2G TSX Chat, Chit, and General Info Thread
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
i promise your endlinks wont break on you....
the mounting point to the subframe will break first...
enlinks are designed to move with play.
the mounting point to the subframe ISNT designed to move at all.
so, when one wheel is higher than the other, the endlinks move with it!
the mounting point on subframe gets stressed and often breaks.
the mounting point to the subframe will break first...
enlinks are designed to move with play.
the mounting point to the subframe ISNT designed to move at all.
so, when one wheel is higher than the other, the endlinks move with it!
the mounting point on subframe gets stressed and often breaks.
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
home made end links
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
i'm not disagreeing that the progress endlinks are beefier, but there is no need for them to be...
all they need to do is pivot, ie; ball joints.
all they need to do is pivot, ie; ball joints.
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
so, if they are designed to move, designed to pivot....it will react accordingly to what the RSB is doing.
p.s. no one's ever tore end links on the TL side either. and we track our cars.
its always the subframe mount.
p.s. no one's ever tore end links on the TL side either. and we track our cars.
its always the subframe mount.
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Yeah, looking at the Progress end links, they're basically just a Heim joint with a turnbuckle for adjustment. Not very hard to make.
Buuuut, from experience, I know that those Heim joints aren't cheap (well, for precision ones, not sloppy ones you'd use on a fence gate or something) and that the $150 Progress is asking is more than fair.
Eyeballing the stock endlinks and the Progress links; they appear roughly the same size connecting shaft. The only thing I can see different is the spherical bearing vs. ??? the stock bit uses.
Buuuut, from experience, I know that those Heim joints aren't cheap (well, for precision ones, not sloppy ones you'd use on a fence gate or something) and that the $150 Progress is asking is more than fair.
Eyeballing the stock endlinks and the Progress links; they appear roughly the same size connecting shaft. The only thing I can see different is the spherical bearing vs. ??? the stock bit uses.
The following 2 users liked this post by cu2wagon:
iCrap (04-02-2015),
justnspace (04-02-2015)
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Yeah, looking at the Progress end links, they're basically just a Heim joint with a turnbuckle for adjustment. Not very hard to make.
Buuuut, from experience, I know that those Heim joints aren't cheap (well, for precision ones, not sloppy ones you'd use on a fence gate or something) and that the $150 Progress is asking is more than fair.
Eyeballing the stock endlinks and the Progress links; they appear roughly the same size connecting shaft. The only thing I can see different is the spherical bearing vs. ??? the stock bit uses.
Buuuut, from experience, I know that those Heim joints aren't cheap (well, for precision ones, not sloppy ones you'd use on a fence gate or something) and that the $150 Progress is asking is more than fair.
Eyeballing the stock endlinks and the Progress links; they appear roughly the same size connecting shaft. The only thing I can see different is the spherical bearing vs. ??? the stock bit uses.
so, the progress endlinks wont bind as easily as stock...
VTEC just kicked in, yo!
Good to know. Only reason I asked is because I've read in the 8th gen forums people with failing end links on a thicker RSB via track usage. I'm not disagreeing with anyone here. Merely just trying to get insights/comments/experiences. I 100% agree if anything, the mounting bracket/plate area will break before anything else.
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Dunno
Someone who has actually taken a stock one off can answer better than I, but from this image I ganked off the interwebs, it looks to me like the end of the link is fixed in place more or less (what do they call that, like a CV joint type linkage?):
And the Progress link joint *would seemingly* offer a bit more, um, "conical rotation" if that makes sense:
If the stock is what I think it is, then the Progress will have less compliance and more rigidity. To some small extent, it will make the rear end a little bit rougher since the heim joint offers absolutely no damping to vibration from the road.
Don't know what that's worth, but there you go.
Someone who has actually taken a stock one off can answer better than I, but from this image I ganked off the interwebs, it looks to me like the end of the link is fixed in place more or less (what do they call that, like a CV joint type linkage?):
And the Progress link joint *would seemingly* offer a bit more, um, "conical rotation" if that makes sense:
If the stock is what I think it is, then the Progress will have less compliance and more rigidity. To some small extent, it will make the rear end a little bit rougher since the heim joint offers absolutely no damping to vibration from the road.
Don't know what that's worth, but there you go.
