Comptech vs. AEM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #1  
krisdlm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives On BOOST
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, Ca
Comptech vs. AEM

Whats a better choice for 2003 cls 6sp?
AEM cold air intake or Comptech Icebox?
Im not sure what the dyno is on AEM but Comptech says the
Icebox has a max 14hp gain @ 6000 Rpm!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #2  
kyle77777's Avatar
Gonna cost to catch up
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, WA
Search. There are plenty of threads discussing this. Similar power increase. AEM gives more sound though. I just ordered an AEM cai from Excelerate today
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
krisdlm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives On BOOST
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, Ca
AEM's largest gain is 9.6 @ 6000 rpm(aempower.com).
Gotta go with the icebox even though more sound would be nice
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
BigLizard's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,125
Likes: 11
From: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Lightbulb



Look at the links in my signature, maybe that will help you?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #5  
foreveraflboy's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Shalimar, FL 32579
^ good one
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
m733l's Avatar
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 16
From: No. Cal
i've got the comptech icebox and it's pretty agressive sounding when i floor it. i'm sure it's not as loud as the aem but it's loud enough for me imo.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #7  
Dirty Type-S's Avatar
B A N N E D
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery County, Maryland
K&N drop in + Res Removal = Just as good.

and only 35 bucks and 20 minutes of work.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 12:42 AM
  #8  
goredcar's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Canada
The AEM is way better sounding... and quite frankly I doubt that the CT produces any more power. The large cone shaped filter provides unrestricted high volume airflow.

A friend of mine went for the CT and after he heard my AEM regretted it.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 02:07 AM
  #9  
aznboi2424's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 209
From: Elk Grove, CA
Originally Posted by Dirty Type-S
K&N drop in + Res Removal = Just as good.

and only 35 bucks and 20 minutes of work.
this is exactly what i did and it was one of the easiest mods i have done.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 02:27 AM
  #10  
INSPIRE 32V's Avatar
Glacier Frost Mica CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 24
From: Dallas, TX
AEM all the way
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #11  
Excelerate's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,877
Likes: 624
From: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Considering Comptech closed its doors and you can't get an Icebox anymore unless you find a used one, AEM is your best bet.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #12  
tnobori1's Avatar
Missing my
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 22
From: Discovery Bay, CA
I ended up going AEM. I asked the same question about power gains before I made my purchase. The answer I got from research and survey was that power was about the same, but AEM has a louder sound. I added XS Power Headers and I am in love with the sound of my car now! I don't think I've listened to the radio since I paired the two!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:02 AM
  #13  
SG81's Avatar
Missing My CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,376
Likes: 13
From: Toronto
Comptech= better power gain
AEM= louder sound

to me,
power > sound
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:19 AM
  #14  
Glasuan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
I have to agree with the majority of posters on this thread. My aem is nice and sounds great, and I really doubt that the CT icebox could produce significantly more HP. Also, don't forget at speed, a CAI is more effective, as the air is being forced into it, somewhat of a ram air effect. (assuming there is a hole for the air to go through).
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #15  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
Originally Posted by Glasuan
I have to agree with the majority of posters on this thread. My aem is nice and sounds great, and I really doubt that the CT icebox could produce significantly more HP. Also, don't forget at speed, a CAI is more effective, as the air is being forced into it, somewhat of a ram air effect. (assuming there is a hole for the air to go through).
The Icebox is also a CAI, so whats your point?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:41 AM
  #16  
Glasuan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Icebox is not a CAI, it works differently as far i can tell based on pictures.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #17  
SG81's Avatar
Missing My CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,376
Likes: 13
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Glasuan
Icebox is not a CAI, it works differently as far i can tell based on pictures.
uh, it is a CAI
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #18  
BigLizard's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,125
Likes: 11
From: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Originally Posted by SG81
uh, it is a CAI
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #19  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
Originally Posted by Glasuan
Icebox is not a CAI, it works differently as far i can tell based on pictures.
As far as I can tell based on your post you don't know what your talking about




Disclaimer: If this post offends anyone....Eh I don't care its Monday morning
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 10:50 AM
  #20  
Excelerate's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,877
Likes: 624
From: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Originally Posted by Glasuan
I have to agree with the majority of posters on this thread. My aem is nice and sounds great, and I really doubt that the CT icebox could produce significantly more HP. Also, don't forget at speed, a CAI is more effective, as the air is being forced into it, somewhat of a ram air effect. (assuming there is a hole for the air to go through).
Comptech made more hp. Look at the dynos. The Comptech Icebox is a cold air intake. It just isn't aluminum like the AEM or tubular.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #21  
tnobori1's Avatar
Missing my
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 22
From: Discovery Bay, CA
I respect everyone's opinions, and I realize that the Icebox is a CAI. But how can a tube with a filter gain more HP than another tube with a filter. For you smartasses out there, I realize that the Icebox is more than a tube with a filter, but if anything you would think that would be more constrictive.

If you actually put ice in the Icebox, I can understand higher gains (possibly), but otherwise I doubt any difference at all.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #22  
SG81's Avatar
Missing My CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,376
Likes: 13
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by tnobori1

If you actually put ice in the Icebox, I can understand higher gains (possibly)
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #23  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
Originally Posted by tnobori1
I respect everyone's opinions, and I realize that the Icebox is a CAI. But how can a tube with a filter gain more HP than another tube with a filter. For you smartasses out there, I realize that the Icebox is more than a tube with a filter, but if anything you would think that would be more constrictive.

If you actually put ice in the Icebox, I can understand higher gains (possibly), but otherwise I doubt any difference at all.
But isn't the factory intake just a tube with a filter? So your out to disprove the known dyno-graphs?

