2nd gen cl type s
#4
on to a CRZ
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ to the OP: i defended you through your accident thread. You just got the car fixed. im all for having a little fun but what makes you so quick to race someone at speeds reaching 120? Chill out a bit.
/rant
#5
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Im not dogging the TSX, their a good cruising car, and nice to look at, however it wont run with a CLS6.. TSX 15.6-second quarter time < CL-S 6 14.2 quarter mile time... doesnt seem like much but thats a huge difference on the street.
Last edited by combat mediC; 03-25-2009 at 03:20 AM.
#6
Special-K
Are those Car and Driver numbers or something?? I've never seen a CL-S run low 14's.. stock auto that is. I'd say with the guys mods compared to a stock CL-S.. keeping up is bad since you should've left him!
#8
heel/toe is my specialty
I agree. All the stock, auto, cl-s I have seen run have been low-mid 15's. Actually, I think the one cl-s stock 6 speed i have seen run did a 15 flat. But that was one guy/one day so not exactly a good sample size.
#13
lowrd on tein CS biatch
iTrader: (2)
you guys give no credit to the cl.
For the record back when I had a 2001 Acura cl... it Still beat a volvo V70R (twin turbo) 1/4 mile from a stand still by 2-3 lengths.
I got a cl-s now with an Injen CAI (installed it 2 nights ago in 2 hrs somehow) and yea it hauls.
Many numbers posted back when the car originally came out were exceptionally slow. like 16.0s 1/4 mile slow.
For the record back when I had a 2001 Acura cl... it Still beat a volvo V70R (twin turbo) 1/4 mile from a stand still by 2-3 lengths.
I got a cl-s now with an Injen CAI (installed it 2 nights ago in 2 hrs somehow) and yea it hauls.
Many numbers posted back when the car originally came out were exceptionally slow. like 16.0s 1/4 mile slow.
#16
heel/toe is my specialty
you guys give no credit to the cl.
For the record back when I had a 2001 Acura cl... it Still beat a volvo V70R (twin turbo) 1/4 mile from a stand still by 2-3 lengths.
I got a cl-s now with an Injen CAI (installed it 2 nights ago in 2 hrs somehow) and yea it hauls.
Many numbers posted back when the car originally came out were exceptionally slow. like 16.0s 1/4 mile slow.
For the record back when I had a 2001 Acura cl... it Still beat a volvo V70R (twin turbo) 1/4 mile from a stand still by 2-3 lengths.
I got a cl-s now with an Injen CAI (installed it 2 nights ago in 2 hrs somehow) and yea it hauls.
Many numbers posted back when the car originally came out were exceptionally slow. like 16.0s 1/4 mile slow.
Look guys, i love the cl-s as much as the next guy (maybe not the self-destruct auto though). No doubt from a roll, with your numbers you guys should be eating the tsx alive. But unless someone who is running these mythical 12's in their cl-s wants to post up a timeslip I am not buying it.
The quickest proven stock auto I have found is ~14.9 and stick at ~14.5. Neither of those were close to sea level so I am sure someone can come up a few tenths quicker.
I know the cl guys are going to be all over me for this one. So PROVE me wrong, nothing would make me happier, not to mention add some much needed validity to this quickly slipping thread.
Last edited by Red@8; 04-09-2009 at 04:15 PM.
#18
mmmmmm....
#19
mmmmmm....
#20
Pro
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Age: 42
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
props to you.
#21
Advanced
I know the 2nd gen TL-S (same engine as the CL-S but auto) has like 220whp (260hp advertised)..my tsx has like 185whp, is lighter and 6 speed..i don't think the tl-s would be too far ahead, but the 6speed in the cl will give it a bit more depending on the driver
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
09-15-2015 06:41 PM