Something is wrong with this Dyno!
Something is wrong with this Dyno!
Looking at this dyno chart, UR AV6 pullies, the torque and HP curves crosses at different rpm. The before curve crosses at > 5200 rpm and after curve < 5000 rpms
It seems wrong for me
It seems wrong for me
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
sounds BS to me, all cars crossover at 5252 RPM
they'll always cross @ 5252 RPM, 1 HP is equivalent of 33,000 ft lbs of work per minute, and at 5252 RPM, 1 ft lb is equal to 33,000 ft lbs of work per minute, so they equal out. just like at 2,626 the HP is half the torque, or at 7,878 the HP will be 1.5 times the torque, or at 10,504 the HP will be double the torque. and no matter what the peak torque RPM is, its always gonna cross with the HP @ 5252 because HP is calculated, and at 5252 1 hp = 1 TQ, or however much power you make.
they'll always cross @ 5252 RPM, 1 HP is equivalent of 33,000 ft lbs of work per minute, and at 5252 RPM, 1 ft lb is equal to 33,000 ft lbs of work per minute, so they equal out. just like at 2,626 the HP is half the torque, or at 7,878 the HP will be 1.5 times the torque, or at 10,504 the HP will be double the torque. and no matter what the peak torque RPM is, its always gonna cross with the HP @ 5252 because HP is calculated, and at 5252 1 hp = 1 TQ, or however much power you make.
yeah, I was a lil' surprised at how low my dyno was too...
Then i heard that Mustang Dynos were typically lower on average than others (ie: DynoJet).
Supposedly Mustangs Dynos are more accurate because it uses two barrels vs. just one for the tires to rest on.
Then i heard that Mustang Dynos were typically lower on average than others (ie: DynoJet).
Supposedly Mustangs Dynos are more accurate because it uses two barrels vs. just one for the tires to rest on.
Trending Topics
I will be ordering a UR pulley (Polished) anyways from the V6accord group buy, it would cost $275 plus shipping. I estimate a $75 is enough to get it installed by a Honda/Acura Master tech!
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by frank828
just to let you know, that dyno is not altered in any way. I know the guy (viper aka Samir) from the accordv6 forums.
just to let you know, that dyno is not altered in any way. I know the guy (viper aka Samir) from the accordv6 forums.
then why doesn't it crossover at 5252?
Re: Something is wrong with this Dyno!
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Looking at this dyno chart, UR AV6 pullies, the torque and HP curves crosses at different rpm. The before curve crosses at > 5200 rpm and after curve < 5000 rpms
It seems wrong for me
Looking at this dyno chart, UR AV6 pullies, the torque and HP curves crosses at different rpm. The before curve crosses at > 5200 rpm and after curve < 5000 rpms
It seems wrong for me
the graphs are fine.
the lines don't cross because the scales are different for hp (90-180 on the left) and torque (70-190 on the right) on this graph.
the hp still equals the torque at 5252 rpm for both runs, as would be expected.
Originally posted by ghander
then why doesn't it crossover at 5252?
then why doesn't it crossover at 5252?
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by tankmonkey
the hp and torque curves are plotted on different scales. they'll only cross (on a graph) at 5252 if they are plotted on the same scale.
the hp and torque curves are plotted on different scales. they'll only cross (on a graph) at 5252 if they are plotted on the same scale.
that would make sense
right after i make this post
http://www.v6accord.com/forums/showt...2356#post69636
Originally posted by chikai
yeah, I was a lil' surprised at how low my dyno was too...
Then i heard that Mustang Dynos were typically lower on average than others (ie: DynoJet).
Supposedly Mustangs Dynos are more accurate because it uses two barrels vs. just one for the tires to rest on.
yeah, I was a lil' surprised at how low my dyno was too...
Then i heard that Mustang Dynos were typically lower on average than others (ie: DynoJet).
Supposedly Mustangs Dynos are more accurate because it uses two barrels vs. just one for the tires to rest on.
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
However, I do still believe that both curves should cross at the same rpms regardless if it was 5225 rpm or not.
Anyother thought?
However, I do still believe that both curves should cross at the same rpms regardless if it was 5225 rpm or not.
Anyother thought?
Originally posted by KavexTrax
Is your actuator functioning properly??
Is your actuator functioning properly??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acuratl26
2G TL (1999-2003)
24
Apr 23, 2020 07:30 PM
Hines57
Car Parts for Sale
0
Sep 24, 2015 01:58 PM


