V6 or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2011, 10:25 PM
  #41  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
I'd probably do a V6 TSX, but the price premium over the I4 is insanely out of wack.
Old 02-25-2011, 11:12 PM
  #42  
Racer
 
Craig-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by russel082581
yes 60/40, and the i4 is 57/43, or close to it, big deal. i take my v6 around corners just to see what it can do, i dont drive that way often. often took out the cones from my work van and it handled fine around those. it could use some better tires. as far as the 5k upgrade, that is sticker price, i got mine for 32k because i walked out on the dealer. its all about how u deal to get the right price.
Even at that price you still paid over $25 for each extra horsepower over the cost of the 4 cyl base model. Not bad at all, but I would have rather spent the extra $2k on getting the tech package. On a daily basis I'd get more pleasure out of that than dropping a second or so off the 6 speed's 0-60 numbers that the V6 gets you. To each his own I suppose.

When my lease is up in May, as a replacement for my 6 speed base model, I see a black on black 6 speed with tech in my future.
Old 02-25-2011, 11:34 PM
  #43  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
i gotta ask, since i refuse to put my tsx on the street in hoboken, where the heck are you keeping that thing there without being paranoid about it getting parking raped?
Old 02-26-2011, 03:10 AM
  #44  
Advanced
 
b.ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As Ive test driven both, Ive found the I4's feeling of "tossability" is enhanced by the fact the electronic steering is so sensitive. The V6 feels a lot more weighted and more comparable to hydraulic steering so the feeling of being able to 'toss' around the car wasn't there. But I can definitely attack corners hard and zip in and about traffic very easily, albeit with more movement on the steering wheel.

But while OP has made up his mind, if anyone else is buying...you should just test drive both to your satisfaction. I just could no go back into the I4 after piloting the V6.
Old 03-14-2011, 10:43 PM
  #45  
Cruisin'
 
tsxtatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Coast
Age: 41
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just test drove the V6 immediately followed by the I4 this past Saturday. Honestly, I thought I was sold on the V6 because of the amount of sheer power it had before I even drove the thing, but I found the V6 to feel more 'luxurious' than I really wanted the car to be because of how relatively quiet the car is versus the I4! Something about a high-revving 4 banger is music to my ears since I'm coming from a Civic.

Also, the V6 did feel heavier than the I4, so I felt that the I4 was going to be a better vehicle for the way that I like to drive. I decided to go for a 2011 TSX with Tech (black on black) and I love it! No regrets!
Old 03-14-2011, 11:47 PM
  #46  
Burning Brakes
 
ressling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 959
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Craig-D
The V6 TSX sticks you with something like a 60/40 front to rear weight bias - which is a handling disaster. The $5k premium for it is also a tough sell IMHO. When Car & Driver reviewed the V6 TSX, their conclusion was you're better off with the 6 speed 4 cyl. Pair the 4 cyl with the sweet 6 speed manual and you'll have plenty of performance - as quick as sub 7 seconds 0-60. The manual and auto 4 cyl are two totally different cars - the difference is that dramatic. The V6 is much quicker than both, but not enough quicker to justify the $5k extra.
Amen brother.
Old 03-16-2011, 06:27 PM
  #47  
Advanced
 
elsapo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure the V6 is worth it in terms of fuel consumption and weight. If you are concerned with power and torque you really should be looking at the BMW range.
Old 03-27-2011, 05:03 PM
  #48  
Racer
 
tvac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 276
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by russel082581
yes 60/40, and the i4 is 57/43, or close to it, big deal. i take my v6 around corners just to see what it can do, i dont drive that way often. often took out the cones from my work van and it handled fine around those. it could use some better tires. as far as the 5k upgrade, that is sticker price, i got mine for 32k because i walked out on the dealer. its all about how u deal to get the right price.
I concur. I paid same and it was worth every penny. Replace those stock Michelins with some performance tires and then try those cones. You'll be amazed at the difference. I just wish they had included the backup camera stock instead of bundling it with the Tech Pack cause backing up is a bitch.
Old 03-27-2011, 07:31 PM
  #49  
Racer
 
Terdbath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 50
Posts: 492
Received 104 Likes on 72 Posts
I miss the power from my 05 RL but I dont miss the gas pump. Even with its SH-AWD and 290 HP 3.5 V6 I'd say my 201 HP 4Cyl TSX is way more fun to drive and at the end of the day thats what I want. A fun to drive car with a clutch and proper hand brake.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.