2008 TSX - rear brake pads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #1  
lacadien72's Avatar
Thread Starter
6th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
2008 TSX - rear brake pads

Hi, I had to replace my rear brake pads last week on my 2008 TSX. I only have 56,000km. Is this normal wear?
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:04 AM
  #2  
nj2pa2nc's Avatar
it's a car-drive it
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 262
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by lacadien72
Hi, I had to replace my rear brake pads last week on my 2008 TSX. I only have 56,000km. Is this normal wear?
If you do alot of driving that involves stop and go driving or using jamning on your brakes then replacement would be normal. I do mostly highway driving so they are still good.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 07:21 AM
  #3  
mrgold35's Avatar
mrgold35
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,018
Likes: 1,661
From: ABQ, NM
I had to replace my rear brakes at around 30,000 miles. Acura service department must have used a different type of brake pad because I've gone 45,000 miles on the rear pads with 80% still left after my last inspection. My driving habits have not changed in 5 years.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
nj2pa2nc's Avatar
it's a car-drive it
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 262
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by nj2pa2nc
If you do alot of driving that involves stop and go driving or using jamning on your brakes then replacement would be normal. I do mostly highway driving so they are still good.
While getting my tsx serviced a few weeks ago they measured the brakes-the fronts have 80% life and the rears have 60% life-
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #5  
darowa's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 22
I went about 67,000 miles before needing rear brake pad replacement. Apparently, the braking bias is set so that the rear brakes wear out first - (I never had a car wear out its rear brakes before - and some of my cars went 100,000 miles before needing front pads and never needed rear pads).
Reply
Old May 27, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #6  
SoCaliTrojan's Avatar
Let me help you!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 12
From: So. Cali
Originally Posted by darowa
I went about 67,000 miles before needing rear brake pad replacement. Apparently, the braking bias is set so that the rear brakes wear out first - (I never had a car wear out its rear brakes before - and some of my cars went 100,000 miles before needing front pads and never needed rear pads).
The rear brake pads are half the size as the front, so they wear down quicker.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2011 | 11:24 PM
  #7  
rollindom's Avatar
6th Gear
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: South Eastern Washington
I had 32,000 miles on mine and I'm running 20" by 8.5" rims on it. Acura told me the wheels added to the extra wear. I didn't believe them so I asked the Tire Rack and they agreed this is not unusual and the dealer wasn't telling me a lie.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mada51589
3G TL Problems & Fixes
80
Jan 9, 2025 04:40 PM
mav888
1G RDX (2007-2012)
10
Sep 8, 2015 11:49 AM
nishant11
2G TL (1999-2003)
5
Sep 2, 2015 10:34 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.