Automatic vs Manual

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2009, 01:51 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the clutch is extremely light. The first time I test drove a 2G and depressed the clutch for the first time I didn't see it coming and burried my foot in the floor. Add that to one of the smoothest gear boxes on the market and it's no wonder so many people are willing to pass up faster competitors for a TSX.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:59 AM
  #42  
Racer
 
mucter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: el Burrito
Age: 44
Posts: 261
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
Yeah, the clutch is extremely light. The first time I test drove a 2G and depressed the clutch for the first time I didn't see it coming and burried my foot in the floor. Add that to one of the smoothest gear boxes on the market and it's no wonder so many people are willing to pass up faster competitors for a TSX.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:31 AM
  #43  
my acura sanctuary
 
subdued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sinnjin
Just test drive both MT and AT tsx when you are ready to buy.

FWIW, I commuted 50+ miles per day for 12 years with a MT in SFbayarea. all stock, non-performance cars: protege, accord coupe x2, and now a tsx. It's not as though it's necessary to shift through all the gears going up a hill. I lived on the very top of potrero hill, so hills I know. I bought my 6MT when I lived on that hill. it's a matter of preference. just telling you this since others posted generalizations about what they think it's like to drive a MT daily. In my experience it's possible and fun. Enjoy whatever you get.

Originally Posted by BB_inc
I'd get the automatic, since personally I find mt's to be more of a hassle than anything else, especially with traffic or hills. Besides this is an entry level luxury sedan, if you want an mt you should look at a sportier car, maybe a coupe. Otherwise a 4 banger mt sedan is almost stupid imo.
I guess BB_inc has never been to europe or asia? MT sedans are the most common and the avg. And drivers there drive 2x as good as the US avg driver.

and in the background I am 'almost' hearing a whiney voice saying "....owww my hand hurrtsss, I can't shift anymore...owwww"

later
Old 04-21-2009, 08:12 AM
  #44  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
I'd get the automatic, since personally I find mt's to be more of a hassle than anything else, especially with traffic or hills. Besides this is an entry level luxury sedan, if you want an mt you should look at a sportier car, maybe a coupe. Otherwise a 4 banger mt sedan is almost stupid imo.
Honda MTs are one of the best in the business.

You've stated your opinion, now move on. People are going to disagree with you.
Old 04-21-2009, 09:42 AM
  #45  
Banned
 
Breako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based upon Jeff's first drive of the new TSX last year at TOV, it sounds like the automatic TSX can keep up very well with the manual. When he was driving a manual and following another TSX he thought it was a manual - even though it was an automatic!
Old 04-21-2009, 10:06 AM
  #46  
WTH happened to my garage
 
HeavyDuty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 57
Posts: 1,743
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Um, the 370 and the Elise are two seaters, genius & I have three midgets under the age of twelve.

My 6MT TSX does exactly what it's supposed to and does an exceptional job of it. Will I do mods to increase the power/handling? Of course. Am I perfectly happy with a 30mpg city sedan *with* all the acoutrements *without* the temptation?

Damn skipppy.

If I want a street racer, I pick another car.
Old 04-21-2009, 10:46 AM
  #47  
Intermediate
 
BB_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meh if you guys like manual enjoy it, your choice, just doesn't make sense to drive a stock mt tsx when the automatic can keep up if not beat it. It's the skill of the driver not the transmission which dictates the winner.
Old 04-21-2009, 10:50 AM
  #48  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
^^sometimes the bigger man is the one who accepts other opinions. Take it from a 1g AT owner. Its not worth the typing.
Old 04-21-2009, 11:08 AM
  #49  
Intermediate
 
BB_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really isn't...
Old 04-21-2009, 11:10 AM
  #50  
Three Wheelin'
 
kowloonsniperhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Age: 35
Posts: 1,626
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
I would say go with a manual, more fun. I test drove the manual, and it was so smooth. I got an automatic for my 2G because traffic in orlando is killer. the paddle shifters are fun but the novelty wears off quickly. but i can say friends think that the paddle shifters are cool lol.

