all motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2005, 12:10 PM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
beastman187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all motor

what mods would it take for a type-s to run like a mid 13 in the 1/4 mile n/a and w/o the 3.5 swap?
Old 11-22-2005, 12:19 PM
  #2  
I now drive an accord....
 
spdy0001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Etters, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not gonna happen.

You need either the 3.5 swap or FI to make those numbers
Old 11-22-2005, 01:19 PM
  #3  
I'm a Vagiterian.
 
All Mine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of FreakNick.
Age: 39
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't Allmotor_2000 running 13's with all boltons?
Old 11-22-2005, 01:27 PM
  #4  
I now drive an accord....
 
spdy0001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Etters, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ok I stand corrected it appears that Allmotor_2000 has these numbers '03 CL-S 6spd (NA), 13.572 @ 102.65. I have no clue what all he did to hit those numbers though. Plus it will be harder for you if you have a 5AT tranny
Old 11-22-2005, 01:28 PM
  #5  
shift@8k
 
shinybluecls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: san gabriel
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
custom made larger TB and ported IM i believe
Old 11-22-2005, 01:39 PM
  #6  
Never had a clean run
 
rtatsutani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Honolulu
Age: 47
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spdy0001
Ok I stand corrected it appears that Allmotor_2000 has these numbers '03 CL-S 6spd (NA), 13.572 @ 102.65. I have no clue what all he did to hit those numbers though. Plus it will be harder for you if you have a 5AT tranny
It would be impossible with a 5AT. Even with full on slicks. Assuming you mean mid 13s = ~13.5
Old 11-22-2005, 07:39 PM
  #7  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
i heard port and polish does not do much... but ported throttle body and intake manifold might. anyone confirm this? not too many people are doing it so i dont know how good it can be.
Old 11-22-2005, 10:47 PM
  #8  
Safety Car
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think you can run 12's NA on a 6-speed. The issue is traction. If you can get out of the hole properly (1.8 60-foot time) and have about 270whp, you can hit very low 13's. The 3.5L will give you torque, so on an 5AT you can get out of the hole pretty well.

The 13.5x run was on a relatively shitty launch even with drags on (barely made a 1.9x 60-foot). The clutch busted so the mph was not that high - see thread on clutch issues at that time.

Mods were:

i. Extrude-honed intake with a nearly 80mm inlet
ii. Custom throttle-body (oversize, billet unit)
iii.Fuel mods
iv.Short-radius CAI (like a short-ram, but its a CAI)
v. Lightened flywheel + clutch (Comptech)
vi.Some weight reduction (took off the exhaust completely, but that's about it)
Old 11-22-2005, 11:41 PM
  #9  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
allmotor - what fuel mods did you do? im running out of boltons and im contemplating whether or not to go 3.5L, i was thinking a walboro fuel pump and fuel reg, and ill be replacing my plugs with fresh ones, but on NA i figure there isnt much more needed than that in terms of fuel.
Old 11-23-2005, 01:45 AM
  #10  
TQ > MPG
 
Joe5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Age: 42
Posts: 3,624
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
If I had ALL the bolt-ons and some slicks I could probably see some mid 13's, but they would come at the expense of some serious driveline abuse.
Old 11-23-2005, 02:18 AM
  #11  
Parting out 02 Type S :(
 
power3dfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: LA,CA
Age: 74
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont think anyone here has ran a 13.8 or less in a 5at NA 3.2
if you have a 6 speed, then its doable but will take time. If your auto, dont even think about it!
Old 11-23-2005, 11:52 AM
  #12  
KXM
Advanced
 
KXM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Escondido CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potential 1/4 mile times 6spd

Our Cl's weigh far too much to expect low 13's with normal aspiration and without some very severe abuse of the drive line. Even if you did get a good launch, like a 1.7 or 1.8 sixty foot time.
I have had my LT5 'vette on the strip dozens of times with a best of 12.66 @ 114.9. Now I have to tell you, that under 13 sec ET did not come without some
drastic means and luck: a perfect launch (for me, which was not below 1.9) and some top of the power band power shifting, ouch if you miss! . And that is with a motor putting out over 330rwhp and moving 3,500 lbs of plastic and metal and running drag slicks. In other words, flogging it.
The 114.9 trap speed indicates my motor is making decent hp but I would need far more torque to max in at lower rpms to get better et's. For most heavy cars, you need that low end torque to post the good et numbers....higher hp will get you some decent trap speeds but you first have to get all that weight moving from a dead stop.
Old 11-23-2005, 12:23 PM
  #13  
I'm a Vagiterian.
 
