RedShift Motorsports Supercharger
#202
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by RedShiftChris
My understanding is that it's not throttle point but rather MAP that affects VTEC crossover point. And I'm fairly sure we'll keep that window rather than fixing it at one point.
One thought I have is that this hesitation could be somewhat related to the bypass valve on the supercharger.... I don't know obviously, but my experience is that low rpm transition to boost in a Eaton S/C setup often results in slight delays and sporadic boost transition. But going open loop, you may be either helping the confusion in the ecu (because there isn't as much to decide) or you may just be deadening the power delivery and how it feels because of an over-rich condition. Of course, Doug at Hondata I'm sure understand this better than I do, and it may be completely different than that.
I'm sure we'll learn what it is evenually because we may run into it eventually.
Chris at RedShift
One thought I have is that this hesitation could be somewhat related to the bypass valve on the supercharger.... I don't know obviously, but my experience is that low rpm transition to boost in a Eaton S/C setup often results in slight delays and sporadic boost transition. But going open loop, you may be either helping the confusion in the ecu (because there isn't as much to decide) or you may just be deadening the power delivery and how it feels because of an over-rich condition. Of course, Doug at Hondata I'm sure understand this better than I do, and it may be completely different than that.
I'm sure we'll learn what it is evenually because we may run into it eventually.
Chris at RedShift
This has actually been a tough thing for me to recognize. I have an ODBII diagnostic tool, Brockway R920, which reads data from the ECU. The problem is that the MAP sensor voltage had to be clamped in order to prevent the ECU from seeing boost and throwing a CEL. Therefore the ECU stops seeing a proper MAP reading once the ECU sees boost. In order to get around this, and help see my proper MAP reading/boost levels. I ended up installing an external MAP sensor add-on to the R920. I now get a proper MAP and boost reading, and it looks like Vtec engages when the MAP hits about 114 kPa. Hopefully by now Doug has found out a way to allow the ECU to see the proper MAP without it throwing a CEL. This should help him be able to tune under boost.
That's an interesting theory that you've have about the hesitation and it being related to the bypass valve on the blower. This is the first I've heard of this. The theory I mentioned above came directly from Comptech who heard it from Hondata. Apparently their TL had a similar problem and they left their test car with Doug for a few weeks to get it fixed. I can't really comment on your theory, I'm not an expert myself. I'm just some guy who got a supercharger and has learned a little along the way
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#203
TPS vs MAP
MAP and TPS are related, that's very true. Speaking from an engine tuning point of view, a TPS signal is a vastly inferior indication of an engine's airflow. Some old engine management systems used TPS like the old Hilborn system, and having dyno tuned a South African built GT40 replica with Hilborn engine management, I can vouch that the system has it's problems. MAP is a fair more pure way to show an engine's potential airflow....I say potential because it only gives a pressure and not an airflow...it assumes an airflow at a given rpm and pressure.
Doug at Hondata is an exceedingly intelligent guy, and I'd be amazed if he doesn't understand the problem; so I'm not sure my theory is correct. And it could be a couple different things.... Isn't it always more than 1 thing????![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Chris at RedShift
Doug at Hondata is an exceedingly intelligent guy, and I'd be amazed if he doesn't understand the problem; so I'm not sure my theory is correct. And it could be a couple different things.... Isn't it always more than 1 thing????
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Chris at RedShift
#204
Hey guys thought I would keep you updated we have changed one thing on the development kit. We will be using the ASA supercharger, not the rotrex any more. They are still a centrifical supercharger so the efficency is just as good. I know why did we choose this one over the rotrex now?
1) ASA uses improved technology in the planetary system that allows use of your engine's oil rather than having to fit an additional oiling system with the specific ATF-style fluid required by all Rotrex units.
2) The ASA units utilizes a clutched drive that allows a smoother idle and improved stop-start driveability.
3) Superior engineering a technical capability shown by ASA as compared to Rotrex
4) Used by Ruf, Hamann etc...including the newest Ruf Porsche Kompressor R
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=117299
We are also seriously investigating twin screw designs. The Lysholm twin screw is probably better suited to the lack of low rpm power in many Honda/Acura applications and they have excellent efficiency under high boost (unlike a roots blower). The only issues with the Lysholm is 1) packaging because twin screws are larger and 2) cost. So hopefully sooner rather than later you will see a Twin screw for our cars.
1) ASA uses improved technology in the planetary system that allows use of your engine's oil rather than having to fit an additional oiling system with the specific ATF-style fluid required by all Rotrex units.
