Did anyone consider a CPO 2G RDX before buying a 19-20?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2020, 10:37 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
e-man22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Did anyone consider a CPO 2G RDX before buying a 19-20?

Like the title says, I am wondering whether anyone considered a second generation RDX before purchasing a third generation. I am currently looking at another number of certified preowned RDXs and my biggest concern with the third generation are the noise concerns expressed on this forum.

Is the second generation RDX more luxurious and quieter than the third generation?
Old 11-25-2020, 03:32 PM
  #2  
Skeptic
 
NooYawkuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NY Panhadle ©
Posts: 1,493
Received 427 Likes on 283 Posts
No.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-25-2020, 05:28 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
DriverOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,382
Received 225 Likes on 161 Posts
Originally Posted by e-man22
Like the title says, I am wondering whether anyone considered a second generation RDX before purchasing a third generation. I am currently looking at another number of certified preowned RDXs and my biggest concern with the third generation are the noise concerns expressed on this forum.

Is the second generation RDX more luxurious and quieter than the third generation?
You would have to be high on crack to buy a 2G if you can buy a 3G. If you're worried about noise, test drive it and see if it bothers you.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-26-2020, 11:33 AM
  #4  
Racer
 
jmhumr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 344
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
That cheesy dual-screen is enough to keep me away from 2G. That's the main reason I won't even consider an MDX, even though the deals are great.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-26-2020, 11:54 AM
  #5  
Drifting
 
Madd Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: New Yorkie, Hudson Valley
Posts: 3,001
Received 1,025 Likes on 715 Posts
Not at all.

SH-AWD is only in gen 3, and that was a major factor in going with the RDX.

The gen 2 is FWD with a slip and grip clutch for the rear wheels, so most of the time it drives, and plows, like an FWD car.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-26-2020, 03:34 PM
  #6  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
e-man22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Thanks for all the responses everyone. Very helpful.
Old 11-26-2020, 05:10 PM
  #7  
Drifting
 
JB in AZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Arizona
Age: 72
Posts: 2,278
Received 803 Likes on 528 Posts
Nope! Based on a (now) two Generation old CR-V. Pass.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-26-2020, 09:28 PM
  #8  
Intermediate
 
RDXWiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I looked at late model 2G because they could have been had for a good price. After driving them back to back, there was no comparison between the old and new. The old one had price and its engine (IMO) going for it, but didn't outweigh the new features such as panoramic sunroof, larger interior and of course real SH AWD. However, I honestly believe that a majority of people will never use SH AWD as it was designed. Most folks tend to lift their foot off the gas or brake during turn in.


Last edited by RDXWiz; 11-26-2020 at 09:30 PM.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-26-2020, 10:39 PM
  #9  
Skeptic
 
NooYawkuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NY Panhadle ©
Posts: 1,493
Received 427 Likes on 283 Posts
Originally Posted by RDXWiz
... However, I honestly believe that a majority of people will never use SH AWD as it was designed. Most folks tend to lift their foot off the gas or brake during turn in.
I love to see those chevrons light up on the rear wheels on the SH-AWD display. The torque-vectoring.is wonderful. I feel sorry for people who just went with the FWD . They saved themselves some money but they don't know what they're missing.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (06-07-2023)
Old 11-27-2020, 10:31 AM
  #10  
Racer
 
AcuraGuy2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Age: 40
Posts: 405
Received 75 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by e-man22
Thanks for all the responses everyone. Very helpful.
I've actually owned a 2G RDX, and the road noise from the 3G RDX is terrible, much worse than the 2G. That was the primary reason we did not purchase one. We do a lot of driving on high speed concrete highways, so that is an important feature.

We test drove several 3G RDX. While the vehicle is otherwise decent, the powertrain is great for city driving, but lacking a bit for higher speed acceleration, the road noise was terrible. Close your eyes and feel like you're in a cheap mainstream vehicle. The high road noise alone killed the luxury experience.

We bought our 2G RDX after test driving a Honda CRV. The CRV road noise and slow acceleration were deal killers - the 2G RDX was much quieter and accelerated faster than the 3G. The 3G road noise reminded me of the last gen Honda CRV.

We were happy with the 2G RDX and didn't want to buy a vehicle that soon, but we knew we needed a new vehicle within 5 years, so we test drove a 3G RDX to see if we liked the generation enough to get one years down the road. We were so upset with the terrible road noise, unrefined power train, and frustrating track pad, that we bought a MDX Sport Hybrid years earlier than we wanted. We love the MDX SH. That is a true luxury vehicle, even quieter and more refined than the 2G with an easy to use and responsive touch screen infotainment.

Last edited by AcuraGuy2016; 11-27-2020 at 10:35 AM.
Old 11-27-2020, 11:42 AM
  #11  
Burning Brakes
 
supafamous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 48
Posts: 754
Received 300 Likes on 193 Posts
I test drove a 2G before settling on the 3G. As I like my cars sporty the 2G was a huge disappointment - I'd rather have bought a new CR-V for the money (or more likely the CX-5 Turbo). The V6 is nice but it was only marginally nicer than a new CR-V IMO.
Old 11-27-2020, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
DriverOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,382
Received 225 Likes on 161 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraGuy2016
We were happy with the 2G RDX and didn't want to buy a vehicle that soon, but we knew we needed a new vehicle within 5 years, so we test drove a 3G RDX to see if we liked the generation enough to get one years down the road. We were so upset with the terrible road noise, unrefined power train, and frustrating track pad, that we bought a MDX Sport Hybrid years earlier than we wanted. We love the MDX SH. That is a true luxury vehicle, even quieter and more refined than the 2G with an easy to use and responsive touch screen infotainment.
So you were happy with your current car and didn't need a new car, but went to test drive a car that you might want to buy 5 years from now? And then you were so angry at how bad it was that you went out and bought a different car before you needed to? That's some next-level decision-making right there.
The following 3 users liked this post by DriverOne:
esquire0399 (11-27-2020), JB in AZ (11-27-2020), rdx_to (11-28-2020)
Old 11-27-2020, 12:01 PM
  #13  
Racer
 
AcuraGuy2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Age: 40
Posts: 405
Received 75 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by supafamous
I test drove a 2G before settling on the 3G. As I like my cars sporty the 2G was a huge disappointment - I'd rather have bought a new CR-V for the money (or more likely the CX-5 Turbo). The V6 is nice but it was only marginally nicer than a new CR-V IMO.
Agree the 2G is not that sporty, but it was a great value for a compact luxury SUV. We bought a 2015 6 years ago. At the time, it was the 2015 CRV, which the 2015 RDX AWD Tech (highest RDX trim at the time) was MUCH MUCH better than the CRV at that time. That CRV was SLOW and NOISY. I know as we test drove them extensively. We ended up getting the 2015 AWD Tech for only $2K more than the CRV AWD Touring. That CRV had relatively uncomfortable seats and a terrible audio system as well.

Agree the current CRV generation is much better than the previous. If current CRV gen was out at the same time, we may have found it acceptable and got it. We only looked at the 2G RDX since we hated the 2015 CRV. Budget was much tighter back then, but with the deal on the 2G RDX, we were thrilled.

Still the 2G RDX is much faster, comfortable, quieter, and with a much better sound system than the current CRV. 3G RDX is actually very sporty and "fun to drive" around town. Turbo kicks in at low rpm. Sound system is great and it is comfortable. But, and I mean this, the road noise is TERRIBLE. If Acura can address this, I would have bought a 3G RDX, but to my ears, it is really bad and a dealbreaker.
Old 11-27-2020, 01:01 PM
  #14  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
e-man22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
AcuraGuy2016 — thank you so much for taking the time to post your feedback. This is exactly my main concern. We have test driven the 3G RDX and had one for an extended period of time while our 2020 MDX was being serviced. It is truly a fun car to drive but my concern is that the fun factor will wear off very quickly particularly when driving on the highway which is part of the reason why we are looking to get this car. It may also be used as a college car to go to and back from school and may remain on campus for a semester or two.
Old 11-27-2020, 03:56 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
AcuraGuy2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Age: 40
Posts: 405
Received 75 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by DriverOne
So you were happy with your current car and didn't need a new car, but went to test drive a car that you might want to buy 5 years from now? And then you were so angry at how bad it was that you went out and bought a different car before you needed to? That's some next-level decision-making right there.
Would have been more like 2-3 years - we didn't buy it then, we waited a year and got a 2019, as we thought that would be the last MY of the current gen. Really liked the MDX and was concerned, maybe rightfully so, that the next gen MDX would be larger and not fit in our garage and also be considerably more expensive, and possibly have cost cutting measures that increase road noise. We actually really liked the MDX when we bought the 2G RDX, but it wasn't in our budget then.

I thought the 2019+ Sport Hybrid MDX were an incredible bargain for all that vehicle offers vs. the competition.
Old 11-27-2020, 04:28 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
flames9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: MD
Age: 51
Posts: 323
Received 66 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by e-man22
AcuraGuy2016 — thank you so much for taking the time to post your feedback. This is exactly my main concern. We have test driven the 3G RDX and had one for an extended period of time while our 2020 MDX was being serviced. It is truly a fun car to drive but my concern is that the fun factor will wear off very quickly particularly when driving on the highway which is part of the reason why we are looking to get this car. It may also be used as a college car to go to and back from school and may remain on campus for a semester or two.
you test drove it....was it too loud?? If you were happy with the noise level, you are good to go. If unsure, go for another test ride on the roads u travel, you dont have to go the route the sale person tells you to go..it is your $$$.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarkSithCL
Technology
14762
03-02-2024 12:24 PM
sillbeer
2G RDX (2013-2018)
9
08-26-2020 12:15 PM
AcuraGuy2016
3G RDX (2019+)
42
07-29-2020 09:17 PM
neoshi
2G RDX (2013-2018)
1
07-27-2019 08:06 AM



Quick Reply: Did anyone consider a CPO 2G RDX before buying a 19-20?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.