SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 03:43 PM
  #1  
JRock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.

Burned him twice after he rode my ass for a few mins and followed right on my ass as I turned onto another road. He fell so far back each time I probably shouldn't have bothered racing him.

Nothing else to say, really.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
Chaptorial's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18,552
Likes: 4
From: Long Island, NY
Good kill(s). However he was driving a Mercedes so in the end, he/she really wins.

Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 10:01 PM
  #3  
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Good kill!!! Was it an auto or manual?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 10:31 PM
  #4  
ZED'S Type-S's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, TN
My friends MOM almost lost her title because she thought hers could beat me. But, I let her keep that slow car.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 08:15 AM
  #5  
ThoroDredCLS's Avatar
Shift_3.5 Auto
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: MD <> VA
Originally posted by Chaptorial
Good kill(s). However he was driving a Mercedes so in the end, he/she really wins.

Not really, they are driving a SLK. That to me is as bad as driving the new MB hatchback. :o Unless they have the SLK AMG model.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 08:16 AM
  #6  
ThoroDredCLS's Avatar
Shift_3.5 Auto
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: MD <> VA
Re: SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.

Originally posted by JRock
Burned him twice after he rode my ass for a few mins and followed right on my ass as I turned onto another road. He fell so far back each time I probably shouldn't have bothered racing him.

Nothing else to say, really.
Nice kill JRock!

1sicklex - They are slow either manual or auto. Test drove one with my uncle b4 he bought the e430.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 10:10 AM
  #7  
quikcls's Avatar
WHO'S NEXT!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally posted by Chaptorial
Good kill(s). However he was driving a Mercedes so in the end, he/she really wins.

he only wins in your world!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 11:07 AM
  #8  
JRock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
It was a manual, and sorry but an SLK-230 is about as poserish as a general C-class Benz, Porsche Boxter non-S, or a BMW 328. I wouldn't drive any of those wannabe cars, especially for how much they want for them. It's the whole "buying the brand name" thing where they just want to be able to own a Benz/Porsche/BMW, but can't afford a real one (and yet somehow can justify spending way too much on a piece of entry-level junk just to think they're a big dog).
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 11:14 AM
  #9  
mikegunnz's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
True the 230 is slow as sh!t, but you do some small mods to that thing and it'll fly. Remember, the kompressor is s/c'ed which means easy power.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 12:01 PM
  #10  
ThoroDredCLS's Avatar
Shift_3.5 Auto
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: MD <> VA
Originally posted by mikegunnz
True the 230 is slow as sh!t, but you do some small mods to that thing and it'll fly. Remember, the kompressor is s/c'ed which means easy power.
Are you talking about the slk 230? Damn, i didn't even know they had a supercharger in them. I should have opened the hood during the test drive.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 01:05 PM
  #11  
mikegunnz's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
Originally posted by ThoroDredCLS


Are you talking about the slk 230? Damn, i didn't even know they had a supercharger in them. I should have opened the hood during the test drive.
Not 100% sure, but it depends on the year. If it says 230 its just a 2.3 liter 4 banger, if it says 230 kompressor, than its the supercharged.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 08:36 PM
  #12  
JRock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
According to KBB the only SLK-230 available is a 4cyl supercharged.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 09:00 PM
  #13  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally posted by JRock
It was a manual, and sorry but an SLK-230 is about as poserish as a general C-class Benz, Porsche Boxter non-S, or a BMW 328. I wouldn't drive any of those wannabe cars, especially for how much they want for them. It's the whole "buying the brand name" thing where they just want to be able to own a Benz/Porsche/BMW, but can't afford a real one (and yet somehow can justify spending way too much on a piece of entry-level junk just to think they're a big dog).
Yea everyone driving a C320, Boxster and 3 series are wannabes Your jealous that you couldnt afford any of the cars above. Learn something about cars before you open your teenage mouth. All the cars you named are segment leaders, so therefore they must be garbage
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 09:14 PM
  #14  
JHEIII850Turbo's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Congratulations on the win, man! I've had a couple experiences with the SLK series of Mercedes. The first one was a SLK 230 Kompressor, I was in my dad's 94 Miata which used to have a Jackson Racing Supercharger, and that SLK got roasted. The second I was riding in my volvo 850 turbo, and an slk 32 AMG was riding my ass, so I stomp on it, and he's still on my ass and gaining closer, so I keep it gunned, and he finally floors it and starts passing me pretty badly. I was dissapointed with my car thinking it was just a SLK 230, but when I got a look at the bumper and it said SLK 32 AMG, I knew I had just gotten my ass beat
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 09:13 PM
  #15  
NOVAwhiteTypeS's Avatar
Suzuka Master
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally posted by Maximized
Yea everyone driving a C320, Boxster and 3 series are wannabes Your jealous that you couldnt afford any of the cars above. Learn something about cars before you open your teenage mouth. All the cars you named are segment leaders, so therefore they must be garbage

EXACTLY they are wannabe garabes's dur.. finally we agree on something.

everyone knows the real car is the higher end models.

gs300 wanna bee gs400
and other models, even common in the acura family.

why get a lower end model? probably cause those people only care about looks and not engine performance like 90% of us here.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 03:50 PM
  #16  
Maximized's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally posted by NOVAwhiteTypeS
EXACTLY they are wannabe garabes's dur.. finally we agree on something.

everyone knows the real car is the higher end models.

gs300 wanna bee gs400
and other models, even common in the acura family.

why get a lower end model? probably cause those people only care about looks and not engine performance like 90% of us here.
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 10:11 AM
  #17  
mikegunnz's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
Originally posted by Maximized
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
True Dat!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #18  
NOVAwhiteTypeS's Avatar
Suzuka Master
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally posted by Maximized
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.

no cause m's and 540's are in diff category. but i dont 'wanna argue you win.

:P blah~
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
LogicWavelength
3G TL Photograph Gallery
33
Nov 1, 2015 09:38 AM
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Oct 14, 2015 08:20 AM
07Acuradude
1G TSX (2004-2008)
4
Sep 29, 2015 03:01 PM
MilanoRedDashR
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 27, 2015 10:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.