2) The ASA units utilizes a clutched drive that allows a smoother idle and improved stop-start driveability.
3) Superior engineering a technical capability shown by ASA as compared to Rotrex
4) Used by Ruf, Hamann etc...including the newest Ruf Porsche Kompressor R
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=117299
We are also seriously investigating twin screw designs. The Lysholm twin screw is probably better suited to the lack of low rpm power in many Honda/Acura applications and they have excellent efficiency under high boost (unlike a roots blower). The only issues with the Lysholm is 1) packaging because twin screws are larger and 2) cost. So hopefully sooner rather than later you will see a Twin screw for our cars.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#206
I own a TSX so I have to care ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I can't edit the other post I dunno why but I meant to say
They are still a PlANETARY supercharger so the efficency is just as good
Not
"They are still a centrifical supercharger so the efficency is just as good."
Any questions I am here
Thanks all Greg
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I can't edit the other post I dunno why but I meant to say
They are still a PlANETARY supercharger so the efficency is just as good
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
"They are still a centrifical supercharger so the efficency is just as good."
Any questions I am here
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#208
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by RedShiftChris
MAP and TPS are related, that's very true. Speaking from an engine tuning point of view, a TPS signal is a vastly inferior indication of an engine's airflow. Some old engine management systems used TPS like the old Hilborn system, and having dyno tuned a South African built GT40 replica with Hilborn engine management, I can vouch that the system has it's problems. MAP is a fair more pure way to show an engine's potential airflow....I say potential because it only gives a pressure and not an airflow...it assumes an airflow at a given rpm and pressure.
Doug at Hondata is an exceedingly intelligent guy, and I'd be amazed if he doesn't understand the problem; so I'm not sure my theory is correct. And it could be a couple different things.... Isn't it always more than 1 thing????![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Chris at RedShift
Doug at Hondata is an exceedingly intelligent guy, and I'd be amazed if he doesn't understand the problem; so I'm not sure my theory is correct. And it could be a couple different things.... Isn't it always more than 1 thing????
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Chris at RedShift
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
And thanks for the updates, I don't know much about ASA, but when I do a google search then I get a lot of hits from Audi and BMW forums. Very interesting. So at this point do you know if the estimated costs that you posted before will stay the same?
#209
They should most def. stay the same. ASA chargers are real big in Europe. Used on some prety nice cars, by some pretty good companies. Alpina, Ruf, and some other high end European tuners use them. They are an excellent quality unit.
#215
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by RedShiftChris
My understanding is that it's not throttle point but rather MAP that affects VTEC crossover point. And I'm fairly sure we'll keep that window rather than fixing it at one point.
One thought I have is that this hesitation could be somewhat related to the bypass valve on the supercharger.... I don't know obviously, but my experience is that low rpm transition to boost in a Eaton S/C setup often results in slight delays and sporadic boost transition. But going open loop, you may be either helping the confusion in the ecu (because there isn't as much to decide) or you may just be deadening the power delivery and how it feels because of an over-rich condition. Of course, Doug at Hondata I'm sure understand this better than I do, and it may be completely different than that.
I'm sure we'll learn what it is evenually because we may run into it eventually.
Chris at RedShift
One thought I have is that this hesitation could be somewhat related to the bypass valve on the supercharger.... I don't know obviously, but my experience is that low rpm transition to boost in a Eaton S/C setup often results in slight delays and sporadic boost transition. But going open loop, you may be either helping the confusion in the ecu (because there isn't as much to decide) or you may just be deadening the power delivery and how it feels because of an over-rich condition. Of course, Doug at Hondata I'm sure understand this better than I do, and it may be completely different than that.
I'm sure we'll learn what it is evenually because we may run into it eventually.
Chris at RedShift
It worked fine but still was not good enough. The better solution later came from Hondata programmable ECU which allows control of when to exit closed-loop mode based on engine load using the MAP sensor. This means if closed-loop mode is set to exit before atmospheric pressure, the ECU will not fight your attempt to add fuel during boost transition, and hopefully cures the fuel related hesitation issue.
#217
Instructor
Originally Posted by Redshiftmotorsports
Hey guys thought I would keep you updated we have changed one thing on the development kit. We will be using the ASA supercharger, not the rotrex any more. They are still a centrifical supercharger so the efficency is just as good. I know why did we choose this one over the rotrex now?
1) ASA uses improved technology in the planetary system that allows use of your engine's oil rather than having to fit an additional oiling system with the specific ATF-style fluid required by all Rotrex units.
2) The ASA units utilizes a clutched drive that allows a smoother idle and improved stop-start driveability.
