at the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2010, 11:29 AM
  #81  
Drifting
 
JDM Inspired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 36
Posts: 2,955
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by 02type-s
wtf? Quit spamming threads with completely irrelevant shit



edit- oops, forgot this-
stfu pussy

Last edited by JDM Inspired; 02-02-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Old 02-02-2010, 01:23 PM
  #82  
slow tl..
iTrader: (2)
 
gfrg88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the 303
Age: 36
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ lol late... But I do have to agree... lets just cruise
Old 02-02-2010, 03:46 PM
  #83  
-Arsenic-
 
02type-s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 36
Posts: 6,192
Received 101 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by JDM Inspired
stfu pussy


You just saw that?? lmao
Old 02-04-2010, 08:34 AM
  #84  
Drifting
 
JDM Inspired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 36
Posts: 2,955
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by 02type-s


You just saw that?? lmao
lol yeh.....
Old 02-04-2010, 01:45 PM
  #85  
Pro
 
Vman159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
well i dont know i have the same problem last year i ran 17.1 than i did seafoam and it went down to 16.4-16.5
Old 02-04-2010, 02:11 PM
  #86  
Instructor
 
Sneaky Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Baltimore,Md
Age: 34
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
spark plugs egr port cleaning thats all try it you'll see
Old 02-05-2010, 12:44 AM
  #87  
Advanced
 
kenshinx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Age: 43
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
id say user error.. i run my car bone stock and i get high 15's.
Old 02-05-2010, 09:30 AM
  #88  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
same.. i've even ran 15.4 bone stock. on overdue tires
Old 02-05-2010, 12:27 PM
  #89  
Pro
 
Vman159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^i forgot but what car did you have? people say i get slow time because of elevation. there was this one corvette (06+) at the track and he said he runs almost a second slower than what he does at sea level.
Old 02-05-2010, 12:27 PM
  #90  
Pro
 
Vman159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
hey but thinhthan your car looks great i hope i can make mine somewhat like yours
Old 02-05-2010, 01:00 PM
  #91  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
All of you guys are so funny!!!! I can't believe only 1 of you people out of everyone in this thread knew the answer as to why he runs low 17's. Crazymonkey is the only one that knew it? I am suprised. Anyway for the facts: He ran a 17.2 due to the altitude. The track that he ran at is 5200+FT above sea level. Factor in pressure, humidity, temperature and I bet his DA is way above 6000ft. His 17.2 is normal there. At sea level he would be in the 15's. Even here in Tucson where I run its 3075ft and the DA was 4200ft on the day that I ran. At sea level I would run .8 tenths of a second faster and add about 5MPH for my time. It is easier to correct your 1/4 mile time if you know the DA, which there is a calculator for on dragtimes.com. You need to know the conditions of the day which you can find out online. type in the info into the calculator and it will give you your DA. then you type in your 1/4 mile time and MPH and it will show you an estimated time that you would run in more optimal conditions.

OP- There is nothing wrong with your TL. That is normal for Denver!
Old 02-05-2010, 02:41 PM
  #92  
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
friesm2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 38
Posts: 8,502
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
All of you guys are so funny!!!! I can't believe only 1 of you people out of everyone in this thread knew the answer as to why he runs low 17's. Crazymonkey is the only one that knew it? I am suprised. Anyway for the facts: He ran a 17.2 due to the altitude. The track that he ran at is 5200+FT above sea level. Factor in pressure, humidity, temperature and I bet his DA is way above 6000ft. His 17.2 is normal there. At sea level he would be in the 15's. Even here in Tucson where I run its 3075ft and the DA was 4200ft on the day that I ran. At sea level I would run .8 tenths of a second faster and add about 5MPH for my time. It is easier to correct your 1/4 mile time if you know the DA, which there is a calculator for on dragtimes.com. You need to know the conditions of the day which you can find out online. type in the info into the calculator and it will give you your DA. then you type in your 1/4 mile time and MPH and it will show you an estimated time that you would run in more optimal conditions.

OP- There is nothing wrong with your TL. That is normal for Denver!
x2, i was going to post something like that , not quite a good as an explanation though, but yeah the altitude kills the power here (live in Denver also), and from a day to day basis, we are probably down a good 15-20% down on power then everyone at sea level (so like 40+ HP on a type-s )


force inducted cars are not as affected by the altitude, but they still lose power also
Old 02-05-2010, 03:29 PM
  #93  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by friesm2000
we are probably down a good 15-20% down on power then everyone at sea level (so like 40+ HP on a type-s )
Yes it is something like that. When I did my calculation using the calculator on Dragtimes it showed my honda was running at 89% where I ran at SIR on that day. 11% is HUGE!!!

