Test drove 03TLS, not as strong as my 02TLS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2005 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
Shaqs2002TLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo NY
Test drove 03TLS, not as strong as my 02TLS

A friend of the family pulled up today at my house in his 03 TLS w/ OEM kit and wing. It's silver just like mine so I asked him if I could take it for a ride just to see if there were any driving differences. So I took it for a nice 2 mile run and pushed the gas pretty hard a couple of times and noticed it doesn't pull as hard as my 02 TLS. It definitely road better over bumps. Maybe cuz his as 49K and mine had 83K AND i have 225/45/17 where his has OEM 215/50/17. Didn't think that difference in profile would've made that much of a difference. Also both stock.

Anyway, anyone know why I would feel that much difference in power? Also does that tire profile change actually make that much difference in the ride over bumps in addition to the 33K mile difference?
Old 09-06-2005 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
PenguinQX's Avatar
All go, no show
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 1
The cars are basically identical, you really shouldn't feel any difference even w/ the mileage differences. Maybe his car isn't well maintained?

The profile difference really isn't enough to matter... perhaps the brand of tire?
Old 09-06-2005 | 10:26 PM
  #3  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
with out a side by side race how do you know that it didnt pull as hard? also our computers lear to our driving, so if it isnt driven as hard as yours it isnt going to respond as quick
Old 09-06-2005 | 10:42 PM
  #4  
spl1011's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
That is more for tha adaptive trannies than engines in the 2nd gen.

Any dead bodies in the trunk? That always slows me down.

Maybe the body kit and wing added a lot of drag... j/k..

Im sorry, I am in a goofy mood. The cars should be the same, minus variables such as tires, etc. Which it could very well be that your tires are grippier and tranfer energy to the road better. I know when I replaced my tires I could barely get the new ones to chirp on launches anymore, whereas the stocks would just spin until VSA kicked in. With the new tires, I noticed much more response in that form. - oh and profiles were the same stock size 215 50 R17. All that changed was the brand of rubber.
Old 09-07-2005 | 04:56 AM
  #5  
Shaqs2002TLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by PenguinQX
The cars are basically identical, you really shouldn't feel any difference even w/ the mileage differences. Maybe his car isn't well maintained?

The profile difference really isn't enough to matter... perhaps the brand of tire?

How much possible maintanence could he do at 49K? It's not time for any major maintanence by then. Who knows, maybe he used 87 Octane. Didn't ask, kindof in a rush.


Originally Posted by fsttyms1
with out a side by side race how do you know that it didnt pull as hard? also our computers lear to our driving, so if it isnt driven as hard as yours it isnt going to respond as quick
I wanted to go side by side with him but that just wasn't the right time. Mine just "felt" stronger. If I had the opportunity I'd role with him. Maybe next time.
Old 09-07-2005 | 05:39 AM
  #6  
spl1011's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
Take a video camera if you do :-)
Old 09-07-2005 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
Originally Posted by spl1011
That is more for tha adaptive trannies than engines in the 2nd gen.
correct, but having it be more responsive on gear select/shift can make it feel quicker/slower
Old 09-07-2005 | 12:18 PM
  #8  
bkzjimmy's Avatar
NiGhT rIdEr
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 2
From: brooklyn, ny
Originally Posted by spl1011
Take a video camera if you do :-)
Old 09-07-2005 | 02:21 PM
  #9  
snowman81's Avatar
Sippy Cup (x2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 9
From: Virginia Beach, VA
I wouldn't think the difference in the ride is from the size of the tires either. There is only a 6 mm difference from yours to his (his being the larger of course). I would say maybe the brand like other people have mentioned or the wear on your suspension might make for a bit of a harsher ride. As for yours pulling more, I don't know. Maybe the ECU is programmed a little differently in '03 but I'm not sure.
Old 09-14-2005 | 08:24 AM
  #10  
Vicman17's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: NNE of 716
I sure feel a difference when I switch to my winter rims (04 Accord 16" seven-spoke with stock Michelins). It seems the car is more "sure footed" compared to the stock 17" MXM4s, although the torque -steer is much more pronounced on the 16's and the cornering isn't as good- I guess 'coz of the increased tire aspect.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
Oakroadsteve
3G TL (2004-2008)
9
10-28-2015 10:28 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM



Quick Reply: Test drove 03TLS, not as strong as my 02TLS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.