Assumption about CL transmissions ?!
10-10-2001, 06:29 PM
#1
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Assumption about CL transmissions ?!
Can we assume for those people whose tranny works fine after 15-20K miles that they will probably not have any problems in future with tranny?
I think defective transmissions fail before person drives 20K miles.
if you pass 20K miles it is likely that your tranny has no deffects???
I think defective transmissions fail before person drives 20K miles.
if you pass 20K miles it is likely that your tranny has no deffects???
10-10-2001, 06:33 PM
#3
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by minla007:
<STRONG>i hope so...hearing about all these trannys dying is makin me paranoid</STRONG>
<STRONG>i hope so...hearing about all these trannys dying is makin me paranoid</STRONG>
10-10-2001, 07:23 PM
#4
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Looks like in the majority of the cases after you go above 20K, chances are very small.... there are very few people who had their trannies replaced after 20K
10-11-2001, 01:36 PM
#5
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing that I have noticed is that these transmissions take a long time to switch from forward to reverse gears. One thing I ALWAYS make sure to do is, when backing up stop completely and you will feel it engage into drive. If you don't you will be sure to see a burnt up tranny on no time at all.
Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)
[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]
Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)
[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]
10-11-2001, 03:16 PM
#6
Masshole
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: MA
Age: 53
Posts: 12,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I notice the same thing, Dynmicracer. I ALWAYS wait for the gear to engage before gassing it. Most autos I've ever driven are like that, but it seems the CL-S is especially slow to engage into both D and Reverse.
Originally posted by Dynmicracr:
<STRONG>One thing that I have noticed is that these transmissions take a long time to switch from forward to reverse gears. One thing I ALWAYS make sure to do is, when backing up stop completely and you will feel it engage into drive. If you don't you will be sure to see a burnt up tranny on no time at all.
Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)
[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]</STRONG>
<STRONG>One thing that I have noticed is that these transmissions take a long time to switch from forward to reverse gears. One thing I ALWAYS make sure to do is, when backing up stop completely and you will feel it engage into drive. If you don't you will be sure to see a burnt up tranny on no time at all.
Alex
===================== http://www.needboost.com/dynmicracr
98' Eclipse GSX
01' CL Type-S (for sale)
94 Supra TT (on the way)
[ 10-11-2001: Message edited by: Dynmicracr ]</STRONG>
10-11-2001, 03:30 PM
#7
Burning Brakes
Originally posted by tmk70:
<STRONG>I notice the same thing, Dynmicracer. I ALWAYS wait for the gear to engage before gassing it. Most autos I've ever driven are like that, but it seems the CL-S is especially slow to engage into both D and Reverse.
</STRONG>
<STRONG>I notice the same thing, Dynmicracer. I ALWAYS wait for the gear to engage before gassing it. Most autos I've ever driven are like that, but it seems the CL-S is especially slow to engage into both D and Reverse.
</STRONG>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
