I don't even believe it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 10:21 PM
  #1  
wmb357's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
I don't even believe it

Hey guys I just ran my 02 CL-S auto tonight for the first time. I want your opinions, my buddy said that I ran 13.92 at 96 mph. They were not handing out time slips so I don't know for sure and can't prove it. I think it was probably 14.92 and he is just BSing me. I've been looking at track times on different websites and the information is unreliable. Some guys are running 13.5,6,& 7s at 96 to 98 mph and others are running high 14's at the same speed. I know I know this is too good to be true but I want your feed back anyway.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #2  
blk2001tlon19s's Avatar
318whp/289wtq @ 6psi
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: Accokeek, Maryland
With that trap speed it I don't think it was an 13.92 but I'm not an expert on that.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 03:42 AM
  #3  
All Mine's Avatar
I'm a Vagiterian.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Home of FreakNick.
That's more of a 14.7-14.9 trap.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
mlb585's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: fort lauderdale,fl
Well, if he got a great 60' time then it could happen.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
03_3.2_type-s's Avatar
14.3, 101.3mph (I/H)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by mlb585
Well, if he got a great 60' time then it could happen.
that would be impossible, even if he got a great 60' time a 13.9 with a stock auto cl-s just wont happen.

i dont even think that his trap speed is right. 96 mph is high for a stock auto.

your time was most likely a 14.9, still pretty good
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
farberstyle's Avatar
something witty
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
No one is running 13's with a CL-S unless they have nos or boost. The guys on here who are all-motor with every available engine mod haven't broken the 14 second barrier. Still good times, especially for your first run.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #7  
mclarenf3387's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,620
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by farberstyle
No one is running 13's with a CL-S unless they have nos or boost. The guys on here who are all-motor with every available engine mod haven't broken the 14 second barrier. Still good times, especially for your first run.
Allmotor ran a 13.6 allmotor, but he had every bolt-on plus some custom machine work done.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #8  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by farberstyle
No one is running 13's with a CL-S unless they have nos or boost. The guys on here who are all-motor with every available engine mod haven't broken the 14 second barrier. Still good times, especially for your first run.
I thought Ram broke the the pre-14 second barrier in NA form...
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
wmb357's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Cool yeah

thanks guys for the feedback I knew it wasn't possible I'm gonna smack that little bitch that was with me, he ALWAYS lies.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
imposible 13.90= 101 to 102 mph unless you did a 1.60 ft.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #11  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by farberstyle
No one is running 13's with a CL-S unless they have nos or boost. The guys on here who are all-motor with every available engine mod haven't broken the 14 second barrier. Still good times, especially for your first run.
noone?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #12  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
best i ran14.10@ 100.70 mph nov -03 union grove wisc. 60ft 2.18
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #13  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by johntypes
imposible 13.90= 101 to 102 mph unless you did a 1.60 ft.
did 13.7 at 101
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
m&b6speed's Avatar
buy my car
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: hillsborough, nj
Originally Posted by johntypes
best i ran14.10@ 100.70 mph nov -03 union grove wisc. 60ft 2.18

2.18 60 ft is good, are you auto or manual

stock???(if manual i would say yes-if auto maybe intake-possibly headers)
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #15  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
Auto ,I have every thing from comptech Headers exhaust b-pipe Ice box titanium STB sways bars brake lines v-tec fuel pump adj.fuel reg. koni yellows I had a friend three years ago who ran 14.2s@ 101MPH and his 60Ft was 2.18 also
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #16  
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 21
Originally Posted by johntypes
Auto ,I have every thing from comptech Headers exhaust b-pipe Ice box titanium STB sways bars brake lines v-tec fuel pump adj.fuel reg. koni yellows I had a friend three years ago who ran 14.2s@ 101MPH and his 60Ft was 2.18 also
Uhhhh...what kind of an improvement in the 1/4 do you think the sway bars brake lines and konis did for you?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #17  
mclarenf3387's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,620
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte
Konis might help with 60 ft times as there will be less squat, but the other stuff, yea.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 09:51 PM
  #18  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
the sways & koni helped handling ss brake lines and diffrent rotors and brake made a big diffrence
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
Aug 4, 2024 10:35 AM
oo7spy
2G RL (2005-2012)
18
Jun 19, 2023 12:48 AM
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
429
Nov 4, 2019 06:44 AM
CheeseyPoofs McNut
5G TLX (2015-2020)
35
Oct 11, 2015 11:25 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.