How many going to trade in for V-6 2010?
#2
Senior Moderator
The V6 is the reason I would have looked at another TSX when its time to replace my 04. But I won't be in the market for a new car anytime soon. And even if I was, the lack of an MT takes it off my list.
#3
I'd like to know what this does to the balance of the car. The TSX is already nose heavy, I think I read the V6 and its accessories will weigh the car down approximately 130 more lbs? Any truth to that?
Also no MT = people like me wont even consider it.
I was hoping they'd give the 4 cylinder a reprogram, hit the high cam at 5k and a slightly more aggressive high cam for 215 to 220 hp.
Also no MT = people like me wont even consider it.
I was hoping they'd give the 4 cylinder a reprogram, hit the high cam at 5k and a slightly more aggressive high cam for 215 to 220 hp.
#5
i believe its the same motor as the 09' base TL. if that's true, i've test driven a 09' base TL and let me tell you, there is NO excitement in terms of acceleration. none of the the pin-you-in-your-seat sorta' power. the motor is very mild tempered and pulls that way all the way through the rev range. it *is*sneaky fast since you don't really feel the power coming on tho.
i'll keep my screaming 4-banger, thank you very much.
i'll keep my screaming 4-banger, thank you very much.
#7
Unregistered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like simple design of the first generation and I really have some doubts about the nimble/light feel of the car. The most important reason why I wont be looking into it is the fact that I changed the things that I didnt like about my own TSX (speakers, noisy tires, lack of torque) and now I am really in love with it
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Trending Topics
#14
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
I hope every one of you who is saying that you are not interested because there is no manual currently owns a manual transmission car and has purchased one in the last 5 years. We are a dying breed of car enthusiast and it is pissing me off that finding a used car with a manual these days is like hunting for a needle in a haystack...
#16
Intermediate
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 39
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
Burning Brakes
I hope every one of you who is saying that you are not interested because there is no manual currently owns a manual transmission car and has purchased one in the last 5 years. We are a dying breed of car enthusiast and it is pissing me off that finding a used car with a manual these days is like hunting for a needle in a haystack...
I'm disappointed that Honda/Acura would eliminate the only redeeming factor of the 2G TSX, but I can't say it's all that surprising. Considering that they had already taken away almost all of the 1G TSX's sporty characteristics from the new generation, this sounds like a logical progression. It's obvious to me that Honda/Acura is now striving to be a Toyota/Lexus clone
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#20
Pro
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Antioch, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm actually pretty content with my 07 TSX. I feel that the 4 cylinder provides adequate acceleration. Although the V6 would be nice, I can't justify spending the money to upgrade to another FWD sedan. If this new 2010 was going to have the SH-AWD, then I would SERIOUSLY consider upgrading. I really like the new TSX, but unless they put SH-AWD in it, I'm not going to bother.
#21
Happy with my 05. There is no point to me getting a new car, new car payment, etc, especially considering that with a little care, it'll run for another 100k (most of which I will not have a car payment for).
Besides that, if I were to make some sort of jump, it'll be to a used m5/540 or 996 911
Besides that, if I were to make some sort of jump, it'll be to a used m5/540 or 996 911
#25
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sacramento
Age: 38
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i doubt it will be 280. the tls barely makes that power. there is no way they r going to put that power into the tsx. they jus need to to the turbo version they were talking about doing. and if they put a v6 in the tsx they would have to make it a bit larger for the added motor. so i doubt they will put a v6 in it.
#26
Senior Moderator
i doubt it will be 280. the tls barely makes that power. there is no way they r going to put that power into the tsx. they jus need to to the turbo version they were talking about doing. and if they put a v6 in the tsx they would have to make it a bit larger for the added motor. so i doubt they will put a v6 in it.
2010 Acura TSX V-6 Debuts at Chicago Auto Show
More Powerful TSX Blows into the Windy City
CHICAGO - 02/11/2009
Acura debuted an all-new V-6 model for its TSX sports sedan line-up at the Chicago Auto Show today. Scheduled to go on sale this summer, the 2010 TSX V-6 will be equipped with a powerful 3.5-liter engine, exclusive suspension tuning, larger diameter wheels and additional enhancements.
"The automotive market may be slowing down, but not Acura," said Jeff Conrad, vice president of Acura sales. "With improved acceleration and handling, the new 280 horsepower V-6 adds even more sport to the already sporty nature of the popular TSX sports sedan."
Link: http://www.hondanews.com/categories/793/releases/4947
#28
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sacramento
Age: 38
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
previous statement retracted. i guess they r unless this add is wrong but i doubt it. check it out here.
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
#29
Senior Moderator
previous statement retracted. i guess they r unless this add is wrong but i doubt it. check it out here.
