Just Dyno'd my car..
Just Dyno'd my car..
Here's the Dyno:
Mods:
OBX headers
Tanabe exhaust
AEM CAI (my filter is dirty as fuck)
VAFC- just dyno tuned. Gains were: 10 HP and 8 TQ
Numbers:
250 HP at the wheels,
214 TQ at the wheels
Not too bad, but my Z will eat her up!
Mods:
OBX headers
Tanabe exhaust
AEM CAI (my filter is dirty as fuck)
VAFC- just dyno tuned. Gains were: 10 HP and 8 TQ
Numbers:
250 HP at the wheels,
214 TQ at the wheels
Not too bad, but my Z will eat her up!
whoa, 10hp and 8lb/tq for VAFC tuning?! I haven't even LOOKED into gettin a VAFC, let alone know wtf it does. Is it really worth it to get it then? And where did you get it tuned? Nice numbers
Originally Posted by mattg
those numbers are really high. you should be able to run a high 13 sec 1/4 and trap over 100 if they're true.
you should be more like 230whp/ 204wtq with those mods.
you should be more like 230whp/ 204wtq with those mods.
I'm not sure about that (re: the 13second 1/4 mile). The Dynopack is a nice system, but it generally shows higher numbers than a Dynojet.
The Dynojet is using an inertial roller and the Dynopack is hooked up without the wheels on (it hooks up to the hubs). The losses from tire slippage and wheel/tire mass/inertia go away, and the method used to calculate HP/TQ is different. The Dynopack "brake" style dyno with variable slew, and the other uses a fixed-weight drum.
It's a nice system that can vary the step time and load. However, it can be a little hazardous to compare a given dynojet dyno to a Dynapack and divine what it will do at the track.
http://www.mustangworld.com/ourpics/News/nowheel.htm
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by EricL
I'm not sure about that (re: the 13second 1/4 mile). The Dynopack is a nice system, but it generally shows higher numbers than a Dynojet.
The Dynojet is using an inertial roller and the Dynopack is hooked up without the wheels on (it hooks up to the hubs). The losses from tire slippage and wheel/tire mass/inertia go away, and the method used to calculate HP/TQ is different. The Dynopack "brake" style dyno with variable slew, and the other uses a fixed-weight drum.
It's a nice system that can vary the step time and load. However, it can be a little hazardous to compare a given dynojet dyno to a Dynapack and divine what it will do at the track.
The Dynojet is using an inertial roller and the Dynopack is hooked up without the wheels on (it hooks up to the hubs). The losses from tire slippage and wheel/tire mass/inertia go away, and the method used to calculate HP/TQ is different. The Dynopack "brake" style dyno with variable slew, and the other uses a fixed-weight drum.
It's a nice system that can vary the step time and load. However, it can be a little hazardous to compare a given dynojet dyno to a Dynapack and divine what it will do at the track.
That "250hp" number on the Dynopack is probably about 20-25 hp higher than the number a dynojet would produce.Good gain from the VAFC though...
AkuraCLS's car is a CL-S, I installed his headers etc. The real purpose of his dyno session was to tune the V-AFC. So... the dyno shows 10 more whp, what's the big deal
For those who care so much about whp... take the car to the track. Driving skills and car preparation are far more important than 10whp!
For those who care so much about whp... take the car to the track. Driving skills and car preparation are far more important than 10whp!
Originally Posted by EricL
I'm not sure about that (re: the 13second 1/4 mile). The Dynopack is a nice system, but it generally shows higher numbers than a Dynojet.
his mustang dyno numbers are in line w/ a modded 3.5L on a dyno jet.
i guess it's just the difference between dyno's.
nice gains from the v-afc. that's what matters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
D-Rob
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
62
Jan 5, 2016 11:44 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM



