up with that crap (Churchillian: Crap, up with which I will not put.). So I have insurance, and hope that the crooks target someone other than my sorry ass.
I am more worried about the Acuralink. I mean, someone could hack that and have full access to your car. I would think that would be easier than grabbing the key fob code.
Someone theoretically could get into the mainframe and obtain and offer for sale connections to activate fleets of cars.
Scary Stuff. Probably hard to do, but these days, anything can be done.
Someone theoretically could get into the mainframe and obtain and offer for sale connections to activate fleets of cars.
Scary Stuff. Probably hard to do, but these days, anything can be done.
Trending Topics
Doesn't hurt to take precautions. I personally haven't worried about auto theft since I owned my '93 Accord, which is one of those vehicles that has a high theft rate for parts. Since then, I figured that if someone is going to steal a car that it's not likely to be an Acura. Between the immobilizer tech and relatively low value compared to other luxury vehicles, I don't see them as a hot theft item. Plus, if you have comprehensive insurance, you're covered for theft.
Now if we're talking about break in's to steal stuff in the car it might be a different matter. However, I think it's bad practice to leave anything valuable in a car, especially in plain sight. There's really no reason for it anyway. No one carries CD's with them anymore. Cash in plain sight is just stupid. Expensive sunglasses can easily be concealed in the sunglass holder, glove box or center console. And new generation stereo's rarely get stolen anymore.
Regardless, not a bad idea to take precautions. But like you said, it's definitely a low risk vulnerability.
Now if we're talking about break in's to steal stuff in the car it might be a different matter. However, I think it's bad practice to leave anything valuable in a car, especially in plain sight. There's really no reason for it anyway. No one carries CD's with them anymore. Cash in plain sight is just stupid. Expensive sunglasses can easily be concealed in the sunglass holder, glove box or center console. And new generation stereo's rarely get stolen anymore.
Regardless, not a bad idea to take precautions. But like you said, it's definitely a low risk vulnerability.
I have insurance for this, if they want to steal it, fine. It is my understanding that they can only steal the code if you use the buttons on the fob to lock or unlock it not the proximity though they could probably do that as well.
I sure would not want to disable a convenience over this 1 in a million chance
I sure would not want to disable a convenience over this 1 in a million chance
You can wrap your fob in tin foil! LINK
What is the risk of having the FOB signal intercepted? What is the impact if it happens? What is the cost to reduce the risk both in $ and effort? What is the cost and effort of recovery if something happens? Lots of differing thoughts. Personally speaking, the cost to reduce the risk both in $ and effort is so minuscule it probably makes sense to shield it when not driving, when entering vehicle, and when locking vehicle.
To me, the keyless entry is a great feature. I always seem to forget to get my key out and have way too many pockets with too much stuff in them. The solution for stopping someone from stealing a signal is not much different than the old system of fishing for your key and then an added step of unwrapping it. If it makes anyone feel better, the stats for 2016 show the top two cars stolen were the Honda Accord and the Honda Civic - no Acuras made the top 10. The real interesting thing is that the model year numbers were for a 1997 Accord and 1998 Civic. I bet the vast majority of those did not have keyless entry. My paranoia is not theft but door dings. Maybe I should wrap my car in aluminum foil after I park.
Fodder - something in plentiful supply (opinion) but of little value (my opinion).
Fodder - something in plentiful supply (opinion) but of little value (my opinion).
This information is correct. Aluminum wrapped around it acts as a farraday cage. Blocks signals well. Thats why shielded wires are encased in aluminum foil. It prevents Electomagnetic Interference. I would suggest getting a smalk aluminum box to store them in when at home.
The FOB is sending/receiving signals not just when the buttons are pushed. If that were the case, the vehicle would not know you from an intruder when touching the door handle.
I choose to not worry about such things. Life is way too short to live in fear
I have insurance for this, if they want to steal it, fine. It is my understanding that they can only steal the code if you use the buttons on the fob to lock or unlock it not the proximity though they could probably do that as well.