All Mine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of FreakNick.
Age: 39
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by power3dfx
i dont think anyone here has ran a 13.8 or less in a 5at NA 3.2
if you have a 6 speed, then its doable but will take time. If your auto, dont even think about it!
Didn't Matt G run like a 13.2?
Old 11-23-2005, 02:34 PM
  #14  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by KXM
Our Cl's weigh far too much to expect low 13's with normal aspiration and without some very severe abuse of the drive line. Even if you did get a good launch, like a 1.7 or 1.8 sixty foot time.
.
really?
Old 11-23-2005, 02:35 PM
  #15  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by KXM
Our Cl's weigh far too much to expect low 13's with normal aspiration and without some very severe abuse of the drive line. Even if you did get a good launch, like a 1.7 or 1.8 sixty foot time.
.
opps i meant ...REALLY?
Old 11-23-2005, 02:37 PM
  #16  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
and my 13.306 at 106 was prior to the TB/upper lower intake ,and prior to the thermoblok,and spoon t stat
Old 11-23-2005, 02:59 PM
  #17  
13.2 @ 104.76mph
 
bigguyonbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: portland, or
Age: 44
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by All Mine
Didn't Matt G run like a 13.2?
with the help of some laughing gas.
Old 11-23-2005, 03:30 PM
  #18  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
don't forget that we can remove our front and rear cross beams, VSA, and a few minor other things to rack in 50+ lbs of weight reduction. some light wheels would also help in weight reduction along with the whole rotating mass thing. and don't forget that headers eight less than stock headers, and i believe that goes for the rest of the exhaust but im not positive. also im pretty sure my comptech icebox altogether weighs less than my stock intake system (whatever it may be). and don't forget there are carbon fiber hoods and trunks available for our cars. with all that, you can lighten the CL up enough.

taking all of that into consideration... beef up the suspension, all the boltons, and i mean ALL boltons... i believe a mid 13 is VERY doable.

i know its a long shot, but if typeR ran a 13.3 with the 3.5L upgrade and that wasn't including ported throttle body/intake manifold, spacers, and thermostat... get a good launch, and why not?

like someone said, its not going to come easy, but it can be done without 3.5L, turbo, or supercharger.
Old 11-23-2005, 07:24 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL

i know its a long shot, but if typeR ran a 13.3 with the 3.5L upgrade and that wasn't including ported throttle body/intake manifold, spacers, and thermostat... get a good launch, and why not?

like someone said, its not going to come easy, but it can be done without 3.5L, turbo, or supercharger.
and im planning a 12.9 or better with the above mentioned,also plan on adding test pipe comptech B pipe and maybe magnaflow cans
Old 11-23-2005, 08:08 PM
  #20  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
CleanCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
typeR - were you forced to go with the 6MT Icebox after removing the VSA or are there more gains to be seen by it than the one designed for the 5AT? i would think they provide the exact same gains, but i was just curious since i believe you are the only AT running the MT icebox.
Old 11-23-2005, 09:54 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Port Richey, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 7,588
Received 48 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
typeR - were you forced to go with the 6MT Icebox after removing the VSA or are there more gains to be seen by it than the one designed for the 5AT? i would think they provide the exact same gains, but i was just curious since i believe you are the only AT running the MT icebox.
I DONT KNOW IF ID SAY FORCED...the only difference between the two is the length of the tube from the throttle body...so yes i went with that on purpose because i wanted to eliminate the VSA
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jamus22
2G TL Problems & Fixes
24
06-11-2023 10:08 AM
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
10-22-2019 01:55 PM
juanrl
2G RL (2005-2012)
9
09-29-2015 03:25 AM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
5
09-28-2015 06:51 PM



Quick Reply: all motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.