THIS ONES FOR ALL DA HATERZ who doubted THA FLOW!
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uranus
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THIS ONES FOR ALL DA HATERZ who doubted THA FLOW!
THE FOLLOWING IS BOUND TO GET ME BANNED, YET AGAIN, but here goes..........
DIRECT QUOTE FROM VTEC.NET:
-"The Accord went second and performed like we thought it would after hammering the throttle for a couple of days. No shy, retiring commuter engine, the J30A4 is a beast. It belted out 217 hp and 195 lbs-ft of torque at the wheels. And this engine is only rated at 240 hp/212 lbs-ft at the flywheel! Of course, we did use premium gas to extract the most possible power and the J30A4 rewarded us with a surplus. By comparison, last year's CL-S 6-spd pumped out 218 hp and 201 lbs-ft (also on a Dynojet) from its J32A2 engine. We felt that the J32A2 was pretty accurately rated at 260 hp/232 lbs-ft at the flywheel. If this is the case, that would make the Accord a 260 hp/225-230 lbs-ft engine. Not bad for 3 liters, SOHC and the "economy" form of VTEC. Note how ruler flat the torque curve is. From 1500 to 6500 the engine produces 90% or more of its peak torque. The little blip at 4000 rpm appears to be the VTEC transition, while at 5000 rpm the intake manifold butterfly valves open. Sweet. If we had any complaint about this engine it was that it wanted more revs - yep, that's about the only complaint"
DIRECT QUOTE FROM VTEC.NET:
-"The Accord went second and performed like we thought it would after hammering the throttle for a couple of days. No shy, retiring commuter engine, the J30A4 is a beast. It belted out 217 hp and 195 lbs-ft of torque at the wheels. And this engine is only rated at 240 hp/212 lbs-ft at the flywheel! Of course, we did use premium gas to extract the most possible power and the J30A4 rewarded us with a surplus. By comparison, last year's CL-S 6-spd pumped out 218 hp and 201 lbs-ft (also on a Dynojet) from its J32A2 engine. We felt that the J32A2 was pretty accurately rated at 260 hp/232 lbs-ft at the flywheel. If this is the case, that would make the Accord a 260 hp/225-230 lbs-ft engine. Not bad for 3 liters, SOHC and the "economy" form of VTEC. Note how ruler flat the torque curve is. From 1500 to 6500 the engine produces 90% or more of its peak torque. The little blip at 4000 rpm appears to be the VTEC transition, while at 5000 rpm the intake manifold butterfly valves open. Sweet. If we had any complaint about this engine it was that it wanted more revs - yep, that's about the only complaint"
#3
Happy CL-S Pilot
3.0L... 260 Hp and 230 lbft.
3.2L... 277 HP and 245 lbft......>>> 2004 TL Engine?
3.4L....294 HP and 260 lbft
3.5L....303 HP and 268 lbft......>>> 2005 AWD TLS Engine?
3.2L... 277 HP and 245 lbft......>>> 2004 TL Engine?
3.4L....294 HP and 260 lbft
3.5L....303 HP and 268 lbft......>>> 2005 AWD TLS Engine?
#7
Best D-Line in the NFL
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gainesville, Fl for college, Palm Beach Gardens, Fl at Home
Age: 38
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont care what your damn car produces, its a damn accord no one cares when they see an accord on the road, and imo it looks like shit. Happy now?
Trending Topics
#11
The Liquidator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Red Nj-s
My ass farts could beat your POS honduh. Take that tin can bar of soap looking peice of junk back to vtec.net.com.lickmyass.sodacanexhaust.gov.
YOUR MOTHER.
My ass farts could beat your POS honduh. Take that tin can bar of soap looking peice of junk back to vtec.net.com.lickmyass.sodacanexhaust.gov.
YOUR MOTHER.
PH
#18
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow... A fast car no one will ever notice.
I have a 03 Accord 4-cylinder because I think it's pathetic trying to make a boring family car into a sports car. No need for that power in a car like that. That's why I also have a Z.
I have a 03 Accord 4-cylinder because I think it's pathetic trying to make a boring family car into a sports car. No need for that power in a car like that. That's why I also have a Z.
#19
have a 03 Accord 4-cylinder because I think it's pathetic trying to make a boring family car into a sports car. No need for that power in a car like that. That's why I also have a Z.
No one really cares about appliances. The Accord is nice, but an appliance and very far from a sports car.
For goodness sakes dude, it's a rental car.
#20
What, me drive fast?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Andover, MA
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think that anyone ever doubted that the Accord is pretty hast, have they? The last generation coupe was a lot cooler looking than the current gen IMO. The current one just isn't distinctive looking. Not that the 2nd gen CL is any huge eye catcher but it still looks a lot classier. Torque...why do you get pleasure out of starting threads that will just get you flamed? You are showing your age. If you just grew the fuck up you might get along a bit better with everyone.
#21
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torque: It seems as if you aren't a troll just here. I read this post in my350z about you (which also coincidentally you got banned from also)
I think your true motivation is holding the record on being banned from the most car sites ever
Don't worry about this guy fellas...
He's a know troll all over the net..
which explains why he got banned from a few sites..
Including stangnet...
He's a know troll all over the net..
which explains why he got banned from a few sites..
Including stangnet...
#28
Find beauty in dissonance
Re: THIS ONES FOR ALL DA HATERZ who doubted THA FLOW!
Originally posted by 007torqueaholic
THE FOLLOWING IS BOUND TO GET ME BANNED, YET AGAIN, but here goes..........
THE FOLLOWING IS BOUND TO GET ME BANNED, YET AGAIN, but here goes..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM