Interesting HP observation...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 08:30 AM
  #1  
jimcol711's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Interesting HP observation...

Yesterday i was lying in bed, flipping through the channels on the TV while my G/F was still sleeping and i stopped on TNN for some good ol' Horsepower TV. i was really intruiged by what they did, check this out.

they had a 2001 Camaro SS. they did a baseline dyno run. now in case you didnt know, these bad boys are rated at 325 hp....this car was a friggin AUTOMATIC....the baseline dyno was 302 hp!!!!! for all those without a calculator handy, thats a mere 7.1% loss!!! HOLY FUCK!!! thats incredible!!!! but in any case, after the baseline dyno, they just changed all the fluids:

-synthetic 5W30 oil
-hi performance rear differential oil
-hi performance tranny fluid
-some kind of coolant additive that gauranteed to drop engine temps by 10%


so after they changed those 4 fluids, thay put it back on a dyno and the car made 311 HP!!!! DAAAMN, a 9 HP gain from just changing fluids????? can we do this on our car???? im particularily interested in the coolant additive, it was some purple stuff, in a little container, maybe 24 fl. oz. or something like that. and the guy said it was gauranteed to drop your engine temp by 10%....now ive heard our cars are very sensitive to high coolant temps so maybe we could see some results with that stuff??? any ideas guys??

but i guess the biggest thing that blew me away was the baseline run on that camaro....holy shit, 7.1% AUTOMATIC tranny loss????? wow, all i can say is WOW.....Acura should be taking notes!!!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:06 AM
  #2  
JSuppi's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx, USA
Just an observation...could be wrong??

I might be completely wrong about this, but generally don't RWD cars have less transmission loss generally than front wheel drive cars?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:07 AM
  #3  
fender4's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Coppell, Texas, USA
Must be Redline, yes it increases HP at higher RPMs,, post dyno if you have it. Need to see gains separate where the increase is ie, Trans, Engine, then Diff...,,,, Then put in Mobil1 and then Amsoil,, gains will be close. Check out Redline page they did this with a Corvette. But they don't post any data about long term every day use or extended drain intervals. If you Race on a track this stuff is very good for a couple of hundred miles of racing.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:10 AM
  #4  
Rescuer's Avatar
Evil Bob Knieval
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 7
i was going to do a radiator flush next weekend, so i'll have to check out this addative and purchase it
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:11 AM
  #5  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
no the SS camaro are underrated... fluids can give 1%-3% gains

so on 200 WHP like a CLS you expect an extra 4-5 WHP... marginal at best ... but still better than nothing.

On CLS you cannot touch the ATF and only the engine oil and the coolant can be moded.. I will add Redline Wetwatter when the coolant service is due.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:31 AM
  #6  
jucee187's Avatar
PACDAT
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: mississauga, canada
NASHUA why dont you just get a mugen 1.3 radiator cap?.. it does the same job as the wetwatter doesnt it by increasing the boiling temp???....

and.. what fluids needs to be changed to gain 4-5WHP?...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:38 AM
  #7  
Mike's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,925
Likes: 12
From: location location
Re: Just an observation...could be wrong??

Originally posted by JSuppi
I might be completely wrong about this, but generally don't RWD cars have less transmission loss generally than front wheel drive cars?
That's backwards. FWD cars suffer less parasitic loss due to the shorter drive train.

IMO, the engine is underrated.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:55 AM
  #8  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Originally posted by jucee187
NASHUA why dont you just get a mugen 1.3 radiator cap?.. it does the same job as the wetwatter doesnt it by increasing the boiling temp???....

and.. what fluids needs to be changed to gain 4-5WHP?...
Could u explain me how a radiator decrease the temp of the cooland? any referencs or links to this product?

Thanks

Okay I found this is what Mugen has to say:

RADIATOR CAP
This radiator cap is a high-pressure type that increases the pressure inside the radiator, thus raising the coolant boiling point and increasing cooling efficiency. The open valve pressure is 1.3kg/cm² compared to the normal 1.1kg/cm². It demonstrates its power under high-load situations such as circuit driving.

Okay... I do not need to increase the boiling point, I need to lower the average normal temp.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:29 AM
  #9  
jucee187's Avatar
PACDAT
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: mississauga, canada
and the wetwatter will lower the avg normal temp?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
Red Nj-s's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 0
From: central jerzey
it really has about 340 hp, but they cant say that or it would piss off the vette owners.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:37 AM
  #11  
Dom418's Avatar
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
I have also heard that those engines are underrated... and it makes sense. Look at the times they put up in the Auto.

I have actually heard >340.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #12  
JRock's Avatar
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
My guess would be the time spent changing all those fluids allowed the engine to cool off a little too.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #13  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
Reference: http://www.redlineoil.com/redlineoil/wwti.htm

WaterWetter®
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Red Line WaterWetter® is designed to provide improved metal wetting and excellent corrosion inhibition when added to plain water or a glycol coolant. The most poorly maintained system in an automobile is usually the cooling system. Maintenance is quite simple and only required once each year, but most vehicle owners never routinely change the coolant or replenish the corrosion inhibitors which are required for trouble-free operation. Proper cooling system maintenance is very critical for most modern engines which utilize more aluminum. Aluminum has a very high corrosion potential, even higher than zinc, which is very widely used as a sacrificial anode. The only property which enables aluminum to be used in a cooling system is that it will form protective films under the proper conditions which will prevent the uncontrolled corrosive attack of acids or bases. Poor aluminum corrosion inhibition will cause the dissolution of aluminum at the heat rejection surfaces, weakening the cooling system walls and water pump casing and weakening the head gasket mating surfaces. These corrosion products will then form deposits on the lower temperature surfaces such as in radiator tubes which have very poor heat transfer properties, causing a significant reduction in the cooling ability of the entire system. Red Line WaterWetter® will provide the proper corrosion inhibition for all cooling system metals, including aluminum, cast iron, steel, copper, brass, and lead.

Water has twice the heat transfer capability when compared to 50% glycol antifreeze/coolant in water. Most passenger automobiles have a cooling system designed to reject sufficient heat under normal operating conditions using a 50/50 glycol solution in water. However, in racing applications, the use of water and WaterWetter® will enable the use of smaller radiator systems, which means less frontal drag, and it will also reduce cylinder head temperatures, even when compared to water alone, which means more spark advance may be used to improve engine torque.

BENEFIT SUMMARY
Doubles the wetting ability of water
Improves heat transfer
Reduces cylinder head temperatures
May allow more spark advance for increased torque
Reduces rust, corrosion and electrolysis of all metals
Provides long term corrosion protection
Cleans and lubricates water pump seals
Prevents foaming
Reduces cavitation corrosion
Complexes with hard water to reduce scale
COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
The conventional spark ignition gasoline engine is not a very efficient powerplant. A considerable amount of the available fuel energy must be rejected from the metal combustion chamber parts by the coolant and dispersed to the atmosphere through the radiator. This heat rejection is necessary in order to prevent thermal fatigue of the pistons, cylinder walls, and the cylinder head. Another problem is that the combustion chamber must be cooled enough to prevent preignition and detonation. The higher the combustion chamber temperatures, the higher the octane number required to prevent preignition and detonation. Since the octane of the available fuel is limited, increasing temperatures in the combustion chamber require retarding the spark timing which reduces the peak torque available. Higher inlet temperatures also reduce the density of the fuel/air mixture, reducing available torque further. For these reasons reducing the flow of heat to the coolant usually reduces the efficiency of the engine. Figure 1 shows a typical heat balance diagram for a spark ignition engine. This diagram demonstrates that the coolant in an automobile engine must absorb and reject through the radiator 2 to 3 times the amount of energy which is converted to brake power.



THERMAL PROPERTIES
Water has amazingly superior heat transfer properties compared to virtually any other liquid cooling medium - far superior to glycol-based coolants. As shown in Table 1, water has almost 2.5 times greater thermal conductivity compared to glycol coolants. Mixtures of glycol and water have nearly proportional improvement due to the addition of water. Most heat is transferred in a cooling system by convection from hot metal to a cooler liquid as in the engine block or from a hot liquid to cooler metal surfaces, as in the radiator. The convection coefficient of liquids in a tube is a complicated relationship between the thermal conductivity, viscosity of the liquid, and the tube diameter which determines the amount of turbulent flow. Since 50/50 glycol solution has about 4 times the viscosity and only 70% of the thermal conductivity of water, the thermal convection coefficient for a 50/50 glycol solution is approximately 50% of the coefficient for water. Water in the cooling system is capable of transferring twice as much heat out of the same system as compared to a 50/50 glycol coolant and water solution. In order for a 50/50 glycol mixture to reject as much heat as water (amount of heat rejected is independent of the coolant), the temperature differentials at the heat transfer surface must be twice as great, which means higher cylinder head temperatures.

Table 1
Thermal Properties of Cooling System Materials Material Density
g/cm3 Thermal
Conductivity
Watt/m · °C Thermal
Convection
Watt/m · °C Heat
Capacity
cal/g · °C Heat of
Vaporization
cal/g
Water 1.000 0.60 1829 1.000 539
Glycol 1.114 0.25 ------ 0.573 226
50/50 1.059 0.41 897 0.836 374

Aluminum 2.70 155 0.225
Cast Iron 7.25 58 0.119
Copper 8.93 384 0.093
Brass 8.40 113 0.091
Ceramics 1 - 10
Air .0013 .026 0.240


HEAT TRANSFER
Red Line WaterWetter® can reduce cooling system temperatures compared to glycol solutions and even plain water. Water has excellent heat transfer properties in its liquid state, but very high surface tension makes it difficult to release water vapor from the metal surface. Under heavy load conditions, much of the heat in the cylinder head is transferred by localized boiling at hot spots, even though the bulk of the cooling solution is below the boiling point. Red Line's unique WaterWetter® reduces the surface tension of water by a factor of two, which means that much smaller vapor bubbles will be formed. Vapor bubbles on the metal surface create an insulating layer which impedes heat transfer. Releasing these vapor bubbles from the metal surface can improve the heat transfer properties in this localized boiling region by as much as 15% as shown in Figure 2. This figure demonstrates the removal of heat from an aluminum bar at 304°F by quenching the bar in different coolants at 214°F under 15 psi pressure. Compare the time required to reduce the temperature of the aluminum to 250°F, or the boiling point of water at 15 psi. WaterWetter® required 3.2 seconds, water alone 3.7 sec, 50/50 glycol in water required 10.2 sec, and 100% glycol required 21 sec. Water alone required 15% longer, 50/50 glycol 220% longer, and 100% glycol required 550% longer.


Performance Properties of Coolants
Cooling System Fluid Stabilized Temperature
50% Glycol/ 50% Water 228°F
50/50 with WaterWetter 220°F
Water 220°F
Water with WaterWetter 202°F

DYNO TEST RESULTS
Dynomometer tests performed by Malcolm Garrett Racing Engines showed significant improvements in coolant temperatures using WaterWetter. These tests were performed with a Chevrolet 350 V-8 with a cast iron block and aluminum cylinder heads. The thermostat temperature was 160°F. The engine operated at 7200 rpm for three hours and the stabilized cooling system temperature was recorded and tabulated below:

These numbers are similar to the temperatures recorded in track use and heavy-duty street use.

COOLANT EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE
Under moderate load conditions, each percent glycol raises cylinder head temperatures by 1°F. 50% glycol raises head temperatures by 45°F. This increase in temperature will raise the octane required for trace knock levels by typically 3.5 octane numbers. A car equipped with a knock sensor will retard the timing to compensate for the increase in octane requirement by approximately 5°, which will reduce the maximum brake torque by about 2.1%. Racing vehicles not equipped with knock sensors can advance timing for increased torque.


BOILING POINT ELEVATION
Red Line WaterWetter® does not significantly increase the boiling point of water; however, increasing pressure will raise the boiling point. The boiling point of water treated with Red Line using a 15 psi cap is 250°F compared to 265°F at 15 psi for 50% glycol. Increasing the pressure by 50% to 23 psi will increase the boiling point of water to 265°F. Because of the doubling of the ability of the radiator to transfer heat, boilover using Red Line treated water is not a problem as long as the engine is circulating coolant through the head and the fan is circulating air. Sudden shutdown after very hard driving may cause boilover.

SAE 880266 Water +
Red Line 50% Glycol 70% Glycol
Increase in Cylinder
Head Temperature Baseline +45°F +65°F
Increase in Octane
(RON) Requirement Baseline +3.5 +5.0
Change in Spark Timing
for Trace Knock Baseline -5.2° -7.5°
Change in Torque Baseline -2.1% -3.1%

FREEZING POINT DEPRESSION
Red Line WaterWetter® does not significantly reduce the freezing point of water. If the vehicle will see freezing temperatures, an antifreeze must be used. Water expands approximately 9% upon freezing which can cause severe engine damage. Even in summertime, the use of air-conditioning can blow freezing air through the heater and cause freezing of the heater core unless approximately 20% antifreeze is used.

CORROSION PROTECTION
Modern automotive engines now use aluminum for heads, radiators, water pump housings, and nearly all hose fittings. These engines require significantly greater corrosion protection than their cast iron counterparts of the past. Aluminum is such an electroactive metal that it requires an impenetrable corrosion inhibitor film to prevent rapid corrosion. Acid neutralization capability is very important. Coolant which has been left in a cooling system for several years has probably become acidic from the oxidation of the glycol to acids. Also, keeping the glycol concentration in the cooling system below 50% will help stability.

Red Line also provides excellent protection from cavitation erosion in the water pump and cylinder head. Localized boiling in the cylinder head forms vapor bubbles which collapse when they come in contact with cooler liquids. This collapse creates tremendous shock waves which removes the inhibitor film from the aluminum surface and can cause catastrophic erosion of the aluminum if the inhibitor does not reform the film quickly. Another problem created by cavitation erosion is the deposition of the removed aluminum as a salt with poor heat transfer properties in the lower temperature radiator tubes. Red Line prevents this corrosion through effective film formation and smaller vapor bubble formation, which has a less violent collapse. Foam control is equally important since entrained air will cause cavitation erosion due to the collapse of foam bubbles. Red Line provides excellent control of foam with water alone and glycol solutions.

Most coolants additives on the market provide only protection for iron and perhaps moderate protection for aluminum. The milky soluble oil types can actually impede heat transfer by wetting the metal surface with oil and this oil can swell and soften rubber coolant hoses. Table 3 shows the many tests which the Red Line formula will satisfy and how it compares to a standard antifreeze.

TABLE 3
Comparison of Corrosion Inhibition Properties
PROPERTY RED LINE SPEC COOLANT A
pH 8.6 7.5 - 11 9.8
Boiling Point @ 15 psig 250°F 265°F (50%)
Freezing Point 31°F -35°F(50%) -35°F
Foaming Height, ml 75 150 50
Color Pink green
Ash, % 0.5 5, max 1
Surface Tension @ 100°C,
Dynes/cm2 28.3 58.9 (water)
ASTM D4340 Heat Transfer
Corrosion Test, Aluminum
Weight loss, mg/cm2/wk 0.21 1 max 0.45
ASTM D1384 Corrosion,
Weight loss, mg/specimen
Copper 1 10 max 5
Solder 6 30 7
Brass 2 10 5
Steel 1 10 6
Cast Iron 0 10 3
Aluminum 16 30 30


SLIPPERINESS OF COOLANTS
Red Line WaterWetter® does not alter the frictional property of tire rubber and water on a pavement surface. The chart below shows the static and dynamic friction of pavement wetted with different coolant types. Higher friction indicates less slipperiness. The dynamic friction indicates the increase in slipping which occurs after the tire begins to break loose. Water and water with WaterWetter® reduce the friction relative to dry pavement about 50%, but it is much less than the reduction in friction caused by ethylene glycol and even more slippery is propylene glycol.


USE DIRECTIONS
One 12 ounce bottle treats 12-16 quarts of water or a 50% ethylene or propylene glycol solution. In smaller cooling systems, use 4-5 caps per quart. Add directly through the cooling system fill cap into the radiator or into the overflow tank. Do not open a cooling system while hot. For best protection for aluminum, replenish or replace every 15,000 miles. The anti-scaling ingredients in Red Line WaterWetter allow its use with ordinary tap water. However, using with distilled or deionized water will accomplish some scale removal in the cylinder head area. For maximum temperature reductions use the most water and the least antifreeze possible to prevent freezing in your climate. Even in summertime the use of air-conditioning can blow freezing air through the heater and cause freezing of the heater core unless approximately 20% antifreeze is used. Red Line WaterWetter is available in 12 ounce containers.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Red Line Synthetic Oil Corp.
6100 Egret Court
Benicia, CA 94510
(707)745-6100