Isn't the TSX manual the same as the Civic Si's, just with different gear ratios?
Old 04-21-2009, 12:05 PM
  #51  
Vancouver B.C.
 
ttk5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,704
Received 325 Likes on 262 Posts
My friend with a 350z drove my 6spd tsx and he was like "whoa...the transmission is just so...smooth...it feels like a penis going into something"
Old 04-21-2009, 12:07 PM
  #52  
Vancouver B.C.
 
ttk5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,704
Received 325 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by kowloonsniperhk
Isn't the TSX manual the same as the Civic Si's, just with different gear ratios?
my brother drives a csx-s and im pretty sure everything about its 6spd is the same as an si, including the ratios. That being said...our cars feel COMPLETELY different. When I drive his car, its so much more sporty and has a sort of "mechanical" feel to its shifts. I love his car but our 2nd gens have that luxuriousness to it.
Old 04-21-2009, 12:07 PM
  #53  
Burning Brakes
 
ressling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 959
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
wow this thread has gotten crazy...

to compare a 370z to a TSX is just idiotic... 2 completely different ballparks.

And I thought I was ignorant.

For the record, my 6MT 2009 TSX is my daily driver and I drive in one of the worst traffic cities in the country - Atlanta, GA.

I STILL would not have purchased the TSX in a 5AT. Paddle shifters are whack IMO.

I'm not going to sit here and bash 5AT because again, it all comes down to personal preference. And I'm not going to lie to you and say that sitting in traffic with a 6MT is pleasureable.

But all in all, I found the driving experience to be much more fun in going with the 6MT. I stand by my decision. This was my first 6MT BTW.

Oh and finally, there is such a classification as a "Sports Sedan" to whomever was hating on the TSX for not being sporty. TSX is entry level, but I would still definitely classify it as sporty sedan.
Old 04-21-2009, 12:45 PM
  #54  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
Meh if you guys like manual enjoy it, your choice, just doesn't make sense to drive a stock mt tsx when the automatic can keep up if not beat it. It's the skill of the driver not the transmission which dictates the winner.
I'm sorry...you clearly have never seen a dyno graph of the TSX if you really think that is true.

Sure the difference is not going to be entire car lengths, but they way that manual transmissions and automatics put down power is a well known and well documented reality. You will need to accept reality at some point, whether you like it or not.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:02 PM
  #55  
Racer
 
mucter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: el Burrito
Age: 44
Posts: 261
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by kowloonsniperhk
I would say go with a manual, more fun. I test drove the manual, and it was so smooth. I got an automatic for my 2G because traffic in orlando is killer. the paddle shifters are fun but the novelty wears off quickly. but i can say friends think that the paddle shifters are cool lol.

Isn't the TSX manual the same as the Civic Si's, just with different gear ratios?
Yeah, I own a TSX and an Si, and back to back, the transmissions/clutch feel virtually identical.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:23 PM
  #56  
Intermediate
 
BB_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I'm sorry...you clearly have never seen a dyno graph of the TSX if you really think that is true.

Sure the difference is not going to be entire car lengths, but they way that manual transmissions and automatics put down power is a well known and well documented reality. You will need to accept reality at some point, whether you like it or not.
It's not such a significant gain, that I'd want to sacrifice my comfort for it. The car is an entry level "luxury" sedan not a sports sedan, sure it has "sporty" elements but why would you want to sacrifice luxury and comfort for a minor improvement in performance? Which won't do much if you suck at driving as well. The notion it's only fun if it's mt is ridiculous in general.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:32 PM
  #57  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
Meh if you guys like manual enjoy it, your choice, just doesn't make sense to drive a stock mt tsx when the automatic can keep up if not beat it. It's the skill of the driver not the transmission which dictates the winner.
Quit when you think you're ahead.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:34 PM
  #58  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
It's not such a significant gain, that I'd want to sacrifice my comfort for it. The car is an entry level "luxury" sedan not a sports sedan
That's semantics. If the marketing department declares the TSX "space aged" would it therefor be capable of entering orbit?


