Trading in the TSK TSK -- telll me this ain't shittay
Trading in the TSK TSK -- telll me this ain't shittay
Check out the email exchange from my salesman, below. If I traded in my 2012 TSX with 13k miles, this is what I would get for a lease rate on a new TSX 6-speed.
Not too bad, $565 for 15k at 36 months. Don’t forget we buried $1000 negative last time from your Civic.
This time we are burying $4400, nothing I can do because your lease is so young! The only upfront expense you
would have is the first months payment. Let me know if you may be interested!
Dan
Hi Spdandpwr,
Not too bad, $565 for 15k at 36 months. Don’t forget we buried $1000 negative last time from your Civic.
This time we are burying $4400, nothing I can do because your lease is so young! The only upfront expense you
would have is the first months payment. Let me know if you may be interested!
Dan
I don't like the auto tsx. I'm willing to pay more to move out of the tsx auto and into a manual...since I got quoted $460 for an ILX (after burying $4400 in negative equity), I'm going to move into that versus going into an Si or a manual tsx.
This doesn't sound abnormal, and mostly due to as stated how early you are into your current lease and the payoff vs. current value of the TSX. When it's so soon after start, it's not abnormal for there to be this difference, and on a lease that's naturally a shorter term than financing, any negative equity shows up plain as day.
Not to say there aren't a few dollars here or there, but the negative equity of being so soon into your lease is the main issue here not pricing of new car. Acura resale is fantastic, but tough when you have that many miles on a current model year vehicle and someone can walk in and get the same car but brand new for not much more, plus special financing and leasing, they can't get on what would be your CPO model.
Not to say there aren't a few dollars here or there, but the negative equity of being so soon into your lease is the main issue here not pricing of new car. Acura resale is fantastic, but tough when you have that many miles on a current model year vehicle and someone can walk in and get the same car but brand new for not much more, plus special financing and leasing, they can't get on what would be your CPO model.
Trending Topics
^I never disagreed, I just think that given the current lease incentives for the ilx, it makes more sense for me to hop on down to that versus trying to get a 6-speed tsx (which costs nearly the same msrp) for $100 more a month.
yea, the fact that it's 400lbs lighter than the tsx makes me happy. A lot of Si parts crossover too...the motor mounts for example are a direct swap, I will be placing delivery on those once / if I get the ILX...credit is the only thing that might bite me in the ass as I'm going in with 4.4k in negative equity
yea, the fact that it's 400lbs lighter than the tsx makes me happy. A lot of Si parts crossover too...the motor mounts for example are a direct swap, I will be placing delivery on those once / if I get the ILX...credit is the only thing that might bite me in the ass as I'm going in with 4.4k in negative equity 

Clutch was light, good feel, seemed just right. Shifter buttery smooth. Easy to work the gears, even that hard to do 1-2 shift. I was most impressed with the torque. Also, the engine sound is most excellent, starts with a growl and then really sings near the red-line. The lighter weight makes you want to toss it around. My son bought one, so Ill be begging him for more time behind the wheel.
Not trying to be a a$$ here, but you did not give anyone enough information to determine if that payment was reasonable. What is the dealer payoff on your car right this moment? Did you ask the dealer what the MF/Rate is being used to calculate the lease payment? What is the dealers out the door price on the new car?
You have to think the dealer is absorbing $4400 in negative equity -- they have to payoff the current car before selling it, so that money has to be put into the new lease, and since it's negative equity it changes the cars depreciation value which causes the lease payment to increase.
You also need to consider gap insurance if you do this, since I doubt any leasing company will take that much negative equity any allow you not to have gap protection on it.
Again, just trying to point out a good educated decision can't really be made here.
You have to think the dealer is absorbing $4400 in negative equity -- they have to payoff the current car before selling it, so that money has to be put into the new lease, and since it's negative equity it changes the cars depreciation value which causes the lease payment to increase.
You also need to consider gap insurance if you do this, since I doubt any leasing company will take that much negative equity any allow you not to have gap protection on it.
Again, just trying to point out a good educated decision can't really be made here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JDM96specCTR
Car Parts for Sale
1
Oct 17, 2015 01:06 PM








