Assumption about CL transmissions ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2001 | 06:29 PM
  #1  
russianDude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 848
From: NJ
Assumption about CL transmissions ?!

Can we assume for those people whose tranny works fine after 15-20K miles that they will probably not have any problems in future with tranny?

I think defective transmissions fail before person drives 20K miles.
if you pass 20K miles it is likely that your tranny has no deffects???
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2001 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
minla007's Avatar
pumpkin escobar
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 387
Likes: 3
From: from east point to shaolin...
i hope so...hearing about all these trannys dying is makin me paranoid
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2001 | 06:33 PM
  #3  
moomaster_99's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Originally posted by minla007:
<STRONG>i hope so...hearing about all these trannys dying is makin me paranoid</STRONG>
Wrong...37K...tranny broke. I think it has something to do with the automatice clutch getting burnt out.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2001 | 07:23 PM
  #4  
russianDude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 848
From: NJ
Looks like in the majority of the cases after you go above 20K, chances are very small.... there are very few people who had their trannies replaced after 20K
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 01:36 PM
  #5  
Dynmicracr's Avatar
6th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: California
One thing that I have noticed is that these transmissions take a long time to switch from forward to reverse gears. One thing I ALWAYS make sure to do is, when backing up stop completely and you will feel it engage into drive. If you don't you will be sure to see a burnt up tranny on no time at all.

Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)

[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 03:16 PM
  #6  
tmk70's Avatar
Masshole
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 12,755
Likes: 0
From: MA
I notice the same thing, Dynmicracer. I ALWAYS wait for the gear to engage before gassing it. Most autos I've ever driven are like that, but it seems the CL-S is especially slow to engage into both D and Reverse.


Originally posted by Dynmicracr:
<STRONG>One thing that I have noticed is that these transmissions take a long time to switch from forward to reverse gears. One thing I ALWAYS make sure to do is, when backing up stop completely and you will feel it engage into drive. If you don't you will be sure to see a burnt up tranny on no time at all.

Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)

[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]</STRONG>
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 03:30 PM
  #7  
icy CL's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 3
From: VA
Originally posted by tmk70:
<STRONG>I notice the same thing, Dynmicracer. I ALWAYS wait for the gear to engage before gassing it. Most autos I've ever driven are like that, but it seems the CL-S is especially slow to engage into both D and Reverse.


</STRONG>
plus i always hear that clunking noise when putting it on reverse from drive or vice-versa.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
Oct 8, 2015 11:16 AM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Oct 5, 2015 11:00 AM
hashbrown
4G TL (2009-2014)
2
Sep 29, 2015 12:13 PM
ROSSARONIE
3G TL (2004-2008)
6
Sep 22, 2015 11:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.