Originally Posted by BB_inc
The notion it's only fun if it's mt is ridiculous in general.
You're having buyers remorse and taking it out on the people who have the car you wish you had bought.
Old 04-21-2009, 01:47 PM
  #59  
Intermediate
 
BB_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah my buyers remorse is huge, who would've thought I'd make the mistake of buying an automatic luxury sedan, maybe when I hit the lotto and buy a 7 series I'll make a custom mt for it to have "fun" : /
Old 04-21-2009, 01:52 PM
  #60  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I hate these threads because of the A-hole opinions that come out of both camps. The only right answer to the question is to buy what you're comfortable with. There is no right or wrong answer.

OP, test drive both, consider you're driving habits and make a decision.
Old 04-21-2009, 02:13 PM
  #61  
Vancouver B.C.
 
ttk5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,704
Received 325 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I hate these threads because of the A-hole opinions that come out of both camps. The only right answer to the question is to buy what you're comfortable with. There is no right or wrong answer.

OP, test drive both, consider you're driving habits and make a decision.
word

x2
Old 04-21-2009, 02:17 PM
  #62  
Pro
 
JD23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I hate these threads because of the A-hole opinions that come out of both camps. The only right answer to the question is to buy what you're comfortable with. There is no right or wrong answer.

OP, test drive both, consider you're driving habits and make a decision.
So true. There are advantages and disadvantages to both MT and AT, and to suggest one is clearly better than the other is ridiculous.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:20 PM
  #63  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
It's not such a significant gain, that I'd want to sacrifice my comfort for it....why would you want to sacrifice luxury and comfort for a minor improvement in performance?
That's your opinion. In my opinion, there is no sacrifice in comfort, or luxury to have a manual.

To the OP, as others have stated, the Manuals are a joy to drive. However, you should keep in mind that they are very hard to find in every color/trim combination. This is especially true now (and probably throughout this year). If you do decide to go MT, plan ahead. Way ahead if you are particular on color.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:27 PM
  #64  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I hate these threads because of the A-hole opinions that come out of both camps. The only right answer to the question is to buy what you're comfortable with. There is no right or wrong answer.

OP, test drive both, consider you're driving habits and make a decision.

Yup. Plus the negative connotations attached by both camps are pretty childish IMO.

Doowhutchalike.....
Old 04-21-2009, 03:37 PM
  #65  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't want to pretend I looove MTs only slightly more than AT. For me the difference is quite dramatic.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:41 PM
  #66  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
I don't want to pretend I looove MTs only slightly more than AT. For me the difference is quite dramatic.
Can't speak for 2nd gens but I owned both an AT and MT 04 for quite some time and while I enjoy the MT more (never really had an auto before the AT TSX) the difference IMO was not dramatic by any means.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:42 PM
  #67  
WTH happened to my garage
 
HeavyDuty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 57
Posts: 1,743
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
I have ADD, without a MT I get bored too easily.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:48 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Can't speak for 2nd gens but I owned both an AT and MT 04 for quite some time and while I enjoy the MT more (never really had an auto before the AT TSX) the difference IMO was not dramatic by any means.
MT has been a lot more fun for me in the 2G because it has a flatter torque response up the RPM scale (someone had a nifty graph illustraing this) so there's this very satisfying constant sense of going and going after the clutch meshed with the fly wheel. The 1G's torque was enemic up until 6,000 RPM where it would suddenly lurch forward for a whole fraction of a second prior to red line, meaning that just as you were having fun you had to change gears again, and that detracted significantly.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:49 PM
  #69  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by HeavyDuty
I have ADD, without a MT I get bored too easily.
Could you say that having a MT says less about the car itself and more about the driver?
Old 04-21-2009, 03:52 PM
  #70  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
...suddenly lurch forward for a whole fraction of a second prior to red line, meaning that just as you were having fun you had to change gears again.
You're telling me! My 2000 S2000 had 3000 RPM on the 'hot' cam, the 2005 had 2000 RPM and the TSX has 1000 RPM.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:56 PM
  #71  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And Hondata aparently fixed that if you were lucky enought to have an '04-'06, Honda screwed the pooch with the 1G's VTEC.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:04 PM
  #72  
Drifting
 
LukeaTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
This BB_inc troll is hilarious with his idea that he holds some sort of monopoly on what is fun/good/comfortable/whatever. I guess the giant grin I get on my face every time I drive my car is really just a grimace of pain from my left foot and right arm. Shit, here I thought I just loved everything about driving my car. Well, I'm off to set fire to that piece of crap. Thanks for setting me straight BB_inc!

