CL 6 speed vs. Impala
#1
EVO IX MR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 48
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL 6 speed vs. Impala
Beat an Impala the other day, no big deal, but figured I'd post anyway. He was in front of me for a minute or 2, driviing fast, figured he'd be game. We got to line up at the light, didn't really look at him to see if he wanted to go, so,.. took off fairly normally, up to about 5K, he stayed w/ me, so it was on, only had him by a nose till I hit 3rd, then I was gone. I gotta get some headers, ...wont be till July because I'm going to the field for two months
![Thumbs Down](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
#2
Safety Car
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TAMPA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good race slim.. u in the army? my little sister is in the army, she's at ft. campbell. I'm in the airforce bout to re-enlist again (10 year mark) goes by fast.. i just got headers for my 3.0 and WOW did it make a difference. anyways good luck in the field.
#3
Originally Posted by 2003type-s6
Beat an Impala the other day, no big deal, but figured I'd post anyway. He was in front of me for a minute or 2, driviing fast, figured he'd be game. We got to line up at the light, didn't really look at him to see if he wanted to go, so,.. took off fairly normally, up to about 5K, he stayed w/ me, so it was on, only had him by a nose till I hit 3rd, then I was gone. I gotta get some headers, ...wont be till July because I'm going to the field for two months ![Thumbs Down](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
![Thumbs Down](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
Sedan: 3.4L, 180hp, 205lb-ft - 3389lbs curb weight
LS: 3.8L, 200hp, 225lb-ft - 3466lbs curb weight
SS: 3.8L SC, 240hp, 280lb-ft - 3564lbs curb weight
[bench_racing] Must have been LS, because statistically the SS should have won that race, and the base Sedan would have been no contest! [/bench_racing]
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#5
Originally Posted by Dem1K
from what I've seen, the new Impala SS is a mid 15 second car. Therefore, the race shouldn't have been a problem. The CLS6 runs 14.5 and below, depending on the driver (usually).
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
With 20hp less and 50lb-ft more than a CL-S, as well as an extra 100lbs, it should still be a low 14 sec car. The SS has the power to run low-mid 14s, must be the shitty 4-speed slushbox.
#7
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03 CL TypeS
You gotta be kidding !!!!
With 20hp less and 50lb-ft more than a CL-S, as well as an extra 100lbs, it should still be a low 14 sec car. The SS has the power to run low-mid 14s, must be the shitty 4-speed slushbox.
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
With 20hp less and 50lb-ft more than a CL-S, as well as an extra 100lbs, it should still be a low 14 sec car. The SS has the power to run low-mid 14s, must be the shitty 4-speed slushbox.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Dem1K
It's got 20hp less and 28lb-ft more, and weighs a bit more. Plus, the gearing sucks I believe. Who knows?
Their slushbox may benefit significantly from a higher stall torque converter.
#9
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
holy crap, I could of sworn it was 240/260...thanks for correcting me
Anyway, here's the only stat that I found on the car, since I can't find people who have actually taken it to the strip online
http://www.modernracer.com/chevroletimpalass.html
Maybe it's off?
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
http://www.modernracer.com/chevroletimpalass.html
Maybe it's off?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-25-2015 06:14 PM