Dynos with A/F ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2005, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Dynos with A/F ratio?

Has anyone done a dyno on a stock TSX with an air/fuel ratio plot? Stock or modified, I'm just curious...
Old 04-04-2005, 02:17 PM
  #2  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Yes, I have. Like I said in the other post, I didn't get a printout of my dyno, but I got ALL the data (including the A/F ratio) from the dyno. I can plot it when I get home tonight.
Old 04-04-2005, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
It's just purely out of curiosity. If you don't feel like plotting it, what were the highs and lows and at what RPM did they happen?
Old 04-04-2005, 02:23 PM
  #4  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
This would be most useful if Hondata releases the K-Pro...
Old 04-05-2005, 09:59 AM
  #5  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Here is the A/F ratio graph for my stock (engine wise) TSX. I'm posting the dyno as well.


Old 04-05-2005, 10:08 AM
  #6  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Thanks Vincent!

It would be interesting to see how the hondata reflash compares to that.
Old 04-05-2005, 10:10 AM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Wow! the stock A/F is pretty rich around 4000 rpm. I wonder what the "modified" Hondata A/F looks like...
Old 04-05-2005, 10:15 AM
  #8  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Ok...I have to admit. I'm a at this A/F ratio thing (I'm more of a suspension, wheels/tires guy ). What is consider rich and what is consider lean?
Old 04-05-2005, 10:35 AM
  #9  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Rich means that there is more fuel (thus A/F ratio is lower) and lean is when there is less fuel (thus A/F ratio is higher).
Old 04-05-2005, 10:41 AM
  #10  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
Ok...I have to admit. I'm a at this A/F ratio thing (I'm more of a suspension, wheels/tires guy ). What is consider rich and what is consider lean?
14.64 is the stoichiometric ratio meaning that it's the theoretically perfect mix of gasoline and air to achieve complete combustion. Higher ratios indicate a lean condition (more air than fuel). Often engines are tuned a little on the rich side (13.5 to 14.5 for NA or 12.5 to 13.5 for forced induction engines) during WOT runs. When you're under light load or idling it's not uncommon for engines to be tuned lean (sometimes as high as 16 or 17:1) for increased mileage and emissions reasons.
Old 04-05-2005, 10:51 AM
  #11  
Racer
 
AZTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wait so this is a stock dyno correct? And you got a max HP of 185.9 and tq of 158.2? Isnt that kinda high considering stoke got 184.6 hp and 151.1 tq? I was jw not trying to be an ass or anything
Old 04-05-2005, 11:02 AM
  #12  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AZTSX
wait so this is a stock dyno correct? And you got a max HP of 185.9 and tq of 158.2? Isnt that kinda high considering stoke got 184.6 hp and 151.1 tq? I was jw not trying to be an ass or anything
This run was on a Dynopak dyno which reads about 10hp higher than a dynajet.
Old 04-05-2005, 11:03 AM
  #13  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by AZTSX
wait so this is a stock dyno correct? And you got a max HP of 185.9 and tq of 158.2? Isnt that kinda high considering stoke got 184.6 hp and 151.1 tq? I was jw not trying to be an ass or anything
Mine was dyno'd on a Dynapack, while Stoke was probably on a Dynojet. Dynapack is known to read about 10hp more than a Dynojet, however the dyno's on the Dynapack are repeatable within couple of hp.

BTW, thanks Dan for the detail explanation. Reading your explanation reminds me of the Internal Combustion Engine class I took back in college. But I have forgotten most of it already.
Old 04-05-2005, 11:07 AM
  #14  
Team Owner
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
So, if I'm reading the plot correctly, the TSX burns 6.5% more fuel (14.4 vs. 15.5) at 2000RPM than at 1800RPM? Does that translate into gas mileage being 6.5% better?
Old 04-05-2005, 11:12 AM
  #15  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jlukja
So, if I'm reading the plot correctly, the TSX burns 6.5% more fuel (14.4 vs. 15.5) at 2000RPM than at 1800RPM? Does that translate into gas mileage being 6.5% better?
This AFR chart only measures the ratio under WOT and full load. There are other mappings for cruising speeds so there's not much point to gathering fuel efficency info off this chart.
Old 04-05-2005, 11:14 AM
  #16  
Racer
 
AZTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
Mine was dyno'd on a Dynapack, while Stoke was probably on a Dynojet. Dynapack is known to read about 10hp more than a Dynojet, however the dyno's on the Dynapack are repeatable within couple of hp.

