Accord Tourer concept = the next TSX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2007, 07:10 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accord Tourer concept = the next TSX?

If the next TSX is once again the Euro Accord sedan, then this new concept of the Accord Tourer that was just unveiled is probably what the next TSX will look like, except with a trunk:









Old 09-11-2007, 07:40 AM
  #2  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
rza49311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,072
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
someone beat ya to it.

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...ht=2009+accord
Old 09-11-2007, 07:44 AM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I read somewhere, I think on a link from topix.net, that the next TSX isn't supposed to be based off the Accord, but this thing looks a lot like the photos we've seen, so I guess that article was wrong.
Old 09-11-2007, 08:28 AM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
LoveMyTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Cloud, FL
Age: 67
Posts: 11,995
Received 361 Likes on 316 Posts
I like the new design. Very clean looking.
Old 09-11-2007, 10:02 AM
  #5  
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
 
xjohnkdoex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: nassau county, ny
Age: 46
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that just looks a mdx/rdx jr.

a coupe version might look pretty sweet. hopefully the rims will be better looking than what's in that pic.
Old 09-11-2007, 10:11 AM
  #6  
talk about mudflaps....
 
dereksmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Age: 51
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they bring this wagon here with the 2.3T, the SH-AWD, with a 6MT, why would you even bother with an RDX?
Old 09-11-2007, 10:30 AM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by dereksmalls
If they bring this wagon here with the 2.3T, the SH-AWD, with a 6MT, why would you even bother with an RDX?
That'll never happen.
Old 09-11-2007, 10:31 AM
  #8  
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
 
xjohnkdoex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: nassau county, ny
Age: 46
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
exactly. why would they want to take away from the RDX market?
Old 09-11-2007, 12:12 PM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rza, good to know, thanks for crushing my dreams of ever being first at anything.

I'm convinced the next TSX will share that body style, because even though they're calling it a Honda, they've blatantly given it the Acura grill and made it look like it would fit beside the MDX on a car lot.

If this is it, it might take some time for that front end to grow on me. It's not as sloped as the current model, and it doesn't look as natural. It looks a bit like it got punched in the nose.

They probably won't offer this station wagon in the US obviously because they didn't last time, but they should, because BMW offers some high class station wagons and some of us don't consider an SUV or a girly-ass crossover as suitable stand-in.



Old 09-11-2007, 12:21 PM
  #10  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
rza49311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,072
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
rza, good to know, thanks for crushing my dreams of ever being first at anything.
You're welcome, there's nothing I prefer more than pointing out the shortcomings of others.
Old 09-11-2007, 01:11 PM
  #11  
Poser / Fanboi
 
hunterk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dereksmalls
If they bring this wagon here with the 2.3T, the SH-AWD, with a 6MT, why would you even bother with an RDX?
+1, except I want the diesel motor.

The face is nice overall, a little too much chrome but I'd live with it. The nose does resemble the RDX.
Old 09-11-2007, 01:14 PM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dereksmalls
If they bring this wagon here with the 2.3T, the SH-AWD, with a 6MT, why would you even bother with an RDX?
For my money the TSX and TL have more in common than a TSX wagon and an RDX.
Old 09-11-2007, 01:20 PM
  #13  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also a wagon TSX might cost an easy $7000 less than an RDX.
Old 09-11-2007, 01:20 PM
  #14  
Audi Driving Snob
 
TinkySD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intersting -- I hope the execution is a little less edgy and they go with a more timely design. I still think the design of the current TSX is very nice even though it's almost 5+ years old!(accord in europe came out in as an 03 model in 02)

Regardless if the tsx has the right credentials(awd turbo and not too much of a size increase) I'll likely be coming back to the honda fold after my TT lease is up in 2010.
Old 09-11-2007, 01:56 PM
  #15  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,742
Received 1,519 Likes on 1,185 Posts
Too much of a Ford Fusion look to the grille and it looks like a Dodge Magnum from the side. I like the LED tail lights, clear wrap around headlights and front lower grille with fogs.