I sure would not want to disable a convenience over this 1 in a million chance
I sure would not want to disable a convenience over this 1 in a million chance
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-new...hem/1403196784
I don't think you need to worry about someone stealing the car by cloning AcuraLInk You can start it remotely but you cannot drive it unless you push the start button in possession of the key fob and have your foot one the brake.
I also wonder about the shielded wallets being pushed these days. I have quite a few microchipped credit cards but none of them are RFID. Cell phones and key fobs are another story but I'm not going to shield them, just will take my chances.
I also wonder about the shielded wallets being pushed these days. I have quite a few microchipped credit cards but none of them are RFID. Cell phones and key fobs are another story but I'm not going to shield them, just will take my chances.
Might want to look at this link. It is a lot more than one in a million chance at least in my city. Everyone makes their own assessment of cost to mitigate, impact of it happening, and risk of it happening.
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-new...hem/1403196784
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-new...hem/1403196784
I know this is a little off topic, but has anyone noticed when you have an iPhone in your pocket with the keyfob in the same pocket, the remote does not allow you to open the doors or back hatch.
Yes! That can be rather annoying to have cell phone in one pocket, fob in the other and then having the phone closer to the car than the fob.. First world issues!
The owner's manual warns about this situation. I was actually happy to read that a cell phone can block the signal of the keyfob. I have had a Ford keyless ignition for 4 years and I would get the message that no keyfob was present when it was in my pocket along with my cell phone. I never understood why it was happening until I read it in the RDX owner's manual. This is not an Acura problem but just a conflict of radio signals.
No offense but car theft punishment is the same regardless of the type of car one steals. If they are going thought all the trouble to steal you FOB “code”, it’s better be a high demand car ove sea or popular car like an Accord where parts are easily stripped and popular.
Acura has never been a high target for professional theft.
Acura has never been a high target for professional theft.
No offense but car theft punishment is the same regardless of the type of car one steals. If they are going thought all the trouble to steal you FOB “code”, it’s better be a high demand car ove sea or popular car like an Accord where parts are easily stripped and popular.
Acura has never been a high target for professional theft.
Acura has never been a high target for professional theft.
Just thought to share since this thread was not too long ago.
in short, took a team of researchers and some clever reverse engineering to steal the FOB signal and brute force the encrypted key code. Not an easy task but certainly feasible. Now, does anyone know who makes Acura’s key fob systems?
https://www.wired.com/story/hackers-...conds-key-fob/
in short, took a team of researchers and some clever reverse engineering to steal the FOB signal and brute force the encrypted key code. Not an easy task but certainly feasible. Now, does anyone know who makes Acura’s key fob systems?
https://www.wired.com/story/hackers-...conds-key-fob/
Telsa stolen this way:
Tesla Model 3 Stolen From Mall of America Using Only a Smartphone
Dude just called after looking at the VIN through the window and Telsa loaded the car into his account!
Tesla Model 3 Stolen From Mall of America Using Only a Smartphone
Dude just called after looking at the VIN through the window and Telsa loaded the car into his account!
Telsa stolen this way:
Tesla Model 3 Stolen From Mall of America Using Only a Smartphone
Dude just called after looking at the VIN through the window and Telsa loaded the car into his account!
Tesla Model 3 Stolen From Mall of America Using Only a Smartphone
Dude just called after looking at the VIN through the window and Telsa loaded the car into his account!
"The automaker told Electrek that the alleged car thief likely had previously rented the vehicle and had an already-authenticated phone as a result."
Still interesting.
RFID blockers listed at Amazon. 2-pack for $19.95 Link:
RFID blockers listed at Amazon. 2-pack for $19.95 Link: RFID Blocking Sleeves
Or did you just read the title?
Last edited by acuraada; Sep 15, 2018 at 10:22 PM.
That’s the way I feel about this whole issue. We are back to square one or may be square zero.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NW-CL
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
4
Nov 1, 2002 12:01 AM
icy CL
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
1
Mar 24, 2002 01:25 AM











