2004 Honda Accord EX-L vs 2004 Acura TSX(Base)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2010, 07:52 PM
  #1  
xxh
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
xxh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Age: 37
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 Honda Accord EX-L vs 2004 Acura TSX(Base)?

I am looking at both of these to buy when I get a check in a couple months. I checked the blue book.


2004 Acura TSX (auto) 130,000 miles = $8,300 in good condition.


2004 Honda Accord EX-L (auto) 130,000 = $7,800 in good condition.



$500 difference. Can someone explain to me the differences bwetween these two cars? Pros and Cons? Thank you!
Old 07-27-2010, 08:01 PM
  #2  
4th Gear
 
grammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personal preference mostly.

Acura has more power (200hp vs ~150hp)

They look different, and the Accord is slightly bigger, but not by much. Options will be around the same but I am not sure what the honda EX-L has, but it is a top of the line accord so it should have similar options as the acura. Both nice cars but the TSX is nicer, in my opinion.
Old 07-27-2010, 08:18 PM
  #3  
Racer
 
Jimmy The Saint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DC
Age: 49
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
because the TSX is far and away a more refined car. Handles better, makes more power and much more torque. The acura in general side by side is a more expensive car anyway. An accord after all is juts an accord.
Old 07-27-2010, 10:00 PM
  #4  
Racer
 
Boulder TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boulder, CO
Age: 50
Posts: 459
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Well, as you might imagine, you aren't going to find too many people in this forum who will advise you to pick anything over a TSX...even another Honda. My two cents: the TSX is much more fun to drive & has more luxury...well worth the $500 in your case.

My advice is to go to CarAndDriver.com and look up the reviews and comparisons of each car...those guys are better at covering all the details -- (and they get paid for it, unlike us.)

Good luck. You can't go wrong with either car, (assuming they are both in good condition.)
Old 07-28-2010, 12:12 AM
  #5  
Modding newbie
 
Itchytoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Down south where the food is good.
Age: 42
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^^^ What he said. Nobody here is going to suggest the accord over the TSX. Better engine, better handling, more comfortable, far more aftermarket options if that's your thing.... TSX wins that one by a knockout 10 seconds in the first round.
Old 07-29-2010, 09:16 AM
  #6  
Racer
 
jchan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 32
Posts: 333
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by xxh
I am looking at both of these to buy when I get a check in a couple months. I checked the blue book.


2004 Acura TSX (auto) 130,000 miles = $8,300 in good condition.


2004 Honda Accord EX-L (auto) 130,000 = $7,800 in good condition.



$500 difference. Can someone explain to me the differences bwetween these two cars? Pros and Cons? Thank you!
Actually, I might not pick the TSX blindly over the Accord. After living with mine for almost 2 months now, I've realized the TSX is not necessarily the best car for families given the smaller backseat and trunk relative to the Accord. I'd say if you routinely carry people in the backseat or will be using the car as your family's primary car, the Accord may be the better bet simply for the extra space.

However, if you only occasionally carry people and/or stuff, I would get the TSX. Much more refined driving experience, and not on every single street corner.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:29 AM
  #7  
10th Gear
 
HNDFRK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Age: 49
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You also have to consider that the '04 TSX have some issues with the dash lights going off, oil burning, loose drivers seat, headlight condensation that the accord does not have.

And as someone else said, the accord backseat has a little more room and should be better if you have a family.
Old 07-30-2010, 03:30 AM
  #8  
Unregistered User
 
valeratj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accord is plain boring compared to TSX. 150hp in a midsize sedan is just pathetic.
Old 07-30-2010, 10:54 AM
  #9  
Racer
 
Carraway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 324
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
If you're looking at autos, I think you should probably get an Accord. Basically, the TSX is a slightly more compact, more driver-focused, more decked out version of the Accord. If you're looking for a nice commuter that handles well and is a little fun, the Accord is great. The TSX is just more taught, more potent.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
Soul_Deamon
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
7
11-13-2018 04:44 PM
csmeance
4G TL (2009-2014)
22
09-10-2018 09:15 AM
Heyzuez20
1G TSX (2004-2008)
10
10-14-2015 07:18 AM
nuldabz
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-03-2015 05:49 PM



Quick Reply: 2004 Honda Accord EX-L vs 2004 Acura TSX(Base)?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.