The TSX version will have to have a 3.0L/3.2L V-6 or 2.3T before I would consider trading in the 06.
Old 09-11-2007, 02:05 PM
  #16  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I want a diesel sedan
Old 09-11-2007, 02:20 PM
  #17  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
No thanks on the wagon. I'm waiting to see if the Honda Stream would actually make it here.
Old 09-11-2007, 02:50 PM
  #18  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This article says the new Accord Tourer has the same engine options as the previous model. That' doesn't sound promising to say the least. If the new TSX is the same car I have now with a slightly different shape I'll have to pass. I don't know where I'll go, but that's too much of the same for me. I don't think they should make the car something it's not, but if the USDM Accord gets a v6 I think the TSX is owed the same potential.
Old 09-11-2007, 03:49 PM
  #19  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Old 09-11-2007, 03:51 PM
  #20  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
says the new Accord Tourer has the same engine options as the previous model. That' doesn't sound promising to say the least. If the new TSX is the same car I have now with a slightly different shape I'll have to pass.
From the press release.

The all-new Accord range will boast one of the first all-Euro 5-compliant engine line-ups which will consist of two i-VTEC petrol engines of 2.0 and 2.4-litre capacities and a newly developed 2.2-litre i-DTEC next-generation diesel engine.Compared to the current Accord engine line-up, power output will be boosted and emissions and fuel economy significantly improved.
Old 09-11-2007, 03:57 PM
  #21  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, like they promised more power for '06 by widening the air passages?
Old 09-11-2007, 04:20 PM
  #22  
F-C
Senior Moderator
 
F-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,822
Received 1,119 Likes on 803 Posts
Slightly dissapointed by the lack of a larger displacement engine. However, this car looks great. Honda really needs to bring the wagon here. I'm thinking about replacing my TSX with a wagon due to home expansion, and the only options I see now are the German wagons.
Old 09-11-2007, 05:20 PM
  #23  
mrgold35
 
mrgold35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 6,742
Received 1,519 Likes on 1,185 Posts
This is the type of engine Honda/Acura needs to add to the Wagon:

http://www.automotoportal.com/articl..._passenger_car

V-12 TDI Diesel with 500hp and 738 lb/tq. Max torque available at 1,750 rpms! And you still get 20 mpg.
Old 09-11-2007, 06:45 PM
  #24  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think honda is running out of designs because that rearend does look about 100% like the RDX aside from the LED taillights.

once again though if this Accord tourer looks better than the new US Accord sedan.
Old 09-11-2007, 06:59 PM
  #25  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it looks better than the USDM Accord. I don't get the last generation Accord either. I must be out of touch with the average soccer mom and conformist dad because to me the USDM Accord looks like an excerise in radical geometry whereas the euro Accord looks as natural as one of God's creatures.

This thing is growing on me, even though it's a station wagon. I'm kind of hoping they sell it over here so I have the choice because I could use the space. The RDX... not for me.
Old 09-11-2007, 07:05 PM
  #26  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
I posted on the other thread, and I will post it here again - I think this is absolutely beautiful! Look at the clean and effective lines that flow so beautifully from the headlights to the rear end! I love the rear especially, because it's so unusual for a wagon and it's so sporty too! Almost like a hatch rather than a wagon.

Imagine if they sell this as a TSX, complete with a sedan and a coupe!!! That would be so absolutely wonderful.... but somehow I am not so optimistic about them selling this stunning wagon here.... but if they do, I would take this one in the exact same red color! Buh bye A4 wagon and 3 series wagon fantasies...
Old 09-11-2007, 09:17 PM
  #27  
TSX Addict
 
Power1Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The new A-Vtec better have >249hp on the new 2.4L NA unit. Otherwise, the Accord coupe's V6 with 268hp would beat the pants off of it...
Old 09-11-2007, 09:30 PM
  #28  
Advanced
 
financeman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Age: 40
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks a little too boy racer for me. Look at how classy the current and near future entry level luxury cars look: new 328 is nice ( admittingly too "bangley" for some), IS looks as aggresive a luxury model can, 09 A4 is timeless, new C300 is slightly on the conservative side but befitting of benz. This car cannot compete with any of those on luxury car looks, I see it competing more with the lancer. Sure the Acura will have different emblems. I can see the rear end being identical to this model- and it does remind me of the rdx.

As for powertrain, I am very excited about A-VTEC. However, the most power I could see it having is 240 hp, and Id expect something like 220 hp and 180 ft lbs tourque with the same MPG as now. In 2011, i could see the Type S with turbo AWD.

