Do you guys think the TL is a better car than a 530i?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2004, 04:05 PM
  #81  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by Gabo3k
Based on what you said, then you too realize that BMW is just the ultimate driving machine in its class, and not just the ulimate driving machine, right!

Also, you do realize that perfection is humanly impossible, right! And even if perfection was attainable, Lexus would not be the company to achieve it...
Geez, I didnt realize we were talking about the deeper meaning of life and transcending to next level of consciousness
Old 01-21-2004, 04:46 PM
  #82  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
dacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"A BMW is a sports car, a luxury car, and a practical everyday car all in one. I stand by the statement of ultimate driving machine."

A BMW 5 series is not a sports car. And to call an entire brand of cars the Ultimate Driving Machine is a bit arrogant despite it being a slogan for a commercial/advertisement. I certainly do not consider the X5/X3 ultimate. To give them credit, I think they do offer the best balance of ride and handling. But others are getting real close to it and to me, the premium is just too high. If I were to buy prestige, I'd rather have a Porsche or Mercedes. To me, BMW is a notch lower.
Old 01-21-2004, 04:53 PM
  #83  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by dacura
"A BMW is a sports car, a luxury car, and a practical everyday car all in one. I stand by the statement of ultimate driving machine."

A BMW 5 series is not a sports car. And to call an entire brand of cars the Ultimate Driving Machine is a bit arrogant despite it being a slogan for a commercial/advertisement. I certainly do not consider the X5/X3 ultimate. To give them credit, I think they do offer the best balance of ride and handling. But others are getting real close to it and to me, the premium is just too high. If I were to buy prestige, I'd rather have a Porsche or Mercedes. To me, BMW is a notch lower.
Ill give credit about using that slogan across the board.

But bmws ARE sporty, very much so, and i would call a 6, 8 series sports cars. i would call and m3 a sports car. i would call an m5 a sports sedan. mcoupe - sports car.

My questions is have some of you people making statements even driven a bmw for anything length of time? if so, then fine you have your opinions and i have mine, wonderful. But if you havent, then you need to quit basing opinions off of nothing, cause you have o ground to stand.

As for getting a porsche, if i wanted a pure sports car with less luxury, yeah id go porsche.

Mercedes, never really liked them, still dont. Only ever liked the SLs.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:07 PM
  #84  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow 4 pages. Let's REMEMBER, the TL is for those seeking "value" and it's a car to "remind" them of a BMW. It's not a BMW. Sure the TL has a lot of equipment, BMW does tons more R&D in how the car drives etc etc.

I still can't see how we are compaing a 38k with a 58k car seriously. But I am not surprised. Over on the other site, they used to compare their TL-S against a GS 400 or 540...

And I don't care what u say, when u pay a certain amount of money for a car, you want people to notice and appreciate it. You can buy the most feature laden, value packed TL, no one will notice or care. You could drive a bare bones 525, and people will constantly be asking you about it. Yeah, it's silly, but such is life.
Based on what you said, then you too realize that BMW is just the ultimate driving machine in its class, and not just the ulimate driving machine, right!

Also, you do realize that perfection is humanly impossible, right! And even if perfection was attainable, Lexus would not be the company to achieve it...
Well those are high aspirations. I'd rather roll with that then "The feel of value" or " Your payments will be cheaper with us" or whatever slogan Acura uses.
Acura offered Xenon in the US before BMW. STANDARD. $800 option on 530... but yes you get a couple more gimmicks
Correct me if I am wrong I think they were available in the 740 way before the 99 TL. And while Acura sticks to the cheapest HIDs, luxury car companies have HAD self leveling units and now have moved on to HIDs that move in the direction of the steering wheel.
Acura was the FIRST with a Navigation system, the FIRST with DVD based system, the FIRST to integrate climate controls and navi.
Acura had NAV is 99 with the TL right? I know the GS had it in 98, with some of those features. I am pretty sure BMW/Benz had it in the 7/S before 1999.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:14 PM
  #85  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX

And I don't care what u say, when u pay a certain amount of money for a car, you want people to notice and appreciate it. You can buy the most feature laden, value packed TL, no one will notice or care. You could drive a bare bones 525, and people will constantly be asking you about it. Yeah, it's silly, but such is life.
Im not arguing anything your saying, cept for this statement. I think the new TL commands a little more attention then previous gens of TL. It has more presence and a look that isnt SO bland.