Let us all know how it goes putting some ice in your icebox :rof: Maybe try some dry ice
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #24  
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
In the Mid-South meow
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 2,298
From: Music City
Either way what the hell is +3 or +4 horsepower at the crank going to equate to at the wheels, like +1 horsepower? There's no way you're going to be able to feel the difference between the two, so go with what sound you want, quiet or loud. Decision made.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #25  
TheWeez's Avatar
I Wanna Beer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 109
From: Minneapolis, MN
The Icebox's air intake location is in a better location to pickup the cool air. I'd also feel much better about using the Icebox in wet conditions then I would using the AEM intake.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #26  
Deap Threat84's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
From: CT
Does the AEM hum at idle like a setup without a resonator?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #27  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper169
Either way what the hell is +3 or +4 horsepower at the crank going to equate to at the wheels, like +1 horsepower? There's no way you're going to be able to feel the difference between the two, so go with what sound you want, quiet or loud. Decision made.
Actually the dyno numbers are wheel horse power and they are 9hp vs 14hp. So your gaining 5hp at the wheels. I agree that even at 5hp you might not notice a difference but Power > Sound and it is a better design

Also as excelerate has said comptech is closed to this argument is worthless unless he can find a used one
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #28  
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
In the Mid-South meow
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 2,298
From: Music City
Originally Posted by spdy0001
Actually the dyno numbers are wheel horse power and they are 9hp vs 14hp. So your gaining 5hp at the wheels. I agree that even at 5hp you might not notice a difference but Power > Sound and it is a better design

Also as excelerate has said comptech is closed to this argument is worthless unless he can find a used one
Oh, I thought it was crank hp, but like you said, either way it's still a very small gain that you probably can't tell the difference between, so it comes down to the sound and availability.

In Lord Helmets absence to this thread I'll do it for him... you know Injen makes a CAI for us too, right?!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #29  
Glasuan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
In order to truly know the difference, they both need to use the same exact car, under the same conditions. I just truly don't see how Comptech's box could be so much better that it nets 5 whp. This is a opinion of course, so don't go blasting me.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #30  
tnobori1's Avatar
Missing my
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 22
From: Discovery Bay, CA
Originally Posted by spdy0001
But isn't the factory intake just a tube with a filter? So your out to disprove the known dyno-graphs?

Let us all know how it goes putting some ice in your icebox :rof: Maybe try some dry ice
If you read earlier, I said I have an AEM. I have seen some people on this forum that actually claim that ice (ice packs) can be placed in the Icebox for better gains. I wouldn't do it, but I also don't have an Icebox.

Secondly, the stock intake is not just a tube with a filter. I don't know why you're playing dumb, but I'm sure you've seen that there are several compartments to it.

I am not out to disprove dyno-graphs, but we all know that companies can fudge figures to make things seem better.

Clearly, you're (correct spelling) out to be a smartass when I was just asking a serious question... In the future, keep your (correct spelling) fucking mouth shut!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #31  
tnobori1's Avatar
Missing my
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 22
From: Discovery Bay, CA
Originally Posted by TheWeez
The Icebox's air intake location is in a better location to pickup the cool air. I'd also feel much better about using the Icebox in wet conditions then I would using the AEM intake.
That's an answer that makes sense. Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #32  
Techniques's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: The UNE,The Bay. CA
Originally Posted by tnobori1

If you actually put ice in the Icebox, I can understand higher gains (possibly), but otherwise I doubt any difference at all.

Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 01:24 AM
  #33  
jproy's Avatar
MP90 uninstalled
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 2
From: Lafayette, LA
Put Ice int your Icebox?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #34  
ljmushock's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 996
Likes: 4
i put a dual comptech/aem intake on my car. so yeah
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #35  
spdy0001's Avatar
I now drive an accord....
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2
From: Etters, PA
Originally Posted by tnobori1
Clearly, you're (correct spelling) out to be a smartass when I was just asking a serious question... In the future, keep your (correct spelling) fucking mouth shut!
Your exactly right after 4+ years on this site im going to never post here again because you said so

Hey if you stay stupid shit your going to get smart ass answers. If you can't handle it I don't think you will stay around too long.

Don't worry though your not the first and won't be the last person to make a dumb ass post
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #36  
SG81's Avatar
Missing My CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,376
Likes: 13
From: Toronto
ok, this thread went bad
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #37  
tnobori1's Avatar
Missing my
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 22
From: Discovery Bay, CA
Originally Posted by spdy0001
Your exactly right after 4+ years on this site im going to never post here again because you said so

Hey if you stay stupid shit your going to get smart ass answers. If you can't handle it I don't think you will stay around too long.

Don't worry though your not the first and won't be the last person to make a dumb ass post

Just a few threads pertaining to the "ice in the icebox" thing. Like I said earlier, I don't own an Icebox, so I don't have any way of verifying this stuff. I was asking a question... Furthermore, it stands to reason that colder air (from ice) could help gains. My original post was asking the question "how can one CAI be better than another?" The "better placement" answer makes sense. If you want to ridicule someone, ridicule the people who posted the following info.

Mfg padding #s with ice pack in front of CAI

https://acurazine.com/forums/archive...hp/t-4413.html

Dry Ice Icebox
(silly question because of CO2)

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=inside+icebox

Icebox designed to put ice cubes in

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...t=cubes+icebox

On a side note, I do think its funny that spdy0001 still doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're" at the age of 25.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #38  
Glasuan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=98338

Go there for some real #'s comparing the AEM to the Icebox. Yes there is a difference, but its not 7 hp.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #39  
deematic's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 5
From: EastCoast
Aem???

Does anyone know the difference between the standard AEM CAI and the V2 version?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #40  
TheWeez's Avatar
I Wanna Beer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 109
From: Minneapolis, MN
V2 is for CL Premium not the CL-S
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.