3.2 or 3.5? Piston Velocity/Acceleration Curves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #1  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
3.2 or 3.5? Piston Velocity/Acceleration Curves

All.

I did some preliminary investigation of the benefits/ill-effects of upgrading to the 3.5 using STOCK parts with limited customization. Attached are curves depicting piston accelration at 8000 RPM for the stock 3.2, stock 3.5 and 3.5 using 3.2 rods.

It appears that stroke is the important factor here. There isn't really a big difference... and I don't think anybody plans on going past 8K RPMS anyways:

http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/gunjan_ra...c=ph%26.view=t

More on this later...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #2  
Zapata's Avatar
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
allmotor,
Long term longevity you want that rod-stroke ratio nice and tight right? One of the issues that bothered me about using the MDX block.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
The graph was tiny could you comment what is going on?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #4  
BlueCLS6's Avatar
ex 6 Speed owner :(
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
If you know the rod length, you can also derive acceleration numbers from one of the calculators here:
http://www.slowgt.com/Calc2.htm
I can't comment on its validity, but looks good to me.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Hey that's a cool site... saves me some math in the future!

There are two larger effects of rod-ratio and several smaller effects. Larger effects include:

(1) Piston speed/acceleration and motion dynamics (forces on the rod, wrist-pin, crank etc.)
(2) Dwell-time (time the piston spends at TDC)

The real purpose of graph was to ondicate that there ISN'T a very significant difference between the MDX block and the CL-S block at 8K rpms in terms of piston acceleration. Dwell-time changes and hence hence limits very aggressive cam profiles.

Just stuff to think about.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 12:36 PM
  #6  
LiQiCE's Avatar
Liquid Ice
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 89
From: Northern Virginia, USA
So is what you're saying basically that we can continue to use our existing block and just grab the MDX rods and end up with pretty much the same results as if we got the MDX block put in our cars?

Sorry I don't know much about cars, but I am pretty interested in getting the 3.5L upgrade..
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 01:48 PM
  #7  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
The rods won't make a difference.. in fact you should use the CL-S rods as they are longer. You have to use the MDX crank, however. The problem is the pistons. If you use the MDX crank and CL-S rods, you have to get custom pistons. I think the CL-S pistons are 346grams each, so you want to definately be lighter than that!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 01:55 PM
  #8  
LiQiCE's Avatar
Liquid Ice
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 89
From: Northern Virginia, USA
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
The rods won't make a difference.. in fact you should use the CL-S rods as they are longer. You have to use the MDX crank, however. The problem is the pistons. If you use the MDX crank and CL-S rods, you have to get custom pistons. I think the CL-S pistons are 346grams each, so you want to definately be lighter than that!
So much for using all Acura OEM parts and it being a simple swap-out then if you go for the custom piston route, although I'd imagine that the gains would of course be better with the custom pistons then..

How were people like TypeR doing this in the past? using all MDX parts for the crank, pistons, rods and block?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 02:00 PM
  #9  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
I think they are using MDX crank, MDX rods and an older 3.0 V6 pistons.. same bore I believe.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
Juker008's Avatar
TRELOS
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: S. WPB Fla.
Hey S,

U think u can PM me the link to where u are able to get all ur piston, rod, and crank info.



Tnx







Juker008
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #11  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
One of the folks on this board e-mailed me the complete vehicle specifications for ours cars... so if you PM me with your e-mail, I'll just e-mail it to you.

-OR-

MODS: Let me e-mail this to you... and you guys post it in the 'useful info' section! They are .pdf's
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
Dec 4, 2019 02:11 PM
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
Mar 16, 2016 09:17 AM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
Jan 20, 2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
Nov 16, 2015 08:30 PM
navtool.com
1G RDX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
Sep 25, 2015 05:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.