2005 Consumer Reports - AWD Mid-Luxury Sedan Comparison
#1
2005 Consumer Reports - AWD Mid-Luxury Sedan Comparison
2005 Consumer Reports - AWD Mid-Luxury Sedan Comparison
The Audi came in the 2nd place again, which is a good consistant showing for Audi. The A6 had the best fuel economy, but got a low score for controls & displays. The RL placed more at the bottom this time and got a low score for trunk space and controls & displays . The GS got the lowest scores for emergency handling and driving position. The STS placed mid-pack, but didn't get good scores for fit & finish and trunk space. The M got a low score for trunk space and fuel economy as did the others with 18 MPG. Trunk space was an issue for all of them. The GS and A6 had the best scores for noise. The M35x is now CR's overall top rated sedan.
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
3. Cadillac STS V6
4. Acura RL
5. Lexus GS300 AWD
Infiniti M35x:
0-60 MPH - 7.0 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 128 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Audi A6 3.2 Quattro:
0-60 MPH - 7.7 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 129 Feet
Fuel Economy - 21 MPG
Cadillac STS V6:
0-60 MPH - 7.1 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 131 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Acura RL:
0-60 MPH 6.9 Seconds
60-0 MPH 131 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Lexus GS300 AWD:
0-60 MPH - 7.4 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 133 Feet
Fuel Economy - 20 MPG
Credit: DrewSRX
The Audi came in the 2nd place again, which is a good consistant showing for Audi. The A6 had the best fuel economy, but got a low score for controls & displays. The RL placed more at the bottom this time and got a low score for trunk space and controls & displays . The GS got the lowest scores for emergency handling and driving position. The STS placed mid-pack, but didn't get good scores for fit & finish and trunk space. The M got a low score for trunk space and fuel economy as did the others with 18 MPG. Trunk space was an issue for all of them. The GS and A6 had the best scores for noise. The M35x is now CR's overall top rated sedan.
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
3. Cadillac STS V6
4. Acura RL
5. Lexus GS300 AWD
Infiniti M35x:
0-60 MPH - 7.0 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 128 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Audi A6 3.2 Quattro:
0-60 MPH - 7.7 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 129 Feet
Fuel Economy - 21 MPG
Cadillac STS V6:
0-60 MPH - 7.1 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 131 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Acura RL:
0-60 MPH 6.9 Seconds
60-0 MPH 131 Feet
Fuel Economy - 18 MPG
Lexus GS300 AWD:
0-60 MPH - 7.4 Seconds
60-0 MPH - 133 Feet
Fuel Economy - 20 MPG
Credit: DrewSRX
#2
This is how the luxury sedans now rank, according to Consumer Reports:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
#4
Originally Posted by jrock65
This is how the luxury sedans now rank, according to Consumer Reports:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
#5
Originally Posted by acurafox
It's interesting that CR rates the Benz so highly, given their recent (and ongoing) reliability problems.
#6
office monkey
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 45
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So because the RL has a small trunk in their opinion and because they dont like its controls/displays they ranked it that low? Odd.
I gotta wonder if the RL was ranked first and the M 4th if jrock would have posted this
I gotta wonder if the RL was ranked first and the M 4th if jrock would have posted this
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#7
Originally Posted by Rob L
So because the RL has a small trunk in their opinion and because they dont like its controls/displays they ranked it that low? Odd.
I gotta wonder if the RL was ranked first and the M 4th if jrock would have posted this![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I gotta wonder if the RL was ranked first and the M 4th if jrock would have posted this
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
JRock does not seem to be biased towards any particular brand.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Rob L
I gotta wonder if the RL was ranked first and the M 4th if jrock would have posted this![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
However, fact of the matter is that the M has won a lot of comparos that it's been in, so it may end up that a comparo I post will have the M as the winner.
I like comparos not because of the rankings (which are generally worthless given the subjectivity), but for ratings on specific aspects of the car and test times.