© 2000 Red Line Synthetic Oil Corp.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:47 AM
  #14  
Dom418's Avatar
I LOVE MY CAR
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
what?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:47 AM
  #15  
civic4982's Avatar
SHIFT_over.so.I.can.see
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, TX
hmm I thnk you're right Red Nj-s... I'd be pissed too if I paid 15K more for a car with only 5 or so hp more...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #16  
jucee187's Avatar
PACDAT
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: mississauga, canada
That waterwetter product sounds interesting..how much does it cost?. and we can just simply add it to our coolant?.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 02:03 PM
  #17  
edgalang's Avatar
Purchased: April 28, 2001
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 2
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally posted by jucee187
That waterwetter product sounds interesting..how much does it cost?. and we can just simply add it to our coolant?.
It runs between $12-15 and yes you can simply add it in. Ideally it would be nice if you had the proper mixture, but for most of us, opening up the radiator cap and pouring it in would suffice. Oh, and it lasts for 15k miles.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 02:27 PM
  #18  
jucee187's Avatar
PACDAT
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: mississauga, canada
Now where can i get one?.. i live in canada and are not as privileged as you US peeps..
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 08:23 PM
  #19  
Wires's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally posted by Red Nj-s
it really has about 340 hp, but they cant say that or it would piss off the vette owners.
It is the same engine, so it's no wonder. Before, the only difference between the Vette and Camaro engine was the headers (and the Camaro doesn't have covers over the injection system -- odd, 'cause it looks naked and weird.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 08:25 PM
  #20  
Wires's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally posted by jucee187
NASHUA why dont you just get a mugen 1.3 radiator cap?.. it does the same job as the wetwatter doesnt it by increasing the boiling temp???....

and.. what fluids needs to be changed to gain 4-5WHP?...
If you change out all oils (engine, transmission, differential) and replace with synthetic you can pick up-to 4% more horsepower.

Problem with the CL is you can't replace the manual fluid or auto fluid or they don't shift right.

You can replace the engine oil with synthetic though....


Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 08:39 PM
  #21  
bigman's Avatar
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,016
Likes: 4
From: Yonkers NY
It is a proven fact that gm underates the Firebird and Camaro, so the Vette owners wont get pissed off. The WS6 Bird and SS Camaro have very close hp numbers to the stock vette and pull close numbers in tests as well. Its kinda like how the Boxter S was a few ticks slower than a base 911 a few years back. But porcshe would never tell anyone that.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:10 PM
  #22  
JRock's Avatar
Old timer
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 1
From: .
Originally posted by civic4982
hmm I thnk you're right Red Nj-s... I'd be pissed too if I paid 15K more for a car with only 5 or so hp more...


Aside from a similar-looking interior design, the Corvette is an entirely different car than the Camaro.

Besides, there are a plethora of cars that cost $15k more than a Camaro but have less horsepower.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:14 PM
  #23  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
where can i get red line water wetter??
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:15 PM
  #24  
Wires's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally posted by JRock


Aside from a similar-looking interior design, the Corvette is an entirely different car than the Camaro.

Besides, there are a plethora of cars that cost $15k more than a Camaro but have less horsepower.
Different looking, but almost the same powertrain.

Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #25  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
even though these f body's put down 310 to the wheels i think a auto cl-s w/ h/i can beat a drop top auto camaro or TA to around the end of 2nd gear which is 70ish, then the v8 will haul ass
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 09:56 PM
  #26  
roo97ss's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
you'd only be beating it if it botched the launch. A CLS is way harder to launch on the street than the camaro. The fact that we autos don't have posi units and are fwd, and have a low 1st gear doesnt' help any.

Look at what the guys run at the track, 2.2 and they're ecstatic, often in the 2.3- 2.5 60' time. That is horrendous for a stock LS1/LT1, they shoud run from 2.0-2.2. The reason it's closer to 70 is simply the amount of time you're racing.

Also, unless the headers make a huge, i mean huge difference, above 110, on the highway the cls is hosed.

For a car that seem so strong, the 3 times i've taken it out in 3rd and hit 4th it felt like someone dropped anchor, the car which was pulling hard just started driving. The LS1 is just out of control at this point, painting that smile on your face permanently.
In either 4th in the std, or 3rd in the performance gear auto, the cars pull hard to 125 and 130...and then when hitting 4/5 depending keep going, just not as profoundly.

Joe
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 01:15 AM
  #27  
edgalang's Avatar
Purchased: April 28, 2001
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 2
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally posted by darrinb
where can i get red line water wetter??
Personally I've never gotten it from anywhere else but their website. Call the toll free 800 number and ask for it. The lady was soo happy to that I wanted their product that she was more than willing to ship it to me even though it wasnt customary.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
Jan 26, 2016 04:15 PM
Euro4gen
2G RL (2005-2012)
11
Dec 12, 2015 03:14 AM
ROWDY621
Car Parts for Sale
1
Sep 30, 2015 03:20 PM
Sarlacc
Console & Computer Gaming
5
Sep 30, 2015 02:15 PM
MonkeyTrucker
Southeast
0
Sep 25, 2015 02:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.