Turbo CL-S Dyno
Thread Starter
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Blue... give Shawn a call if you want to dyno your car. I told him about your car as well... so he'll hook you up with a price as long as you don't have to spend time tuning - which you don't!
goldmemberererer
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
From: West Hills, CA
Holy shit, Ram... I just had to call you to congratulate you on the impressive work... keep rocking that CL! I can't wait to see it in person... so lucky to have this going on in my back yard =)
ENGAGE MY VTEC BABY!!!!!!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,975
Likes: 2
From: Tracy, Ca
WOW those are some impresive numbers
so whats teh 1/4 mile times? i cant wait to see the car on detialing day at Meguires down south, im driving from tracy,ca to the meet to hang out and i have to get a ride in that awsome machine
so whats teh 1/4 mile times? i cant wait to see the car on detialing day at Meguires down south, im driving from tracy,ca to the meet to hang out and i have to get a ride in that awsome machine
Parting out 02 Type S :(
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: LA,CA
it was really good hearing about the over 400whp news. congrats, it looks like you have achieved the power levels you were hoping for! I think whats more impressive is the tq. at such low rpms, something i wouldnt imagine with a turbo at 3k rpms!
cl-s6 stock: 220 whp
allmotor cls6: 420 whp
Total of 200 whp gain, nearly double stock output. Congrats again!
cl-s6 stock: 220 whp
allmotor cls6: 420 whp
Total of 200 whp gain, nearly double stock output. Congrats again!
That is awesome!! I personally think your looking at the mid 11's for 1/4 mile et. just gootttaaa hook up. Since you've taken this to a higher level, are there plans for you to seek out aftermarket custom axels. Clutch? If your considering doing so, there are a few of us on here that would like to jump on that train which could reduce the cost of such items.
Suzuka Master
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
We need a stronger ignition system.. I have a misfire at around 5.2K RPM. What I don't
understand is how the stock injectors (even at 90psi) can maintian a 12.4 AFR for this kind of power level. I tuned the car to run 12.0 AFR with the stock exhaust.... opening it up bumps it to about 12.4 which is ideal for maximum power.
understand is how the stock injectors (even at 90psi) can maintian a 12.4 AFR for this kind of power level. I tuned the car to run 12.0 AFR with the stock exhaust.... opening it up bumps it to about 12.4 which is ideal for maximum power.
I agree on the fuel aspect, it is amazing that they are holding this well. I seriously doubt they are 240cc unit!!!
Banned
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by scalbert
Ah man, I just noticed it was on a Dynapack. Any chance of making pulls on a Dynojet for comparisons sake??
Liquid Ice
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 89
From: Northern Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by car_lost
i was about to say the same. was the old setup dynoed on a dynapack as well?
Even so, the power you're making is incredible. I wish I bought a 6spd CL-S instead of my 5AT TL-S when I look at those numbers!!!! Congrats!
Thread Starter
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Last time was the Dynapack as well. Shawn has corrected his Dynapack as best as he could because everybody uses the Dynojet as the 'correct' hp figure. So, they dyno'd a G35C stock on the Dynapack and the Dynojet and saw a 10hp decrease on the Dynojet. They dyno'd a lower powered car and saw a 11hp decrease. So... I figure there is a 10-15hp increase on the Dynapack. Honestly I think the difference between a stationary dyno and a moving car is more than 15hp!
Yes... 70F, not 70C!
Yes... 70F, not 70C!
Thread Starter
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
I really don't want to start a Dynojet vs. Dynapack argument. I chose Dynapack because I dyno'd on a Dynapack the last time. If its a 10-15whp difference, that is already within the 'error' reading of a dyno as it will always measure a different # on a different day... different temps etc. A nice 50F day would probably bump this up another 10-15whp - its all relative.
Suzuka Master
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
I really don't want to start a Dynojet vs. Dynapack argument. I chose Dynapack because I dyno'd on a Dynapack the last time. If its a 10-15whp difference, that is already within the 'error' reading of a dyno as it will always measure a different # on a different day... different temps etc. A nice 50F day would probably bump this up another 10-15whp - its all relative.
In the end you made some serious power. I'm just glad my estimates were closer when taking the dyno type into consideration.
And that 450 WHP mark is within striking distance and should be easily acheived. 
Suzuka Master
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by scoob5555
Wonder what class these mods would put me in for Solo2 autoxing? 
They might as well leave you in the stock class as you will be pushing so wide in the turns with this much power. 
Thread Starter
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
I think 450whp is very achievable... probably at 8psi. That's about it for the stock motor though! It's nuts to think this motor can make this kind of power at truly moderate boost levels. I sent a copy to Comptech
Thread Starter
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Vegeta1
Looks like you will be killing alot of cars out there. Now who around here said the nsx was the best Acura. Congrats.
I used to own one and it IS a better car than the CL-S!
[QUOTE=allmotor_2000]
We need a stronger ignition system.. I have a misfire at around 5.2K RPM. What I don't
understand is how the stock injectors (even at 90psi) can maintian a 12.4 AFR for this kind of power level. I tuned the car to run 12.0 AFR with the stock exhaust.... opening it up bumps it to about 12.4 which is ideal for maximum power.
I don't see how the stock injectors are keeping up with it. Scalbert said they are 240cc injectors, but i think they may be 290cc. I say this because the NSX comes with 290cc in the nsx 3.2 which is similar in HP of a stock CLS. At Allmotors level, it would be reasonable to expect an injector to be in at least the range of 45-50 lbs.
We need a stronger ignition system.. I have a misfire at around 5.2K RPM. What I don't
understand is how the stock injectors (even at 90psi) can maintian a 12.4 AFR for this kind of power level. I tuned the car to run 12.0 AFR with the stock exhaust.... opening it up bumps it to about 12.4 which is ideal for maximum power.
I don't see how the stock injectors are keeping up with it. Scalbert said they are 240cc injectors, but i think they may be 290cc. I say this because the NSX comes with 290cc in the nsx 3.2 which is similar in HP of a stock CLS. At Allmotors level, it would be reasonable to expect an injector to be in at least the range of 45-50 lbs.
Pro
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
From: us 'n a
HOLY 
Congrats AllMotor and yes change your name.
The stock CLS injectors are 270cc and e-Manage is responsible for providing enough fuel. I also agree on Dynapak difference 3-5% reads higher then industry standard Dynojet so my I'd say its solid and incredible 404-405 WHP car with low boost.
Congrats AllMotor and yes change your name
.The stock CLS injectors are 270cc and e-Manage is responsible for providing enough fuel. I also agree on Dynapak difference 3-5% reads higher then industry standard Dynojet so my I'd say its solid and incredible 404-405 WHP car with low boost.
AKA MaxGeek
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 429
Likes: 1
From: WA
Still not hosted? email me at johnlemvp@hotmail.com if you need it hosted.
