Alignment issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2018, 11:24 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
03TLSinCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Alignment issues

Recently replaced my front shocks and driver's side upper control arm (had a bad upper ball joint). Brought the car in for an alignment and was told they couldn't get it within specs. The car does have a fairly strong pull to the right, but don't have the readings handy right now. The recommendation was to get an adjustable ball joint to allow the shop to get the alignment into or at least closer to specs.

While I am not aware of any significant damage being done to the front end recently (the car was aligned about a year ago without issue), but I guess it's possible that installing new parts exposed wear and tear on other parts, causing this issue. The car does have over 300k miles on it and this is the first significant front end work being done (I've had the car since it had 30k miles).

Two questions:

1) Has anyone run into an issue like this and does an adjustable ball joint seem like a reasonable approach to resolving this issue?
2) Other than the ball joint, what other component might contribute to the inability to get the alignment within specs, understanding that the ball joint was the only recommended component replacement (tie rods are apparently still good)?

Thanks for any feedback.
Old 04-25-2018, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,887
Received 8,584 Likes on 6,630 Posts
Depends what they're trying to get into stock. If it's camber, then don't worry about it. negative camber will go over time but it's perfectly fine to have a little negative camber
Old 04-25-2018, 12:43 PM
  #3  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
03TLSinCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Pretty sure the issue is toe. I'll post the readings this evening. They also said they wanted to get it just a bit negative, but couldn't.
Old 04-25-2018, 12:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,887
Received 8,584 Likes on 6,630 Posts
Please post the sheet, it will help us determine if it's necessary... I don't think upper ball joints are even adjusted when doing toe.. there are toe arms that the alignment tech adjusts.. He may be pulling your chain.
Old 04-25-2018, 12:49 PM
  #5  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
03TLSinCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks. I appreciate the input and your insight.
Old 04-25-2018, 07:27 PM
  #6  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
03TLSinCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
OK, so I was mistaken. The problem is primarily with the camber setting. It is -1.0° on the front drivers side, which is out of spec. The other settings on both sides are within spec. Caster is the same on each side (2.7°). Toe is 0.06° on the driver's side and 0.01° on the passenger side, both within spec, but perhaps not ideal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skunkworkz
1G RL (1996-2004)
0
03-03-2015 05:57 PM
lowchef
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
27
01-25-2014 10:28 AM
jime
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
11
10-26-2011 10:45 AM
conquest80
1G CL (1997-1999)
17
12-05-2004 08:49 PM
asiankidd
2G TL (1999-2003)
1
08-02-2002 09:54 AM



Quick Reply: Alignment issues



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.