3) Superior engineering a technical capability shown by ASA as compared to Rotrex
4) Used by Ruf, Hamann etc...including the newest Ruf Porsche Kompressor R
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=117299
We are also seriously investigating twin screw designs. The Lysholm twin screw is probably better suited to the lack of low rpm power in many Honda/Acura applications and they have excellent efficiency under high boost (unlike a roots blower). The only issues with the Lysholm is 1) packaging because twin screws are larger and 2) cost. So hopefully sooner rather than later you will see a Twin screw for our cars.![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
1) ASA uses improved technology in the planetary system that allows use of your engine's oil rather than having to fit an additional oiling system with the specific ATF-style fluid required by all Rotrex units.
2) The ASA units utilizes a clutched drive that allows a smoother idle and improved stop-start driveability.
3) Superior engineering a technical capability shown by ASA as compared to Rotrex
4) Used by Ruf, Hamann etc...including the newest Ruf Porsche Kompressor R
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=117299
We are also seriously investigating twin screw designs. The Lysholm twin screw is probably better suited to the lack of low rpm power in many Honda/Acura applications and they have excellent efficiency under high boost (unlike a roots blower). The only issues with the Lysholm is 1) packaging because twin screws are larger and 2) cost. So hopefully sooner rather than later you will see a Twin screw for our cars.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#220
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Greg,
So with a ASA setup we should be expecting more HP over the Rotrex blower? A buddy of mine used to have a E46 and always talked about getting a ASA kit bringing him to 500+ WHP. Also would there be an issue with cooling the ASA charger with our engine oil if we don't religously change it every 3k miles or after a few intense weekends of autocrossing?
I personally don't know much about the technical details in FI setups, so when I heard the CCX has a Twin Rotrex setup I was excited! Now I heard ASA I'm equally waiting to be one of the first in line to get this setup! I'll definately take a drive out to PA on my way to visit a friend in Bethesda, MD given you'll be willing to do the install.
Thank God you bought a TSX and can share the love of tuning it with all of us!
So with a ASA setup we should be expecting more HP over the Rotrex blower? A buddy of mine used to have a E46 and always talked about getting a ASA kit bringing him to 500+ WHP. Also would there be an issue with cooling the ASA charger with our engine oil if we don't religously change it every 3k miles or after a few intense weekends of autocrossing?
I personally don't know much about the technical details in FI setups, so when I heard the CCX has a Twin Rotrex setup I was excited! Now I heard ASA I'm equally waiting to be one of the first in line to get this setup! I'll definately take a drive out to PA on my way to visit a friend in Bethesda, MD given you'll be willing to do the install.
Thank God you bought a TSX and can share the love of tuning it with all of us!
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#221
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redshiftmotorsports
We are also seriously investigating twin screw designs. The Lysholm twin screw is probably better suited to the lack of low rpm power in many Honda/Acura applications and they have excellent efficiency under high boost (unlike a roots blower). The only issues with the Lysholm is 1) packaging because twin screws are larger and 2) cost. So hopefully sooner rather than later you will see a Twin screw for our cars. ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I did find a sound clip of the Rotrex charger on a ITR
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...96874&q=rotrex
I'm guessing this will be somewhat similar to the sound we should expect out of a ASA charger as well. Which I like
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I never actually heard a clip of the Lysholm charger so I did a quick search on it and found
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...4684&q=lysholm
If this is typically what it sounds like, I like the higher note over the lower whine of the Comptech charger.
Yes.. it's time for me to finally sleep... at 7:20 in the morning.
#222
Drifting
^^ the whine of the comptech supercharger is magnified a bit if you have a short-ram intake...
but my supercharger makes a klunking noise now and my past week was one of the worsts for me...
but my supercharger makes a klunking noise now and my past week was one of the worsts for me...
![Sad](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
#223
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man that sucks, hope you get that taken care of by comptech.
From what I was told by one of my buddies with a 06 Si, comptech chargers have been giving them a lot of problems over at Club Si as well on the 06+ models.
From what I was told by one of my buddies with a 06 Si, comptech chargers have been giving them a lot of problems over at Club Si as well on the 06+ models.
#224
closed loop op for s/c
Originally Posted by JTso
Many people who run the Eaton JRSC have experienced a typical tip-in detonation issue related to how quickly the boost build-up and how quickly the ECU is able to transition out of closed-loop mode. This condition results a split second lean a/f and slight hesitation when the ECU is still trying to maintain 14.7:1 a/f. The old style JR fuel enrichment relay which modifies the IAT signal didn't help. Some have decided to modify the TPS signal to the ECU by using the boost pressure switch from the intake manifold as a trigger to a relay. The modification also involves with adding a resistor bus using one 2.2K ohms and one 22 K ohms resistor. When the pressure switch detects 1 psi, the output of the relay bypass the normal TPS signal and sends a modified 4.55v to the ECU tricking the ECU as WOT which forces the ECU into opened-loop mode.
