What defines an..."Import" ?
#41
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What defines an..."Import" ?
Originally posted by fahoumh
Please elaborate.
Please elaborate.
Elaborate on what? As I wrote, I am putting things into perspective. I described 2 facts. That's it.
#42
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
Elaborate on what? As I wrote, I am putting things into perspective. I described 2 facts. That's it.
Elaborate on what? As I wrote, I am putting things into perspective. I described 2 facts. That's it.
#43
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
I know you disagree. What I am asking you is to tell me why do you think they are British? Why are they not USAmerican?
Also, why does Jaguar suddenly look worse in your eyes if it were USAmerican in descent? What's wrong with that?
I know you disagree. What I am asking you is to tell me why do you think they are British? Why are they not USAmerican?
Also, why does Jaguar suddenly look worse in your eyes if it were USAmerican in descent? What's wrong with that?
#44
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
so what you're saying is that I can't be as learned as you because I'm 10 years your junior. And that because I'm Canadian, I must be anti-American?
so what you're saying is that I can't be as learned as you because I'm 10 years your junior. And that because I'm Canadian, I must be anti-American?
Where did you see me write or ellude to any of the above? And why the negative attitude?
#45
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
The comany started out in the UK and still manufacture its cars in the UK. The Jaguar company itself even says it is British.
The comany started out in the UK and still manufacture its cars in the UK. The Jaguar company itself even says it is British.
#46
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
So? What does it matter where the cars are manufactured? I say again. The Camry is manufactured here. Does that make Toyota an American company?
So? What does it matter where the cars are manufactured? I say again. The Camry is manufactured here. Does that make Toyota an American company?
#47
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
Where did you see me write or ellude to any of the above? And why the negative attitude?
Where did you see me write or ellude to any of the above? And why the negative attitude?
#49
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
apples and oranges
apples and oranges
#50
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
I already answered that.
To put perspective to your attack.
I already answered that.
To put perspective to your attack.
#51
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
What does that mean and how is it an argument to my statement above? So if Jaguar is British, is Toyota USAmerican? I ask you again.
What does that mean and how is it an argument to my statement above? So if Jaguar is British, is Toyota USAmerican? I ask you again.
Camry continues to be the best-selling passenger car in America and posted strong sales of 33,313 units, up 12.9 percent. The Corolla had a record September with 24,314 units sold, up 14.8 percent over the same period last year.
Jaguar is a British car manufacturer that just so happens to be owned by Ford. Jaguars are their own cars, built in Jaguar plants, in the UK.
#52
registered pw
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,821
Received 354 Likes
on
252 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
so what you're saying is that I can't be as learned as you because I'm 10 years your junior. And that because I'm Canadian, I must be anti-American?
so what you're saying is that I can't be as learned as you because I'm 10 years your junior. And that because I'm Canadian, I must be anti-American?
#54
Masshole
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: #1 in all the land!!
Age: 51
Posts: 15,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: What defines an..."Import" ?
Originally posted by greenmonster
Only old people like you and me remember
Most of the MTV generation (born after 1980), don't associate the term "Gran Turismo" with anything but a game you can play on playstation
Heck, I forgot what the "O" stood for in GTO, but doing a google search just leads me to thousands of gaming websites
Only old people like you and me remember
Most of the MTV generation (born after 1980), don't associate the term "Gran Turismo" with anything but a game you can play on playstation
Heck, I forgot what the "O" stood for in GTO, but doing a google search just leads me to thousands of gaming websites
#55
Masshole
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: #1 in all the land!!
Age: 51
Posts: 15,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What defines an..."Import" ?
Originally posted by Bulldog01
I think it's Omogato, or something along those lines.
I think it's Omogato, or something along those lines.
#56
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
Toyota is a Japanese company that just happens to build "America's best-selling passenger car" in the U.S.A. It's just smart business practice.
Toyota is a Japanese company that just happens to build "America's best-selling passenger car" in the U.S.A. It's just smart business practice.
Originally posted by fahoumh
Jaguar is a British car manufacturer that just so happens to be owned by Ford. Jaguars are their own cars, built in Jaguar plants, in the UK.
Jaguar is a British car manufacturer that just so happens to be owned by Ford. Jaguars are their own cars, built in Jaguar plants, in the UK.
Wow. So the fact that Jaguar would have been in the history books, if it were not for Ford's acquisition and rekindking of it says nothing to you. Ford could have bought the company and changed the name to FORD. Or Gabe. They could have done anything they wanted with the company and they can do anything they want with the company.
