CL Type-s vs. 330Ci in July Car&Driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2002, 03:36 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
AJP97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisville
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL Type-s vs. 330Ci in July Car&Driver

For thoose who have not seen it, the acura gets a great write up, but C&D picks the 330 Ci the winner despite the $7000 price difference. C&D claims 0-60 for the CL-S is 5.9 and the BMW is 5.8. The CL-S was quicker to 100 and 120 however. Overall good article, It would be very hard to choose a clear winner. The car tested was with the 6 speed manual.
Old 05-30-2002, 03:40 PM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
C&D always picks the BMW as the winner, regardless of what it's going up against. They always find a reason to declare it #1
Old 05-30-2002, 03:44 PM
  #3  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Great... I can't wait until my 330Ci buddy gets a hold of a copy and let's me hear about it.
Old 05-30-2002, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Instructor
 
tktommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago's western burbs
Age: 64
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by juniorbean
C&D always picks the BMW as the winner, regardless of what it's going up against. They always find a reason to declare it #1
Isn't that the gospel truth!:thumbsdn: I could have told you the winner before I even read the article. This why I always take C&D with a grain of salt.
Old 05-30-2002, 03:54 PM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally posted by Scrib
Great... I can't wait until my 330Ci buddy gets a hold of a copy and let's me hear about it.

or me!!


damn those are fast times, 5.8 and 5.9.... is this the 6-speed CLS and manual 330ci?
Old 05-30-2002, 03:55 PM
  #6  
JZ
Three Wheelin'
 
JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Potomac MD
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once again they make the price difference between the CL and the BMW look small by comparing base prices.

It seems as though everyone but them knows that a comparably equipped 330 runs about 45K which is 15 thousand dollars more than a CL!

Let's see them justify that!
Old 05-30-2002, 04:02 PM
  #7  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 330i has many advantages over the CL-S in terms of performance. The braking, handling, and RWD are major advantages it has over the CL-S.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:04 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally posted by JZ
Once again they make the price difference between the CL and the BMW look small by comparing base prices.

It seems as though everyone but them knows that a comparably equipped 330 runs about 45K which is 15 thousand dollars more than a CL!

Let's see them justify that!
its more like a 10k difference.. but yea i agree with you.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Suzuka Master
 
sidemarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXAS
Age: 43
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5.8 and 5.9 second 0-60

that is full of shit

our cars are quick but not sub 6.0 seconds quick

sidemarker
Old 05-30-2002, 04:25 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by sidemarker
5.8 and 5.9 second 0-60

that is full of shit

our cars are quick but not sub 6.0 seconds quick

sidemarker
Those are for a 6spd.....and BMW 3-series will always win....they can't lose...it's in the Constitution or something.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:27 PM
  #11  
STi
 
4thGSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Windy City~Chicago, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the 1/4 mile time?
Old 05-30-2002, 04:28 PM
  #12  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
The 100-120mph numbers don't surpise me I knew the 6sp CL-S was a topend monster. The CL-S would do better 0-60 numbers also if not for the shitty stock rubber. These cars are not even in the same class....one is $40,000 the other $30,000. Everyone is right about the BMW though...what comparison hasn't it won?
Old 05-30-2002, 04:31 PM
  #13  
Suzuka Master
 
sidemarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXAS
Age: 43
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are for a 6spd.....and BMW 3-series will always win....they can't lose...it's in the Constitution or something.
even for the 6-speed that number seems kind of low

they did test a stock 6-speed?

6.1 at best

sidemarker
Old 05-30-2002, 04:33 PM
  #14  
Suzuka Master
 
NOVAwhiteTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Northern VA
Age: 43
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thry probably revveed it real high and dropped the clutch to get those times.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:38 PM
  #15  
Instructor
 
codehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 229
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Crazy Sellout


its more like a 10k difference.. but yea i agree with you.
Choose metallic paint, bi-xenons, and cold, premium, and sport packages, and it's $10k more than a CL-S. If you want the automatic, that's another $1275. That's without a CD changer, but probably a better stereo otherwise (add $600 and give up your glove box or part of the trunk if you want the changer). In California, you can add another $800-$900 to sales tax, (figure your state's rate). You get hit with a smidgen of luxury tax (fortunately not much in 2002 and disappears after that).

