SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.
SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.
Burned him twice after he rode my ass for a few mins and followed right on my ass as I turned onto another road. He fell so far back each time I probably shouldn't have bothered racing him.
Nothing else to say, really.
Nothing else to say, really.
Originally posted by Chaptorial
Good kill(s). However he was driving a Mercedes so in the end, he/she really wins.
Good kill(s). However he was driving a Mercedes so in the end, he/she really wins.
Re: SLK-230 couldn't keep up... twice.
Originally posted by JRock
Burned him twice after he rode my ass for a few mins and followed right on my ass as I turned onto another road. He fell so far back each time I probably shouldn't have bothered racing him.
Nothing else to say, really.
Burned him twice after he rode my ass for a few mins and followed right on my ass as I turned onto another road. He fell so far back each time I probably shouldn't have bothered racing him.
Nothing else to say, really.
1sicklex - They are slow either manual or auto. Test drove one with my uncle b4 he bought the e430.
Trending Topics
It was a manual, and sorry but an SLK-230 is about as poserish as a general C-class Benz, Porsche Boxter non-S, or a BMW 328. I wouldn't drive any of those wannabe cars, especially for how much they want for them. It's the whole "buying the brand name" thing where they just want to be able to own a Benz/Porsche/BMW, but can't afford a real one (and yet somehow can justify spending way too much on a piece of entry-level junk just to think they're a big dog).
Originally posted by mikegunnz
True the 230 is slow as sh!t, but you do some small mods to that thing and it'll fly. Remember, the kompressor is s/c'ed which means easy power.
True the 230 is slow as sh!t, but you do some small mods to that thing and it'll fly. Remember, the kompressor is s/c'ed which means easy power.
Originally posted by ThoroDredCLS
Are you talking about the slk 230? Damn, i didn't even know they had a supercharger in them. I should have opened the hood during the test drive.
Are you talking about the slk 230? Damn, i didn't even know they had a supercharger in them. I should have opened the hood during the test drive.
Originally posted by JRock
It was a manual, and sorry but an SLK-230 is about as poserish as a general C-class Benz, Porsche Boxter non-S, or a BMW 328. I wouldn't drive any of those wannabe cars, especially for how much they want for them. It's the whole "buying the brand name" thing where they just want to be able to own a Benz/Porsche/BMW, but can't afford a real one (and yet somehow can justify spending way too much on a piece of entry-level junk just to think they're a big dog).
It was a manual, and sorry but an SLK-230 is about as poserish as a general C-class Benz, Porsche Boxter non-S, or a BMW 328. I wouldn't drive any of those wannabe cars, especially for how much they want for them. It's the whole "buying the brand name" thing where they just want to be able to own a Benz/Porsche/BMW, but can't afford a real one (and yet somehow can justify spending way too much on a piece of entry-level junk just to think they're a big dog).
Your jealous that you couldnt afford any of the cars above. Learn something about cars before you open your teenage mouth. All the cars you named are segment leaders, so therefore they must be garbage
Congratulations on the win, man! I've had a couple experiences with the SLK series of Mercedes. The first one was a SLK 230 Kompressor, I was in my dad's 94 Miata which used to have a Jackson Racing Supercharger, and that SLK got roasted. The second I was riding in my volvo 850 turbo, and an slk 32 AMG was riding my ass, so I stomp on it, and he's still on my ass and gaining closer, so I keep it gunned, and he finally floors it and starts passing me pretty badly. I was dissapointed with my car thinking it was just a SLK 230, but when I got a look at the bumper and it said SLK 32 AMG, I knew I had just gotten my ass beat
Originally posted by Maximized
Yea everyone driving a C320, Boxster and 3 series are wannabes
Your jealous that you couldnt afford any of the cars above. Learn something about cars before you open your teenage mouth. All the cars you named are segment leaders, so therefore they must be garbage
Yea everyone driving a C320, Boxster and 3 series are wannabes
Your jealous that you couldnt afford any of the cars above. Learn something about cars before you open your teenage mouth. All the cars you named are segment leaders, so therefore they must be garbage
EXACTLY they are wannabe garabes's dur.. finally we agree on something.
everyone knows the real car is the higher end models.
gs300 wanna bee gs400
and other models, even common in the acura family.
why get a lower end model? probably cause those people only care about looks and not engine performance like 90% of us here.
Originally posted by NOVAwhiteTypeS
EXACTLY they are wannabe garabes's dur.. finally we agree on something.
everyone knows the real car is the higher end models.
gs300 wanna bee gs400
and other models, even common in the acura family.
why get a lower end model? probably cause those people only care about looks and not engine performance like 90% of us here.
EXACTLY they are wannabe garabes's dur.. finally we agree on something.
everyone knows the real car is the higher end models.
gs300 wanna bee gs400
and other models, even common in the acura family.
why get a lower end model? probably cause those people only care about looks and not engine performance like 90% of us here.
Originally posted by Maximized
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
Originally posted by Maximized
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
How is a GS300 a wanna be?? Id take a GS300 over any Acura excluding a NSX. People on this board sometimes have the most irrational logic. So by your logic...a person driving a 540 is a wanna be b/c he or she isnt driving a M5. Every consumer isnt concerned with performance thats why they offer different engine packages.
no cause m's and 540's are in diff category. but i dont 'wanna argue you win.
:P blah~
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LogicWavelength
3G TL Photograph Gallery
33
Nov 1, 2015 09:38 AM
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Oct 14, 2015 08:20 AM