It worked fine but still was not good enough. The better solution later came from Hondata programmable ECU which allows control of when to exit closed-loop mode based on engine load using the MAP sensor. This means if closed-loop mode is set to exit before atmospheric pressure, the ECU will not fight your attempt to add fuel during boost transition, and hopefully cures the fuel related hesitation issue.
It worked fine but still was not good enough. The better solution later came from Hondata programmable ECU which allows control of when to exit closed-loop mode based on engine load using the MAP sensor. This means if closed-loop mode is set to exit before atmospheric pressure, the ECU will not fight your attempt to add fuel during boost transition, and hopefully cures the fuel related hesitation issue.
We continue to gain important development partners, and our development cabilities in engine managementsecond to none. We have a couple projects in the coming weeks including a 450 hp 06 Civic Si (K24) endurance racecar that are important to our ongoing development and related directly to longevity of our street s/c kits. We have alot of work to do and we'll keep steady progress.
And the new Accord is very similar to the other models in many ways...the K24 is similar to the TSX and the V6 is similar to the TL. So, that has always been squarely on the development target.
When we release a system, it will be best engineering, best usable power, and best driveability.
Cheers,
Chris
#225
Drifting
^^yeah, unfortunately comptech is not open on the weekends...will have to wait till monday to get anything done...
and from speaking with a few guys over at clubrsx who have had problems..comptech has been nothing but awesome with customer service...plus the units have a 3 yr warranty..
and from speaking with a few guys over at clubrsx who have had problems..comptech has been nothing but awesome with customer service...plus the units have a 3 yr warranty..
#226
tehLEGOman
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 9,135
Received 1,982 Likes
on
1,335 Posts
Thank you for showing interest in the new generation Acura lineup.
I look forward to the finished product.
Eric
I look forward to the finished product.
Eric
#227
Drives With Hands
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
I never actually heard a clip of the Lysholm charger so I did a quick search on it and found
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...4684&q=lysholm
If this is typically what it sounds like, I like the higher note over the lower whine of the Comptech charger.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...4684&q=lysholm
If this is typically what it sounds like, I like the higher note over the lower whine of the Comptech charger.
My favorite video of a Lysholm unit is on this GTO. 685 RWHP baby yeah!
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....B098596683&p=0
#228
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^
MAN! I was actually looking around for that video for a while! I remember the disctint sound of that supercharger and didn't know what type it was. I was on streetfire for like 30 min last night looking for GTO videos to find that bad boy!
Thanks for relieving my brain.
MAN! I was actually looking around for that video for a while! I remember the disctint sound of that supercharger and didn't know what type it was. I was on streetfire for like 30 min last night looking for GTO videos to find that bad boy!
Thanks for relieving my brain.
#230
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
This is very superficial of me, but one thing is that I never really liked the sound of the comptech SC on the TSX. Granted I don't have any first hand experience listening to it, this is all based off clips members posted on here. But I feel the tone is a bit too low of a whine.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...05005881914448
#232
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by bchang2001
any new updates?? also when is the preorder over?
Systems expected by Spring 07 include 06+ Civic Si, TSX, RSX, 2006 Civic EX,DX,LX, and Fit. Summer 07 we will launch V6 Accord and Acura TL/CL. For SEMA 07, will be the launch the twin supercharged truck systems for the Acura MDX, Honda Pilot and Honda Ridgeline
#233
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by bchang2001
any new updates?? also when is the preorder over?
#234
No worries
You can still pre-order now for the discount. BUT I don't know how much longer that will be going on, once we do release it I know it won't. Also we appreciate your patience, we are going as fast as we can we just will absoutly NOT compromise quality just to get the product out.
As of now no real new updates, just its going along very smoothly and soon, but I am here to answer any questions I can.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As of now no real new updates, just its going along very smoothly and soon, but I am here to answer any questions I can.
#238
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Age: 48
Posts: 7,594
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by godfather2
^ that's what i didn't want to hear
#239
Low and Slow
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midlothian, Virginia
Age: 36
Posts: 1,362
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These new TSX chargers sound great, and I'd love an alternative to the comptech blower. Does Red Shift have any plans at this point to release a unit for the Second Generation TL?