I say again, the SHOTS ARE CALLED IN DETROIT. For Jaguar. By Ford execs. If the X Type would have been built, someone from Ford decided on that. Which platforms and engines will be shared and how will Jaguar's future will look like, FOrd execs decide. Jaguar plants operate because of FORD money. USAmerican money. Jag employees get paid with that money too. Jaguar exists because Ford exists.
So "just so it happes" for Jag cars to be produced in England. That, in no way, makes Jag a British company. Jaguar is 100% a USAmerican company like Volvo, Saab, Aston, Holden, Opel, Vauxhaul and others.
#57
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by dallison
you know, i find it funny sometimes that the canadians know more about our country and gevernment than we do. interesting huh?
you know, i find it funny sometimes that the canadians know more about our country and gevernment than we do. interesting huh?
#58
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What defines an..."Import" ?
Originally posted by Bulldog01
I think it's Omogato, or something along those lines.
I think it's Omogato, or something along those lines.
#64
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by ABreece
The CL-S is 100% designed, manufactured and assembled in the US, but it's still an import
The CL-S is 100% designed, manufactured and assembled in the US, but it's still an import
#65
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally posted by ABreece
The CL-S is 100% designed, manufactured and assembled in the US, but it's still an import
The CL-S is 100% designed, manufactured and assembled in the US, but it's still an import
#66
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
Right. Cost it's been designed and manufactured by a Japanese company. So that makes it an import.
Right. Cost it's been designed and manufactured by a Japanese company. So that makes it an import.
#67
Shogun Assassin
Originally posted by gavriil
So it's smart business for Toyota, but that does not apply for Ford and GM. Nice and fair arguement. Sorry.
So it's smart business for Toyota, but that does not apply for Ford and GM. Nice and fair arguement. Sorry.
"...just so happens to be owned by Ford"
Wow. So the fact that Jaguar would have been in the history books, if it were not for Ford's acquisition and rekindking of it says nothing to you. Ford could have bought the company and changed the name to FORD. Or Gabe. They could have done anything they wanted with the company and they can do anything they want with the company.
Wow. So the fact that Jaguar would have been in the history books, if it were not for Ford's acquisition and rekindking of it says nothing to you. Ford could have bought the company and changed the name to FORD. Or Gabe. They could have done anything they wanted with the company and they can do anything they want with the company.
I say again, the SHOTS ARE CALLED IN DETROIT. For Jaguar. By Ford execs. If the X Type would have been built, someone from Ford decided on that. Which platforms and engines will be shared and how will Jaguar's future will look like, FOrd execs decide. Jaguar plants operate because of FORD money. USAmerican money. Jag employees get paid with that money too. Jaguar exists because Ford exists.
So "just so it happes" for Jag cars to be produced in England. That, in no way, makes Jag a British company. Jaguar is 100% a USAmerican company like Volvo, Saab, Aston, Holden, Opel, Vauxhaul and others.
Again, these are just my opinions. I have nothing against you; I just happen to not agree with your notion that Jaguar, Volvo, Aston Martin, Mazda, and Land Rover lose their respective heritages simply because they are owned by Ford.
LOL, that reminds me of the phrase: "You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of the boy."
#68
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
So it's smart business for Toyota, but that does not apply for Ford and GM. Nice and fair arguement. Sorry.
So it's smart business for Toyota, but that does not apply for Ford and GM. Nice and fair arguement. Sorry.
Originally posted by fahoumh
That's what I meant by "apples and oranges".
That's what I meant by "apples and oranges".
#69
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
"...just so happens to be owned by Ford"
Wow. So the fact that Jaguar would have been in the history books, if it were not for Ford's acquisition and rekindking of it says nothing to you. Ford could have bought the company and changed the name to FORD. Or Gabe. They could have done anything they wanted with the company and they can do anything they want with the company.
"...just so happens to be owned by Ford"
Wow. So the fact that Jaguar would have been in the history books, if it were not for Ford's acquisition and rekindking of it says nothing to you. Ford could have bought the company and changed the name to FORD. Or Gabe. They could have done anything they wanted with the company and they can do anything they want with the company.
Originally posted by fahoumh
Actually, that means a lot to me...thanks to Ford, the quality and reliability of Jaguars is at its best.
Actually, that means a lot to me...thanks to Ford, the quality and reliability of Jaguars is at its best.
