Injen intake or Comptech icebox

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #1  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
Injen intake or Comptech icebox

What do you guys recommend..The Comptech ice box or the Injen CAI used as a short ram only? I'm stuck as to which one might be better, anybody have any input? Thanks inadvance!
Jose
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #2  
Stokeless_TSX's Avatar
Stokeless
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
From: South East Daygo
Power wise injen. Looks injen....price injen...take ur pick. =)
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
gsclifton's Avatar
ABP TSX
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Rep of TX
Comptech IceBox
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5826

Injen CAI
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22721

K&N CAI
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6125

Fujita CAI
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26568

Mugen
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5119
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #4  
Tsx536's Avatar
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 3
From: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Icebox - Better low end, quiet (Close to stock sound with a little more roar)

Injen - Better mid range, Loud (Fairly quiet at low RPMS, Nice big growl when you open it up)
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #5  
gvtsx's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
The Injen was fairly loud, especially with a heavy load on the engine (ie: Taking an uphill on-ramp to a freeway). Also took a noticeable amount of low end torque away. I swtiched to the ice box and it was perfect for what I wanted. I got more low end torque back and it isn't even close to the volume of the Injen. I have an AT though and I have read that they tend to make the the intake a little louder then the MT, I don't know this to be a fact but mine was loud. I did loose some noticeable, but very slight, high end pull and don't hear the VTEC change over as much. The Injen intake looked damn nice though, and I miss that most about it. Anyways that's my .
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #6  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
with my California AT brothers. Somewhere there is a thread that shows a dyno graph of both the intakes (sorry, I couldn't find it). I remember it showed the Icebox better down low, the Injen better at mid and high rpms and the Icebox again with more power at the very very top of the rev range.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
really...so basically on say highway driving my Injen sounds like a good idea (loud) and say on 0-30mph street driving the icebox hits the spot.

Any1 have those graphs jlukja was talking about?

And when you guys are referring to the Injen, was that in CAI form only or do you guys have any experience with it in Short Ram?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
Stokeless_TSX man on ebay the icebox come to $150 while the Injen come to alittle over $200...but I'd be getting the Injen for around $150 anyway from a dude around here.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #9  
foolioness's Avatar
Professional SLACKER
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga
depend on your pref. If you don't mind loud get the injen. especially for only $150... For me, icebox is perfect. I hate the loud noise..... and $150 for a brand new icebox is a good deal.... my
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #10  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
I was thinking the same thing
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #11  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
how much of a noise difference is there between the two, is it as obvious as you guys say...even the short ram...I've had experience with a CAI Injen in a past civic and at high rpms it was screeming...but is that the same case as the short?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #12  
gvtsx's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Mine was in the CIA configuration. I think in SR mode you gain a little low end torque back and lose some upper end horse power, I could be totally bass ackwards though . Oh, and on the highway at cruising speed my Inkjen intake was hardly audible, it was when I gave it some gas to pass or increase my speed that it would get louder.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
Stokeless_TSX's Avatar
Stokeless
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
From: South East Daygo
yea if you pay more than 160 for the injen u payin to much...i honestly dont think the icebox is worth it...but thats my opinion....
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 09:45 PM
  #14  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
I'm not talking about loudness...But, out of the two which one has a leaner bassier tone?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #15  
CKcentral's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
I would do the Ingen. Just installed it this past weekend and it sounds so bad ass!
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #16  
moda_way's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,594
Likes: 4
From: Cincinnati, OH
^^Agreed. I helped install it and it was a very nice CAI... I was impressed.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #17  
LoveMyTL-S's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,999
Likes: 362
From: St. Cloud, FL
Love my Injen CAI. Sounds stock until you punch it.......
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #18  
CKcentral's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by LoveMyTSX
Love my Injen CAI. Sounds stock until you punch it.......
exactly, thats what i like about it.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #19  
chuson's Avatar
T.DoT P.I.M.P. lol
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
Seriously, when you don't rev your car above 3500rpm, it sounds pretty much stock. Then when you race it, or when you rev it up pass 5000rpm, the noise is getting louder. But let put it this way, when you drive fast, would you prefer to be quiet or race car like loud? If you prefer quiet, then don't even think about high-flow cat and Cat-back exhaust cause they will be more louder than the Intake itself. By saying this, you don't have much choice on bolt-on upgrade for TSX then.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #20  
shaang's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Here's the link:

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25092

The Icebox is the obvious choice, quieter & more overall gains under the curve.

By the way, pics of the dynos are down...
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #21  
jackacc's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
I have the injen in SRI mode and I love it. Feels the same to me as far as pull (maybe a few more ponies) but man, when I open it up to get onto a highway or just want to wind it out a bit... this thing sounds like I have a full exhaust. It has a deep mean growl and I wouldn't trade it for anything. Best part as others have said, is that until you go above 3500 rpm or really rock on the long pedal, you don't even know it is there.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #22  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
If you are only considering SRI mode, then I would take the Icebox over the Injen any day. Icebox runs cooler than the SRI.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #23  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
hemmm...so it sounds like more people are weighing towards the Injen...

But JTso your the first one to adress my concern of the ice box verse the SRI mode. I wish I knew someone in the area with one of the install so I could see in person.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 10:30 PM
  #24  
foolioness's Avatar
Professional SLACKER
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga
I had the oportunity of driving an 05 (bone stock) as a loaner....
My goodness its a hell of a difference with my 04 w/ icebox......
the accelaration response, noise, etc once you hit that gas pedal......
it seems so hard for the stock 05 to get to 6k rpm.....
Can't imagine what it'll be like with an injen......
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 07:45 AM
  #25  
BulldogHockey's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: TC, Mn
I think Injen is the most popular choice and was perceived as more powerful until Asahi posted some head to head dynos. Realistically I probably would not be able to tell the difference between 1-2 hp using my butt dyno.

