Unichip dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #1  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
Unichip dyno sheet

here is the dyno sheet.

a few things. it says 50 shot but i have a 75 shot. it says 4th gear but i know they did the dyno in 3rd.

the numbers are SAE corrected for flywheel hp and tq. i was able to look at the uncorrected numbers on the dyno computer screen and the max wheel horsepower was 244 w/ unichip, 301 w/ unichip and n2o. the way this machine measures output shows my drivetrain loss at ~ 12%.

this is the email from Jack that came along w/ the dyno chart.
Matt,
Here's the dyno sheet for your car. It's quite a few lines and bears some explanation. Remember, dashed lines are torque and solid lines are bhp; everything is SAE and flywheel corrected. The Light Yellow lines are stock/dry, the Red lines are Unichip/dry. The Gold lines are stock/NOS and the Orange lines are Unichip/NOS.
The biggest "weird" aspect to the chart is the large disparity between the Gold and Orange lines at low rpm; as we discussed, that results from the manual "power roll on"
required with the stock NOS configuration to not bend the engine or smoke the tires and the progressive/Unichip controlled NOS application on the Unichip runs. Note: the stock NOS numbers at low rpm very much represent us trying to not hurt the car at low rpm and can probably be significantly higher when an experienced driver who has lots of NOS launch experience drives the car. Best case, however, would be drawing a smooth line from the stock NOS curve at 4500 rpm back to where the other 3 curves (dry/stock, dry/Unichip, and
NOS/Unichip) are essentially coincident; that represents a theoretically perfect stock/NOS launch and you can see you're still making far less power than with the computer controlled Unichip launch.
The other aspect of note is the way the Unichip/NOS curves drop away to the stock/NOS curves near redline again because the Unichip is automatically shutting the NOS down 400 rpm prior to redline.
Average gain dry was 4.7% across the entire rpm with a maximum gain of 8.8%, both above just the hardware modifications with a peak of 277.7 bhp and 221.0 lb-ft. The NOS gains were average 23.9% across the entire rpm range, with a peak gain of 86.1% and a maximum of 342.1 bhp and 287.4 lb-ft (calculating only data above 3000 rpm since you'll only be below that in 1st gear, the numbers become 10.5% average across the rpm band and 40.2% peak gain).
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers,
Jack

Jack Friedman, General Manager
Unichip of North America
www.unichip.us
Toll free 1.866.643.7400
Local 1.503.6407465
Fax 1.503.214.6444


Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 11:50 PM
  #2  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
wow, cant wait to get mine in, the gains are def there

i like that trq curve!!!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #3  
babyblue's Avatar
Sold but not Forgotten...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, ON
Matt,

not a bad dyno eh.... impressive
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 12:18 AM
  #4  
farberstyle's Avatar
something witty
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
congradulations are in order. 300 whp is very impressive. are you happy with the results? were you expecting more/less? would you consider the unichip a good investment?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 02:24 AM
  #5  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Wow!... Wow! ...Wow! the gains are there...

Let me say the following:

Other than the fact that all numbers were nornalized so that max stock fly numbers are 260 HP (the 12 % correction factor), it seems good.

So back to SAE Wheel hp and torque:
NA no UNIChip: Max SAE Torque: 184 lb.ft of torque, Max SAE WHP: 228 WHP
NA + UNIChip : Max SAE Torque: 193.6 lb.ft of torque, Max SAE WHP: 243.76 WHP

In a nutshell, your CLSresponded to the UNIChip with 10 lbft and 10 WHP gain.

With Nitrous:
NO no UNIChip: Max SAE Torque: 242 lb.ft of torque, Max SAE WHP: 294.8 WHP
NO+ UNIChip : Max SAE Torque: 253.44 lb.ft of torque, Max SAE WHP: 300.96 WHP

I see 20 lbft and 20 WHP gains.

That gain is worth the asking GB price of the UNIChip!

Congrats!

Nashua.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #6  
LiQiCE's Avatar
Liquid Ice
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 89
From: Northern Virginia, USA
The awesome thing is not just a 10whp/10 ft-lbs max gain, but a ~10whp/10 ft-lbs gain across the entire powerband ...

