CL vs GSR vs IS300
12-04-2003, 03:08 PM
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ohio
Age: 39
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL vs GSR vs IS300
I raced with IS300 and i won by half car lengh.
i though IS300 is fast. was he pushing all the way or not?
and my friend has GSR stock and he always say he will beat me.
but he never race me. (he is pussy
)
so which one is fastest, CL 3.0, GSR, or IS300
PS I won new Tibron V6 by 2 car lengh
i though IS300 is fast. was he pushing all the way or not?
and my friend has GSR stock and he always say he will beat me.
but he never race me. (he is pussy
) so which one is fastest, CL 3.0, GSR, or IS300
PS I won new Tibron V6 by 2 car lengh
12-04-2003, 08:44 PM
#3
Beware of leakage
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana, just east of nowhere
Age: 42
Posts: 19,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice kill, GSR should be the fastest out of the group.
PS Tiburon is shit, almost bought my sister one, downgraded Eclipse GT. Nice big (looking) exhaust tips, but when getting close to them you notice how almost all the space is filled in with some kind of black filling). Damn Hyundai
PS Tiburon is shit, almost bought my sister one, downgraded Eclipse GT. Nice big (looking) exhaust tips, but when getting close to them you notice how almost all the space is filled in with some kind of black filling). Damn Hyundai
12-05-2003, 04:39 AM
#4
Pro
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 909 foo
Age: 39
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dont take those tiburons lightly buddy...my friend has a MT 2002 v6 tiburon with only a aem cai and greddy exhaust...and i only beat him by 1.5 car lengths or so...very close race honestly...i dont know how it owuldve been in top end...but off the line those things shouldn't be taken lightly
btw i (used to) have an 03 cl-s
btw i (used to) have an 03 cl-s
Trending Topics
06-22-2004, 10:21 AM
#9
The v6 tiburon should be able to take you, or at least be neck to neck, if it's drivrn right. The gsr will pull on you in 3rd gear, and win, and as for the IS300, if driven right as well, it could give you a run for your moeny. Been there, done that, so I speak from experience. Just that half the drivers out there dont know how to run thier cars....Nice kills though...
07-08-2004, 01:34 PM
#11
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: CRY, CRY SOME MORE!
Age: 49
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
WTF guys.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
07-08-2004, 02:18 PM
#13
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i GSR is a integra that will wax a slow gs-t that runs a soild high 15 low 16 and the GSX runs another awesome high 15.......... also i think the GSR is a hell of a lot lighter than the eclipse but i may be wrong i mean i just race them like everynight
07-08-2004, 03:21 PM
#14
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes
on
346 Posts
My last car was an Integra GS-R and if i might add, i loved that car cuz people would always expect it to be slow when it's actually very quick.
i used to take heavily modded preludes, eclipses, gt mustangs, civics, accords, 280sx, 3.0 cls, sentra's and beat them, maybe it was that they didn't know how to drive their cars, but the integra gs-r is a fast car and shouldn't be overlooked. And all i had on my car was an intake and headers. nothing else.
i'd say the gs-r will win against a 3.0 CL. I've raced a couple 3.0 Cl's with my gs-r and beat them everytime. it's the auto tranny that does the CL in. The gs-r is so much quicker off the line because of the manual tranny and it's light weight.
but i have love for both models since i'm a former gs-r owner and current CL-S owner, either way ACURA WINS
i used to take heavily modded preludes, eclipses, gt mustangs, civics, accords, 280sx, 3.0 cls, sentra's and beat them, maybe it was that they didn't know how to drive their cars, but the integra gs-r is a fast car and shouldn't be overlooked. And all i had on my car was an intake and headers. nothing else.
i'd say the gs-r will win against a 3.0 CL. I've raced a couple 3.0 Cl's with my gs-r and beat them everytime. it's the auto tranny that does the CL in. The gs-r is so much quicker off the line because of the manual tranny and it's light weight.
but i have love for both models since i'm a former gs-r owner and current CL-S owner, either way ACURA WINS
07-09-2004, 07:31 AM
#17
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eclipse23
WTF guys.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
A GS is a non-turbo Eclipse. The GS-R was a trim level of the Integra.
07-09-2004, 07:35 AM
#18
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast98cl3.0
i GSR is a integra that will wax a slow gs-t that runs a soild high 15 low 16 and the GSX runs another awesome high 15.......... also i think the GSR is a hell of a lot lighter than the eclipse but i may be wrong i mean i just race them like everynight
A GS-T or GSX that runs high 15's is busted or not properly driven.
They are solid low 15's - high 14's. I was nailing down high 14's stock at Atlanta Dragway in the middle of summer back in '96 in my wife's GS-T and I wasn't alone. There were other stock cars there running the same times. Add a few small $$ parts and mid - low 14's was possible.
07-11-2004, 09:31 PM
#19
Underdog
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Age: 42
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eclipse23
WTF guys.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
The GSR is a nonturbo eclipse. If it's stock it will go nowhere.
If it was a GS-t At least it had a turbo to keep up.
If it was a GS-X it would be a race.
If it was a modded GSX, you would all be owned.
On the subject now, the Acura Integra GSR should have pulled on you in 3rd.
07-11-2004, 10:36 PM
#20
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes
on
346 Posts
Originally Posted by Crusher
On the subject now, the Acura Integra GSR should have pulled on you in 3rd.
you could be at 80 mph in 3rd gear at 6K rpm and still have over 2K to go before you hit redline, and at 6200 vtec kicked in and you'd rocket away.
i miss my teg
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