Noise was a big factor for me so I chose the Icebox. Throttle response seems a lot better and it does seem to pull better to redline now. I haven't really detected any low end torque loss, which is also good since that's where I drive the car 90% of the time. Noise is pretty much stock until you get above 4000 rpms and are WOT. Also I like the fact that access to the filter for cleaning is a breeze. I do like the look of the Injen a lot better though.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #26  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by jlukja
with my California AT brothers. Somewhere there is a thread that shows a dyno graph of both the intakes (sorry, I couldn't find it). I remember it showed the Icebox better down low, the Injen better at mid and high rpms and the Icebox again with more power at the very very top of the rev range.
Here is the thread I was talking about. https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25092
Unfortunately the pics with the Dyno scans don't seem to be working but you can get the gist of what was found from the discussion. See post #14.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #27  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
Originally Posted by BulldogHockey
I think Injen is the most popular choice and was perceived as more powerful until Asahi posted some head to head dynos. Realistically I probably would not be able to tell the difference between 1-2 hp using my butt dyno.

Noise was a big factor for me so I chose the Icebox. Throttle response seems a lot better and it does seem to pull better to redline now. I haven't really detected any low end torque loss, which is also good since that's where I drive the car 90% of the time. Noise is pretty much stock until you get above 4000 rpms and are WOT. Also I like the fact that access to the filter for cleaning is a breeze. I do like the look of the Injen a lot better though.

My wife wants me to get the Injen mostly because of how it looks under the hood, and the noise..
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #28  
BulldogHockey's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: TC, Mn
Originally Posted by SimpleWhite
My wife wants me to get the Injen mostly because of how it looks under the hood, and the noise..
I'm impressed! My wife keeps wondering why I'm spending money on a car that she says is fast enough. And she's opposite in that she doesn't want any extra noise. I guess it's her car too
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #29  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
my wife loves my passion for hondas...well at least to some extent...The bug hit her when I started moding her mitsubishi
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #30  
jiggaman's Avatar
I spend 2 much time here
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,115
Likes: 103
From: MA
after reading through all of these threads i think that a comptech icebox is in my future, i have had the injen since it was first released but have yet to convert to CAI mode due to my paranoia of sucking up water with the filter being down low. it is my assumption that i wouldn't have to worry about that with the icebox.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #31  
rmpage's Avatar
Drives With Hands
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by JTso
If you are only considering SRI mode, then I would take the Icebox over the Injen any day. Icebox runs cooler than the SRI.
Definitely this. The Icebox is plastic, so its housing (which is basically a CAI with an air box in the middle) doesn't conduct heat to incoming charge air nearly as fast as the aluminum tube of the Injen does. The whole reason for getting a mandrel-bent aluminum intake is to get the orifice out of the hot engine bay, like a snorkel. The cooler air is so much cooler that it doesn't matter that the tubing conducts heat in. So, the aluminum SRI is the worst of both worlds: hot engine cowling air heated further by radiator heatsoak.

Originally Posted by jiggaman
after reading through all of these threads i think that a comptech icebox is in my future, i have had the injen since it was first released but have yet to convert to CAI mode due to my paranoia of sucking up water with the filter being down low. it is my assumption that i wouldn't have to worry about that with the icebox.
Honestly, I don't think it matters. The intake on the icebox extends down to where the old resonator goes, pretty much even with where the CAI inlet on the Injen goes. Both of these are so high off the ground that you'd literally have to drive through a freaking lake to totally submerge the inlet. Might be something to think about on some other cars, but not with any of the stuff I've seen for ours.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #32  
jiggaman's Avatar
I spend 2 much time here
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,115
Likes: 103
From: MA
Originally Posted by rmpage


Honestly, I don't think it matters. The intake on the icebox extends down to where the old resonator goes, pretty much even with where the CAI inlet on the Injen goes. Both of these are so high off the ground that you'd literally have to drive through a freaking lake to totally submerge the inlet. Might be something to think about on some other cars, but not with any of the stuff I've seen for ours.
i was gonna convert the injen to CAI until your boys at ESP advised against it, that is what had me worried.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #33  
rmpage's Avatar
Drives With Hands
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Do you remember what they said?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #34  
Black_6spd's Avatar
VSA Rocks
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
I always wonder why only Injen & Icebox are compared against each other.

What about K&N Typhoon? As an owner of the Injen where they decided to located the IAT sensor in a place where it almost hits the radiator hose, I'd have to say the K&N would be my preference if I were to buy one today.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 02:12 AM
  #35  
aaronng's Avatar
Driver/Detailer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 2
From: Sydney
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
I always wonder why only Injen & Icebox are compared against each other.

What about K&N Typhoon? As an owner of the Injen where they decided to located the IAT sensor in a place where it almost hits the radiator hose, I'd have to say the K&N would be my preference if I were to buy one today.
The new Injen (part number starting with SP) has the IAT sensor at the proper location now and doesn't stretch the wiring as well.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 06:33 AM
  #36  
TSX420J's Avatar
CarbonGreyPearlEbony
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 3
Comptech Icebox PDF file:

http://comptechusa.com/store/media/dyno/tsx_icebox.pdf

fujita cai


k&n cai


injen


injen with mr technology


injen without mr technology
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #37  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
I know Injen listed this as the TSX dyno but I don't believe it is. Just look at the peak rpm and curves. Then compare it with the other real TSX dyno charts. Keep in mind Hondata TSX reflash was not available back then.


Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
Aug 2, 2016 06:52 PM
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
Jan 26, 2016 04:15 PM
swany0095
2G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
3
Oct 7, 2015 02:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.