CL type S Vs. Lancer Evo.
#3
This proves you don't know anything about cars. Here is the faqs,2003 Acura 3.2 CL Type-S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Specifications:
Engine
Type: V6
Displacement cu in (cc): 196 (3210)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 260(191) / 6100
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 232(315) / 3500-5500
Redline at RPM: 6900
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/disc
Tires F-R: 215/50 R17
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 192 × 69.2 × 53.3
Weight lb (kg): 3446 (1563)
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII RS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Specifications:
Engine
Type: Inline-4, Turbocharged
Displacement cu in (cc): 122 (1997)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 271(200) / 6500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 273(370) / 3500
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 235/45 ZR17
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 178.5 × 69.7 × 57.1
Weight lb (kg): 3175 (1440)
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked. For mor faqs visit http://www.rsportscars.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Specifications:
Engine
Type: V6
Displacement cu in (cc): 196 (3210)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 260(191) / 6100
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 232(315) / 3500-5500
Redline at RPM: 6900
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/disc
Tires F-R: 215/50 R17
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 192 × 69.2 × 53.3
Weight lb (kg): 3446 (1563)
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII RS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Specifications:
Engine
Type: Inline-4, Turbocharged
Displacement cu in (cc): 122 (1997)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 271(200) / 6500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 273(370) / 3500
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 235/45 ZR17
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 178.5 × 69.7 × 57.1
Weight lb (kg): 3175 (1440)
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked. For mor faqs visit http://www.rsportscars.com
#5
^
You posted the specs, and you don't even know what you're talking about... here's the important numbers, maybe you can figure it out now.
CL-S
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 260(191) / 6100
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 232(315) / 3500-5500
Weight lb (kg): 3446 (1563)
Evo
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 271(200) / 6500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 273(370) / 3500
Weight lb (kg): 3175 (1440)
so as you can see "an EVO will murder a cl-s".
You posted the specs, and you don't even know what you're talking about... here's the important numbers, maybe you can figure it out now.
CL-S
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 260(191) / 6100
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 232(315) / 3500-5500
Weight lb (kg): 3446 (1563)
Evo
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 271(200) / 6500
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 273(370) / 3500
Weight lb (kg): 3175 (1440)
so as you can see "an EVO will murder a cl-s".
#6
Originally posted by 3.2 Premium
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked.[/url]
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked.[/url]
Is this guy for fucking real?
Trending Topics
#27
Originally posted by 3.2 Premium
This proves you don't know anything about cars. Here is the faqs,2003 Acura 3.2 CL Type-S
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked. For mor faqs visit http://www.rsportscars.com
This proves you don't know anything about cars. Here is the faqs,2003 Acura 3.2 CL Type-S
So you mean that a 4cyl. turbochaged 5psd can beat a V6 3.2 6psd, in a 1/4 mile it will get spanked. For mor faqs visit http://www.rsportscars.com
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA
#28
oh man check out the benz
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/m_clk_dtm.asp
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/m_clk_dtm.asp
#29
Originally posted by optiq
oh man check out the benz
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/m_clk_dtm.asp
oh man check out the benz
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/m_clk_dtm.asp
#32
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 979
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by mattg
scott, i wanted to hear what he had to say. you should unban him for a few.
scott, i wanted to hear what he had to say. you should unban him for a few.
#35
Last week I was at the Irwindale 1/8 track. The fastest EVO I saw did 8.670@79.5 mph. My CL-S Auto with road race tires(Hoosier S3A03 245/35/18) only did 8.89 @82.7mph. I wish I had another 1/8mile, maybe with that extra 1/8 mile I will passed him.
#38
I am pretty sure Evo will win by a big margin. CL Type S is able to compete against cars like G35, RX-8, 330i/330Ci, WRX, or even Boxster S. But Evo is at another level, it is somewhere Corvette or M3 are.
#39
I found this but didn't know where to put it. Then I remembered, this is the most retarded thread I have ever come across.
Copy & paste http://sohc.vtec.net/article_files/236224/04ias-39.jpg into your URL box.
Copy & paste http://sohc.vtec.net/article_files/236224/04ias-39.jpg into your URL box.