Originally Posted by friesm2000
force inducted cars are not as affected by the altitude, but they still lose power also
This is very true!
Old 02-05-2010, 04:11 PM
  #94  
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
friesm2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 38
Posts: 8,502
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
try the climb to 11000 ft (and the speed limit is 75 btw) at the westbound entrance to the eisenhower tower on I-70, just when you actually want the additional power
Old 02-09-2010, 11:14 PM
  #95  
Instructor
 
jrm1508's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aurora, CO
Age: 33
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by friesm2000
try the climb to 11000 ft (and the speed limit is 75 btw) at the westbound entrance to the eisenhower tower on I-70, just when you actually want the additional power
wat do you mean i went up that hill doing 80 in forth no problem at all, and i have 150k.
Old 02-10-2010, 11:36 AM
  #96  
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
thinhthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 36
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok so i guess my car is normal.. well i plan on puttin a new engine into it casue it has 19xxxx miles on it im planning on building a j35 with a j32 type s head
Old 02-10-2010, 01:06 PM
  #97  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
All of you guys are so funny!!!! I can't believe only 1 of you people out of everyone in this thread knew the answer as to why he runs low 17's. Crazymonkey is the only one that knew it? I am suprised. Anyway for the facts: He ran a 17.2 due to the altitude. The track that he ran at is 5200+FT above sea level. Factor in pressure, humidity, temperature and I bet his DA is way above 6000ft. His 17.2 is normal there. At sea level he would be in the 15's. Even here in Tucson where I run its 3075ft and the DA was 4200ft on the day that I ran. At sea level I would run .8 tenths of a second faster and add about 5MPH for my time. It is easier to correct your 1/4 mile time if you know the DA, which there is a calculator for on dragtimes.com. You need to know the conditions of the day which you can find out online. type in the info into the calculator and it will give you your DA. then you type in your 1/4 mile time and MPH and it will show you an estimated time that you would run in more optimal conditions.

OP- There is nothing wrong with your TL. That is normal for Denver!
most of that has been discussed in here.. but elevation does not account for the AMOUNT of time he's off..

its not just .8 tenths of a second here.. he is 1.5-1.75 seconds off... thats more then elevation IMO.. but i guess we'll never know really.
Old 02-10-2010, 03:11 PM
  #98  
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
friesm2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 38
Posts: 8,502
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by jrm1508
wat do you mean i went up that hill doing 80 in forth no problem at all, and i have 150k.
you know what i mean


it can still go, but it is still severely down on power though
Old 02-10-2010, 03:48 PM
  #99  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by Rockstar21
most of that has been discussed in here.. but elevation does not account for the AMOUNT of time he's off..

its not just .8 tenths of a second here.. he is 1.5-1.75 seconds off... thats more then elevation IMO.. but i guess we'll never know really.
I don't think you completely understand. The .8 tenths of a second was my correction for my 1/4 mile time. I was showing an example of what elevation, DA, humidity, temperature and other conditions do to 1/4 mile times. My DA was 4200+Ft. His DA is going to be 6000ft +. His elevation at the track is I think 5200ft. He can find out what his exact DA is and that will determine the correction factor. 1.5 - 1.75 seconds off is normal for him at the track in Denver. So in reality we will know if he does the correction. He just needs to use the dragtimes.com calculator and he can get the conditions of the day he ran and enter in his elevation. that will give him a correct time for sea level and optimal conditions.
Old 02-10-2010, 04:09 PM
  #100  
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
friesm2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 38
Posts: 8,502
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
track would be Bandimere Speedway; here is a straight link to their site:
http://bandimere.com/services/trackFacts.php

and the track is at a elevation of 5800' by their data


BTW: the grass next to the track in the picture is never that green
Old 02-10-2010, 04:36 PM
  #101  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by friesm2000
track would be Bandimere Speedway; here is a straight link to their site:
http://bandimere.com/services/trackFacts.php

and the track is at a elevation of 5800' by their data


BTW: the grass next to the track in the picture is never that green
thanks for the info! Even higher than I though so that really solidifies his 17.2
Old 02-10-2010, 05:05 PM
  #102  
B A N N E D
iTrader: (4)
 
friesm2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 38
Posts: 8,502
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
yeah my old 94 accord lx auto could only run mid 18's here iirc (i know it was in the 18's though) completely stock with the motor running good (and only like 85k miles on it too)

and that was with torque braking (loading the toque converter up to stall speed) the tranny too, before launching

Last edited by friesm2000; 02-10-2010 at 05:09 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
jpadilla
3G RLX (2013+)
4
09-27-2015 07:53 PM
4drviper
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-23-2015 09:00 PM



Quick Reply: at the track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.