BTW, thanks Dan for the detail explanation. Reading your explanation reminds me of the Internal Combustion Engine class I took back in college. But I have forgotten most of it already.
thanks for the clarification
Old 04-05-2005, 11:17 AM
  #17  
Team Owner
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
This AFR chart only measures the ratio under WOT and full load. There are other mappings for cruising speeds so there's not much point to gathering fuel efficency info off this chart.
Gotcha. Thanks Dan.
Old 04-05-2005, 11:25 AM
  #18  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Here's another question from the . What would happen if I lean out the A/F mixture at WOT? OTOH, what would happen if I add more fuel at WOT?

When I was at Church's place to dyno my Prelude, he said something about my Prelude running a bit lean. But when I compare the A/F ratio graphs between my Prelude and TSX, my Prelude is already running a bit richer than the TSX.
Old 04-05-2005, 11:28 AM
  #19  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Do you have a fuel management system on your Prelude?
Old 04-05-2005, 11:33 AM
  #20  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Do you have a fuel management system on your Prelude?
No, but Church recommended me to get an adj. FPR. what it would do?
Old 04-05-2005, 12:04 PM
  #21  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I'm not familiar with the use of FPRs for NA engines so I really don't know what they'll do. Usually with a FI engine, an adjustable fuel pressure regulator is used to increase fuel flow when it senses boost. There's a little vacuum line on the top of the regulator that actuates the flow rate.

Maybe Johnny could shed some light on this for you.
Old 04-05-2005, 12:14 PM
  #22  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
The adjustable FPR increases fuel based on load condition via a vacuum line to the intake manifold. When vacuum is high, like during idle or cruising speed, the build-in pressure spring is overcome by the vacuum source and certain amount of fuel is allowed to return back to the fuel tank from the fuel rail. When the vacuum is low, like during acceleration or WOT, the pressure spring is pressed down against the diaphragm forcing more fuel to stay inside the fuel rail causing fuel pressure to go up. The adjustable FPR allows you to adjust the tension of the pressure spring. However, the adjustmet affects the entire rpm range and not just where you need it. Therefore, you might correct certain lean area of the rpm range but cause another area to be rich.
Old 04-05-2005, 12:18 PM
  #23  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
So it functions the same way I guess. It definitely sounds like you want a programable ECU Vincent.
Old 04-05-2005, 12:26 PM
  #24  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
So it functions the same way I guess. It definitely sounds like you want a programable ECU Vincent.
Can't do, not allowed in STX class. When my Prelude becomes the dedicated track car, then I'll consider.

So is it more fuel, more power; or less fuel, more power?
Old 04-05-2005, 12:26 PM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
This is what an adjustable FPR looks like with a custom mount. Note the adjustment screw on top.



This is what a programmable ECU can do to the A/F during WOT.

Old 04-05-2005, 12:48 PM
  #26  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
That's mighty impressive JTso. It's ruler-flat throughout the run.

Couple questions:
Is datalogging optional or standard on the K-Pro? Do you need a standalone wideband O2 controller or can the K-Pro use a wideband sensor instead of the OEM narrowband?
Old 04-05-2005, 01:03 PM
  #27  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
The K-pro comes standard with the K-Manage software, which allows tuning and datalogging. I believe the TSX primary O2 sensor is already a wideband sensor, but not sure if the K-pro is able to use it for proper tunning or not.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
12-17-2019 10:58 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
09-15-2015 06:44 PM
Billu99tl
3G TL Problems & Fixes
1
09-13-2015 11:30 AM



Quick Reply: Dynos with A/F ratio?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.