#9
Originally Posted by msu79gt82
Consumer Reports separates the product ratings from its reliability ratings. Thus reliability does not effect where a vehicle ranks. HOWEVER Consumer Reports will not recommend any product will less than average reliability ratings. Thus a car can rank first, third, whatever and NOT be Recommended based on it repair records.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#10
Originally Posted by acurafox
I agree that they do separate them for their current ratings, but it seems like the link used to be much stronger between the reliability data and the overall ratings that they used to rank the cars in each category in the past. I have a couple of old CR issues (I don't know why), so maybe I will examine them and see if there is any evidence of this or if it is just my imagination and middle aged (lack of) memory at work. ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#11
has been here awhile
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe I'm a little bitter, but is Consumer Reports a publication luxury car buyers go to? I really don't think of them as an auto magazine and find them useful only for reliability ratings. I could care less if the people of Consumer Reports find that the RL doesn't handle too well...what do they know? Funny thing is that all enthusiast magazines have rated these vehicles in practically the opposite order...hmm...who to believe?...choices, choices...
--End of immature, petty, RL fanboy rant--
--End of immature, petty, RL fanboy rant--
#12
Originally Posted by SPUDMTN
Maybe I'm a little bitter, but is Consumer Reports a publication luxury car buyers go to? I really don't think of them as an auto magazine and find them useful only for reliability ratings. I could care less if the people of Consumer Reports find that the RL doesn't handle too well...what do they know? Funny thing is that all enthusiast magazines have rated these vehicles in practically the opposite order...hmm...who to believe?...choices, choices...
--End of immature, petty, RL fanboy rant--
--End of immature, petty, RL fanboy rant--
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
I find CR very useful as another research tool; one of the best in my opinion. Are they the only tool I use? Of course not. As far as other enthusiasts magazines go, to my knowledge the M has won virtually all of them. I see consistency across the board.
#13
Originally Posted by jrock65
This is how the luxury sedans now rank, according to Consumer Reports:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#14
So here is Consumer Report's real list/ranking of Luxury Sedans:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Acura TL
3. Toyota Avalon
4. Mercedes-Benz E320
5. BMW 530i
6. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
7. Lexus ES330
8. Cadillac STS V6
9. Acura RL
10. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
11. Lexus GS300 AWD
12. Volvo S80 T6
13. SAAB 9-5
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Acura TL
3. Toyota Avalon
4. Mercedes-Benz E320
5. BMW 530i
6. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
7. Lexus ES330
8. Cadillac STS V6
9. Acura RL
10. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
11. Lexus GS300 AWD
12. Volvo S80 T6
13. SAAB 9-5
#15
Originally Posted by lumpydog
So here is Consumer Report's real list/ranking of Luxury Sedans:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Acura TL
3. Toyota Avalon
4. Mercedes-Benz E320
5. BMW 530i
6. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
7. Lexus ES330
8. Cadillac STS V6
9. Acura RL
10. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
11. Lexus GS300 AWD
12. Volvo S80 T6
13. SAAB 9-5
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Acura TL
3. Toyota Avalon
4. Mercedes-Benz E320
5. BMW 530i
6. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
7. Lexus ES330
8. Cadillac STS V6
9. Acura RL
10. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
11. Lexus GS300 AWD
12. Volvo S80 T6
13. SAAB 9-5
Also they must use some value for the $$$ formula, which would explain the TL being rated higher than the RL. Or am I missing something here?
#16
Consumer Reports is indeed just a basic research tool.
They do so many tests on just about everything that they
rarely give more than just a glossy overview of the product.
I run a website that's big on electronics, computers and
Home Theater. Whenever I see CR doing their reports on
any of these categories I find that they totally miss their mark.
They limit themselves to the popular brand names instead of
telling you what "other brands" actually equal or exceed.
I'm not telling you guys anything you don't know already,
but if you really want reliable ratings you have to look at
specialized magazines, or even better , forums like
this one where you can connect with actual consumers.
This is why I trust Acurazine member opinions when it comes
to my RL.
On another note....
My day job outside of my Internet business is working for the
Postal Service. I see a lot of car magazines go by. Reading some
of the latest issues I find comments made about the Acura RL that
aren't very flattering. In one magazine a reader reffered to the
RL as a "car made more for a chauffeur rather than an enthusuast"
and another magazine took jabs at the car for being mostly full
of high-tech gadgetry and not much else including a V-8 engine.
All I know is that I am VERY happy with this car.
They do so many tests on just about everything that they
rarely give more than just a glossy overview of the product.
I run a website that's big on electronics, computers and
Home Theater. Whenever I see CR doing their reports on
any of these categories I find that they totally miss their mark.