Then again, what do I know.
Old 09-11-2007, 10:16 PM
  #29  
Driver/Detailer
 
aaronng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A-VTEC doesn't make more power. It just helps eliminate the torque hole in the non-optimised RPM range in between profiles.
Old 09-12-2007, 07:40 AM
  #30  
Racer
 
jdepasqu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philadelphia..., well Ambler
Age: 42
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you ask me the OVERALL SHAPE (not the details) reminds me of a dodge magnum....., which is not so good....
Old 09-12-2007, 08:16 AM
  #31  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by jdepasqu2
if you ask me the OVERALL SHAPE (not the details) reminds me of a dodge magnum....., which is not so good....
But the sedan will obviously look different. Not much you can do with a wagon, really. It's a loooong car and they all have generally the same shape.
Old 09-12-2007, 09:43 AM
  #32  
Nom-nom-nom!!!
 
TSX_831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 188
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
I cant get over the headlights... Why did they not keep the same headlights as the Sports4 concept...
Old 09-12-2007, 09:56 AM
  #33  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX_831
I cant get over the headlights... Why did they not keep the same headlights as the Sports4 concept...
Exactly, those headlights suck, Way too big and wrap around far too much IMO. And that huge front overhang doesn't help either.
Old 09-12-2007, 10:01 AM
  #34  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think they got those headlights from the US Accord because it looks eeriely familiar in shape and length.
Old 09-12-2007, 02:39 PM
  #35  
Instructor
 
RGlesing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Age: 73
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not interested. If I wanted an SUV/Crossover (or whatever you want to call it) I would go elsewhere. If I want an Acura I want a CAR.
Regarding bigger and more powerful engines, I think Acura (and any other company) would be smart not to spend money developing overpowered vehicles. My belief is that in a very short while, maybe within a couple of years, two things will happen: (1) there will be a big grassroots outcry to start making serious reductions in pollution, and(2)the government will get off its a$$ and mandate new CAFE standards. Neither of those situations will be compatible with continued development of bigger and more powerful engines.
Old 09-12-2007, 02:49 PM
  #36  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by RGlesing
Not interested. If I wanted an SUV/Crossover (or whatever you want to call it) I would go elsewhere. If I want an Acura I want a CAR.
Regarding bigger and more powerful engines, I think Acura (and any other company) would be smart not to spend money developing overpowered vehicles. My belief is that in a very short while, maybe within a couple of years, two things will happen: (1) there will be a big grassroots outcry to start making serious reductions in pollution, and(2)the government will get off its a$$ and mandate new CAFE standards. Neither of those situations will be compatible with continued development of bigger and more powerful engines.
There is going to be a car (sedan). This vehicle shown here is for the Euro market, and it's a wagon. The regular sedan version will be shown soon enough. And keep in mind, this is still a concept. It isn't going to look like this down to a T, so relax!
Old 09-12-2007, 02:52 PM
  #37  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
And keep in mind, this is still a concept. It isn't going to look like this down to a T, so relax!

If the last few Honda concepts are any indication, this is 90-95% of what the production car will look like. Not good IMO.
Old 09-12-2007, 03:00 PM
  #38  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
If the last few Honda concepts are any indication, this is 90-95% of what the production car will look like. Not good IMO.
Yeah, but it's still the wagon version. The sedan will look better, I think.
Old 09-12-2007, 03:35 PM
  #39  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RGlesing
Not interested. If I wanted an SUV/Crossover (or whatever you want to call it) I would go elsewhere. If I want an Acura I want a CAR.
Regarding bigger and more powerful engines, I think Acura (and any other company) would be smart not to spend money developing overpowered vehicles. My belief is that in a very short while, maybe within a couple of years, two things will happen: (1) there will be a big grassroots outcry to start making serious reductions in pollution, and(2)the government will get off its a$$ and mandate new CAFE standards. Neither of those situations will be compatible with continued development of bigger and more powerful engines.
First, that's a station wagon, not an SUV or crossover. Second, that's a Euro Accord wagon and a sedan version may or may not represent the next TSX. You'd save yourself some grief by paying closer attention.

If they're willing to pop a V6 in an USDM Accord I'd think they could do the same with the Euro Accord. Doesn't seem like a lot to ask.
Old 09-12-2007, 03:37 PM
  #40  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
wackura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Yeah, but it's still the wagon version. The sedan will look better, I think.
I think it will take on a new life with a nice trunk line, especialy if you consider how ugly this beast is:



Quick Reply: Accord Tourer concept = the next TSX?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.