Bottom line is it was going to cost me a minimum $12k more out the door (it's easier to get a discount on a CL than a ci) and a long wait to get a manual 330ci. It's a great car, but at about 38% higher cost than my CL-S 6MT, it just wasn't *that* great.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:41 PM
  #16  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Hell for 45k you may as well get a new M3. No offense Crazy Sellout.:P
Old 05-30-2002, 04:47 PM
  #17  
__
 
Zoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gosh guys come on!
First u bitch about our cars not being compared enough in car mags. When they finally do, YOU KEEP ON BITCHING! You are like some old ladies complaining about new mailboxes in your apartment building! Now, no offense, but u guys are biased so of course you are going to defend your trusty FWD CL. You haven't even read the article and u are bitching! Oh boy, I can feel the flaming now...

P.S. Black CL-S 4-Life: There have been many times when Bmw lost a comparo. The most recent example is C&D's October 2001 issue with an AWD spot sedan comparo. 3rd place: 330xi, 2nd place: WRX, 1st: S4
Old 05-30-2002, 04:49 PM
  #18  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Acura3.0CLP

P.S. Black CL-S 4-Life: There have been many times when Bmw lost a comparo. The most recent example is C&D's October 2001 issue with an AWD spot sedan comparo. 3rd place: 330xi, 2nd place: WRX, 1st: S4
Ooopppss! I must have missed that one....I just started getting C&D in January.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:52 PM
  #19  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Acura 3.0CLP no flames from me I think you bring up a valid point...atleast they gave the CL-S 6sp a road test.
Old 05-30-2002, 04:56 PM
  #20  
Fuct in the hed!
 
Nicky Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicagoland-ish
Age: 45
Posts: 14,057
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
C&D is like a high school coach........they always have thier favorites!!!!!!
Old 05-30-2002, 05:08 PM
  #21  
Safety Car
 
BigPimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yap yap yap, blah blah blah......


Yo homies, quit your whining cause every single one of you will take a 330 over a cls if you would be able to afford it or justify spending more on it.
And thank you Acura3.0CLP for pointing out when a BMW actually lost and its exactly right, the 4X4 comparo, 330xi had a poor showing and got blown away by WRX and the S4.

Also, as far as price goes, the CL 6spd is not being discounted that much right now, but it likely could be had for about 31 out the door where as the 330 fully loaded will cost about 41 out the door with some negotiation. But you will get what you paid for, in the case of the the CLS, a poorly built beefed up accord, and in the case of the 330 a true sports coupe built with great care and qaulity.
Old 05-30-2002, 05:17 PM
  #22  
Racer
 
NJTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North Jersey
Age: 46
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 330CI is a very nice car but IMO very overrated and definately not worth $45,000. Every BMW dealer I have ever visited has them for around $45,000, with all of the options. true, you can order them without all of the options, but a luxury car is supposed to come with much more standard equipment than what BMW offers. IMO the only BMW's with a justifiable price are the M3/M5.
Old 05-30-2002, 05:39 PM
  #23  
Burning Brakes
 
vince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Acura3.0CLP
P.S. Black CL-S 4-Life: There have been many times when Bmw lost a comparo. The most recent example is C&D's October 2001 issue with an AWD spot sedan comparo. 3rd place: 330xi, 2nd place: WRX, 1st: S4
Just to add to that list:

The 325ix wagon finished behind an A4 Avant 1.8T quattro in a recent comparo.

When the current 325 came out, came in second in a sports sedan comparo. The A4 was first again. (February 1998)

A 525iT came in last, behind the Audi A6 Avant and the first place Volvo 850. March (or is it April?) 1995 issue.

A 740i finished behind a Benz E420 and Lexus LS400 in February 1995.

The 528i finished second (A6 2.7T was first), just before the 528 became the 530.

Yeah, I'm bored...:P
Old 05-30-2002, 05:45 PM
  #24  
STi
 
4thGSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Windy City~Chicago, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by vince

Just to add to that list:

The 325ix wagon finished behind an A4 Avant 1.8T quattro in a recent comparo.

When the current 325 came out, came in second in a sports sedan comparo. The A4 was first again. (February 1998)

A 525iT came in last, behind the Audi A6 Avant and the first place Volvo 850. March (or is it April?) 1995 issue.

A 740i finished behind a Benz E420 and Lexus LS400 in February 1995.

The 528i finished second (A6 2.7T was first), just before the 528 became the 530.