Fucking idiot.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:13 PM
  #73  
Pro
 
JD23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LukeaTron
This BB_inc troll is hilarious with his idea that he holds some sort of monopoly on what is fun/good/comfortable/whatever.
That's true, but you could say the same thing about all of the MT snobs in the forum who have decided that anyone who drives an AT is some sort of unsophisticated buffoon.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:21 PM
  #74  
Drifting
 
LukeaTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
True enough but I don't see that happening here. In fact, I don't know if I've ever seen any one claim as much with the air of authority that BB_inc is claiming. It's one thing to hold an opinion. It's another to present it as fact.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:30 PM
  #75  
WTH happened to my garage
 
HeavyDuty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 57
Posts: 1,743
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
<snip> The 1G's torque was enemic up until 6,000 RPM where it would suddenly lurch forward for a whole fraction of a second prior to red line, meaning that just as you were having fun you had to change gears again, and that detracted significantly.
I only had a loaner for a short time, but yeah, kinda like sex, when it got *really good* it was over.

Originally Posted by Colin
Could you say that having a MT says less about the car itself and more about the driver?
What was the question again?
Old 04-21-2009, 04:36 PM
  #76  
Pro
 
JD23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LukeaTron
True enough but I don't see that happening here. In fact, I don't know if I've ever seen any one claim as much with the air of authority that BB_inc is claiming. It's one thing to hold an opinion. It's another to present it as fact.
That's true. I think most reasonable people know the pros and cons of both MT and AT. The comparison between the two types of transmissions is also dependent on the specific car, as some cars have excellent MTs and poor ATs, and vice versa. The TSX seems to have an excellent MT and a pretty good AT, so it isn't like one model is totally gimped.
Old 04-21-2009, 04:52 PM
  #77  
Drifting
 
LukeaTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Not at all. Both the MT and AT are above average transmissions. I think the MT stands out from the field more than does the AT though. There are a lot of personal factors involved that this douche seems to believe he is the supreme high dictator of. I hate self righteous assholes like that.
Old 04-21-2009, 05:07 PM
  #78  
Intermediate
 
BB_inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm self righteous for having a strong opinion that I like to voice? I didn't start the flame war, I made a comment and got bombarded, fair game from that point. Most of you admit the difference isn't that major so I just don't see the point in an mt particularly in this car. By the way I never said anything about AT being more fun than MT I was arguing about luxury and comfort, and you'd have to be a complete ass to say MT is more luxurious or comfortable, jackass.
Old 04-21-2009, 05:19 PM
  #79  
Drifting
 
LukeaTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by BB_inc
I didn't buy it for performance, forgot it's a 2.4 lol. The highlander just goes to show how weak the car is, didn't say anything about it being "fun." For 27k you can buy an 05 elise with 14k miles and it'll rip a Porsche apart. Fact of the matter is a mt on such a weak "sedan" is a joke, especially at 30k. If you want a sports car get an appropriate car, not a tsx. Also, why would you need premium equipment on a 370z, cloth and stick are perfectly ok. : |
I just thought you were an idiot up until this point. Once you start claiming lordship over other peoples opinions you become a fascist. So now I think you're an idiot and an asshole. Thanks for putting to rest the idea that anything you have to say is worth paying any attention to, though admittedly, you had already made that conclusion all but foregone.
Old 04-21-2009, 05:20 PM
  #80  
Banned
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too late to play "little innocent me" after describing the TSX as a "daewoo" with a "lawn mower" engine.


Quick Reply: Automatic vs Manual



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.