From 3000-7000rpms you'll notice roughly those same gains! Should do really nice for our mid-range which doesn't benefit too much from headers or intake.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:30 AM
  #7  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA


That looks fantastic!!!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:34 AM
  #8  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Holy Torque Batman! I need NOS! HAHA...... but really.

Your car is gonna rip!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:38 AM
  #9  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
I am confused though. It says your bhp with I/H/E is only 260 flywheel. Shouldn't that be closer to 290-300? Our cars come stock with 260. I understand the gains are there, just curious why the bhp is only at 260.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #10  
LiQiCE's Avatar
Liquid Ice
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 89
From: Northern Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by mrsteve
I am confused though. It says your bhp with I/H/E is only 260 flywheel. Shouldn't that be closer to 290-300? Our cars come stock with 260. I understand the gains are there, just curious why the bhp is only at 260.
12% powertrain loss is what they assume. Our powertrain loss is closer to 20-25% ...

Stock our cars make 260/232 but only put down about 200/180 to the wheels... ~25% powertrain loss.

A 25% powertrain loss would put a 244whp @ about 305 flywheel hp.. Max torque is about 220 ft-lbs on their dyno, about (12% less) ~194 ft-lbs to the wheels, (25% more) ~242 ft-lbs at the flywheel ... Seems kindof low on the torque, unless the torque figures weren't corrected *shrug*...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 10:30 AM
  #11  
Zapata's Avatar
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
interesting........so 10hp/10ftlbs is nearly the difference between a CLS running on cool dry air and CLS running in hot humid air.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:29 AM
  #12  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
That looks good You might not have too much gain while using N2O, but it will be safer to use considering the UniChip will retard timing!

It looks like the 'droop' from 6400 RPM to 7000 RPM is fixed... that's is basically all fuel control - good job!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
Chaptorial's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18,552
Likes: 4
From: Long Island, NY
Damn over 300hp to the wheels when you're spraying.

Simply awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #14  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
i have to find the right stretch of road to really open the car up on the n2o. it will get to 110 really quickly now. i need better brakes, steve. not nearly as bad as you do though.


i like the 22hp and 18tq. gain at 7000rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 09:47 PM
  #15  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by mattg
i have to find the right stretch of road to really open the car up on the n2o. it will get to 110 really quickly now. i need better brakes, steve. not nearly as bad as you do though.
Soon, very soon. I need to finish up some of the other requests first. The RES plate should be ready by now among other things.

But I decided to wait for several weeks to begin the brakes unless I clear up other projects first. I have all of the information I need so it is just a matter of test fitting peices and finalizing the drawings. Once I get back on it I should be done within a couple of weeks.

BTW and I already said so, that dyno looks great. I knew it would work out well.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #16  
Nitin's Avatar
But I just got here
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 55
From: MD
Are we still shooting for Tuesday as the day everything will ship out?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #17  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
Originally Posted by Nitin
Are we still shooting for Tuesday as the day everything will ship out?
thats what i heard last
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 10:49 PM
  #18  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Unichip Vs my CLS Dyno.

Since I have dyno for my 01 CLS with CAI/UR Pulleys and SR Headers, I decided to overlay the UniChip Dyno and mine. I normalized the Unichip Dyno scale to Acutal SAE WHP.

Here is the dyno:



Here is my orginal dyno:



As you can note, my Dyno is 100% match to the Unichip Dyno curve up to 5750 rpms where the Unichip start gaining more torque. After 5750 rpms my Torque curve starts falling and matches mattg curve with no UniChip. There is a good 9 to 18 lbft of torque gained by the UniChip.

I hope this info is helpfull.

Nashua.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #19  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
nice work nashua, did u order a chip??
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #20  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Originally Posted by darrinb
nice work nashua, did u order a chip??
Nope. I missed the first GB. Maybe I will be on the next GB
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #21  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Thanks that helps! +1

This chip is looking like it is all it was cracked up to be.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #22  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
BTW, As I mentioned before here http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142985

The Unichip is leaning the Air Fuel after 5000 rpms! In the above thread as well as the dyno graph's A/F ratio, there is rich mix after 5000 rpms.