#70
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by fahoumh
Again, these are just my opinions. I have nothing against you; I just happen to not agree with your notion that Jaguar, Volvo, Aston Martin, Mazda, and Land Rover lose their respective heritages simply because they are owned by Ford.
LOL, that reminds me of the phrase: "You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of the boy."
Again, these are just my opinions. I have nothing against you; I just happen to not agree with your notion that Jaguar, Volvo, Aston Martin, Mazda, and Land Rover lose their respective heritages simply because they are owned by Ford.
LOL, that reminds me of the phrase: "You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of the boy."
2. Why are you putting words in my mouth? Where did you see me write that Mazda is an American company? Mazda is not a WHOLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY of any American company. So...
3. "You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of the boy." So I guess I will categorize this as attack number 2 against me. Nice. Keep it up...
#71
Censored User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami - just one day, I would like to drive without getting cut off!
Age: 56
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as Holden goes, they were a completely separate car company until GM bailed them out a few decades ago. They were designing there own cars even then. All I'm saying is there are different style cars, for different countries. Perhaps GM makes financial decsions for Holden and helps decide the direction of the company. But there has to be Aussies at least bringing those ideas to the table. As probably is the case with Europe and other regions. Who knows what an Aussie wants to drive better than an Aussie? Which brings me to the Monaro. Which through the 80's and 90's more resembled an Asian make than any GM car I've ever seen IMHO. I think its possible that whith GM's cancellation of their muscle cars due to CAFE, they needed a sporty V6 to fill in. And Holden happened to have one that has 430 hp (the GTS not the GTO). IMO because of the graying lines between import and domestic, an import would be a foreign Maker (originally), foreign market intended for (originally), and a foreing majority producer or builder. Or a combination of the three.
Originally posted by gavriil
Holden is a WHOLY OWNED GM SUBSIDIARY. That means that Holden is PART of General Motors. GM is a USAmerican company, HENCE, Holden is USAmerican, hence the Monaro is USAmerican and that makes the GTO USAmerican.
Why does this seem so obvious to me and others get so confused?
"The car is foreign built"
So the Z3, Z4, X5 and others are USAmerican cars? Cos they are built here. Same with Camry and a million others. Come on. Holden BELONGS....TOTALLY to GM. If it's built in Australia is irrelevant. That does not make the car an Australian car, nor the company Australian. It belongs to GM. The shots for OPEL, Vauxhul, Holden, Saab are called in Detroit!
"The car is designed"
So? The car is designed by Holden which OPERATES in Australia and hires Australian employees. So that makes the Monaro an Australian car? No. Holden OPERATES because it's financed by GM. So if it operates financed by GM, it pays people it hires with "GM money". Which makes the whole "deal" a GM "deal". Which makes it a USAmerican deal.
Holden is a WHOLY OWNED GM SUBSIDIARY. That means that Holden is PART of General Motors. GM is a USAmerican company, HENCE, Holden is USAmerican, hence the Monaro is USAmerican and that makes the GTO USAmerican.
Why does this seem so obvious to me and others get so confused?
"The car is foreign built"
So the Z3, Z4, X5 and others are USAmerican cars? Cos they are built here. Same with Camry and a million others. Come on. Holden BELONGS....TOTALLY to GM. If it's built in Australia is irrelevant. That does not make the car an Australian car, nor the company Australian. It belongs to GM. The shots for OPEL, Vauxhul, Holden, Saab are called in Detroit!
"The car is designed"
So? The car is designed by Holden which OPERATES in Australia and hires Australian employees. So that makes the Monaro an Australian car? No. Holden OPERATES because it's financed by GM. So if it operates financed by GM, it pays people it hires with "GM money". Which makes the whole "deal" a GM "deal". Which makes it a USAmerican deal.
#74
Censored User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami - just one day, I would like to drive without getting cut off!
Age: 56
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because a car maker is owned by another car company doesn't mean that the owner totally drives the direction of the subsidiary. Like Ford decides the directions of Lincoln. Which is apparent in the use of the same platforms. Ford probably has a pool of designers, enginers, and artists that come up with most of the ideas. Then each other maker will take from that which they want to integrate, with Ford's approval. But what would be the point of being the president of Mercury if Ford was going to make all the decisions anyways. Even Lincoln and Mercury have to be making decisions on where they want to take the company. And they're in the same market region as ford. Holden has to be calling its own shots for the most part. But I will try to find out how much involved GM is with Holden.
