Should I take Ziebart rust-proofing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2004 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
Belzebutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm the Firestarter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,309
Likes: 1,042
Should I take Ziebart rust-proofing?

(I did a search and I only hit two mentions on Ziebart and nothing specific on it, so I'm asking here).

Camco Acura in Ottawa is offering Ziebart rust-proofing for CAN $499.

First of all, is it any good? How does it compare to Krown?

When I was at the dealership they weren't pushy, but they did a pre-emptive strike against Krown by saying "now, let me warn you, you should not use any oil-based rust-proofing product like Krown because there are many electrical components in the TSX and the oil will attack them. Any damage as a result will not be covered by warranty". I said that I was surprised that Krown would do that because it's so popular, and he said "well, just make sure they use a very light oil, then you should be ok". They also said that they will not drill holes in the car. Seems like they just spray stuff on.

Now, cost-wise it seems to be pretty competitive against Krown, which is $100/year and since I would probably keep the car about 5 years it would be pretty equal. I like the fact that you don't have to reapply Ziebart every year, but when I was reading up on it it seems you have to come back every year for inspection and a touch-up, which I think is free (it better be).

So, any thoughts? I know Krown is recommended but it could be easier to just let the dealer do it, and if it's just as good and doesn't cost more...
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #2  
ccarbajal08's Avatar
OCD in the OC
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
I'm skeptical. Not about Ziebart rust-proofing--I don't even know that that is. However, if the dealer is charging you $499, you can probably get the SAME EXACT thing for half the price after market.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #3  
patuww's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Well, it is common in the North (not in CA). I would call around and see what others are offering and at what price. Never hurts to shop around.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #4  
STL's Avatar
STL
Three Wheelin'
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 20
From: St. Louis
It's just a way for salesmen the get more profit. Even if you wanted it (and I really question the need for it), I sure wouldn't get it from the dealer!
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #5  
OTT-TSX's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
I have used Krown before with great results, the only down sides are
1) You have to reapply it yearly
2) They usually take a drill to your car panels

I had the Zeibart thrown in for free on my last car (before my TSX) the biggest problem was that it was sticky as hell and you are not allowed to wash your engine bay (it gets really dirty) or it voids the warranty. In my opinion it is not worth the $499.00 cost.

But I think you answered your own question when you said you plan on keeping the car for only 5 years. A properly built car will not show any signs of rust in that little time, especially newer cars which are better designed for this. If you don't believe me both my mom and dad own Acura's. One of them is 6 years old, never rust proofed and has no signs of rust. If you want some more proof I have a couple of good friends in the auto industry and have always told me to avoid the rustproof the dealer offers cause it is crap and to avoid it all together if you plan on keeping the car for 5 years or less. But if you want the piece of mind Krown seems to be the place of choice, that is if you can stand having a drill taken to your doors.

Just my 2 cents. Hope it helps.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #6  
underhill's Avatar
7th Gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
I never got the rust proofing. Several reasons, one being the warrenty. Another is the panels underneath I thought they should be taken off before the rust proofing and I did not trust that the panels would be replaced properly. Also, drilled holes I didn't like either.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
Belzebutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm the Firestarter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,309
Likes: 1,042
Originally Posted by underhill
I never got the rust proofing. Several reasons, one being the warrenty. Another is the panels underneath I thought they should be taken off before the rust proofing and I did not trust that the panels would be replaced properly. Also, drilled holes I didn't like either.
How would the rust-proofing affect the warranty in a negative way? Is is the drilled holes?

Thanks for the tip OTT-TSX...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
OTT-TSX's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by Belzebutt
How would the rust-proofing affect the warranty in a negative way? Is is the drilled holes?

Thanks for the tip OTT-TSX...

Not sure exactly what he meant but I know for a fact that with both systems you have to go back yearly ( I think every 3 years with Zeibart) and have the product reapplied or "touched up" in the case of Zeibart. If you don't say bye bye to the rust warranty. Also with Zeibart I was told I could not wash my engine bay or remove the sticky crap on the door trim or my warranty would be void also.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #9  
blazed54's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
why would you want to get your car rust proofed when it comes with a 5 year rust proof warranty? i may be mistaken but check you manual's first before spending money on something you might not need.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
OTT-TSX's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by blazed54
why would you want to get your car rust proofed when it comes with a 5 year rust proof warranty? i may be mistaken but check you manual's first before spending money on something you might not need.
Because it is not a rust proof warranty it is a rust perforation warranty. Meaning the rust has to eat right through the metal and leave a hole before the warranty kicks in. Even with harsh Canadian winters this will rarely ever happen in the first 5 years. You will start to see these things happen around the 7-10 year mark.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #11  
fastg11's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: North Chicago, IL
Just go to the trackless touch free car wash ~3 times a month and you'll be fine. It's a lot cheaper than rustproofing too.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #12  
Bladerunner's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, California, U.S.
Waste of money. Your car already comes with a warranty for rust and vehicles these days are rust-proofed a lot better than earlier years. Just like Perma-Plate is a waste of money.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #13  
Nick250's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Waste of money. Your car already comes with a warranty for rust and vehicles these days are rust-proofed a lot better than earlier years. Just like Perma-Plate is a waste of money.
I agree completely. Infact Consumer Reports found that rustproofing makes your car MORE LIKELY TO RUST. The reason being that the holes they drill allow an entry point for the salt.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PortlandRL
Automotive News
51
Feb 11, 2022 10:56 AM
TLNUBIAN
Wash & Wax
5
May 13, 2006 11:52 AM
elffriend
1G TSX (2004-2008)
2
Apr 1, 2004 09:58 AM
silveraccord
3G TL (2004-2008)
6
Dec 11, 2003 11:44 AM
cosimo
3G TL (2004-2008)
1
Oct 17, 2003 12:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.