The bmw will receive more attention because...its a bmw.

(and cause they made them so fucking ugly now )
Old 01-21-2004, 05:14 PM
  #86  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wow how did this turn into 4 pages


u just cant compare these 2 cars
Old 01-21-2004, 05:15 PM
  #87  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by darrinb

u just cant compare these 2 cars
In terms of how they feel when you have them out on the road.

No, you're absolutely right, you cant.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:16 PM
  #88  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
dacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not think you need to have experienced everything you tend to have an opinion on. If that's a requirement, then noone should be running for president. Even your assessment of your extended time in a BMW is an opinion at the end of the day. People support an opinion in many ways not just from pure experience which can also be highly subjective.

I don't own a BMW but I have 3 close friends that do and I get to drive a 5 series, and X5 and a 323, while not often but certainly enough times. I won't go into my impressions and like I said I think they have a good balance.

But again to call the entire brand of car the ultimate driving machine turns me off. Not to say that they don't have sports cars, they do. Z8, Z4 are. To me, I wouldn't even call an M3 a sports car. I don't even think they pull .90g on a skidpad.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:20 PM
  #89  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by dacura
I won't go into my impressions and like I said I think they have a good balance.

But again to call the entire brand of car the ultimate driving machine turns me off.
Sigh, I follow the moniker "the ultimate driving machine" because I believe bimmers to be the best balance.

Best balance of sport, ot luxury, of practicality, of comfort, of technology, of precisness, of driver experience.

Does this some it up better. This is why I ( ME, MYSELF, and no one else) buys in to bimmers rhetoric.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:23 PM
  #90  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,436
Received 5,098 Likes on 2,707 Posts
Originally posted by dacura
I do not think you need to have experienced everything you tend to have an opinion on.
I think if want to dis a bimmer for how it drives or handles, or any other car for that matter, yeah i think you do.

I may judge cars on looks, but I have ever dissed a car on how handles or drives that i myself have never taken the wheel of.
Old 01-21-2004, 05:37 PM
  #91  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But again to call the entire brand of car the ultimate driving machine turns me off. Not to say that they don't have sports cars, they do. Z8, Z4 are. To me, I wouldn't even call an M3 a sports car. I don't even think they pull .90g on a skidpad.
Z8 got no great handling reviews. It was really just a special edition model.

Z4 getting very mixed reviews. IN my Sports Car International, they blasted the car twice, once with the manual and once with the SMG.

M3, are u kidding. Now I agree, BMW purists (which I am not) claim it's now a porker and losing it's feel. To me, I would LOVE one of these stock, let alone modded. The last 2 M3s (E36/E46) have been kicking everyone's asses for the last 8 years...

Then we have the M3 CSL, who according to EVO, or nevermind.....

You want some cheap true fun in a sedan. Buy an IS 300, many BMW owners state it reminds them of the E36, more fun to drive.
Old 01-21-2004, 06:45 PM
  #92  
Full-Time IDIoT---DoH!!!
 
DISRUPTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DUMB ISLAND
Age: 42
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
acura has had navi since 96 or 97...it 1st appeared in their RLs

trust me, highline hondas in japan can give some of the high end lux cars a close run in tech features and details...its sad honda is so conservative w/their offerings here
Old 01-21-2004, 07:04 PM
  #93  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
acura has had navi since 96 or 97...it 1st appeared in their RLs
I did not know this. Soopa, your correct.
Old 01-21-2004, 07:55 PM
  #94  
Advanced
 
Jeffn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a Bimmer driver, only in reliability....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TL-Rocket
3G TL (2004-2008)
12
04-29-2023 02:33 AM
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM
jordanboi
2G TSX (2009-2014)
16
09-05-2015 01:33 AM
ptbarnett
3G RLX (2013+)
4
08-30-2015 12:39 PM



Quick Reply: Do you guys think the TL is a better car than a 530i?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.