3.2 or 3.5? Piston Velocity/Acceleration Curves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2003, 06:32 PM
  #1  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3.2 or 3.5? Piston Velocity/Acceleration Curves

All.

I did some preliminary investigation of the benefits/ill-effects of upgrading to the 3.5 using STOCK parts with limited customization. Attached are curves depicting piston accelration at 8000 RPM for the stock 3.2, stock 3.5 and 3.5 using 3.2 rods.

It appears that stroke is the important factor here. There isn't really a big difference... and I don't think anybody plans on going past 8K RPMS anyways:

http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t

More on this later...
Old 04-17-2003, 08:06 PM
  #2  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
allmotor,
Long term longevity you want that rod-stroke ratio nice and tight right? One of the issues that bothered me about using the MDX block.
Old 04-17-2003, 08:10 PM
  #3  
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The graph was tiny could you comment what is going on?
Old 04-17-2003, 08:54 PM
  #4  
ex 6 Speed owner :(
 
BlueCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you know the rod length, you can also derive acceleration numbers from one of the calculators here:
http://www.slowgt.com/Calc2.htm
I can't comment on its validity, but looks good to me.
Old 04-18-2003, 12:15 PM
  #5  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey that's a cool site... saves me some math in the future!

There are two larger effects of rod-ratio and several smaller effects. Larger effects include:

(1) Piston speed/acceleration and motion dynamics (forces on the rod, wrist-pin, crank etc.)
(2) Dwell-time (time the piston spends at TDC)

The real purpose of graph was to ondicate that there ISN'T a very significant difference between the MDX block and the CL-S block at 8K rpms in terms of piston acceleration. Dwell-time changes and hence hence limits very aggressive cam profiles.

Just stuff to think about.
Old 04-18-2003, 12:36 PM
  #6  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
So is what you're saying basically that we can continue to use our existing block and just grab the MDX rods and end up with pretty much the same results as if we got the MDX block put in our cars?

Sorry I don't know much about cars, but I am pretty interested in getting the 3.5L upgrade..
Old 04-18-2003, 01:48 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The rods won't make a difference.. in fact you should use the CL-S rods as they are longer. You have to use the MDX crank, however. The problem is the pistons. If you use the MDX crank and CL-S rods, you have to get custom pistons. I think the CL-S pistons are 346grams each, so you want to definately be lighter than that!
Old 04-18-2003, 01:55 PM
  #8  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
The rods won't make a difference.. in fact you should use the CL-S rods as they are longer. You have to use the MDX crank, however. The problem is the pistons. If you use the MDX crank and CL-S rods, you have to get custom pistons. I think the CL-S pistons are 346grams each, so you want to definately be lighter than that!
So much for using all Acura OEM parts and it being a simple swap-out then if you go for the custom piston route, although I'd imagine that the gains would of course be better with the custom pistons then..

How were people like TypeR doing this in the past? using all MDX parts for the crank, pistons, rods and block?
Old 04-18-2003, 02:00 PM
  #9  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think they are using MDX crank, MDX rods and an older 3.0 V6 pistons.. same bore I believe.
Old 04-18-2003, 05:45 PM
  #10  
TRELOS
 
Juker008's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: S. WPB Fla.
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey S,

U think u can PM me the link to where u are able to get all ur piston, rod, and crank info.



Tnx







Juker008
Old 04-18-2003, 05:47 PM
  #11  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One of the folks on this board e-mailed me the complete vehicle specifications for ours cars... so if you PM me with your e-mail, I'll just e-mail it to you.

-OR-

MODS: Let me e-mail this to you... and you guys post it in the 'useful info' section! They are .pdf's
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
01-20-2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
11-16-2015 08:30 PM
navtool.com
1G RDX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
09-25-2015 05:15 PM



Quick Reply: 3.2 or 3.5? Piston Velocity/Acceleration Curves



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.