They limit themselves to the popular brand names instead of
telling you what "other brands" actually equal or exceed.
I'm not telling you guys anything you don't know already,
but if you really want reliable ratings you have to look at
specialized magazines, or even better , forums like
this one where you can connect with actual consumers.
This is why I trust Acurazine member opinions when it comes
to my RL.
On another note....
My day job outside of my Internet business is working for the
Postal Service. I see a lot of car magazines go by. Reading some
of the latest issues I find comments made about the Acura RL that
aren't very flattering. In one magazine a reader reffered to the
RL as a "car made more for a chauffeur rather than an enthusuast"
and another magazine took jabs at the car for being mostly full
of high-tech gadgetry and not much else including a V-8 engine.
All I know is that I am VERY happy with this car.
#17
Originally Posted by jrock65
This is how the luxury sedans now rank, according to Consumer Reports:
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
1. Infiniti M35x
2. Mercedes-Benz E320
3. BMW 530i
4. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro
5. Cadillac STS V6
6. Acura RL
7. Jaguar S-Type 4.2
8. Lexus GS300 AWD
9. Volvo S80 T6
Previously, the Lexus LS430 and E39 BMW 5-Series were the best luxury sedans.
Credit: DrewSRX
Here's another view from Car and Driver Magazine. The RL ranks 2nd to the M35 in this one.
This was the article that finally swayed me to the RL.
I don't regret it a bit.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=9391
#18
Actually, in the Car and Driver article, the RL comes in second to the more-expensive M45-Sport, not M35. Edmunds.com shows that the price I could expect to pay for the M45-Sport with the Technology Package (to get roughly the same stuff that the RL has...maybe a bit more stuff), would be over $54,500. That's a lot more than I paid for my RL. I must say, though, that I test drove the M35 and M45, and I could have been pretty happy with one of them.
#19
Originally Posted by curry7
Actually, in the Car and Driver article, the RL comes in second to the more-expensive M45-Sport, not M35. Edmunds.com shows that the price I could expect to pay for the M45-Sport with the Technology Package (to get roughly the same stuff that the RL has...maybe a bit more stuff), would be over $54,500. That's a lot more than I paid for my RL. I must say, though, that I test drove the M35 and M45, and I could have been pretty happy with one of them.
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
#20
Infiniti does not discount
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
#21
Originally Posted by drugadman
Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
#22
is Pretty Much a Moron
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 38
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
#23
Instructor
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Age: 67
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
#24
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
#25
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: California
Age: 40
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
The RL's platform was built from Honda's Global Platform. It pretty much starts off as a paper-clip and Honda stretches it, bends it, widens it and strengthens it where needed. So if you want to say the RL has it's own exlcusive form of the Global Platform, then you can. Same goes for the Accord, it's platform design started from the Global Platform. It was streched, bent, yada yada yada where needed to be an Accord.
#26
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
I don't think anything you posted was even close to being accurate.
#27
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
Originally Posted by drugadman
As much as ACURA does so the mariginal advantages the M35x may have over the RL are offset by the increased price. Plus, the G series are fancy Altimas and the M series are fancy Maximas, and reliability is poor.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
ACURAs are based on unique platforms with high reliability.
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
#28
Three Wheelin'
Pardon me for being late, but is this the same Consumer Reports issue where they diss the RL because it is hard to attach a baby seat to the back seat of the car?
#29
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
Pardon me for being late, but is this the same Consumer Reports issue where they diss the RL because it is hard to attach a baby seat to the back seat of the car?
Hard to attach a baby seat? Got to be kidding. What kind of seat were they putting in? The babyseat I have has seatbelt-like attachments (push button release and quick connect) and make connecting to the Acura quite easy. Also very easy to get back off.
#30
Three Wheelin'
That's what I recall reading in the issue of Consumer Reports that is currently on newsstands now. They felt that attaching a baby seat was problematic, which was one of their complaints. They also complained about the shifter being difficult to use and the controls being too complex.
#31
has been here awhile
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
That's what I recall reading in the issue of Consumer Reports that is currently on newsstands now. They felt that attaching a baby seat was problematic, which was one of their complaints. They also complained about the shifter being difficult to use and the controls being too complex.
![Thumbs Down](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post