The following 2 users liked this post by cu2wagon:
justnspace (04-02-2015),
xtcnrice (04-02-2015)
Graphite Ghost
iTrader: (2)
right they wont BIND allowing the suspension to work\ more articulation.
stainless steel so they will not rot like the oem.
i didnt say they were NEEDED....all I am saying is they are better than OEM and I noticed an IMPROVEMENT especially when in turns and bumps are encountered.
then I also said that if you never tried them HOW THE FARK can you say there is no gain.....you never tried them
stainless steel so they will not rot like the oem.
i didnt say they were NEEDED....all I am saying is they are better than OEM and I noticed an IMPROVEMENT especially when in turns and bumps are encountered.
then I also said that if you never tried them HOW THE FARK can you say there is no gain.....you never tried them
The following 3 users liked this post by robpp:
VTEC just kicked in, yo!
Great insights/findings cu2wagon!
The following users liked this post:
cu2wagon (04-02-2015)
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Hi rob!
i just like discussing things
how's your cool car coming along? was it an El camino?
i just like discussing things
how's your cool car coming along? was it an El camino?
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
el camino, el el camino.
the front is like a car, the back is like a truck.
el camino. el el camino
the front is where you drive, the back is where you.......
El camino, el el camino!
the front is like a car, the back is like a truck.
el camino. el el camino
the front is where you drive, the back is where you.......
El camino, el el camino!
VTEC just kicked in, yo!
You sell the graphite ghost yet?
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Hey Rob, since you're one of the few here right now that's done it, you can clear this up for me...
On the stock sway bar bushing mount hole (the one that gets enlarged for the Progress) is it tapped on the chassis bracket or is it a bolt/nut?
The parts diagram implies, to me, that it's tapped since it doesn't list a nut in addition to the M8x10 bolt but looking at the pictures of the Progress installation instructions, I find it hard to believe that such a thin piece of bracket would sufficiently hold.
Yeah, I could go crawl under the car and look but, "reasons".
And thanks for your inputs. FWIW, if (who am I kidding, I mean when) I were to add a sway bar, I'd go with the Progress links as well, just as cheap insurance.
--Joe
On the stock sway bar bushing mount hole (the one that gets enlarged for the Progress) is it tapped on the chassis bracket or is it a bolt/nut?
The parts diagram implies, to me, that it's tapped since it doesn't list a nut in addition to the M8x10 bolt but looking at the pictures of the Progress installation instructions, I find it hard to believe that such a thin piece of bracket would sufficiently hold.
Yeah, I could go crawl under the car and look but, "reasons".
And thanks for your inputs. FWIW, if (who am I kidding, I mean when) I were to add a sway bar, I'd go with the Progress links as well, just as cheap insurance.
--Joe
The following users liked this post:
xtcnrice (04-02-2015)
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Turtle wax black box
Unregistered Member
Drove behind a tlx, the brake lights look pixelated.
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Hey Rob, since you're one of the few here right now that's done it, you can clear this up for me...
On the stock sway bar bushing mount hole (the one that gets enlarged for the Progress) is it tapped on the chassis bracket or is it a bolt/nut?
The parts diagram implies, to me, that it's tapped since it doesn't list a nut in addition to the M8x10 bolt but looking at the pictures of the Progress installation instructions, I find it hard to believe that such a thin piece of bracket would sufficiently hold.
Yeah, I could go crawl under the car and look but, "reasons".
On the stock sway bar bushing mount hole (the one that gets enlarged for the Progress) is it tapped on the chassis bracket or is it a bolt/nut?
The parts diagram implies, to me, that it's tapped since it doesn't list a nut in addition to the M8x10 bolt but looking at the pictures of the Progress installation instructions, I find it hard to believe that such a thin piece of bracket would sufficiently hold.
Yeah, I could go crawl under the car and look but, "reasons".
So, the stock RSB bracket has a welded nut on the underside and the M8x20 bolt goes from the top of the chassis bracket and threads into the RSB bracket nut. So when the RSB is in torsion down, the stress is transmitted into the head of the bolt against the chassis bracket. I previously thought the chassis bracket was tapped and the mounting bolt went from under the RSB bracket into the chassis. I was 180-degrees wrong.
That sort of brings me back around to my original question of why not just use a higher strength bolt instead of enlarging the hole. One could still use a backer plate to get some additional stress distribution on the back side as a margin of safety, and intuitively I would think that staying with the slightly smaller stock hole gives you more material on the chassis bracket side and would be *less* prone to failure than a larger hole.