#75
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay.. Let's look at it in a different light and get out of the automotive discussion.
One example: GE recently bought Amersham (a British medical business that used to be owned by the British government) for $9.5 billion. The company will still be based in London and still employ British. But it is now an American company? Yes. Why, because it is now part of GE, a American conglomerate. The shots are called in the US by Americans.
It doesn't matter where the parts are made. Parts for most of what we get are made outside of the US. What matters is where the business is incorporated.
Why should the auto industry be any different?
One example: GE recently bought Amersham (a British medical business that used to be owned by the British government) for $9.5 billion. The company will still be based in London and still employ British. But it is now an American company? Yes. Why, because it is now part of GE, a American conglomerate. The shots are called in the US by Americans.
It doesn't matter where the parts are made. Parts for most of what we get are made outside of the US. What matters is where the business is incorporated.
Why should the auto industry be any different?
#76
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote]Just because a car maker is owned by another car company doesn't mean that the owner totally drives the direction of the subsidiary[quote]
It doesn't matter what level the corporate leaders are calling the shots. It's part of an American business.
Again, think of it in a context of where you work. If your business (American company) bought a company in England for example and now runs it, the company is now American. Your bosses are calling the shots. It's part of an American business.
It doesn't matter what level the corporate leaders are calling the shots. It's part of an American business.
Again, think of it in a context of where you work. If your business (American company) bought a company in England for example and now runs it, the company is now American. Your bosses are calling the shots. It's part of an American business.
#77
Censored User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami - just one day, I would like to drive without getting cut off!
Age: 56
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was actually replying to a comment on the first page of this thread, but after reading more of the earlier posts, I see this one of those topics that will just be opinion based and not come to a real conclusion unless someone actually produces facts or those involved just agree to disagree.
Originally posted by JaDia4
Just because a car maker is owned by another car company doesn't mean that the owner totally drives the direction of the subsidiary. Like Ford decides the directions of Lincoln. Which is apparent in the use of the same platforms. Ford probably has a pool of designers, enginers, and artists that come up with most of the ideas. Then each other maker will take from that which they want to integrate, with Ford's approval. But what would be the point of being the president of Mercury if Ford was going to make all the decisions anyways. Even Lincoln and Mercury have to be making decisions on where they want to take the company. And they're in the same market region as ford. Holden has to be calling its own shots for the most part. But I will try to find out how much involved GM is with Holden.
Just because a car maker is owned by another car company doesn't mean that the owner totally drives the direction of the subsidiary. Like Ford decides the directions of Lincoln. Which is apparent in the use of the same platforms. Ford probably has a pool of designers, enginers, and artists that come up with most of the ideas. Then each other maker will take from that which they want to integrate, with Ford's approval. But what would be the point of being the president of Mercury if Ford was going to make all the decisions anyways. Even Lincoln and Mercury have to be making decisions on where they want to take the company. And they're in the same market region as ford. Holden has to be calling its own shots for the most part. But I will try to find out how much involved GM is with Holden.
#78
Censored User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami - just one day, I would like to drive without getting cut off!
Age: 56
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That makes sense
Originally posted by cusdaddy
Okay.. Let's look at it in a different light and get out of the automotive discussion.
One example: GE recently bought Amersham (a British medical business that used to be owned by the British government) for $9.5 billion. The company will still be based in London and still employ British. But it is now an American company? Yes. Why, because it is now part of GE, a American conglomerate. The shots are called in the US by Americans.
It doesn't matter where the parts are made. Parts for most of what we get are made outside of the US. What matters is where the business is incorporated.
Why should the auto industry be any different?
Okay.. Let's look at it in a different light and get out of the automotive discussion.
One example: GE recently bought Amersham (a British medical business that used to be owned by the British government) for $9.5 billion. The company will still be based in London and still employ British. But it is now an American company? Yes. Why, because it is now part of GE, a American conglomerate. The shots are called in the US by Americans.
It doesn't matter where the parts are made. Parts for most of what we get are made outside of the US. What matters is where the business is incorporated.
Why should the auto industry be any different?
#79
There was an article in Motor Trend like 4 or 5 years ago about "The best built American cars but they are domestics"Off my head, they tested
The TL
Camry
Accord
Solara
Tundra
and some others. Some agency classifies them as domestics.
The TL
Camry
Accord
Solara
Tundra
and some others. Some agency classifies them as domestics.