SH-AWD for RDX
#1
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
SH-AWD for RDX
guys,
A quick question: the first generation of RDX had SH-AWD but the second germination and now the MMC advertise intelligent AWD. Why Acura doesn't use the same SH-AWD system for RDX? any reason ?
thanks
A quick question: the first generation of RDX had SH-AWD but the second germination and now the MMC advertise intelligent AWD. Why Acura doesn't use the same SH-AWD system for RDX? any reason ?
thanks
#2
Short answer: the RDX AWD is simpler, so it weighs less and therefore better fuel economy.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (04-18-2015)
#4
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
thanks guys.
Very strange though. TLX, RLX and MDX have SH-AWD and RDX only AWD for fuel economy. sometimes Acura kills me. like no exhaust tips. still love Acura
Very strange though. TLX, RLX and MDX have SH-AWD and RDX only AWD for fuel economy. sometimes Acura kills me. like no exhaust tips. still love Acura
#6
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
But Acura does offer a great machine and thats the reason many of us here bought one.
But honestly not offering SH AWD to RDX for better fuel economy is laughable. I hope Acura has a better answer (more of R&D cost). Anyway, my brother is looking in to 2016 RDX and I was praying SH-AWD and when we were building one online noticed that there is no SH.
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
agreed!
But Acura does offer a great machine and thats the reason many of us here bought one.
But honestly not offering SH AWD to RDX for better fuel economy is laughable. I hope Acura has a better answer (more of R&D cost). Anyway, my brother is looking in to 2016 RDX and I was praying SH-AWD and when we were building one online noticed that there is no SH.
But Acura does offer a great machine and thats the reason many of us here bought one.
But honestly not offering SH AWD to RDX for better fuel economy is laughable. I hope Acura has a better answer (more of R&D cost). Anyway, my brother is looking in to 2016 RDX and I was praying SH-AWD and when we were building one online noticed that there is no SH.
Trending Topics
#8
Pro
No it's not, the SHAWD is a consant AWD, tons of parasitic drag, the new AWD system is on-demand, it's FWD unless it detects slippage then it transfers power to the rear, so yeah a FWD/AWD vs. constant AWD will make huge difference in fuel economy. I admit the SHAWD was one of it's kind on a crossover, with real torque transfer side to side, actually sending power the outside wheel, nowadays, they (most manufacturers) do torque vectoring by braking the inside wheel during turns, to save weight... by using the ABS, instead of putting a real rear diff in there. Same with FWD cars, they all have traction control by using the ABS, only a few have a LSD in there, all about saving $, look at the Ford Focus, tons of power, no LSD, vs. the golf GTI that has one and goes straight and true.
The following 2 users liked this post by Joe Las Vegas:
justnspace (04-18-2015),
Tony Pac (04-18-2015)
#9
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
No it's not, the SHAWD is a consant AWD, tons of parasitic drag, the new AWD system is on-demand, it's FWD unless it detects slippage then it transfers power to the rear, so yeah a FWD/AWD vs. constant AWD will make huge difference in fuel economy. I admit the SHAWD was one of it's kind on a crossover, with real torque transfer side to side, actually sending power the outside wheel, nowadays, they (most manufacturers) do torque vectoring by braking the inside wheel during turns, to save weight... by using the ABS, instead of putting a real rear diff in there. Same with FWD cars, they all have traction control by using the ABS, only a few have a LSD in there, all about saving $, look at the Ford Focus, tons of power, no LSD, vs. the golf GTI that has one and goes straight and true.
#10
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
I think you don't need to answer every single post in Acurazine. Take a break. I noticed you try to answer from ILX topics to NSX without taking a break. I suggest you to leave others to answer who drive and really know.
#11
That's funny.
#12
The OP raises a valid point. If SHAWD is good enough for the newly designed "fuel efficient" TLX why not the RDX? The new SHAWD is lighter and more efficient. Perhaps it's a cost thing or they felt most of the RDX buyers would not care with this model.
Maybe they will add it back with the next generation RDX because I think one way Acura can keep the brand moving forward and differentiate itself from some of the other near luxury brands is to offer SHAWD on all its vehicles.
Maybe they will add it back with the next generation RDX because I think one way Acura can keep the brand moving forward and differentiate itself from some of the other near luxury brands is to offer SHAWD on all its vehicles.
The following users liked this post:
Tony Pac (04-19-2015)
#14
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
The OP raises a valid point. If SHAWD is good enough for the newly designed "fuel efficient" TLX why not the RDX? The new SHAWD is lighter and more efficient. Perhaps it's a cost thing or they felt most of the RDX buyers would not care with this model.
Maybe they will add it back with the next generation RDX because I think one way Acura can keep the brand moving forward and differentiate itself from some of the other near luxury brands is to offer SHAWD on all its vehicles.
Maybe they will add it back with the next generation RDX because I think one way Acura can keep the brand moving forward and differentiate itself from some of the other near luxury brands is to offer SHAWD on all its vehicles.
#15
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,451
Received 1,613 Likes
on
971 Posts
SMMN -you brought a very good point. SH-AWD differentiate Acura from other brands. When I was shopping for a car, the rep was telling me that their AWD is the top and this is one of their selling point that SH-AWD is not just an ordinary AWD.
The following users liked this post:
Tony Pac (04-19-2015)
#18
mrgold35
Market research and $$$/profits probably kept sh-awd out of the 2nd gen RDX. 1st Gen sales wasn't the greatest and the 1st Gen RDX had smaller following that liked the looks, performance, and handling compared to the 2nd gen. I still have to drive the RDX pretty hard in the curves to get the "sh" to kick in compared to the awd portion. Acura probably assumed the majority of +2013 RDX owners don't need or use the "sh" for performance and you mostly get awd in low speed situations. My fwd bias 1st Gen uses awd about 95-98% of the time compared to sh-awd in normal driving. There was only a +2 mpg increase on the 1st gen RDX without sh-awd (19/24 compared to 17/22). I think the current sh-awd is a little more efficient; but, the difference is only 1 mpg increase without it on the MDX.
Not sure if the +2013 awd or fwd has any tq steer? Sh-awd vehicles have non if this is an issue.
Not sure if the +2013 awd or fwd has any tq steer? Sh-awd vehicles have non if this is an issue.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post