Yeah, I'm bored...:P
Well majority that tops out the Bimmer are Euro cars to. You rarerly see a Japanese cars out perform the Euro cars in there mags. Well the WRX won but you only see that one's in a blue moon lol!!
Old 05-30-2002, 06:10 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4thGSi

Well majority that tops out the Bimmer are Euro cars to. You rarerly see a Japanese cars out perform the Euro cars in there mags. Well the WRX won but you only see that one's in a blue moon lol!!
The only reason why the WRX beat it out...was the sheer price difference on that one...no way they could justify that the Xi was better...
Old 05-30-2002, 06:17 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BigPimp
yap yap yap, blah blah blah......


Yo homies, quit your whining cause every single one of you will take a 330 over a cls if you would be able to afford it or justify spending more on it.
And thank you Acura3.0CLP for pointing out when a BMW actually lost and its exactly right, the 4X4 comparo, 330xi had a poor showing and got blown away by WRX and the S4.

Also, as far as price goes, the CL 6spd is not being discounted that much right now, but it likely could be had for about 31 out the door where as the 330 fully loaded will cost about 41 out the door with some negotiation. But you will get what you paid for, in the case of the the CLS, a poorly built beefed up accord, and in the case of the 330 a true sports coupe built with great care and qaulity.
Whatever.....so the why dont you get off the BMW nutsack and actually buy one? Since the CL is a poorly built beefed up accord...
I remember when the CL-S lost to the FUCKING 328....beat it out in every category....but they still declared the BMW the car they would rather have...whatever.....

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT BMWS ARE GREAT FUCKING CARS!!!FINE!! I THINK THEY ARE NICE LOOKING, BUT A 80S LOOKING DASH...PLEASE.. ARE THEY THE BEST, IF YOU ASK CAR MAGS THEY ARE AND THERE IS VALIDITY TO IT. ARE THEY OVERRATED AND OVERPRICED, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LEVEL OF COMPETITION NOW....AND ADMIT THAT YES THEY ARE.
Old 05-30-2002, 06:42 PM
  #27  
Unregistered Member
 
Tom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 3,472
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally posted by juniorbean
C&D always picks the BMW as the winner, regardless of what it's going up against. They always find a reason to declare it #1
Holy shit, talk about sour grapes!

Yeah, I guess it's all a cospiracy theory then, huh? I guess BMW must be slipping some $$$$ under the table to C&D, huh?

You guys crack me up. Why can't you give credit where it is due?

By the way, BMW doesn't win every comparison test.
Old 05-30-2002, 06:44 PM
  #28  
Unregistered Member
 
Tom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 3,472
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Why is it that nobody remembers the Audi S4 beating out the BMW M3 in a C&D comparison test?
Old 05-30-2002, 06:49 PM
  #29  
f-a-b-o-l-o-u-s
 
my2sense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BigPimp
yap yap yap, blah blah blah......


Yo homies, quit your whining cause every single one of you will take a 330 over a cls if you would be able to afford it or justify spending more on it.
And thank you Acura3.0CLP for pointing out when a BMW actually lost and its exactly right, the 4X4 comparo, 330xi had a poor showing and got blown away by WRX and the S4.

Also, as far as price goes, the CL 6spd is not being discounted that much right now, but it likely could be had for about 31 out the door where as the 330 fully loaded will cost about 41 out the door with some negotiation. But you will get what you paid for, in the case of the the CLS, a poorly built beefed up accord, and in the case of the 330 a true sports coupe built with great care and qaulity.
agreed.
Old 05-30-2002, 07:04 PM
  #30  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yo homies, quit your whining cause every single one of you will take a 330 over a cls if you would be able to afford it or justify spending more on it.
Ummn.... No.. I don't want a BMW.. Thanks for the generalization
Old 05-30-2002, 07:22 PM
  #31  
Pro
 
someguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
The only reason why the WRX beat it out...was the sheer price difference on that one...no way they could justify that the Xi was better...
That is the same reason why the 330 has came in second in two R&T comparos. Lost to the IS300 and now the G35 based on price considerations....
Old 05-30-2002, 07:24 PM
  #32  
Pro
 
someguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
I remember when the CL-S lost to the FUCKING 328....beat it out in every category....but they still declared the BMW the car they would rather have...whatever.....
I assume that you are talking about Motor Trend's comparo with the 328Ci.