Nashua.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #23  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
imma dyno after i get the chip in, i am hoping for 240 whp, even though i had my eyes @ 250 thats not possible cause matts car has lighter rims and a full cat back over mine
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #24  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by darrinb
imma dyno after i get the chip in, i am hoping for 240 whp, even though i had my eyes @ 250 thats not possible cause matts car has lighter rims and a full cat back over mine

Yes but every car and every dyno is different. I wouldn't be surprised to see your hp numbers vary +/- 5 from Matt's
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 09:01 AM
  #25  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
IMHO, 195 to 200 lbft is the max SAE wheel torque that you can expect from a NA 01 CLS engine. Unichip is extending the torque curve all the way to 6500 rpms instead of 5750 rpms.

Lighter wheels will help, port and polishing, bigger throtle body and Thermostat mod of course will help!

The only wild card... is the elusive RES!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:16 AM
  #26  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
eventually i will have the res, polished intake manifold and injector base, cams, throttle body and a built tranny.


i wonder what that combo will put down.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:26 AM
  #27  
cmark's Avatar
Drifting
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 9
From: Seattle, WA
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #28  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by mattg
eventually i will have the res, polished intake manifold and injector base, cams, throttle body and a built tranny.


i wonder what that combo will put down.

Close to 300whp all motor would be my guess. The built tranny wouldn't eat up as much power.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #29  
CLS2001_97124's Avatar
Revving at 9K...
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 1
From: Portland Oregon
Originally Posted by mattg
eventually i will have the res, polished intake manifold and injector base, cams, throttle body and a built tranny.


i wonder what that combo will put down.

Matt, putting a 2nd on your new house anytime soon...

Anyway, looks great man! I'll call you for the track on Saturday. My S is going in for Aftercooler install this Tuesday. I might run it if all is well.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #30  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
cool. i hope all goes well.


see you on saturday.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #31  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
i wanna see a 12.x slip from ya matt

do us auto owners proud
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #32  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
it's supposed to be 90 on saturday.


but i'll see what i can do.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #33  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
damn, order up the mugen t stat
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 01:39 AM
  #34  
SFLA_Type-S's Avatar
Sold 12/29/04 :-(
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by mattg
it's supposed to be 90 on saturday.


but i'll see what i can do.
Very nice dyno numbers Matt. You are seriously making me reach for my wallet.
Good luck at the track, hope to see 12's

BTW: When you are running nitrous the ambient temperature doesn't really matter. As long as your bottle pressue is up, you will run the same in 90 degree temperature as you do in 50 degree.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 06:56 AM
  #35  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally Posted by SFLA_Type-S
BTW: When you are running nitrous the ambient temperature doesn't really matter. As long as your bottle pressue is up, you will run the same in 90 degree temperature as you do in 50 degree.
I would say that it matters less than say forced induction. But the weather does still play a part. Quite a bit of the power, a greater majority of it, comes from the engine making power as though the spray is off. In this case about 240+WHP.

If you add say 60 WHP though spray you net 300+ WHP. But now with inclement weather you are only making 220 WHP. That 60 WHP adder only nets you 280 WHP.

The difference is that the power adder, nitrous in this case, normally gives the same power increases regardless of conditions. However, the base power will change with changes in weather conditions. This lowers the overall power change percentages but it does still change.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #36  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
last time i was at the track it was 80.


we'll just have to see what happens.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #37  
Scrib's Avatar
Administrator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,326
Likes: 131
From: Northwest IN


Love that torque.

Glad to see the mods finally coming to the CLS!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #38  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by mattg
last time i was at the track it was 80.


we'll just have to see what happens.
Please do a few runs without the juice so we can get an idea of what a N/A CL-S will do.

Good luck
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #39  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
the event on saturday is a sport compact drag racing series, which means bracket eliminations. i'll only spray on the warm up runs and after i'm eliminated (unless i win ). the rest of the time i'll be running n/a.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #40  
blader's Avatar
Audi S4 driver
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Forked River NJ
yeah on the NA runs
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.