I suspect the answer comes down to cost... Going to a stronger bolt probably adds a non-insignificant cost to the assembly.
In either case, I'm not sure it really matters. I need to think about this one some more and maybe do a couple calculations. I'm stumped right now as to whether I think the Progress approach of opening up the hole from an M8 to M10 clearance is better or worse than just going to a high strength M8 bolt.
What were we talking about again?
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
Dammit. Forgot this whole point of that last rambling:
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
Has anyone ever heard of powerstop? I sure haven't
wanna put my order in for brakes tomorrow finally,
They have a decent looking deal here:
If those are crap i'll go with Centric rotors and posi-quiet pads maybe
Or these hawks.
These are supposed to be good... right?
wanna put my order in for brakes tomorrow finally,
They have a decent looking deal here:
If those are crap i'll go with Centric rotors and posi-quiet pads maybe
Or these hawks.
These are supposed to be good... right?
I have powerstop cross drilled and slotted with over 70 thousand problem free miles on them.. Glazing is starting to show more now with all the miles but they still bite well.. Powertop pads that came with the rotors in the kit are not complete shit but go with something a lil better.. Been running hawk HPS for almost 40k of those miles, a little dirtier, but have a better initial bite and smoother braking... Powerstop pads glazed up the rotors bad. Bought the kit from rockauto...
Edit... Didn't even realize you were looking to do hawk pads with the powerstop rotors lmao.. Just clicked on the links after the post... Anyways I like the setup very much.. The pads are pretty dirty and squeak at times (reversing, after hard driving, right at the end of braking etc) but nothing horrible.. Wayyyyy better than our stock "akebono-shit wear quickly" pads IMO
Edit... Didn't even realize you were looking to do hawk pads with the powerstop rotors lmao.. Just clicked on the links after the post... Anyways I like the setup very much.. The pads are pretty dirty and squeak at times (reversing, after hard driving, right at the end of braking etc) but nothing horrible.. Wayyyyy better than our stock "akebono-shit wear quickly" pads IMO
Last edited by Jaheri_cbp; 04-02-2015 at 10:40 PM.
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
oh so do you have that same kit that i linked? and then you replaced the pads with Hawks? What did you do for the rears?
Fyi the powerstop evolution pads included in the kit still felt better than the stock pads and left me pleased for a while...
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
I started with the kit for all four rotors and included evolution pads.. Was like 250 bucks or so if I remember correctly.. First maintenance/mod I ever did to the car.
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
Centric blanks (company that makes stoptech performance parts) with hawk hps pads wouldn't be a bad setup either and would perform just as well.. But slotted and drilled looks waaaaay cooler lol.. And still subtle
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
Yeah i mainly want them cause they look cool lmao. But yea maybe ill just do centric all round + hawk...
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
Yep that's the one
The following users liked this post:
iCrap (04-02-2015)
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
k i think ima just do powerstop. Doing a whole centric kit is only $30 less than doing a whole powerstop thing, and the powerstops should be a bit better than the Centric ones it looks like.
The following users liked this post:
Jaheri_cbp (04-02-2015)
ROTAREDOM
I did stop-tech dirlled rotors with Hawk performance pads. I love them! brake dust sucks, and still get some noise but the braking is significantly improved over OEM.
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
ROTAREDOM
I kinda wish I had BBK that is offered from stop tech now, but it would only be for looks.. the brake assembly I have now is really good already.
Drifting
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: City of Champs, MA
Age: 33
Posts: 2,969
Received 657 Likes
on
478 Posts
I did stop tech slotted with posi quiet pads I think? Idk, I did that deal through one of the vendors on here.... They've been great so far with minimal brake dust. Only thing I don't like is how there is a small part on the rotor where the pad doesn't touch so it gets rusted after a while... and rust build up inside of the slots as well.
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
wtf is up with this? It even has calipers
https://www.rockauto.com/catalog/mor...nid=382&jpid=5
Are they bigger than stock? I can't tell.
https://www.rockauto.com/catalog/mor...nid=382&jpid=5
Are they bigger than stock? I can't tell.
No lol just red... Now we turning the rice up lol
TSX AMG Type //M i-VVT
lol yea red is some rice. not gonna do that. If anything i'll paint em black.
ROTAREDOM
Mine are red.. am I rice?
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dirty H-Town, Amerikkka
Posts: 28,432
Received 7,772 Likes
on
5,045 Posts
White rice.