The CL was the pick
Old 05-30-2002, 07:32 PM
  #33  
I love my G sedan
 
SilverCL225hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah BMW 3-series almost never lose in those car magazines' eyes. They are trying to set an unbeatable image for 3-series as far as performance and handling so all of the other car companies are just competing for the second place. If these magazine would give any other company the first place over BMW, it's only because of the price difference.
Old 05-30-2002, 07:55 PM
  #34  
Duck Fuke!
 
jts1207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Back in NC
Age: 48
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Whatever.....so the why dont you get off the BMW nutsack and actually buy one? Since the CL is a poorly built beefed up accord...
I remember when the CL-S lost to the FUCKING 328....beat it out in every category....but they still declared the BMW the car they would rather have...whatever.....

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT BMWS ARE GREAT FUCKING CARS!!!FINE!! I THINK THEY ARE NICE LOOKING, BUT A 80S LOOKING DASH...PLEASE.. ARE THEY THE BEST, IF YOU ASK CAR MAGS THEY ARE AND THERE IS VALIDITY TO IT. ARE THEY OVERRATED AND OVERPRICED, YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LEVEL OF COMPETITION NOW....AND ADMIT THAT YES THEY ARE.



agreed.
Old 05-30-2002, 08:09 PM
  #35  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Where do you guys get a 45k price tag for the 330ci? I just ordered mine for 41k... with EVERYTHING. Including Navi. My TLS with navi was $31,500 when i bought it new. Of course both of those prices arent MSRP. Im just saying you can work with the pricing on the BMWs.

I hear bashing on the BMW, but what is it that you dont like about it? I mean it has the power like the CLS, but it has better handling than the CLS. So for 10k more than the CLS you get better handling and RWD. Is it worth it? Depends on what you are looking for. As for me it is, i like the handling aspect of the BMW, its fun for me.


Oh for those who say why dont someone just get an M3 fo that price... well a loaded 330ci is around 42k... and a base M3 is near 50k. So its not a cheap upgrade.

So all you guys can say the CLS is a better car than the 330ci? Aside from value, how is the CLS better? If everything had to do with value, then we all be in a WRX.

Thats all. I still love ya guys.



-Sellout.
Old 05-30-2002, 08:19 PM
  #36  
Intermediate
 
JerryL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wayne, PA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crazy Sellout:
I have to agree. I just took delivery on my 330Ci and it was $38,500 + tax out the door. It included all the options except the navi and auto.

moomaster_99:
Here is a look at my 80's dash...
Old 05-30-2002, 08:20 PM
  #37  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So all you guys can say the CLS is a better car than the 330ci? Aside from value, how is the CLS better? If everything had to do with value, then we all be in a WRX.
I have to disagree. The WRX and CLS are not comparable in terms of luxury and features. It does not even have a sunroof or leather (I think)
The 330 and CLS are very comparable in luxury as well as other aspects. The WRX is no comparison in that respect. I think the WRX competes more with the Mustang, Camaro. Speed, less emphesis on luxury, etc... The CLS and 3 Series are sport-luxury auto's

So basically you are paying over 7k more for a car that handles marginally better. (which can be helped by upgrading our tires, springs, sways)

I have no intention of getting a 3 series unless it is an M3. BMW's are like Camry's on the road today. So many of them...
Old 05-30-2002, 08:28 PM
  #38  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that nobody remembers the Audi S4 beating out the BMW M3 in a C&D comparison test?
It was a E36 Beemer vs the new S4.

I think a lot of people forget that yeah your car A can beat car B but you'd rather be seen in car B and talk about car B than A. That is why car B cost some more and people will pay for it.

Prestige (or perception of it). Not something written on the sticker price but to some people it is worth the extra dough.
Old 05-30-2002, 08:30 PM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally posted by JerryL
Crazy Sellout:
I have to agree. I just took delivery on my 330Ci and it was $38,500 + tax out the door. It included all the options except the navi and auto.

moomaster_99:
Here is a look at my 80's dash...

lookin good man!! Did you have a CLS before your 330ci?
Old 05-30-2002, 08:33 PM
  #40  
Got BOOST????
 
bnavarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY, Lovely Long Island
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tktommy


Isn't that the gospel truth!:thumbsdn: I could have told you the winner before I even read the article. This why I always take C&D with a grain of salt.
they also said the tls is faster than the cls


Quick Reply: CL Type-s vs. 330Ci in July Car&Driver



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.