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
The 2010 Acura TSX is slated to receive a V6 engine. This front-wheel drive sedan is Acura's entry-level car, and TSX shares some of its basic design with the European-market Honda Accord. The standard engine remains a 201-hp 2.4-liter 4-cylinder. A 280-hp 3.5-liter V6, borrowed from the larger Acura TL, is newly available. The 4-cylinder is available with manual or automatic transmission. The V6 is automatic only. The 2010 Acura TSX should continue to come in a single trim level that includes standard features such as a sunroof, wireless cell phone link, leather upholstery, heated front seats, and automatic climate control. Available safety features should include ABS, traction control, antiskid system, curtain side airbags, and front side airbags. An optional Technology Package for both the 4-cyilnder and V6 should remain available, and versions so equipped should be priced as separate models. The package will continue to include a navigation system with real-time traffic and weather information, rearview camera, and 10-speaker, 415-watt surround-sound audio system. This report is based on evaluations of the 2009 Acura TSX.
#31
Senior Moderator
previous statement retracted. i guess they r unless this add is wrong but i doubt it. check it out here.
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-acura-tsx.htm
#32
Senior Moderator
Not sure if you're still questioning the validity of the V6 but it doesn't get much more official than this.
http://private.honda.wieck.com/categ.../releases/4947
The 3.5 V6 rated at 280 is coming and yes, it will unfortunately only be available with an AT.
http://private.honda.wieck.com/categ.../releases/4947
The 3.5 V6 rated at 280 is coming and yes, it will unfortunately only be available with an AT.
#36
heel/toe is my specialty
It may seem odd to us and we would rather see the turbo/awd. Us/we = AZ/enthusiasts. But we make up ~0.0005% of acura sales and normal everyday person wants a fwd/v6/at sedan as sales have clearly shown. What acura is doing should, without a doubt, increase tsx sales.
#37
Oliver!!!
It was a choice on Honda/Acura's part to offer the V6 vs a turbo 4. And I think its a choice that's more in line with the direction they're trying to go in. With this latest generation of Acura's they seem to be moving more towards a luxury auto maker. The removal of the RSX from the lineup, the recent redesign of the TSX, all designed to make the Acura lineup more luxurious as a whole, less sporty. The average uninformed consumer would look at the TSX, see that it has a 4 cylinder engine, and move on without giving it a second glance. I guess what I'm trying to say is that V6 equates more to a luxury car vs a turbo 4, which equates more to a sports car. IMHO.
I had an 09 TL loaner a few weeks ago for a few days. It had noticibly more power in the low end than the TSX, but it seemed to hit its peak much earlier. But the gas mileage was absolutely horrible. I went out of town when I had the TL. 80 miles of open highway each way. And I got worse gas mileage than I do in mixed driving with the TSX.
All that said, no I won't be trading in my 08 for a V6. I personally don't see the need for it. And I prefer the simplicity of the 1G over the 2G.
I had an 09 TL loaner a few weeks ago for a few days. It had noticibly more power in the low end than the TSX, but it seemed to hit its peak much earlier. But the gas mileage was absolutely horrible. I went out of town when I had the TL. 80 miles of open highway each way. And I got worse gas mileage than I do in mixed driving with the TSX.
All that said, no I won't be trading in my 08 for a V6. I personally don't see the need for it. And I prefer the simplicity of the 1G over the 2G.
#38
Unregistered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope every one of you who is saying that you are not interested because there is no manual currently owns a manual transmission car and has purchased one in the last 5 years. We are a dying breed of car enthusiast and it is pissing me off that finding a used car with a manual these days is like hunting for a needle in a haystack...
Maybe so, but whats with FWD then? It just sickens me that they take away manual transmission and leave it with FWD. If they really want to progress in a sporty direction, make RWD cars !!!
#39
Racer
I agree on multiple points here.
I don't want a v6-auto in a tsx, I would rather step up to a TL at that point.
my 06 6mt has plenty of power already, it's not a fast car, but for daily driving it moves and maintains decent gas mileage.
I don't want another payment. though this car could be an option for my wife in 2 years when we're looking for her next car.
I really think that a turbo 4 sh-awd would have been a good move for acura to have in the line up. a turbo 4 tsx wouldn't interfere with sales of a v6 sh-awd tl.
I'm curious to see if these sell well or if people opt to just get into a TL for a little bit more.
I don't want a v6-auto in a tsx, I would rather step up to a TL at that point.
my 06 6mt has plenty of power already, it's not a fast car, but for daily driving it moves and maintains decent gas mileage.
I don't want another payment. though this car could be an option for my wife in 2 years when we're looking for her next car.
I really think that a turbo 4 sh-awd would have been a good move for acura to have in the line up. a turbo 4 tsx wouldn't interfere with sales of a v6 sh-awd tl.
I'm curious to see if these sell well or if people opt to just get into a TL for a little bit more.
#40
Definitely not interested for these reasons:
1. No MT = boring
2. Not a fan of high hp FWD. To me, 230ish is the limit for FWD.
3. The 2nd gen styling just isn't appealing to me.
4. Not a fan of the J-series motor.
I'm glad to have my 04 TSX 6MT.
1. No MT = boring
2. Not a fan of high hp FWD. To me, 230ish is the limit for FWD.
3. The 2nd gen styling just isn't appealing to me.
4. Not a fan of the J-series motor.
I'm glad to have my 04 TSX 6MT.