Gas Mileage Rankings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2007, 07:34 AM
  #1  
Go Big Blue!
Thread Starter
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Gas Mileage Rankings

I always knew the RL was not "green". But I have to admit I was a bit stunned to see how bad it really is compared to other cars in the Lux class. Check it out;

http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007_luxury_sedans.html
Old 06-25-2007, 07:46 AM
  #2  
Burning Brakes
 
lland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
No surprise...about what I've been getting. Besides, most of the cars above the RL have smaller engines, are lighter, lack AWD, or have some combination of these. For "directly competetive" cars, the RL is near the top or within 1-2 MPG of them.

LL
Old 06-25-2007, 08:04 AM
  #3  
office monkey
 
Rob L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 45
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lland
No surprise...about what I've been getting. Besides, most of the cars above the RL have smaller engines, are lighter, lack AWD, or have some combination of these. For "directly competetive" cars, the RL is near the top or within 1-2 MPG of them.

LL
They all have more gears. I am sure if Acura slapped in a 6 speed the car would be higher up that list, prolly an extra mpg for both city/driving. Regardless, the RL sure isn't some fuel efficient car but not horrible either.

To me the most impressive car on the list is the LS460 since its engine is big, it is powerful and it weighs a good chunk....the 8 gears are clearly doing their thing for the car as is the sweet Toyota engineering.
Old 06-25-2007, 11:49 AM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,018
Received 4,615 Likes on 2,194 Posts
Yup...those numbers seem about right for the RL.
Old 06-25-2007, 12:44 PM
  #5  
Go Big Blue!
Thread Starter
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob L
They all have more gears. I am sure if Acura slapped in a 6 speed the car would be higher up that list, prolly an extra mpg for both city/driving. Regardless, the RL sure isn't some fuel efficient car but not horrible either.
Yea, I agree the gear issue is big and probably the main reason for the poor ranking. The RL is practically the only one still running with a 5 speed AT in it's class. They better do something about that with the next gen. Everyone keeps talking about MORE POWER. That's great. But most people want mpg and shop that number too. Who knows, maybe these low figures are already hurting them in sales. It's a factor in many peoples decision. They're competition is working hard on that already (e.g. MB). They can't keep ignoring that.
Old 06-25-2007, 02:22 PM
  #6  
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
GoHawks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 2,196
Received 95 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
Yea, I agree the gear issue is big and probably the main reason for the poor ranking. The RL is practically the only one still running with a 5 speed AT in it's class. They better do something about that with the next gen. Everyone keeps talking about MORE POWER. That's great. But most people want mpg and shop that number too. Who knows, maybe these low figures are already hurting them in sales. It's a factor in many peoples decision. They're competition is working hard on that already (e.g. MB). They can't keep ignoring that.
For a company that touts itself for being environmentally responsible, you would have figured Honda would have addressed that from the beginning. My bet is that Honda went the conservative route based on what happened when they went from a 4 speed to 5 speed tranny in the 2nd gen TLs.

I'm sure one is in the works, they're just testing the hell out of it to avoid another embarassing situation.
Old 06-25-2007, 02:28 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
 
Chas2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,217
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Although, it is somewhat green from a carbon contribution standpoint being a ULEV II, of course, they may all be that, though doubtful the diesels are.

The principal tailpipe standards applicable to today's vehicles are:

Federal Standards:

Tier 1: The former Federal (EPA) standard; as of 2005, no longer in use.
Tier 1-D: The former Federal diesel standard; permits higher NOx emissions than the Tier 1 standard; as of 2005, no longer in use.
Tier 2 bin 11: New Federal standard, applies only to large trucks.
Tier 2 bin 10: Least-clean Tier 2 bin applicable to cars.
Tier 2 bins 9 through 6: (Progressively cleaner standards)
Tier 2 bin 5: "Average" of new Tier 2 standards. NOx emissions levels of all vehicles sold by each automaker must average to the bin 5 NOx level or cleaner when standards are fully phased in later in the decade.
Tier 2 bins 4 through 2: (Progressively cleaner standards)
Tier 2 bin 1: The cleanest Federal Tier 2 standard. Equivalent to a zero-emission vehicle (ZEV).

California Phase II Low-Emission Vehicle Standards—A new set of Low-Emission Vehicle standards; generally cleaner than Phase I Low-Emission Vehicle standards:

LEV II: Low-Emission Vehicle, the least stringent of the new, Phase II LEV standards. NOx emissions are one-quarter the level of a LEV I-certified vehicle.
ULEV II: Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicle, a mid-level Phase II LEV standard. Hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions levels are nearly 50% lower than those of a LEV II-certified vehicle.
SULEV II: Super-Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicle, a California standard even tighter than ULEV II, including significantly lower NOx emissions and more durable control systems.
PZEV: Partial Zero-Emission Vehicle, compliant with the SULEV standard; additionally has near-zero evaporative emissions and a 15-year/150,000-mile warranty on its emission control equipment.
ZEV: Zero-Emission Vehicle, a California standard prohibiting any tailpipe emissions.

California Phase I Low-Emission Vehicle Standards—The former set of Low-Emission Vehicle standards; generally less clean than Phase II Low-Emission Vehicle standards.

LEV I: Low-Emission Vehicle, an intermediate California standard about twice as stringent as the now-expired Federal Tier 1 standard.
ULEV I: Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicle, a stronger California standard emphasizing low HC emissions.
SULEV I: Super-Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicle, a stronger California applicable only to larger passenger trucks (SUVs, pickups, etc.); emits approximately half as much as a ULEV I-certified truck.
Old 06-25-2007, 02:32 PM
  #8  
Safety Car
 
Chas2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,217
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob L
They all have more gears. I am sure if Acura slapped in a 6 speed the car would be higher up that list, prolly an extra mpg for both city/driving. Regardless, the RL sure isn't some fuel efficient car but not horrible either.

To me the most impressive car on the list is the LS460 since its engine is big, it is powerful and it weighs a good chunk....the 8 gears are clearly doing their thing for the car as is the sweet Toyota engineering.
I remember, a while ago, Lexus was able to gin up a 5 speed transmission by software--using the overdrive plus second, to come up with another gear. I am not sure that we have "overdrives" where this can be done. Any idea?

This was a stop gap before they could bring a true 5 speed or 6 speed--I guess now 8 speeds--to market
Old 06-26-2007, 12:30 AM
  #9  
7th Gear
 
travis13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R
Old 06-26-2007, 12:30 AM
  #10  
7th Gear
 
travis13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
L
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
10-22-2019 01:55 PM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
10-05-2015 11:00 AM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
09-29-2015 10:52 AM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-27-2015 10:22 AM



Quick Reply: Gas Mileage Rankings



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.